Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:11 PM Jan 2015

average rent for two bedroom in LA = $1,890 now

The folks at Apartment List looked at "several hundred thousand monthly listings on our site" and determined that the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in L.A. last month was about double the national average.

That's $1,890 here versus about $950 in much of the rest of America. The finding once again placed L.A. among the most expensive cities in the United States for housing costs.


The site looked at rents in 100 U.S. metro markets overall.

Los Angeles ranked third for highest rents nationwide among the 10 largest American cities, Apartment List found.

New York topped the list with a $3,250 December average. San Jose, home of booming Silicon Valley, came in second place among the 10 largest cities with $2,160.

Only three cities on that list, Dallas ($910), San Antonio ($830) and Phoenix ($760) had average December rents that were less than the national average, the site said
http://www.laweekly.com/news/la-rents-are-double-the-us-average-5333282

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
average rent for two bedroom in LA = $1,890 now (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Jan 2015 OP
That's almost as much as my mortgage beaglelover Jan 2015 #1
Sharks 2160, Kings 1890 KamaAina Jan 2015 #2
Apparently you do... brooklynite Jan 2015 #5
In terms of jobs, yes. KamaAina Jan 2015 #10
you're wrongly assuming that people live precisely where they want to live CreekDog Jan 2015 #12
This is outrageous! Earth_First Jan 2015 #3
Not surprised a bit... PasadenaTrudy Jan 2015 #4
I used to pay $1100.00/mo for a studio in Mountain View - eight years ago REP Jan 2015 #6
Thats 2.5 times my house payment... NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #7
We love it! PasadenaTrudy Jan 2015 #13
I was being a smartass. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #15
hmmm.... I am currently working in Boston handmade34 Jan 2015 #8
Chinatown has one of the highest average smirkymonkey Jan 2015 #11
That's $90 more than I pay for a studio smirkymonkey Jan 2015 #9
honolulu 2BR apt avg $2169 (source = rentjungle.com) and they are small 2BR apts nt msongs Jan 2015 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Jan 2015 #16
In L.A. proper? Plenty of cheaper suburbs, including beach communities. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2015 #17
Its the second largest U.S. city former9thward Jan 2015 #18
Cheaper beach suburbs? Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #19
A person can check "rentals.com", filter for 2 bedrooms, and find apartments in Long Beach for as cherokeeprogressive Jan 2015 #23
Lots of nice parts in the city PasadenaTrudy Jan 2015 #21
Austin, TX is starting to get that way too. Texasgal Jan 2015 #20
I would kill to pay that for even a 1 BR smirkymonkey Jan 2015 #22
San Francisco rents are MUCH higher than that. Curious that it isn't on the top ten. Gormy Cuss Jan 2015 #24

beaglelover

(3,534 posts)
1. That's almost as much as my mortgage
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:14 PM
Jan 2015

on a 2 br/1bath 1600 square foot home in North Hollywood. Rents are crazy in L.A. Probably why I see so many new apt buildings going up.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
2. Sharks 2160, Kings 1890
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:15 PM
Jan 2015


Of course the rents are high in San Jose. We have soooooooooo much to offer compared to those other cities.

In case anyone's wondering, SF would have beaten us to a pulp, except that it isn't one of the ten largest cities (we're No. 10).

brooklynite

(95,401 posts)
5. Apparently you do...
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:41 PM
Jan 2015

...or people wouldn't want to live there in sufficient numbers to jack up the rental rates.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
10. In terms of jobs, yes.
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:52 PM
Jan 2015

Ambiance, not so much. Why do you think all those techies pile into those Google buses to come all the way down 101 from SF?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
12. you're wrongly assuming that people live precisely where they want to live
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:56 PM
Jan 2015

many people who live in one part of the Bay Area would choose to live in another, but cannot afford that.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
3. This is outrageous!
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:24 PM
Jan 2015

There are many things that I am privileged to have access to.

Affordable shelter is one of them.

This unfortunately is not the case for a lot of folks...

REP

(21,691 posts)
6. I used to pay $1100.00/mo for a studio in Mountain View - eight years ago
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:43 PM
Jan 2015

I lived there for 10 years; the rent started around $950.00. I paid less than others because I had been there so long.

You don't even want to know what the rent on a 3b/3br "townhouse"'apartment in Scummyvale was, but the mortgage on my much larger house in Los Gatos is a lot less.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
15. I was being a smartass.
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 08:13 PM
Jan 2015

L.A. would never be for me, but then a lot of people wouldn't love Oklahoma the way that I do.

handmade34

(22,759 posts)
8. hmmm.... I am currently working in Boston
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:50 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/boston/average_rent_neighborhood/

part of my job is looking at housing and demographics
....the rents are pretty high here!... although, there does seem to be a fair share of subsidized housing in the areas I am traveling through

I was working Roxbury today and the average rent there is about $1800
 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
9. That's $90 more than I pay for a studio
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:51 PM
Jan 2015

in Boston. It's ridiculous here. I can't even think about a 1 BR unless I want a very long commute.

Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
17. In L.A. proper? Plenty of cheaper suburbs, including beach communities.
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 08:42 PM
Jan 2015

Who in the world would want to live in L.A. proper?

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
23. A person can check "rentals.com", filter for 2 bedrooms, and find apartments in Long Beach for as
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 11:53 PM
Jan 2015

little as $1150 all day long. When people think of "Los Angeles", they need to realize that Los Angeles County is HUGE, is a suburb of Los Angeles divided into a hundred different cities.

My Son Charlie lives in a 3 bedroom house within walking distance of 2nd Street in Long Beach. It's 2100 sq. ft., has a huge back yard, and rents for LESS than $1500. A HOUSE. With a driveway and a garage... AND A HUGE FENCED BACK YARD.

I was born in L.A. County and spent most of my life there. It's a LOT more than The City of Los Angeles, and a LOT cheaper in most places. Places that are but a few miles in any direction.

That doesn't even include Orange County. It's like ONE HUGE CITY... all of it.

To say Los Angeles is one of the most expensive places to live is misleading if you're talking to a person who doesn't understand it's one big suburb from north of L.A. all the way to Mission Viejo.

Texasgal

(17,059 posts)
20. Austin, TX is starting to get that way too.
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 09:19 PM
Jan 2015

Just ten years ago we rented an apartment for my husbands sister,two bedroom, two bath...695.00. UGH.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
24. San Francisco rents are MUCH higher than that. Curious that it isn't on the top ten.
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 12:20 AM
Jan 2015

It must be an artifact of using listings rather than all existing rents. Average rents in SF (all units, not normalized to a 2BR standard) is well over $3000/month.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»average rent for two bedr...