Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:09 PM Jan 2015

White survivalist shoots black police chief four times without being arrested or charged

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/01/17/3612884/white-survivalist-shoots-police-chief-no-charges/

White ‘Survivalist’ Shoots Police Chief Four Times, Is Released Without Being Arrested Or Charged
BY JUDD LEGUM POSTED ON JANUARY 17, 2015 AT 2:28 PM

In Oklahoma, a white “survivalist” shot a police chief three times in the chest and once in the arm. The shooting did not result in an arrest or charges and the man, identified by local media as 29-year-old Dallas Horton, has been released.

In a press release, the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation said, “Facts surrounding the case lead agents to believe the man was unaware it was officers who made entry.” But Louis Ross, the Sentinel, Oklahoma police chief who was shot, said that he entered the home after “Washita County 911 received two calls from a man who identified himself as Dallas Horton, and claimed to have a bomb inside the head start school.”

Ross cast doubt on the credibility of Horton’s claim that he didn’t know officers were present, noting that there was “screaming from five officers of the law announcing our presence, requesting to see hands.” Ross only survived the shooting because he was wearing a bulletproof vest. He has “massive bruises and welts on his body” and the shot that hit his arm “went clean through.”


57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White survivalist shoots black police chief four times without being arrested or charged (Original Post) Bjorn Against Jan 2015 OP
Well you did state the reason malaise Jan 2015 #1
He was attacked by that DEMON!! bravenak Jan 2015 #2
The demon was CHARGING at him! nt pinboy3niner Jan 2015 #3
With his hand going to his waistband, no doubt. nt brer cat Jan 2015 #5
And he was big..... daleanime Jan 2015 #13
A bomb at the NAACP, at the church in Birmingham, at Dem campaign offices... freshwest Jan 2015 #47
Lynch and the others should be protesting. bravenak Jan 2015 #51
Would Lynch protest Head Start centers with children being targeted for bombing? freshwest Jan 2015 #55
WTH brer cat Jan 2015 #4
I know! linuxman Jan 2015 #24
I'm not even clear what happened. The guy was at a headstart with a bomb, killed police, and is ND-Dem Jan 2015 #6
No, he was at home. linuxman Jan 2015 #20
In fairness, if a POC "survivalist" shot at white officers, he probably wouldn't be arrested either… Journeyman Jan 2015 #7
+1 F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #14
Sounds like a SWATing victim Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #8
The point is not about defending the cops Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #9
Is your problem here they didn't murder him? Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #16
Is your problem that you like to ask absurd questions instead of answer real ones? Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #17
Who keeps track of that? Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #21
If there were such a case it would be pretty easy to find it with Google Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #23
My Google-fu trumps your erroneous assumptions Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #25
Both of those links say the suspects were arrested Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #27
This shooter was arrested Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #32
Now you are claiming that I am trying to justify the murders of Brown and Garner? Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #35
No way any reasonable person could read it as anything but Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #38
Last time I checked shooting a cop was a crime Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #39
"The shooting did not result in an arrest or charges and the man," Bandit Jan 2015 #56
no one is defending the cops, onethatcares Jan 2015 #10
Read the source Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #15
I've read the link in the OP 6x onethatcares Jan 2015 #41
Linked story Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #48
Put a turban and a beard on him and you would have national panic led by the media. Or another Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #11
He must be a friend of George Zimmerman world wide wally Jan 2015 #12
So, linuxman Jan 2015 #18
If he were black? Shoot him for overdue library books. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #33
Didn't really answer my question linuxman Jan 2015 #42
You mean you couldn't think of ANYTHING to charge him with? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #43
Why would you be looking for reasons to charge him with anything? linuxman Jan 2015 #46
Congrats, now flip that for nearly every time a cop does that to a black guy. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #49
But I thought the only option AleksS Jan 2015 #19
Jokes aside, why arent the officers charged with breaking and entering ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #40
I've often thought, "Disturbing the Peace" would be apropos. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #44
How it happened in the heads of some thread participants: linuxman Jan 2015 #22
Stunning, ain't it? Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #26
Who said anyone should be murdered? Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #28
The charge isn't ridiculous at all Man from Pickens Jan 2015 #29
Who complained that he did not get killed? Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #30
Another fine right wing gun enthusiast, and "civil rights activist." Hoyt Jan 2015 #31
You gonna bust his door down?? pocoloco Jan 2015 #34
That's why they don't knock with terrorists like that. Hoyt Jan 2015 #36
Love the black nail polish secondvariety Jan 2015 #37
Oh look, it's Dick Nukem. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2015 #45
It would be nice if we ever got that much leeway... Blue_Tires Jan 2015 #50
That seems fair. Enthusiast Jan 2015 #52
Sweet I can now shoot Cops of Color and get a way with it! ChosenUnWisely Jan 2015 #53
The headline to this story is sensationalized. NutmegYankee Jan 2015 #54
The headline is intended to anger people Democat Jan 2015 #57

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
47. A bomb at the NAACP, at the church in Birmingham, at Dem campaign offices...
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 09:07 PM
Jan 2015

Nothing to see here, business as usual in The Twilight Zone...

Glad the guy is going to make it and hope there will be charges for THE ATTEMPTED MURDER OF A POLICEMAN.

BTW, where is the NYPD union Lynch while this is being swept under the rug of WP? Shouldn't Lynch be desperately worried about this attack clearly aimed at LEOs? And that was only foiled by body armor?

Somebody send RWNJ Lynch an invitation to OK. to talk about how his RWNJ buddies (like the white survivalist) has got blood on his hands.

(I won't hold my breath, though)

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
51. Lynch and the others should be protesting.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:38 AM
Jan 2015

They should be saying 'hands up, don't shoot!' I don't think they care too much otherwise they'd be using it for attention.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
55. Would Lynch protest Head Start centers with children being targeted for bombing?
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 09:14 AM
Jan 2015

Oh, yeah, that's right. It's one of the agencies for which Obama increased the funding. Allegedly attended by poors, disabled kids and minorities. *lightbulb*

brer cat

(24,598 posts)
4. WTH
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:19 PM
Jan 2015

You would think someone in a school with a bomb wouldn't be cut any slack. Isn't white privilege grand??

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
24. I know!
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:15 PM
Jan 2015

It's almost as if they have reason to believe he didn't do it!

Nah, it's because he's white.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
6. I'm not even clear what happened. The guy was at a headstart with a bomb, killed police, and is
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:20 PM
Jan 2015

getting away with it?

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
20. No, he was at home.
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:05 PM
Jan 2015

He's "getting away with it" because he shot and wounded an officer who in all likelihood was participating in one of those oh so awesome "no knock" raids, where it is near impossible for someone on the recieving end to tell who is coming through the door. Based on the information in the story, he didn't call the cops, but was "SWATed" by someone else.

Journeyman

(15,038 posts)
7. In fairness, if a POC "survivalist" shot at white officers, he probably wouldn't be arrested either…
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jan 2015

they'd just call the morgue for him.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
8. Sounds like a SWATing victim
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jan 2015

Him being white or a survivalist and the cop being black doesn't change the equation.

The problem here is that a prank caller can get a gang of heavily armed cops to do an early morning ambush assault against an unsuspecting victim, and the cops don't do due diligence before assuming that a paramilitary raid is necessary.

If you're defending the cops you're on the wrong side of this. If there was the slightest thing they could nail this guy on, believe you me they would have done it.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
9. The point is not about defending the cops
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:31 PM
Jan 2015

Maybe the cops did handle the situation poorly, but can you name me even one case in which a black man shot a cop and was not arrested or killed for doing so?

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
16. Is your problem here they didn't murder him?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:45 PM
Jan 2015

Sure sounds like that. They did arrest him - read the story - but they had nothing to back it up, so they released him.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
17. Is your problem that you like to ask absurd questions instead of answer real ones?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:57 PM
Jan 2015

To answer your ridiculous question, no I don't wish anyone was murdered nor did I say anything to even remotely suggest such a thing.

Why don't you answer the question which you ignored earlier? Can you name a single case in which a black man shot a cop and was not killed or arrested?

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
21. Who keeps track of that?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:06 PM
Jan 2015

You ask a question for which you know there is no way to determine the answer, and then take affront that it's not answered?

Why would you even ask that question unless your preference was to have this man murdered by the cops?

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
23. If there were such a case it would be pretty easy to find it with Google
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:12 PM
Jan 2015

Google does not work real well when it comes to finding stories that don't exist, but it makes finding real stories pretty easy. The reason you can't find such a story is because when a black person shoots a cop they are either killed or arrested.

And no, pointing that out does not mean that I think they should be murdered, you look absolutely ridiculous even suggesting such a thing.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
25. My Google-fu trumps your erroneous assumptions
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:20 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/05/us/new-york-officers-shot/index.html
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-officer-shot-in-englewood-20141007-story.html

Found some with Hispanic suspects too, also taken into custody rather than killed.

And note in these cases, none of these suspects were in their own homes getting raided at 6am on the basis of an unverified phone call.

I trust this is enough evidence to cause you to revise your point of view.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
27. Both of those links say the suspects were arrested
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:27 PM
Jan 2015

I asked you if you could find me a single case in which a black man was not killed or arrested, both of the cases you cited show the suspect was arrested. You have not found a case similar to the one in the OP in which the shooter was not even arrested.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
32. This shooter was arrested
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:48 PM
Jan 2015

can't have the guy released if he was never arrested

Really now, you're grasping at smaller and smaller straws here. Give it up. I feel like I'm arguing with a right wing nut throwing spaghetti at the wall to try and conjure up justifications for killing Michael Brown or Eric Garner.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
35. Now you are claiming that I am trying to justify the murders of Brown and Garner?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:53 PM
Jan 2015

You are straight up lying in this thread. I never said anything to justify the murders of Brown and Wilson, in fact I have been in the streets protesting those murders.

Quit lying about my position, I never justified a single murder.

The headline of the article says this guy was never arrested.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
38. No way any reasonable person could read it as anything but
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 07:03 PM
Jan 2015

Tangents aside, it takes one click through to the source article to see that the headline is in error - due diligence 101.

You don't even have to go that far to figure out that if someone is released, an arrest is a prerequisite for that. Complaining that someone who committed no crime wasn't arrested isn't a terribly good angle to pursue, anyway. No crime committed = innocent man = no grounds for arrest. Which is the exact same thing I hate to tell right-wing nuts over and over about Eric Garner, that "resisting arrest" is a bullshit reason to have used violence on him, when there was no justification to make an arrest in the first place.

onethatcares

(16,184 posts)
10. no one is defending the cops,
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jan 2015

what is being put forward is: If a black or person of color would have been the victim of a "prank caller" and that person would have drawn down against the police, that person would be DEAD, ONE HUNDRED BULLET WOUNDS TO THE BODY MASS DEAD. there would have been no bail granted, nor would that person of color been able to go home.

BTW, how do you know about a"prank caller"?

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
15. Read the source
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:44 PM
Jan 2015

"Friday afternoon an OSBI computer analyst determined calls to 911 did not come from Horton's home."

Also, it's pretty darn obvious from the details given that only a suicidal person would call in a bomb threat and ID himself inviting a SWAT raid, then hang out at his home to wait for it to happen.

onethatcares

(16,184 posts)
41. I've read the link in the OP 6x
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 08:02 PM
Jan 2015

I haven't been able to find the "Friday afternoon..................." part.

Is there another link somewhere else?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
11. Put a turban and a beard on him and you would have national panic led by the media. Or another
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 05:34 PM
Jan 2015

Duck Dynasty character who doubles as a "terrorism expert" on Fox Spews.

Hard to tell until you see get down to the skin.

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
46. Why would you be looking for reasons to charge him with anything?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 08:58 PM
Jan 2015

He did nothing illegal before the cops arrived, then defended himself against intruders who knocked his door in. Such is the risk of no-knock raids. Sometimes you get the wrong house. Sometimes the people who get raided are the victims of set ups like this guy seems to be. Such people have no expectation of police kicking in their doors, and therefore are more inclined to defend their selves from intruders, regardless of who they claim to be. After all, who would be kicking your door in if you hadn't done anything wrong?

Seems you're all hopped up about getting this guy thrown in jail, yet you have no concern about over-aggressive and irresponsibly policing. Very telling.

AleksS

(1,665 posts)
19. But I thought the only option
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:04 PM
Jan 2015

But I thought the only option police had when someone made a vaguely frightening gesture in their direction (much less actually fires a gun at them) was to just unload on the person until that person is super-ultra-dead?

That's what the right wingers insisted in re: Mike Brown, isn't it?

The right wing party line, as far as I remember, was that if you make a policeman feel a little bit scared, then they have no option but to shoot you as many times as it takes to make you super-ultra-mega-dead.

This case boggles my mind. The police should be brought up on charges, since they obviously didn't follow "shoot anyone that intimidates you until you run out of bullets" procedure that our right wing friends insisted was the only option.

Ooooooorrrrrr, maybe, just maybe the police have options other than overwhelming lethal force? And every situation doesn't have to be resolved in a fatality?

(There's a bunch of in there. I'll leave it as an eercise for the reader to figure out where it's hiding.)

ncjustice80

(948 posts)
40. Jokes aside, why arent the officers charged with breaking and entering
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 07:56 PM
Jan 2015

Now that it is clear they went to a false call?

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
22. How it happened in the heads of some thread participants:
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:11 PM
Jan 2015

Man plants bomb in headstart, then calls the cops from somewhere he isn't, all to get the cops to raid him in his home.

Cops raid house

Man in house shoots and wounds black cop on entry team.

Remaining cops see that the shooter is white.

A meeting is convened.

In light of the man being white and having only wounded a black cop, all charges associated with attempting to bomb headstart are declared void, whereupon the shooter is released without further questioning.

The end.

Yep, seems plausible.


 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
26. Stunning, ain't it?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:23 PM
Jan 2015

The similarities to how black victims of police murders get crucified by right-wingers are shocking. Blow all the dog whistles (in this case, "white", "survivalist", and "guns&quot and boom, innocent man is now someone who should have been murdered. Can't believe I'm seeing this from Democrats, who should know better.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
28. Who said anyone should be murdered?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:33 PM
Jan 2015

I want you to quote someone in this thread who said that someone should be murdered. Either provide a quote or stop making ridiculous charges.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
29. The charge isn't ridiculous at all
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:36 PM
Jan 2015

There's absolutely no reason to complain that he didn't get killed unless you wanted him killed. None. Zero. Don't even pretend otherwise, you only further degrade yourself and insult the rest of us.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
30. Who complained that he did not get killed?
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:40 PM
Jan 2015

I know I certainly never said he should have been killed.

Either provide a quote of someone saying this guy should have been killed or stop lying.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
31. Another fine right wing gun enthusiast, and "civil rights activist."
Sat Jan 17, 2015, 06:41 PM
Jan 2015


These folks represent a threat to our society.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
54. The headline to this story is sensationalized.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 09:07 AM
Jan 2015

The man in the house didn't make the bomb threat. The 5 officers smashed into the home without a warrant (felony home invasion) and one got shot by the homeowner defending his family.

Sure, the police could charge him with attempted murder of a police officer, but then that leads to the very uncomfortable question of why 5 officers violently entered a home without a warrant. While it is obvious that being white saved the homeowner's life, as a black man would have been executed by police, the homeowner is completely innocent in this case.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
57. The headline is intended to anger people
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 11:48 AM
Jan 2015

And to encourage poor and middle class people to keep fighting against each other.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White survivalist shoots ...