Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBack to Yucca Mountain
By (Washington Post) Editorial Board
But the regulatory process had already begun, resulting in the NRC report. The countrys nuclear regulators found that the Yucca facility would have been technically sound. They considered the potential for corrosion, cracking, damage from seismic activity and unintentional human intrusion. They gamed out the likelihood of breaches over massive time scales up to a million years from now. Everything checked out, with a few conditions. The NRCs experts, for example, would have barred planes from flying directly over the site. They also noted that if the federal government restarted work on Yucca, officials would have to obtain certain land and water rights from the state.
This means, firstly, that opponents of nuclear power who raise the spectre of radioactive waste haunting humanity hundreds of thousands of years from now wildly exaggerate the difficulty of the problem. Nothing is risk-free, but there are ways to make the risks extremely small. Nuclear power, meanwhile, is likely to play a part in responding to a much more important environmental threat: climate change.
The NRC reports conclusions also show that Nevadans intense opposition to the Yucca project is unreasonable, unambiguously harmful to the country and should end. In a rational world, the NRCs report would result in Nevadans backing down, Congress restoring funding and the Obama administration pushing Yucca along. This could fit neatly into the administrations plan for nuclear waste, which foresees moving waste off reactor sites to interim storage facilities, then to a permanent repository when its ready. Theres no technical reason that the permanent repository shouldnt be Yucca Mountain.
This means, firstly, that opponents of nuclear power who raise the spectre of radioactive waste haunting humanity hundreds of thousands of years from now wildly exaggerate the difficulty of the problem. Nothing is risk-free, but there are ways to make the risks extremely small. Nuclear power, meanwhile, is likely to play a part in responding to a much more important environmental threat: climate change.
The NRC reports conclusions also show that Nevadans intense opposition to the Yucca project is unreasonable, unambiguously harmful to the country and should end. In a rational world, the NRCs report would result in Nevadans backing down, Congress restoring funding and the Obama administration pushing Yucca along. This could fit neatly into the administrations plan for nuclear waste, which foresees moving waste off reactor sites to interim storage facilities, then to a permanent repository when its ready. Theres no technical reason that the permanent repository shouldnt be Yucca Mountain.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/leaving-yucca-mountain/2015/02/08/101fccac-a8cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 595 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Back to Yucca Mountain (Original Post)
FBaggins
Feb 2015
OP
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)1. WP are nuke whores
They would sell their mothers to nukes for pennies, as they certainly are willing to sell their children to the death and destruction nuclear waste will cause.
Screw the WP and their nuke lies!!
NBachers
(17,111 posts)2. I heard from a reliable source that Bundy ranch is next in line for a nuke dump site.
Don't tell anyone.
kiva
(4,373 posts)3. As a Nevadan...
Screw you, Washington Post editorial board.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)4. Countdown to anti-Yucca Nevadans being equated to 'anti-vaxx woo-loving
Jenny McCarthy breastfeeding wannbes' in 5 ... 4... 3... 2...
FBaggins
(26,742 posts)5. Interesting that you should mention that...
... since the first reply comes from someone that fits the bill quite well (at least on the first two).
Nevadans? Nah... that's just standard NIMBYism. But their opinion may start to shift now that the reports that Reid has been suppressing are finally public.