Question about this new "standing" issue re King v Burwell

[Ex Lurker]

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102413868#.

What effect, if any, will this have on the SCOTUS case? Is it too late for it to have an impact? Strange that it's just now coming up. Will the government's lawyers raise the point in their arguments?

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

1. There was no reason to bring the case in the first place, purely political.

We know 4 of the 5 terrorists, as I like to call them, will not care whether the plaintiff has standing or not.

I mean they took a case they had no business taking, so why would they now care that the case has no legal viability?

They dont fucking care, this has nothing to do with law and everything to do with politics.

The ONLY question is did Roberts vote with his terrorist brothers already to destroy ACA on this case, and if so does he NOW reverse himself knowing damn well he could never be respected in the future by any credible human being.

That is what I think is the situation.

I also believe that they have decided 5-4 to kill millions of Americans, UH I MEAN overturn this key portion of the law, already.

Will Roberts change his mind?

[PoliticAverse]

2. The Supreme Court has found that plaintiffs didn't have standing in cases in the past

and may find the same in this case.

[Ex Lurker]

3. So I guess nobody knows? NT