General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichelle Obama looks stunning...edited to add more pics
Last edited Sat Apr 28, 2012, 11:00 PM - Edit history (2)
only picture I could find..so far...will update as more are found.
edited size of picture.
?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1335665560705
http://www.daylife.com/search?q=michelle+obama
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,320 posts)I thought the exact same thing! I think she looks best in elegant or "pretty" dresses and this one is both...
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,320 posts)And it's pretty without being "fussy." Don't think I've seen one that suits her better...
southern_belle
(1,647 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Stunning and radiant AND brains to boot! What's not to be enchanted by???
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Jewel tones really look great on her.
goclark
(30,404 posts)she knocked it out of the ballpark with that dress!
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)They are great together and separate!
Response to one_voice (Original post)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)cares that you're "amused". First Ladies, traditionally, have the necessary profile to bring much needed attention to up and coming fashion designers. Not everything should be viewed through your cynical political lens.
Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #10)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)I'm sorry, you could've moved on, but I suspect your post was more about chastising other DU'ers for something you consider trivial and/or worthless. It's called the shame game. Some very valuable DU'ers were run off from this site because of the treatment they received at the hands of folks like yourself. I, for one, enjoyed the pic threads, and more importantly I cared about the people who posted them.
Not everything has to be earth shatteringly serious all the time. The president and first lady are under enormous pressure & scrutiny 24/7, so I don't begrudge them evenings like this, even if their critics think it's frivolous. This thread would have been perfectly okay without your negative input.
Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #21)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)Passive-aggressive behavior at its finest!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Self-delete is a neat little trick for posters who get cold feet. They get their message out, they get replies, and self delete before it goes to a jury, thereby avoiding the dreaded "hidden post". Depending on who you are, self delete is both a blessing and a curse. The poster in question is a master at this game.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)that poster is an ex-cop and knows all about bullying.
suffice it to say, bullying is when you correct this poster or, even worse, prove them factually wrong.
yup, we don't need to see another long "goodbye" thread, do we?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)We certainly don't, and it's hard to trust anything posted by someone who makes unfounded claims, and refuses to apologize and/or retract when proven wrong. We all makes mistakes, but when a pattern emerges, you have to assume that honesty & integrity are just collateral damage in the furtherance of one's personal agenda.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Or an arc or a trend?
Suffice it to say, we will soon know...
ETA: didn't take long.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/124084258
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)What in blue hell are you on about?
This rant really makes no sense, Nadin.
We are appreciating the first lady's choice of gown for the evening (and shout out to the designer) as well as the fabric selected for the design.
What does that have to do with "boards and city councils"?
Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #34)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)That diatribe against OP and the thread respondents was just uncalled for.
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)to remind us all how much more superior you are and how shallow and frivolous we are.
Response to nobodyspecial (Reply #12)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)Do you go into other topics just to post you are not interested in them? If so, that is a rather odd habit.
Response to nobodyspecial (Reply #18)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)I guess you win the thread. In any case, I'm done being amused by this interaction.
Response to nobodyspecial (Reply #24)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Suffice it to say, if you don't find it interesting (or don't care about the first lady's gown), WHY would you come all up in here and spray graffiti on someone else's thread who IS sharing that with people who DO appreciate the pics?
Lord knows you would be in nuclear mode 12 if someone came onto one of your threads and suggested that what you were sharing was trivial and or vapid. Can't you proffer the same respect to others?
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)Just look at the wonderful things the affluent wear.
It's so chic and ruling class!
Of course, you don't flaunt your wealth and class status when doing a photo op at Target. Wear working class clothes!
Like you, I also get a kick out of reading what fawning admirers write in tribute to the ruling rich.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)they look does not equate to fawning admirers. You can be both critical when warranted and complimentary when warranted. Some of us can chew gum and walk at the same time.
Fuck sake some people aren't happy unless they're shitting on something.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Still sitting here with my jaw agape reading these comments.
Is this the twilight zone?
one_voice
(20,043 posts)JitterbugPerfume
(18,183 posts)you don't like anything
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Sounds like you're in some distress and need to unload some issues!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)This act is beyond old, skippy.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)I can acknowledge when a woman, any woman (in Target clothing or designer duds) looks amazing. And our First Lady looks amazing. A woman walked into our store today in a floral patterned maxi dress. I was blown away by how beautiful she looked. Her response? $15 off the clearance rack of Old Navy.
trumad
(41,692 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)Fashion, with brands numbering in the thousands and costing from little to big bucks, creates thousands upon thousands of jobs and gives young people who love the industry hope for a career. And yes, if you know WHAT LOOKS GOOD, you can dress at Target with a similar style and look just as good. My daughter could take a $10, thrift store outfit and accesorize it, and she would look fantastic. She did all throughout high school, when our dollars were in very short supply.
If Mrs. Obama sets a beautiful example, I love it! We don't all have to look like we were dressed by Chairman Mao.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Everyone should wear the same thing, like comrades.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)I admit to being quite interested. Mrs. Obama looks fantastic! I'm proud that she is our first lady and represents our country so well.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)that you're "so glad that (you) care not at all". Seems like a lot of effort for nothing.
Was it just to leave those of us who are silly enough to care, in awe at your superior detachment? Or to be derisively "amused" at our expense?
What an unpleasnt, self-satisfied post!
Response to Surya Gayatri (Reply #32)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)Next thing you know, she'll accuse you of projecting (interesting, though, that we both share this delusion) and before you know it, she'll call you Skippy, just in case you still haven't realized how inferior you are.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)she's deleted every one of her posts in this thread.
I can understand--I certainly would've been embarrassed to appear so superior and condescending.
Still, that's some pretty erratic behavior!
Baitball Blogger
(46,705 posts)Looks particularly stunning in that outfit.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)I always felt sorry for Laura Bush - drugged and demoted to a doting wife rather than a vibrant, effective first lady.
I'm not comparing Laura's education or life experience against Michelle's as an attorney. That would be unfair.
But Michelle turns heads and is a perfect complement and partner to a terrific President.
SunSeeker
(51,551 posts)Those arms of hers are perfect.
Rozlee
(2,529 posts)I can do tricep curls until the cows come home and I'll never have those kind of arms. Hell, I didn't have those kind of arms when I was in my 20s.
goclark
(30,404 posts)thanks for bringing me up to date.
calimary
(81,261 posts)She's just glorious! Makes me proud!
Kath1
(4,309 posts)I never held Laura Bush responsible for the the idiotic policies of her husband but she could never hold a candle to the style and grace of this lady. Michelle rocks.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)...with a belly bow, some ruffles, and a beaded jacket to boot.
Those dresses of hers with the belly bows were just tooooo much.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)They were always short, like just below the waist but she didn't have the type figure for that style. I know that because I do have that kind of figure. It's a very specific body type that can wear that length.
She needed some some good fashion advice. If she had had that she could have looked lovely. Her face is beautiful and she isn't an odd shape that would be difficult to outfit. She has a good head of hair. If anyone was crying out for a makeover, it was Laura Bush.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)it is easy to find yourself limited as to quantity of fabric.
Maybe she just ran out?
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Simply gorgeous.
The President and his wife make me proud to be an American.
goclark
(30,404 posts)I'm on the West Coast and heard the President Speak for a few minutes ~ how did he do?
Is most of it positive for the Democrats?
one_voice
(20,043 posts)he was funny.
Kimmel's humor was more like a roast, some funny, some just ok. No one was spared.
Hope that helps.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)blue neen
(12,319 posts)He also seems to get a real kick out of some of those lines!
I loved it!
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)just enjoying the moment!
blue neen
(12,319 posts)Very entertaining!
HipChick
(25,485 posts)and cute to boot..
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)malaise
(268,993 posts)Fabulous timing and hit a few folks where it should hurt.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Kimmel was quick - not waiting for laugh lines, so very funny but quite staccato. Tomorrow, you will definitely see headlines about the President's dog joke (difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom is that a pit bull is tasty or something). Michelle even looked down at her plate like yeah, I would have let that one go, but all in all, the President and Kimmel both did a great job.
Hope you can catch it on a replay?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)added that one and another.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)She has impeccable taste. She has such a genuine smile.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)forget the superior, derisive nay-sayers!
Response to one_voice (Original post)
nadinbrzezinski This message was self-deleted by its author.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)if you don't like it, don't look at it. Stop taking pot shots at me and others who might enjoy the thread.
Please show me and the other posters the same respect you'd want shown to you.
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)But I guess it really reflects the abuser's character. Be rude and dismissive to others, get a reaction and then delete it so it can't be used against you. What a squirelly, chickenshit thing to do.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)She can't delete other people's posts and she can hardly call her own words a personal attack. If enough people do this, it may put an end to it.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)It's a cowardly practice, and if the admins won't do something about it, then we as a community certainly should. The practice of starting a thread, getting a ton of replies, and when you get owned, you can just pretend you never posted falsehoods and/or misinformation in the first place? That's not fair, it's intellectually dishonest, and the poster never has to publicly acknowledge they were wrong, they can just "self-delete".
apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)anything with impunity including personal attacks on other DU'ers, but by God if one attempted to reply in return it was Deleted Message City. Not sure if the Guardian Mod is still around now that we have juries instead of moderators, so that might be one small improvement on DU3 over DU2.
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)she would stop doing it. No doubt, she would come up with new ones. Those types always do.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)This same poster posted a very incendiary article re: our involvement behind Syrian lines, and when some very astute DU'ers went to work to get to the root of the story, it was discovered that the story was created out of wholecloth from a facebook posting, which turned out to be false on every count. And after receiving a ton of replies, did the poster apologize? NO! She "self-deleted", after getting her a** handed to her on a platter, thereby shutting down the discussion. It's dishonest at best, and inciteful at the very worst. And she never has to apologize for getting caught making shit up.
A "journalist" stands by their story, or they issue a retraction. Self-delete does away with the need to be held accountable, and that's just sad.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)I agree with this. I think the self delete does have a purpose. If you post something and then realize it was out of line or counter productive, self delete is ok. But when you fill a thread when nastiness you shouldn't get to erase the evidence, you should have to own what you said. You don't get to take your ball and go home.
This person didn't think they were out of line, quite the opposite in fact. They should be held accountable. IMO
zappaman
(20,606 posts)for when the bi-annual "I'm being bullied so I'm leaving" thread gets posted.
BTW, Michelle looks fantastic!
apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)wouldn't hold my breath counting on it any time soon from that poster.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)Bless your heart, and have a good evening.
JitterbugPerfume
(18,183 posts)and she wore it with class and style.
begin_within
(21,551 posts)juajen
(8,515 posts)See, it didn't take me long to warm up this couple, even though I still have some doubts. No doubts would be boring I think.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)I rarely watch "The Biggest Loser" but my dad does and he was here last week. They had a special at the White House and the First Lady worked out with the contestants and their families. The woman is beautiful inside and out. Regardless of how upset I get at her husband at times.
Obamacare
(277 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)YIKES!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I think it looks fabulous on her.
The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)I like that about her.
'Substantive', 'attractive', and bright.
All good.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)That is one fabulous dress on one very pretty lady. Deadly combination. I daresay the poor President doesn't stand a chance.
Julie
Little Star
(17,055 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)CrispyQ
(36,464 posts)As always, Mrs. O displays a fantastic sense of style!
skydive forever
(444 posts)looks so natural.
varelse
(4,062 posts)Lovely pics
Thanks for sharing them here.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)reading some negative responses in this thread, it would only be appropriate for the first lady to dress in a potato bag and not be all show offy and uppity. who does she think she is!
vaberella
(24,634 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)BUT THAT GAL KNOWS HOW TO DRESS!
apocalypsehow
(12,751 posts)Zax2me
(2,515 posts)If she weighed 250 or was not the stunning beauty she is, and were the same person?
She would still deserve this thread.
Her looks are not what make her so special.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)she looked lovely, nothing wrong with saying that.
If she were 250 lbs she would still be lovely.
No one ever said her looks are what made her special. You assumed that part.
edited for spelling as well as an unnecessary jab.
Tunkamerica
(4,444 posts)Superficial means 'at the skin level'. Saying she looks nice is superficial. The word has a negative connotation that you, or we, give it. But saying someone looks nice is superficial.
Not that there's anything wrong with looking nice or being superficial.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Her looks are not what make her so special..."
The one does not deny the other; hence, one may fully appreciate the one without being predicated on or necessitated to premise the other.
"Deserve" a thread? You of course have collated an objective and peer-reviewed list of what does or does not deserve a list? Or (and I find this rather more likely), you are merely basing your disinterest on a subjective premise, thus being guilty of the very thing your indict others for...
(Pogo was right you know-- you should try it sometime...)
tblue
(16,350 posts)She is an absolute dream!!!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)Fantastic dress!
I greatly admired Jacqueline Kennedy, but I think Mrs. Obama is approaching her level of style and may well be considered our most beautiful First Lady.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)she will mix very pricey clothes with very cheap off-the-rack stuff - I really like that!
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I'd love to get a better look at that dress. She positively glows in it.
NBachers
(17,108 posts)Glad I showed up too late for the shit-bombs, but the skid marks are still here.
That said, please consider me a fawning toady for Michelle Obama, the First Lady of the United States of America. She just knocks me out.
clydefrand
(4,325 posts)The first lady gets more beautiful all the time. I think she has had a great influence on the young and old ladies in this country, black, white, etc. And they in turn send those messages to their children or relatives. I used to teach many years ago. I would love to be in a classroom today to see how she and her husband have created a different view for youngsters of all colors. I see this on the news, and I read the articles online. I see them in public. What a change! I'm so glad that we have a black president and family in the WH.
I do hope they will be in the WH again for 4 more years.
Let's all vote for President Obama.
Fran
deaniac21
(6,747 posts)not worthy....!!!
zappaman
(20,606 posts)What dress?
All I see is the most beautiful first lady since Jackie Kennedy!!!
Number23
(24,544 posts)THIS is how you light a black woman
Flawless lighting. Highlights her gorgeous skin and complexion.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)She's got the whole package. Smarts, personality, looks.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)it's not fair I tell you!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We haven't had a first lady with such exquisite taste since Jackie Kennedy.
azlatina
(60 posts)She will be in Tucson AZ tonight! My daughter, her friend & I will be there as volunteers!! WooHoo!! So excited!!!
Skittles
(153,160 posts)and her daughters are very much taking after her!!!