General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGod I just wish Women ran the World.
Oh sure there are a couple of Marine Le Pen's out there.... but over all we'd be so much better off.
I've so had it with the arrogant assholes and their condescending attitude toward Women.
My wife of twenty years is a hundred times smarter than me, more organized, rational, understanding, and terrific when a family crisis occurs.
Is she my equal--- please---- she blows me away.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)You either think women are human or you don't. Pedestals are for artists and divas.
trumad
(41,692 posts)You're God Damn right I worship them.
Thanks for the kick.
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)Sorry you don't see the connection: Blacks are more athletic, Asians are smarter, Natives are more spiritual...and on and on. Separate and propagate.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Is that it--- Your way or the highway.
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)My harshly worded retort was a power play to satisfy my sadistic, authoritarian personality.
trumad
(41,692 posts)RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)and your artifice. I won't forget how this went for you and how you handled it. hahahaha. Hilarious!
trumad
(41,692 posts)You know what they say about dudes who brag about that--- it usually aint the case.
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)which had no hint of "my way or the highway". That was disingenuous of you.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)"Women are perfect! Unless they are completely evil fuck-ups, of course." No pressure.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)no pedestal. it is really about control and dominance and condescending behavior. no thank you
trumad
(41,692 posts)it will be Men who will take away your rights....and are currently doing their best to do so......
You OK with that?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)taken away.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Me advocating that women have the majority of leadership roles in the world is putting them on a pedestal?
Wake up seabeyond...Men are at war with you and your female compatriots..... if you don't think they are---then prepare yourself to be steamrolled.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i waz just sittin here in a slumber about womens position in the whole scheme of things.
i think my eyes are finally opening.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Do they have a role in DC?
Do they?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)other. or one is a shining light beyond the other. humans are just that. characteristics the will be a bonus and a negative, depending on the person. not gender.
trumad
(41,692 posts)17.
It's time to flip that.
keep it staus quo and guess what---that number will diminish.
In mho--- the male humans want to take away the rights of the female humans.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)than what we have. i wont argue that. plenty of women on the right are allowing the taking away rights of women, right along with the men. plenty of the men on the left are standing up for womens rights.
do we need more women as representatives, you betcha.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Zalatix
(8,994 posts)jp11
(2,104 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)more women acknowledged MY awesomeness.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...we wouldn't be the sort of society beset with our current ills.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)Except of course I didn't. I agree with you. My wife is the rock
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Having the world run by only women will yield just as shitty results as when it was run exclusively by men.
trumad
(41,692 posts)and we're not even close.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)Why not seek out a balance that is representative of the population?
It hasn't happened---live ever...and it probably won't happen in my lifetime.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)there has at least been some headway in the last 100 or so years
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Women discriminating against Men is no better than Men discriminating against Women.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)as badly as men have treated women for millennia?
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Even if we assume that Women will benevolent, it is still discrimination.
Since Women are human, I find no reason to believe that they are magically going to be able to have absolute power without being corrupted absolutely.
cali
(114,904 posts)I'd like to think so but....
and it's not just the Marine LePens. What about the Margaret Thatchers?
I believe that power just isn't something most humans- male or female- handle very well.
Atman
(31,464 posts)The personality traits which lead one in the quest for power and world leadership don't have much to do with the glands.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)Mary, Queen of Scots. Yeah, that'll do it.
trumad
(41,692 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)there are ten male politicians. It doesn't mean females have some magic source of goodness.Females are as nuanced in their political leanings as men are,we also have saints,sinners and everyone in between.We aren't the Borg
trumad
(41,692 posts)and why is that?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)You advocate for all leaders to be women. Then, when called on your bullshit, you switch it to, why don't we have more women politicians.
Let me clear this up for you: Your initial post was extremely ignorant. Your fall back position is a perfectly valid point (it simply is not the same as saying all leaders should be one gender).
trumad
(41,692 posts)Let's just make it clear---
Rule the fucking world.
If you think that is ignorant....tough shit.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)I am glad in your mind you can justify it. Sadly, so can so many sexists I know.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)But it is a somewhat mixed lot historically:
Empress Theodora, Catherine the Great, Maria Theresa, Elizbeth I, Indira Ghandi, Evita Peron, etc.
dynasaw
(998 posts)Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman, Kim Kardashian (who is aspring to be mayor of Glendale as preparatory to being president?) Jan Brewer,
Wendy Murdoch, etc. etc. ad nauseum
trumad
(41,692 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)if the reverse was true and women were historically in power, I bet your statement would read the same with men in the minority.
it's not that men per say are the problem, it's power and ego.
there are several right wing women that were mentioned above that proves the point about ego and power.
but on the flip side, there are great people, both men and women, in position of power that do a lot of good.
Sadly, those folks rarely get the props the deserve.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)dynasaw
(998 posts)Women who've taken up the negative male model and who aren't much different when it comes to being in power.
Time to develop and adopt models of governance based on the ways of women.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)or maybe a less ego oriented method of governing is needed.
women are subject to massive egos just as much as men are.
people are people, regardless of gender.
polly7
(20,582 posts)cripes, I can't even spell two letter words today. Good thing I'm not ruling the world.
TheKentuckian
(25,034 posts)It is my wish that the predator class be removed from power rather than another round of three card monty maintaining the status quo while different faces run the ship aground.
Keep pretending it is the face, gender, race, or religion that needs to change to improve the world and keep getting fucked.
Greedy fucks are greedy fucks regardless of gender, as assholes are assholes.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But there are many, many women who are not, and would not.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL
Have no idea why.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)100x smarter, more organized, rational, and better in a crises.
And yet women are not in charge of the world.
Seems either your premise is wrong or men have some compensatory abilities that make up for having a relative IQ of 1.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)William Bond, Mariji Gimbutas, Richard Rudgley... well, they don't quite say the same thing. What it seems to me that they're saying is that despite claims to the contrary, women did once rule the world, and that it was a peaceful 'Golden Age' which most academics consider to be just legends in many cultures.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Physical strength has so often been the determinant of power. However under early tribal conditions females ran the show in terms of keeping a stable environment for humans to succeed and maintaining relationships needed to survive. Males performed more riskier duties.
Females lived longer and provided social stability that laid the ground for our survival and "advancement" (for lack of a better term) as a species with characteristics such as language and advanced cognitive abilities.
bhikkhu
(10,725 posts)...a partner would be fine. Which goes for personal relations as well as individual-to-government relations.
Gender isn't the issue, behavior is the issue.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)Absoluletly horrible person...she's among the top 5 vile people I've ever met personally.
But, my best supervisor (who is still among my good friends) was also a woman.
In neither situation was it about their gender. It was about the kind of persons they were and how they treated other people.
FedUpWithIt All
(4,442 posts)Thanks for sharing that with us.
Ishoutandscream2
(6,664 posts)DU is really out of touch with the real world, isn't it?
Bladian
(475 posts)Nobody is insulting the OP's wife.
FedUpWithIt All
(4,442 posts)IMHO the difference between the net and RL is that people feel they no longer need to practice simple niceties online.
In real life if a man complimented his wife and boasted of the attributes he believes are shared by her gender, because of his admiration of her, people would, typically, see the warmth behind the sentiment and either share in that happiness or at the very least keep their to themselves.
We definitely lose something important in this medium, again, IMHO.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)suggesting a fairy tale if women ran everything, life would be ideal. it would be much better if many more women were in key positions thru out our society, but i dont have to promote an imbalance to stand up for women.
it isnt about the wife. i am thrilled trumad loves his wife. good stuff. as it should be and i could only hope all people get to experience a relationship where they respect, love and admire their mate.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)with what makes a good leader.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)in a large department staffed only by women wouldn't likely agree. I think the answer is a more even split of men and women than is currently the norm...both bring essential inherent skills (maybe not the right word) to the scene.
My wife of twenty years is a hundred times smarter than me, more organized, rational, understanding..
That may go more to a very specific dynamic in your particular case..
I have to say, my wife is my equal, at least..
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)quaint. catfight.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)men and women are meant to coexist together.
Attempting to eliminate one gender, even in a temporary setting, is bound to cause people to act differently than they otherwise would.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)a group of exclusively men would behave exactly the same if you added a few women to the mix (or vice-versa).
Interesting hypothesis. It does seem contrary to pretty much all empirical evidence though.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)it wont matter if all male, all female or a mix....
the kind of problems in that article, is about leadership. management. not gender
Rex
(65,616 posts)and everything ran great, there were minor issues between workers but overall never had a single problem. Of course, I think if people look for a problem based on their own prejudiced world view - one will appear to them shortly.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)when two girls would decide to exclude a third just for the hell of it. Not to mention that a lot of women use their sexual power to gain favor, for all they say they don't.
I've never liked working for women or in a woman-dominated office.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)I haven't found much solidarity in that environment, by gender or anything else.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Their record could not be worse then what the men currently hold.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Ishoutandscream2
(6,664 posts)Genuine, sincere. And people come on the tread and shit all over it.
Only at DU.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Ishoutandscream2
(6,664 posts)Men have been running things forever. Maybe it's time to change course and give women a try. This is not a post wanting to eliminate men from the total equation.
Trumad sounds like a guy who really has an open mind, and he respects women (and, apparently, he has a great wife, as do I. I don't even come close to being the kind of wonderful person my wife is). And I guess because both Trumad and I have these same ideas, we must be sexist against women or hate men. Typical.
Again, only at DU. You're damned if you do, damned if you don't.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)sorry trumad. it was funny
RadiationTherapy
(5,818 posts)Trying to lay virtue as a blanket over an entire demographic is disingenuous and corollary to sexism/racism.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Whether you're making the argument that they are better or worse than the rest of us you are still making them out to be something inhuman.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)The problem is, some folks seem to have trouble following instructions.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)There will always be exceptions.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)Or at least, I hope you mentor kids in some form or sense.
DutchLiberal
(5,744 posts)Men or women... doesn't make a difference. Either you're a good leader or you aren't.
To think that gender has anything to do with qualifications is just.. er.. dumb.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)so I would rephrase that just a little bit.
I wish there were a lot more good women running things, and a lot more good men as well.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)have absolutely nothing to do with gender.
Perhaps your wife should run the world, but that isn't because she is a woman.
It's because she's made of awesome.
Her awesomeness is not connected to her gender, and can't be projected onto "women" as a group.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)LeftishBrit
(41,212 posts)Anyone who WANTS to run the world, male or female, is likely to be a bit suspect.
Not only Marine LePen, but Maggie Thatcher, Ann Widdecombe, Nadine Dorries, Shirley Porter, Sarah Palin, Phyllis Schlafly, Michele Bachmann, Jan Brewer...
But then what about Jean-Marie LePen, Norman Tebbit, George Osborne, Ian Duncan-Smith, Nigel Farage, Nick (ugh) Griffin, Dubya Bush, Dick Cheney, Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney...
A slimeball is a slimeball, whatever the gender.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)but whenever we get into the realm of "running the world", we bump into things like ego and agenda, and both sexes, sadly, are equally susceptible to those failings.
I do appreciate your sentiment, but I don't think that anybody is exempt from that old maxim that Power tends to corrupt, without an effective system of checks and balances employed by all people.
However...
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)There is brilliance and idiocy in women just as there is in men. I'd much prefer it if we just stop seeing gender in our public lives, and use merit as a basis for our leaders.
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)do a better job either
Most folk I know, of any gender, have strengths and weaknesses: I find both genius and moronic greatness, as well as angelic and demonic tendencies, in almost everybody
And there's no shortage of complete jerks on either side of the gender aisle, either
flvegan
(64,423 posts)That said, I do appreciate your post and you may have a really good point there.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)The "women are so complex" notion disappears when women are seen as human beings who are not meant to be oppressed.
Just a tidbit of tangential thought.
Women are horribly oppressed all over the world, just for being female. Religion plays a huge part. Ignorance is the biggest offender.
We have a disadvantage with our high pitched voices and our less-muscular bodies, and our less-aggressive hormones. This is why we women are so easily quieted, so easily pushed aside and told to stay in our place.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)yup.... lol
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)It is every bit as sexist to say "I wish women ruled the world" as it is to say "I wish men ruled the world."
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Men rule the world.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Saying "I wish Australian Aborigines ruled the world" is as racist as saying "I wish the Europeans and their colonial offshoots ruled the world." The fact that the latter is largely true doesn't impact both statements being blatantly racist. Saying "I wish everybody got equal consideration" or something to that effect would be pro-equality, insisting on upending the current order while maintaining imbalanced power is counter-productive because it allows the idea that power should be inequitably distributed to persist.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)If only we could reduce reality to a semantics game.
I wish it would be that easy. What is it going to take, with the reality of women having less forceful bodies, less aggressive hormones, and higher-pitched voices, to ever be "equal" in this mortal world of aggression, religion, ignorance, repression?
As long as we are human beings, there will be a struggle, I am afraid.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)We humans are doing a terrible job of keeping house, of being stewards of the earth. Fire ants could do a better job. Cockroaches. There are creatures who will evolve and take over when we have burned out the torch of HomoSapiens.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Nah......I think we know who will end up taking over....
Bastards are just biding time now.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)BlueIris
(29,135 posts)And sooner than most want to admit.