Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:00 AM Feb 2015

If Al Gore Ran Again, Would You Support Him?

Serious question. We get a lot of "anyone but Hillary" but not a lot of anyone with the recognition to begin raising the kind of money it will take to win in the post Citizens United world.

So, why not Big Al Gore? He won once--but was shut out by the SCOTUS.

Love Warren and Sanders but they will never get the money they need to make it in this race. Al Gore could. So, what about Al? Should we draft him?



86 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Al Gore Ran Again, Would You Support Him? (Original Post) McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 OP
Yes Kalidurga Feb 2015 #1
We tried to draft him in 08. Control-Z Feb 2015 #2
Let's try harder. As hard as we are trying with Warren and Sanders. McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 #3
And by "trying harder" you meet "writing more blog posts to each other" brooklynite Feb 2015 #64
I would think Sherman A1 Feb 2015 #4
Yes I would but elleng Feb 2015 #5
If he wanted to throw his hat in the ring, of course I'd give him serious consideration. We need... Hekate Feb 2015 #6
Yes!!! newfie11 Feb 2015 #7
Yes. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #8
Al is the reason DU exists. MADem Feb 2015 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #83
Look, you've got Google, and I'm not going to bash a decent Dem. MADem Jan 2017 #86
Absolutely! But... Badass Liberal Feb 2015 #10
Post removed Post removed Jan 2017 #84
Sure Bagsgroove Feb 2015 #11
I had one in 2004 McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 #69
LOL - I see what you are doing you stinker OKNancy Feb 2015 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #85
No I would not! mntleo2 Feb 2015 #13
Yep. Gore meekly conceded Florida. Maedhros Feb 2015 #33
Maybe he just chose a different... YvonneCa Feb 2015 #46
If by "meekly conceded" you mean he fought all the way to the Supreme Court NYC Liberal Feb 2015 #68
No, Kerry meekly conceded. Remember "Sore Loserman"? That's cause Gore McCamy Taylor Feb 2015 #70
Here he is... YvonneCa Feb 2015 #45
No, No and No f-ing way anotojefiremnesuka Feb 2015 #14
Al had his moment. It's passed. saltpoint Feb 2015 #15
+1 PDittie Feb 2015 #17
He could have in 2008. Obama did what Gore could have done Tom Rinaldo Feb 2015 #36
Yes, I love the guy davidpdx Feb 2015 #16
Certainly we can do it Feb 2015 #18
about time kpete Feb 2015 #19
He's got to regrow the beard first DefenseLawyer Feb 2015 #20
I think people are fooling themselves about Warren. NCTraveler Feb 2015 #21
Warren would get small donations like Obama did adigal Feb 2015 #41
That, in itself, is rewriting history. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #81
I would, if he won the nomination, of course. MineralMan Feb 2015 #22
Of course. BeanMusical Feb 2015 #35
I like many of his post-2000 views, but would want to see his platform. n/t Orsino Feb 2015 #23
Most likely. Agschmid Feb 2015 #24
He'd be 69 if he was inaugurated in 2017 -- the same age as Ray-run in '81. n/t BP2 Feb 2015 #27
I would not support him in the primary Marrah_G Feb 2015 #25
Is this a trick question?? USArmyParatrooper Feb 2015 #26
How much daylight has he put between himself and the DLC on policy? TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #28
We probably can't draft him. Jamastiene Feb 2015 #29
He's been handed a giant, very visable platform thanks to the TrumpNazi algorewonflorida2000 Jan 2017 #82
Yes.... CherokeeDem Feb 2015 #30
No LittleBlue Feb 2015 #31
Not due to party loyalty... Heck, I am an Independent... Xyzse Feb 2015 #32
No he's a sell out to big money and the 1% , hell he is the 1% glasshouses Feb 2015 #34
Ved-dy in-te-desting. KamaAina Feb 2015 #37
I have always liked Gore AwakeAtLast Feb 2015 #38
Absolutely! I would be thrilled! Nt adigal Feb 2015 #39
Every person has a moment and if they don't seize it it's gone. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #40
Sure! zappaman Feb 2015 #42
voted for him in 2000, would gladly vote for him again! nt steve2470 Feb 2015 #43
In a fucking heartbeat geomon666 Feb 2015 #44
In a word, hifiguy Feb 2015 #47
YES, I admire him so much. R B Garr Feb 2015 #48
Of course I'd vote for him. Stevepol Feb 2015 #49
I support all political outsiders. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2015 #50
Yes! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2015 #51
D Rex Feb 2015 #52
Not saying no, but he's been so far out of it that I think he would have a hard time. Renew Deal Feb 2015 #53
HELL YES DonCoquixote Feb 2015 #54
He wimped out in 2000, how could he be trusted not to do it again tularetom Feb 2015 #55
Absolutely. No question on point Feb 2015 #56
Yes, yes, yes and YES! Peregrine Took Feb 2015 #57
Joe Leiberman olddots Feb 2015 #58
Fuhgettaboutit....... Historic NY Feb 2015 #59
No I wouldn't. Al's biggest problem was connecting with people. napi21 Feb 2015 #60
Just checked he is still legally married to Tipper marlakay Feb 2015 #61
I would but I doubt Gore would jimlup Feb 2015 #62
I thought you didn't want a corporatist 1%er running... brooklynite Feb 2015 #63
Sure! greytdemocrat Feb 2015 #65
Probably not. 840high Feb 2015 #66
Love him love him love him tavernier Feb 2015 #67
No. wickerwoman Feb 2015 #71
YES ailsagirl Feb 2015 #72
Absolutely Art_from_Ark Feb 2015 #73
No dylan33 Feb 2015 #74
nope! n/t wildbilln864 Feb 2015 #75
What makes you think he's even remotely interested in running? SheilaT Feb 2015 #76
I still can't get over Gore choosing Lieberman to run with him politicman Feb 2015 #77
No mikehiggins Feb 2015 #78
no, I like his stand on global climate change but he was a conservative dem who B Calm Feb 2015 #79
Maybe. LWolf Feb 2015 #80

brooklynite

(94,604 posts)
64. And by "trying harder" you meet "writing more blog posts to each other"
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 12:34 AM
Feb 2015

As much as you may complain about Hillary Clinton, HER supporters went out into the real world, got real people to contribute millions of dollars and tens of thousands of people to commit to work for her. I've seen no such organization effort for Warren (admittedly a waste of time, since she won't run) or for Sanders.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
4. I would think
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:08 AM
Feb 2015

his candidacy would deserve a long hard look. Not sure about support until things became a little more clear, but I would certainly give it consideration.

elleng

(130,977 posts)
5. Yes I would but
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:19 AM
Feb 2015

I disagree that Eliz Warren would 'never' get the money she'd need to make it. I don't think she'll run (unless MAYBE Hillary decides not to do so,) but IF EW were to announce, imo she'd receive a HUGE amount of contributions, from We the People.

Hekate

(90,716 posts)
6. If he wanted to throw his hat in the ring, of course I'd give him serious consideration. We need...
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:19 AM
Feb 2015

...a robust primary process, and if only one person steps up, that person will not be battle-hardened for the general election.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. Yes.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:31 AM
Feb 2015

but I kind of gave up on that after '08, as others in the thread did. I really, really, really wanted him to run.

But I came to the conclusion he doesn't seem to want the job terribly much, which paradoxically makes him all the more qualified for it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. Al is the reason DU exists.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:38 AM
Feb 2015

That said, I think his ship has sailed, even if he were interested--and I doubt he is.

His personal life wouldn't stand the scrutiny. It's not a question of what people "should" or "should not" pay attention to, the bottom line is they would scrub his private life, and it would be very distracting, particularly if they went back in time a few years.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/al-gore-confirms-dating-article-1.1768863

Response to MADem (Reply #9)

MADem

(135,425 posts)
86. Look, you've got Google, and I'm not going to bash a decent Dem.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 03:28 PM
Jan 2017

The thing is, Democrats feel a sense of shame if they misbehave--Republicans don't.

What's a bug to Dems is a feature to the GOP, and no, it's not interchangeable. Our set cares about equality and respect.

But Al?

Not happening.

Also, perhaps you'd be so kind as to tell me what motivated you to seek out this thread and respond to it? This thing has been in the archives for two years.

 

Badass Liberal

(57 posts)
10. Absolutely! But...
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:49 AM
Feb 2015

What about Biden?? I think for the non-Hillary fans and the Hillary fans alike, he's a fantastic 2nd choice that maybe we could compromise on. ?

Response to Badass Liberal (Reply #10)

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
12. LOL - I see what you are doing you stinker
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 06:30 AM
Feb 2015

If Al ran, here is what would happen:

He would get years-old stuff brought up...
1.his very pro-war hawk days
2. Washington insider
3. Pro Corporate voting record
4. his personal life
5. he's a quitter
6. any unfortunate utterance he ever made

---------

It wouldn't matter if times have changed, or he has changed his views.

Response to OKNancy (Reply #12)

mntleo2

(2,535 posts)
13. No I would not!
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 06:50 AM
Feb 2015

Look All Gore did not pursue the presidency when he could have had it if he had fought. He did not want it IMO. Democrats blame the voters who voted Green in FL, but the truth is over 190,000 DEMOCRATS crossed the aisle and voted for Bu$h. He had to be aware of that and instead of fighting for the votes he had, he just folded. And he let go the of the only progressive TV station we had ~ for his own profit. I love Al Jazeer, don't get me wrong, but it has not helped Progressives like Current could have. To me these actions say he was in it for himself and could not take anything that overly challenges him.

That being said I would say that if he had pursued his rights, we would not be in the war-stressed mess we are, and while he appears to be a corporatist like HRC caring only for profit, still perhaps we also wouldn't have faced as horrible of the financial crises we have. And I hate to say this but in a sense I blame him for the problems we have with the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (if they would have happened at all because he would have probably averted 9/11), because he could have had the power to stop those war criminals and protect us from the 1000s of American deaths and millions of deaths in the Middle East if he simply had the courage to stand his ground and become president.

Plus the reason I have my doubts about what would have happened within our financial crisis is that he was part of the old guard of Democrats. The ones who were paling around with the likes of Terry McAullife who when asked what he had to say about making all his money off the backs of the poor said, "Thanks!" Sorry I have a hard time forgiving that group who had attitudes like that, who also a hand in making life even harder for the poor and middle class with their support of the stripping of our safety net with Welfare DEFormed and with the loss of any control for our first amendment rights with the Telecommunications Act, for being hijacked by the likes of Clear Channel and FAUX news.

I say let Mr Gore go off and enjoy his $400,000,000 Current profits and do whatever he wants to do ~ and at least it appears he is wise enough not to thrown his hat into the ring again as he knows his limits. He appears to be gung ho for something and then tires of it and goes off to do something else, kind of like chasing a butterfly. What have we heard recently about any environmental concerns lately? What is he doing about helping Progressives ~ or any Democrat to have a voice like he did with Current? Nada ~ he is off doing something else it appears. So I do not miss him nor do I think a majority of Democrats do either.

I will vote for a Democrat no matter who it is ~ or how hard I will have to hold my nose to do it. This is because I have seen any Democrat like him and his friends can be only slightly better than a moderate Republican and as a lifelong Democrat I could never vote for a Republican as the party has always been ...sad. Maybe that will not be a popular stance but it is where I am after seeing them turn on the poor who behaved not that much better than Republicans in the 1990s and for taking away a voice for Progressives by selling them off to the highest bidders.

My 2 cents,
Cat in Seattle

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
33. Yep. Gore meekly conceded Florida.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 02:54 PM
Feb 2015

When the Constitutional crisis was upon us, Gore left the field of battle.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
68. If by "meekly conceded" you mean he fought all the way to the Supreme Court
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 01:34 AM
Feb 2015

and was left hanging in the wind by Senate Democrats when the CBC and other House Democrats tried to challenge the vote in January. All that was needed was ONE Senator to raise an official challenge to the electoral vote. One. Not even some great Democrats like Ted Kennedy or Robert Byrd stepped up.

Gore did all he could. The only thing left after that was armed insurrection.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
70. No, Kerry meekly conceded. Remember "Sore Loserman"? That's cause Gore
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 02:16 AM
Feb 2015

fought it to the SCOTUS and forced them to break the law and tarnish their legacy forever. Maybe if Kerry had done the same they might have hesitated to do it twice.

 

anotojefiremnesuka

(198 posts)
14. No, No and No f-ing way
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 06:58 AM
Feb 2015

Why because of the whole PRMC thing he lead.

The only Gov Job he should have is head of the EPA., otherwise I could care less what he does with his life.

PDittie

(8,322 posts)
17. +1
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 08:47 AM
Feb 2015

Dude ran a pretty lousy campaign in 2000, all things considered. He's a stalwart individual, but he's not the greatest presidential candidate the Democrats ever had.

Much respect for all he's done.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,913 posts)
36. He could have in 2008. Obama did what Gore could have done
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 04:05 PM
Feb 2015

Gore didn't show the will, the desire, the fire needed then and I don't think he has it now either.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
16. Yes, I love the guy
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 07:31 AM
Feb 2015

But he would never do it. And in a way I don't blame him. He got screwed in 2000. Right now he's doing what he wants to do and if he's happy with that, I'm happy for him.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
20. He's got to regrow the beard first
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 10:46 AM
Feb 2015

I am a fan of the less cautious, more "fuck you", bearded version of Al Gore.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
21. I think people are fooling themselves about Warren.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 10:50 AM
Feb 2015

I don't think she would have a problem filling the coffers at all. She doesn't have the team of "collectors" Hillary does and that would hurt her in the primary, but if she made it out of the primary many of those people would simply transfer over to her team. Obama raised more money than anyone ever has and he was initially viewed as unfriendly toward big business. So, what happened? Corporate America puts their money behind winners.

With respect to Gore. I think he is a really good man. I also think he is a professional at allowing others to marginalize him. He has a career of doing just that. I also think he is more of a pragmatist than Obama. Those who cannot stand the incremental steps from Obama would really not like Gore. For some reason people really like to rewrite history with respect to Gore. Maybe because he became such a staunch fighter for something we all know to be true.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
41. Warren would get small donations like Obama did
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 07:08 PM
Feb 2015

While Hillary got the corporations and big donors.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
81. That, in itself, is rewriting history.
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 08:51 AM
Mar 2015

Obama got a whole lot more than small donations. He was out front in all contributions in both of his campaigns. If you can show where Hillary trounced him in other donations I would love to see it. We all know he got a ton of small donations, but that isn't all he got.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
22. I would, if he won the nomination, of course.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 11:00 AM
Feb 2015

I doubt he'll consider running, though, and I'm not sure he'd get my primary vote, either.

Whoever the nominee ends up being will get my full support. In the meantime, I'm focused on legislative races.

USArmyParatrooper

(1,827 posts)
26. Is this a trick question??
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 12:18 PM
Feb 2015

Not just yeah but fuck yeah.

He was the real reason for the economic boom of the 1990's, not Clinton.

The project he led and spearheaded, the High Performance Computing Act of 1991. One of the few real intellectuals in politics.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
28. How much daylight has he put between himself and the DLC on policy?
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 12:27 PM
Feb 2015

I've regretted my vote for him and particularly Lieberman because it and others I got out would probably be better spent on telling the Turd Way to sit and spin and increasing the viability of the Greens to increase pressure from the left flank.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
29. We probably can't draft him.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 12:38 PM
Feb 2015

I would vote for him again. Sadly, we probably would not be able to convince him to run again. He seems very set against running again.

 
82. He's been handed a giant, very visable platform thanks to the TrumpNazi
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 07:24 PM
Jan 2017

I'm not so sure he's quite so rigid about not running. I certainly understand the history preservation of his win in 2000. He did answer the question in a recent forum with Tom Friedman as "not likely". I think that's a lot softer than "absolutely not". Thanks to the TrumpNazi, I think he's been handed a giant, very visible platform on the environment and the threat of climate change which he's now beginning to build on. Our country desperately needs him. I think a Gore/Warren ticket has a pretty good ring to it. I certainly won't hesitate to back him again, that's for sure.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
31. No
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 12:44 PM
Feb 2015

He seems like a decent enough fellow.

We just need to get out of the 90s and leave the Bush, Clinton and Gore families to the history books.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
32. Not due to party loyalty... Heck, I am an Independent...
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 01:43 PM
Feb 2015

But I will vote for pretty much any Democrat that goes on the general election for Presidency at this time.
Republicans are just that damaging. I don't see them being able to run any one that would be even half-way decent.

Saying that, I will support Gore. I wanted him to run during Kerry's time, during Obama's time, but he didn't.

If he does, sure, I'll support him even in the primaries.

 

glasshouses

(484 posts)
34. No he's a sell out to big money and the 1% , hell he is the 1%
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 03:04 PM
Feb 2015

The guy is a walking contradiction of what he says he believes compared to the life he lives.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
37. Ved-dy in-te-desting.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 04:26 PM
Feb 2015

I'd still support Bernie, of course, but if he were to drop out early, I'd definitely support Gore over HRC.

Stevepol

(4,234 posts)
49. Of course I'd vote for him.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 11:42 PM
Feb 2015

He's a proven winner. He won in 2000 by a good margin. SCOTUS changed the rules and flipped the results.

Renew Deal

(81,866 posts)
53. Not saying no, but he's been so far out of it that I think he would have a hard time.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 11:50 PM
Feb 2015

Against Warren I would probably support Warren.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
55. He wimped out in 2000, how could he be trusted not to do it again
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 11:54 PM
Feb 2015

If he would have insisted on a recount in Florida things would probably be a hell of a lot better than they are.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
60. No I wouldn't. Al's biggest problem was connecting with people.
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 12:27 AM
Feb 2015

I'm sure he a very nice guy and maybe even fun to be with, but all most people see is a very stiff guy who rarely even smiles. Like it or not, it's that connection that wins elections. I loved his ideas, and I'm sure he still has most of them and more, but he cannot change his personality. I won't vote for a candidate who I don't believe can ever win.

marlakay

(11,477 posts)
61. Just checked he is still legally married to Tipper
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 12:29 AM
Feb 2015

And dating for last two years, he would have to settle that immediately....

This country is just not accepting enough even though we all have lives like that.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
62. I would but I doubt Gore would
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 12:29 AM
Feb 2015

I think he is feed up with politics ... just my impression - I don't know


God just think of the alternative history... no 9/11, no Iraq war, no bank collapse ... we the people got absolutely FUCKED that horrible night back in 2000!

brooklynite

(94,604 posts)
63. I thought you didn't want a corporatist 1%er running...
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 12:31 AM
Feb 2015

...all the money he's made on the Board of the evil Apple Computer?

wickerwoman

(5,662 posts)
71. No.
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 02:25 AM
Feb 2015

I agree with him ideologically but he had his chance and he didn't fight for it. And if the last 14 years have taught us anything, it's that we need progressive leaders that get out there and fight for it.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
76. What makes you think he's even remotely interested in running?
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 03:44 AM
Feb 2015

This is the kind of thing that makes me absolutely crazy, because it's not grounded in reality. Wishing about an Al Gore campaign in 2016 is basically just pissing into the wind.

Instead, take a close look at genuinely possible candidates and work for them.

 

politicman

(710 posts)
77. I still can't get over Gore choosing Lieberman to run with him
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 06:18 AM
Feb 2015

Just the simple fact that Gore chose Lieberman as his running mate, shows that in 2000 Gore and Bush were similar.

it was not the 'left' that lost the election, it was the DLC which had the gall to think that Lieberman was a good idea for a running mate

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
78. No
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 08:40 AM
Feb 2015

His failure to fight to the bloody end disqualifies him in my opinion. Sure, Lieberman pulled the trigger but Gore gave up the farm way too easily.

All those people who claim he did what was "best for the nation" ignore the fact that there were such dire consequences for treating the Florida voter fraud like it was just trying to throw a pass on the last play. If the Dems had been in office it is highly unlikely that reports of possible terrorism attacks would have been dismissed as partisan ploys like they were by the Bush cabal.

Al Gore? no mas

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
79. no, I like his stand on global climate change but he was a conservative dem who
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 08:46 AM
Feb 2015

chose Lieberman as his VP.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
80. Maybe.
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 01:13 PM
Feb 2015

It depends on what issues he ran on, and what positions he took on those issues.

I did support the movement to draft him in '08, as I had no interest in either of the two left standing months before my primary rolled around.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Al Gore Ran Again, Wou...