Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,703 posts)
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:28 PM Apr 2012

Zimmerman case: Holding witnesses name may set precedent in Florida.

Sounds like both prosecutor and defense attorneys requested that the names or addresses be withheld.

George Zimmerman: Could case set precedent?
WKMG’s Gaard Swanson said that O’Mara wrote “he’s worried about making documents public with witness information which could threaten their safety.”

WESH legal analyst Richard Hornsby said he has never seen a judge keep witnesses’ names confidential. “I think this may be the extraordinary case that creates an exception to the general rule,” Hornsby told Bob Kealing.

WFTV-Channel 9 legal analyst Bill Sheaffer said: ”If this court were to deny access or restrict access to this discovery, it would set a precedent.”

Kealing noted that Judge Ken Lester seemed “clearly swayed by the notion” that both sides in the case favor keeping the names secret.

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2012/04/george-zimmerman-could-case-set-precedent.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Zimmerman case: Holding witnesses name may set precedent in Florida. (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 OP
I think that's the smartest thing I've heard about this case to date. Most certainly teddy51 Apr 2012 #1
I, actually ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #2
Lots of layers to that onion.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #3
Not only did the Sanford police fail Trayvon and his family with their pathetic investigation, Cali_Democrat Apr 2012 #4
You figure out why the police didn't do a proper investigation, and Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #5
The same pathetic investigation that lead to a request that he be charged that nite? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #6
More drama. Nobody wants to harm the witnesses. Solomon Apr 2012 #7
 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
1. I think that's the smartest thing I've heard about this case to date. Most certainly
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:31 PM
Apr 2012

there would be some jerk wad that wanted to do harm to these witness's.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
2. I, actually ...
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:34 PM
Apr 2012

would support this ruling, so long as the attorneys involved had the information.

I see no reason for the witness information to be made public prior to their appearance at trial.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
3. Lots of layers to that onion..
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:38 PM
Apr 2012

I wonder how far down the logic tree they've gamed this one.?

Matryoshka case indeed..

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
4. Not only did the Sanford police fail Trayvon and his family with their pathetic investigation,
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:45 PM
Apr 2012

they also failed these witnesses. Had the police done their jobs in the first place, 99.99% of America wouldn't know Trayvon Martin or George Zimmerman. These witnesses wouldn't be in any danger if their names and addresses were released.

Baitball Blogger

(46,703 posts)
5. You figure out why the police didn't do a proper investigation, and
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 08:37 PM
Apr 2012

you will be ahead of the game to figuring out how this county ticks.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
6. The same pathetic investigation that lead to a request that he be charged that nite?
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:22 PM
Apr 2012

There is nothing to indicate at this time how the rank and file did their jobs that night. However, the lead investigator did recommend that Zimmerman be charged that evening.

I understand being upset about how this has gone, but making up stuff will not help matters.

Solomon

(12,310 posts)
7. More drama. Nobody wants to harm the witnesses.
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:52 PM
Apr 2012

This is more about not wanting witnesses compromised by selling their testimony to tabloids.

O'Mara is milking the "fear of black people" thing to full effect.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Zimmerman case: Holding w...