General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRFK assassination had 2nd shooter -new witness
Key witness to RFK assassination says Sirhan Sirhan didnt act alone
A key witness to the 1968 assassination of Robert F. Kennedy has retracted her official statements in the case and now claims that convicted assassin Sirhan Sirhan did not act alone.
Nina Rhodes-Hughes, 78, tells CNN that the FBI "twisted" her original statements to authorities. In recent court filings led by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, state prosecutors argue that even if there were a second gunman on the scene, Sirhan is still guilty of murder.
"What has to come out is that there was another shooter to my right," Rhodes told CNN. "The truth has got to be told. No more cover-ups."
Rhodes' original FBI statement says she only heard 8 gunshots at the time and makes no mention of a second shooter. However, Rhodes, who was just feet away from Kennedy says she never claimed to have only heard 8 shots.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/key-witness-rfk-assassination-says-sirhan-sirhan-didn-223905927.html
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)If correct...can of worms and all that.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)The guard supposedly went nuts and mistakenly shot RFK instead of Sirhan and the guy fled the U.S. some years back and went home to the Philippines. At least that's how I vaguely remember one of the theories.
villager
(26,001 posts)...who had a military/industrial employment background.
You can look him up, but here's an interesting thread about the RFK assassination from DU2:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2762695&mesg_id=2762695
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)seems just a bit odd to me.
ProfessorGAC
(65,010 posts)You posted what i was going to. Now, she comes forward? Now, she wants her statement untwisted? 44 years later? Seems odd to me, too.
GAC
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
Logical
(22,457 posts)cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)conclusion there was only one shooter based on that?
villager
(26,001 posts)and the haste with which the LAPD removed all the evidence (i.e., the aforementioned paneling), the best guess has always been there were more shots fired than a single gun could allow for.