Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:12 AM Mar 2015

If you worked for Widget Corporation, would you use your personal email for work?

How would my bosses and clients perceive my correspondence coming from "me@keepitreal.com" instead of "me@widget.com"?

The fact that *any* government official (past or present) used their own personal domain, gmail, or blackberry account for government-related emails is appalling (not to mention a security risk).

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you worked for Widget Corporation, would you use your personal email for work? (Original Post) KeepItReal Mar 2015 OP
No, I wouldn't use it. HappyMe Mar 2015 #1
I don't see how she managed to do it in this day and age- snooper2 Mar 2015 #2
Yes. And it's done all the time. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #3
Yup, this. Agschmid Mar 2015 #5
I know that seems like an argument, but it isn't regarding the accusations HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #4
It is definitely a security vulnerability above all else KeepItReal Mar 2015 #6
Yes I think communications concerning classified material could be an issue HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #7
When I was a deputy it was a a violation you could be terminated for Lee-Lee Mar 2015 #8
Great post KeepItReal Mar 2015 #9
Fuck, no. Orsino Mar 2015 #10
At our school a ton of communication apparently is shared via Facebook. Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2015 #11
Never for business-related correspondence. Not ever. WillowTree Mar 2015 #12
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
2. I don't see how she managed to do it in this day and age-
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:16 AM
Mar 2015

There are things like (directories) that people use....

Should I cc the SoS on that? Sure...

Okay, oh shit, she is using AOL right, what was that address again?



BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
3. Yes. And it's done all the time.
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:23 AM
Mar 2015

Hubby is an interior designer and manager of an upscale furniture store (on the verge of becoming the authorized retailer for Erkones, home of the luxury Stressless furniture pieces you've undoubtedly seen commercials for) and has a professional e-mail as well as his private. He rarely uses his professional e-mail when writing clients and company execs. His clients love this special treatment and judging by his sales as top salesperson in the company and in the history of the company, they apparently appreciate that special touch.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
4. I know that seems like an argument, but it isn't regarding the accusations
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:23 AM
Mar 2015

The claim is that HRC broke laws/regulations/administration rules etc either about record keeping or security.

But no one has pointed to exactly where she did that. A cursory read of laws about email and federal records suggests agencies are required to have and follow procedures to ensure the archiving of documents that meet requirements of 'federal records'.

Do I think it's something I'd do? No. My life as a pretty much unknown academic meant my name carried far less than the credibility of the institutions I worked for, so my business emails were always on institutional accounts.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
6. It is definitely a security vulnerability above all else
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:39 AM
Mar 2015

Encryption has to be set up on both ends of an email for it to be secure.

Did Sec. Clinton (or Powell and other transgressors) enable encryption on her end and coordinate with every email recipient at State or other agencies to receive encrypted email specifically from her?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
7. Yes I think communications concerning classified material could be an issue
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:51 AM
Mar 2015

But the claim out on the street is she violated Federal Records Act, as I understand it relative to archiving requirements.



 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
8. When I was a deputy it was a a violation you could be terminated for
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:57 AM
Mar 2015

On top of being stupid.

Department and county policy was very, very clear- no use of non-issued email accounts for any kind of work related stuff.

There were several reasons. First, it ensured all communications were properly on the record and accessable.

Second, it protected me as an officer. If I sent as much as one email regarding a case or investigation no matter how remotely related my entire personal email account became subject to subpoena- and I would have to fight what was handed over.

Third, it ensured that people getting emails could see the domain and be assured it was legitimate email from a legitimate source.

Fourth, it eliminated chances of harassment or stalking based upon a private email from people unhappy we locked up their wife or boyfriend or them- and made cases of that easier to prove and once again kept private emails from having to be admitted into court records.

It would have been way stupid for me, a lowly Sheriff's deputy, to do as well as a violation of policy. I can't imagine why on earth anyone in a position like hers would even consider it.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,845 posts)
11. At our school a ton of communication apparently is shared via Facebook.
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 12:56 PM
Mar 2015

I don't do Facebook to any extent so I sometimes feel left out of the loop.
As for email, we allow auto forwarding of school mail to outside accounts so people only have to check one place for their mail (no value to me but our adjuncts find it helpful). The result is a lot of replies to school issues coming from non-school addresses.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you worked for Widget ...