Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn amicus brief, DOJ says bans on gay marriage unconstitutional.
Excellent!!!
More at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/06/gay-marriage-supreme-court_n_6819712.html?ir=Politics&utm_campaign=030615&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-politics&utm_content=FullStory&ncid=newsltushpmg00000003
"The amicus brief urges the Supreme Court to rule that such bans are "incompatible with the Constitution" because they "exclude a long-mistreated class of human beings from a legal and social status of tremendous import."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 450 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In amicus brief, DOJ says bans on gay marriage unconstitutional. (Original Post)
hifiguy
Mar 2015
OP
I wonder what Pastors Thomas and Scalia will say from their SCOTUS pulpits?!?!
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2015
#2
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)1. I participated in a different amicus brief filed today,
On behalf of faith groups tired of the right/conservatives claiming they speak for all people of faith.
It is the 11th such brief I've participated in, and my name's in it
Amici curiae (Amici) comprise a broad range of religious groups, organizations, and leaders (including nearly 2,000 individual clergy) who support equal treatment for same-sex couples with respect to civil marriage. While Amici come from faiths that have approached issues affecting lesbian and gay people and their families in different ways over the years, they are united in the belief that, in our vastly diverse and pluralistic society, particular religious views or definitions of marriage should not be permitted to influence which couples marriages the state recognizes or permits. Such rights must be determined by religiously neutral principles of equal protection under the law.
. . .
Amici do not suggest that their spiritual views on civil marriage equality should be imposed on anyone else. Rather, they present some of their beliefs here to counter the notion that any one segment of the religious community can claim divine or some other universally normative authority as a basis for exclusively reserving civil marriage for heterosexual couplesas, for example, some amici suggest by stating that their theological perspectives, though often differing, converge on a critical point: that the traditional
husband-wife definition of marriage is vital to the welfare of children, families, and society. [Such f]aith communities . . . are among the essential pillars of this Nations marriage culture. Undersigned Amiciincluding nearly 2,000 individual religious leaders spanning a rich diversity of American faith traditionssubmit that their faith communities, too, are among the pillars supporting the institution of marriage in America. Amici therefore respectfully urge the Court to bear this diversity in mind when assessing the broad cultural implications of the decision it must reach in these cases, at this juncture of American history.
. . .
Amici do not suggest that their spiritual views on civil marriage equality should be imposed on anyone else. Rather, they present some of their beliefs here to counter the notion that any one segment of the religious community can claim divine or some other universally normative authority as a basis for exclusively reserving civil marriage for heterosexual couplesas, for example, some amici suggest by stating that their theological perspectives, though often differing, converge on a critical point: that the traditional
husband-wife definition of marriage is vital to the welfare of children, families, and society. [Such f]aith communities . . . are among the essential pillars of this Nations marriage culture. Undersigned Amiciincluding nearly 2,000 individual religious leaders spanning a rich diversity of American faith traditionssubmit that their faith communities, too, are among the pillars supporting the institution of marriage in America. Amici therefore respectfully urge the Court to bear this diversity in mind when assessing the broad cultural implications of the decision it must reach in these cases, at this juncture of American history.
http://www.kramerlevin.com/files/upload/Brief_Obergefell.pdf
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)2. I wonder what Pastors Thomas and Scalia will say from their SCOTUS pulpits?!?!