Fri Mar 20, 2015, 07:16 AM

Reuters: Democratic support for Hillary drops 15 points since February

Many Democrats want independent Clinton email probe: Reuters/Ipsos poll

Support for Clinton's candidacy has dropped about 15 percentage points since mid-February among Democrats, with as few as 45 percent saying they would support her in the last week, according to a Reuters/Ipsos tracking poll. Support from Democrats likely to vote in the party nominating contests has dropped only slightly less, to a low in the mid-50s over the same period.

Even Democrats who said they were not personally swayed one way or another by the email flap said that Clinton could fare worse because of it, if and when she launches her presidential campaign, a separate Reuters/Ipsos poll showed.

The polling showed that nearly half of Democratic respondents - 46 percent - agreed there should be an independent review of all of Clinton's emails to ensure she turned over everything that is work-related.

254 replies	Author	Time	Post
Reuters: Democratic support for Hillary drops 15 points since February (Original post)	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	OP
the right wing and its enablers are starting to do their job	dsc	Mar 2015	#1
Oh come on. The primary hasn't started, she hasn't declared.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#3
This is exactly what happened to Gore	dsc	Mar 2015	#5
I think people are tiring of the Hatfield, McCoy, McCoy Hatfield Hatfield	namastea42	Mar 2015	#9
what do you think the emails contained?	KMOD	Mar 2015	#15
It doesn't matter what was on them.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#19
namastea42 wonders about what is in them.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#25
But that's my point. The "wonder" is all that matters.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#29
I would like to hear what one wonders,	KMOD	Mar 2015	#31
I just wonder how a cabinet level official	morningfog	Mar 2015	#38
for your reading pleasure	KMOD	Mar 2015	#50
Nothing in that article explains her poor decision to co-mingle emails.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#64
lol, I knew you cherry pick that one statement.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#72
She turned over the emails 6 years after the beginning of the her term	karynnj	Mar 2015	#126
Communications she had for work,	KMOD	Mar 2015	#140
That works if and only if every work email CC'd someone on the .gov server	karynnj	Mar 2015	#158
My husband works in IT security.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#162
I'm not "going after her."	morningfog	Mar 2015	#218
You're on to something	brush	Mar 2015	#79
I was about to post something similar. The risk is way too high.	namastea42	Mar 2015	#83
I asked you earlier,	KMOD	Mar 2015	#85
You asked me earlier?	brush	Mar 2015	#93
I was replying to namastea42	KMOD	Mar 2015	#95
Sorry. nt	brush	Mar 2015	#99
or maybe, just maybe	KMOD	Mar 2015	#84
Still not a good idea	brush	Mar 2015	#98
President Clinton had the server.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#106
Actually, 2008 shows the danger in an unknown (not HRC, who hasover 3 decades in the public eye)	karynnj	Mar 2015	#147
Do you REALLY believe that ...	1StrongBlackMan	Mar 2015	#139
Nope. But that is enough to drive the narrative and frame the campaign.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#204
Drive a campaign based on something ...	1StrongBlackMan	Mar 2015	#224
Libya, we came, we saw, he died.	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#75
doubtful.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#76
That IS the problem, you are GUESSING	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#90
I am not guessing.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#102
LOL, are you trying to "punk" us	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#124
lol	KMOD	Mar 2015	#131
But there is NO PROOF	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#136
Because it's impossible to PROVE something does not exist.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#145
Exactly, it doesn't matter what was in them.	A Simple Game	Mar 2015	#151
I'm terrible on names, but	fadedrose	Mar 2015	#80
The dead broke comment was assinine.	KMOD	Mar 2015	#82
You do realize that ...	1StrongBlackMan	Mar 2015	#146
You're right	fadedrose	Mar 2015	#209
and again	dsc	Mar 2015	#28
I had and stlll have plenty of words for Bush(es) and none of them are kind.	namastea42	Mar 2015	#33
it is about double standards	dsc	Mar 2015	#41
Democrats should not lower standards to match the Bushes. It's that simple.	namastea42	Mar 2015	#56
Do not give the theft of the 2000 election that kind of cover.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#13
I just want a press that doesn't lie	dsc	Mar 2015	#26
Gore won. It was stolen. The blame for that	morningfog	Mar 2015	#34
that is exactly and precisely what not only Bush	dsc	Mar 2015	#40
Not quite the same.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#63
Some here are invested in any narrative BUT the factual one.	Rex	Mar 2015	#58
That's an interesting fantasy about how Bush won in 2000.	Rex	Mar 2015	#55
Had he won NH then Flordia wouldn't have mattered one bit	dsc	Mar 2015	#59
He won, why can you not say it?	Rex	Mar 2015	#61
+1	Enthusiast	Mar 2015	#129
Note that the reaction in the poll is entirely in the primary question	karynnj	Mar 2015	#112
Gore WON the 2000 election. The SC stole it for Bush.	sabrina 1	Mar 2015	#196
The media were marching in lock step against President Gore from the get go.	hedda_foil	Mar 2015	#250
Not sure Hillary will declare, but if she does, she'll need to step up her game. Competition from Elizabeth would help.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#16
I don't think this is bad news. This may ensure more candidates participating	namastea42	Mar 2015	#4
just what we heard about the stories about Gore	dsc	Mar 2015	#6
The Progressive Wing, or the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party, I think you mean.	RiverLover	Mar 2015	#14
The "vast right wing conspiracy"?	earthside	Mar 2015	#37
I have no idea if it is a conspiracy	dsc	Mar 2015	#45
I don't think this is the right wing and its enablers	karynnj	Mar 2015	#86
They hate women and the idea that one can be president is unacceptable to the Koch	NoJusticeNoPeace	Mar 2015	#104
Voting for someone just because the person is a woman is also unacceptable.	L0oniX	Mar 2015	#107
Repeat after me, both parties are the same...keep saying it until you believe it	NoJusticeNoPeace	Mar 2015	#110
Enjoy your Goldman oligarchy vote.	L0oniX	Mar 2015	#171
It's not the right wing ...	1StrongBlackMan	Mar 2015	#133
Today, it looks like we have a choice....	DonViejo	Mar 2015	#134
Sweet! Polling A la Carte ;~)	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#142
I was interested in learning if Ipsos/Reuters was still conducting their polls on the internet...	DonViejo	Mar 2015	#155
Are you sitting down?	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#231
....	DonViejo	Mar 2015	#235
So while Nate Silver said Internet Polls were the most accurate,	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#239
Self delete	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#237
I have a question.	Enthusiast	Mar 2015	#150
He was hoping for an extended primary	dsc	Mar 2015	#168
No, this was before Obama became the clear front runner. This was right from the start.	Enthusiast	Mar 2015	#188
that is baldly false	dsc	Mar 2015	#213
BTW here is a link proving you told a big fat untruth	dsc	Mar 2015	#236
Untruth as in lie? You are mistaken. I thought Limbaugh started with the vote for Hillary	Enthusiast	Mar 2015	#243
In post 188	dsc	Mar 2015	#244
You have an unfair heart.	Enthusiast	Mar 2015	#245
BS - she brought it	840high	Mar 2015	#228
She's only the powerhouse inevitable nominee...until she isn't.	morningfog	Mar 2015	#2
There's a reason so many are so vested in all-but declaring her the nominee now (nt)	jeff47	Mar 2015	#161
Yes, they know Hillary can't withstand scrutiny on the issues & that her poll#s cant survive a rigorous campaign.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#252
Yet she is still outperforming every Republican in the clown car	Proud Liberal Dem	Mar 2015	#7
If Hillary loses, Democrats will not regain the Senate	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#8
We need a "Plan B"; just not sure Bernie is the answer. Maybe a "Plan E"?	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#20
The DNC has hollowed out the party	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#27
+1 for "Plan E"	RiverLover	Mar 2015	#30
What "E" are you thinking about?	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#44
Their infatuation with Elizabeth "New Money" Warren is amusing isn't it?	Capt. Obvious	Mar 2015	#48
Not really amusing at all	demwing	Mar 2015	#68
I was inspired to support her campaign for the Senate...where she wants to stay	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#69
And many of us are inspired to encourage her to run for POTUS	demwing	Mar 2015	#78
Thanx demwing, well said. Oh and btw, Elizabeth WILL run, Hillary can "bank" on it.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#92
With no financial or political resources?	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#100
Agree with you 100%, which is what distinguishes Elizabeth and makes her, as the "reluctant candidate," all the more attractive.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#121
What is attractive about a failure?	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#149
U mite b rite, $ talks, unfortunately, but Elizabeth cud lead by example & swear off big $ donors & get major media buzz that way. It's possible.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#200
She didn't swear off big $ in her Senate race...why do it now?	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#210
Not sure. What do you see in Hillary? /nt	demwing	Mar 2015	#206
Pro choice, pro-gay rights, pro infrastructure, pro safety net, voted against Bush tax cuts...	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#212
Clearly she's a Democrat. So is Elizabeth Warren.	demwing	Mar 2015	#219
I reference failure only in the context of campaigning...	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#223
In the context of campaigning	demwing	Mar 2015	#230
Elizabeth Warren won the State of Massachusetts...and so did Hillary Clinton	brooklynite	Mar 2015	#234
Oh c'mon, it's fun in here!	demwing	Mar 2015	#238
Wouldn't that be wonderful if Warren runs? I sure hope that is in the cards and stars.	namastea42	Mar 2015	#96
Seems like an ascertion with little presented behind it	HereSince1628	Mar 2015	#54
Good points! I agree with your WI scenario	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#66
I don't really know that WI is an exception...	HereSince1628	Mar 2015	#103
Voter turn out.	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#113
Yes thats obvious, but HRC as the only source of said coattails needs fleshing out.	HereSince1628	Mar 2015	#125
Unless Hillary can pickup independent voters, not likely.	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#132
How is retaking the Senate in any way tied to Hillary?	tkmorris	Mar 2015	#73
Coattails, SCOTUS, effective governing	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#88
Gerrymandering does not apply to the senate.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#165
This message was self-deleted by its author	ieoeja	Mar 2015	#214
Coat tails, maybe?	libdem4life	Mar 2015	#91
In the Primary? n/t	ieoeja	Mar 2015	#215
Yes. In the Primary. That's where the momentum is created, choices down ticket	libdem4life	Mar 2015	#254
Garbage	rock	Mar 2015	#10
Keep trying, Manny...nt	SidDithers	Mar 2015	#11
It'll drop even more after she announces.	Erich Bloodaxe BSN	Mar 2015	#12
Hillary does seem to be her own worst enemy, when she starts campaigning & her poll numbers then eventually drop over time as her views become known.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#23
Exactly, this is a preview of the carnage to come	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#24
You're dead on about the Senate. Hillary is not goin to inspire Dems to come out n vote like a true progressive candidate would.	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#135
Agreed. She is as motivational and inspiring as a flat Stanley.	namastea42	Mar 2015	#205
Wow, it's that time already?	FSogol	Mar 2015	#17
Remember, Manny, after four hours call your doctor ...	11 Bravo	Mar 2015	#18
The respondents to the poll are useful idiots	Capt. Obvious	Mar 2015	#21
So what?	Erich Bloodaxe BSN	Mar 2015	#46
There is no scandal	Capt. Obvious	Mar 2015	#53
What I 'give credence to' or not doesn't matter diddly squat.	Erich Bloodaxe BSN	Mar 2015	#62
Hillary will not ignore those voters	Capt. Obvious	Mar 2015	#67
Then she's ignoring those voters.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#170
There you go Erich, if Hillary loses, it's all your fault. /nt	demwing	Mar 2015	#71
"Republicans and their left wing ALLIES"? You gotta be fuckin' kiddin...talk about throwin people under the bus! Wow, nice!	InAbLuEsTaTe	Mar 2015	#116
I guess we better embrace cricket chirp	Badass Liberal	Mar 2015	#22
It's a online poll!!!	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#32
And...	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#39
Online polls are not random samples and do not meet the standards	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#49
Hmm?	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#51
That everyone in the population that is measured has a theoretically equal chance of being polled	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#57
Hmm, again?	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#70
Random sample	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#74
How does a political polling group ensure this?	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#94
What kind of sample did the Reuters poll employ? It looks random?	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#114
Isn't that random?	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#119
Of course not . Not everybody is aware of their existence.	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#127
That's what actually makes it random.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#175
What makes a poll random is that every type of person has an equal chance of having their views...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#183
And that's why this poll used a panel the pollster selected. (nt)	jeff47	Mar 2015	#185
There is no systematic way to collect a traditional probability sample of the general population...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#189
And the same thing applies to your "gold standard" landline polls.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#192
No poll is perfect but those that rely on them still do well in predicting the final results	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#197
What contradiction?	jeff47	Mar 2015	#217
So now the timing of when I make my points is an issue	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#222
It is when you constantly change your argument and contradict yourself.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#225
Please provide evidence that an online internet poll is a random sample as...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#240
Thank you. A set of ppl who have volunteered to be on a panel is NOT a random	Nay	Mar 2015	#211
I am nothing if not honest	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#216
It depends on how the panel is formed.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#226
Online polls can be random samples.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#174
"Which Pre-Election Poll was Most Accurate?"	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#117
...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#122
So, to be clear, we agree that Ipsos- Reuters online polling	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#130
Rasmussen was the most accurate pollster in 2008 according to...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#148
So your point is that all pollsters are bad,	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#182
I hope you aren't smoking when you are standing so close to a strawman.	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#186
So what is your point in bringing up Rasmussen?	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#198
That one election cycle does not break or make a pollster...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#201
"It's a online poll!!!"	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#202
The poll has two flaws. It's an online poll and consequently it's a non-probability sample...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#203
This message was self-deleted by its author	namastea42	Mar 2015	#143
Not using online/panel polling, Manny.....which Nate Silver notes here....	msanthrope	Mar 2015	#166
And again... did you SERIOUSLY not read the article you link to?	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#199
Chart to chart, Manny....you claimed #1, but it's #6. nt	msanthrope	Mar 2015	#221
Is unopened Cialis returnable?	TheCowsCameHome	Mar 2015	#35
...and Morning Joe had a "Monica Story"!	Mike Nelson	Mar 2015	#36
Isn't that reason enough not to nominate a LIGHTNING ROD	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#42
She will be attacked like no other, and so will any Democrat!	Mike Nelson	Mar 2015	#251
Exactly! That's why we can't afford "unforced errors"	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#253
I expect when she actually starts campaigning it will drop a little more.	Autumn	Mar 2015	#43
Be careful, you don't want to make any predictions.	JoePhilly	Mar 2015	#47
E-mail "scandal" is BS	tracks29	Mar 2015	#52
Sure, all cabinet members conduct ALL offical state business on private servers	RiverLover	Mar 2015	#60
I get the sense that MSNBC hosts	fadedrose	Mar 2015	#65
Over and over again it is shown how strong she is currently set up to run.	NCTraveler	Mar 2015	#77
It's not only a online poll but it's a panel study...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#81
Thank you for the additional info.	NCTraveler	Mar 2015	#87
It's getting harder and harder to conduct "conventional" polls	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#89
I do agree about it getting harder and harder.	NCTraveler	Mar 2015	#97
I read that a live caller national telephone survey cost $20,000.00	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#109
You can't live-call a cell phone unless they agree to be called.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#176
Bias would only be introduced if you could demonstrate ...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#180
Same applies to the online panel you decry. (nt)	jeff47	Mar 2015	#184
HA HA This gives them an incentive to make themselves look good.	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#108
That is always a problem in any longitudinal study.	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#111
Every poll has bias	Cosmic Kitten	Mar 2015	#118
I don't defend political poling per se. I defend polling that strives to meet industry standards./NT	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#154
panel studies are actually a pretty innovative and credible approach to polling.	geek tragedy	Mar 2015	#144
I hope King does another book	fadedrose	Mar 2015	#101
This message was self-deleted by its author	Marr	Mar 2015	#105
I wish there was a Decree for Democrats...stop apologizing...stop mea culpa-ing	libdem4life	Mar 2015	#115
IRL I do not know a single living breathing person	anotojefiremnesuka	Mar 2015	#120
I live in arguably the most liberal and diverse large city in the nation; Los Angeles	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#160
That is good for Hillary I guess	anotojefiremnesuka	Mar 2015	#163
She will be a great president for working people if her tenure is anything like her husband's	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#164
That is nice she still won't get my support	anotojefiremnesuka	Mar 2015	#167
It's a free country. You can do as you like./NT	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#172
It's not so free if only two families rule it.	namastea42	Mar 2015	#227
I am a Democrat who will support whomever my party nominates	randr	Mar 2015	#123
KICK KICK KICK	marym625	Mar 2015	#128
huh. . . In February I wasn't sure. But now after all the email bullshit and the made up Benghazi	B Calm	Mar 2015	#137
I blame the vast right wing conspiracy	libodem	Mar 2015	#138
If we get a president Adolf Walker	workinclasszero	Mar 2015	#141
A candidate is not entitled to votes.	jeff47	Mar 2015	#179
Clickbait.	stonecutter357	Mar 2015	#152
Did you just cite an "online poll" as something authoritative? Like the time you cited	msanthrope	Mar 2015	#153
"Which Pre-Election Poll was Most Accurate?"	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#159
Not using Online polling Manny....Nate Silver demolished that....	msanthrope	Mar 2015	#169
Did you seriously not read the article you linked to?	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#181
On the chart you posted, they were #1. But they were actually #6 on my	msanthrope	Mar 2015	#187
You. Are. Incredible.	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#190
You, Manny, posted a chart, claiming they were #1. I posted a chart showing that with	msanthrope	Mar 2015	#193
YOU BROUGHT THE ARTICLE UP	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#194
Chart to chart, Manny.....that what I compared. #6, not 1. nt	msanthrope	Mar 2015	#220
Wow-- thanks for highlighting that.	Marr	Mar 2015	#191
Well, there are online polls and online polls...	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#195
Let's stipulate to move the argument forward that the poll is acceptable...	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#207
What were the different questions asked	MannyGoldstein	Mar 2015	#246
Can you please link me to the IPSOS REID polls so I can see the actual question and data?	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#247
Wasn't your assertion addressed In post #148	DemocratSinceBirth	Mar 2015	#177
I'm Not So Sure This Is Only About The Email Situation...	ChiciB1	Mar 2015	#156
This message was self-deleted by its author	Corruption Inc	Mar 2015	#241
Hopefully people are waking up to the disaster she'd be as president	LittleBlue	Mar 2015	#157
Politics is a rough racket if you're carrying a lot of baggage on the campaign train. K&R	Tierra_y_Libertad	Mar 2015	#173
And it will continue to drop every time she gets in front of a microphone and cameras.	Purveyor	Mar 2015	#178
An online poll with a fixed sample is NOT accurate.	Dawson Leery	Mar 2015	#208
DU polling analysis: Like it? It's solid. Hate it? It's crap.	AtomicKitten	Mar 2015	#229
LOL. In the context of DU...	cherokeeprogressive	Mar 2015	#232
Quite a few no doubt. /nt	AtomicKitten	Mar 2015	#233
Peaked in 2011 and all downhill from there.	NYC_SKP	Mar 2015	#249
it's all the fault of DU!!!!!	Doctor_J	Mar 2015	#242
same thing happened with Whitman--a lot of votes, but no CA Pub I know wanted her	MisterP	Mar 2015	#248

Reuters: Democratic support for Hillary drops 15 points since February

1. the right wing and its enablers are starting to do their job

3. Oh come on. The primary hasn't started, she hasn't declared.

5. This is exactly what happened to Gore

9. I think people are tiring of the Hatfield, McCoy, McCoy Hatfield Hatfield

15. what do you think the emails contained?

19. It doesn't matter what was on them.

25. namastea42 wonders about what is in them.

29. But that's my point. The "wonder" is all that matters.

31. I would like to hear what one wonders,

38. I just wonder how a cabinet level official

50. for your reading pleasure

64. Nothing in that article explains her poor decision to co-mingle emails.

72. lol, I knew you cherry pick that one statement.

126. She turned over the emails 6 years after the beginning of the her term

140. Communications she had for work,

158. That works if and only if every work email CC'd someone on the .gov server

162. My husband works in IT security.

218. I'm not "going after her."

79. You're on to something

83. I was about to post something similar. The risk is way too high.

85. I asked you earlier,

93. You asked me earlier?

95. I was replying to namastea42

99. Sorry. nt

84. or maybe, just maybe

98. Still not a good idea

106. President Clinton had the server.

147. Actually, 2008 shows the danger in an unknown (not HRC, who hasover 3 decades in the public eye)

139. Do you REALLY believe that ...

204. Nope. But that is enough to drive the narrative and frame the campaign.

224. Drive a campaign based on something ...

75. Libya, we came, we saw, he died.

76. doubtful.

90. That IS the problem, you are GUESSING

102. I am not guessing.

124. LOL, are you trying to "punk" us

131. lol

136. But there is NO PROOF

145. Because it's impossible to PROVE something does not exist.

151. Exactly, it doesn't matter what was in them.

80. I'm terrible on names, but

82. The dead broke comment was assinine.

146. You do realize that ...

209. You're right

28. and again

33. I had and stlll have plenty of words for Bush(es) and none of them are kind.

41. it is about double standards

56. Democrats should not lower standards to match the Bushes. It's that simple.

13. Do not give the theft of the 2000 election that kind of cover.

26. I just want a press that doesn't lie

34. Gore won. It was stolen. The blame for that

40. that is exactly and precisely what not only Bush

63. Not quite the same.

58. Some here are invested in any narrative BUT the factual one.

55. That's an interesting fantasy about how Bush won in 2000.

59. Had he won NH then Flordia wouldn't have mattered one bit

61. He won, why can you not say it?

129. +1

112. Note that the reaction in the poll is entirely in the primary question

196. Gore WON the 2000 election. The SC stole it for Bush.

250. The media were marching in lock step against President Gore from the get go.

16. Not sure Hillary will declare, but if she does, she'll need to step up her game. Competition from Elizabeth would help.

4. I don't think this is bad news. This may ensure more candidates participating

6. just what we heard about the stories about Gore

14. The Progressive Wing, or the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party, I think you mean.

37. The "vast right wing conspiracy"?

45. I have no idea if it is a conspiracy

86. I don't think this is the right wing and its enablers

104. They hate women and the idea that one can be president is unacceptable to the Koch

107. Voting for someone just because the person is a woman is also unacceptable.

110. Repeat after me, both parties are the same...keep saying it until you believe it

171. Enjoy your Goldman oligarchy vote.

133. It's not the right wing ...

134. Today, it looks like we have a choice....

142. Sweet! Polling A la Carte ;~)

155. I was interested in learning if Ipsos/Reuters was still conducting their polls on the internet...

231. Are you sitting down?

235. ....

239. So while Nate Silver said Internet Polls were the most accurate,

22. I guess we better embrace cricket chirp