General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBOSTON GLOBE Opinion Piece: "The world of threats to the US is an illusion."
:large
............
WHEN AMERICANS look out at the world, we see a swarm of threats. China seems resurgent and ambitious. Russia is aggressive. Iran menaces our allies. Middle East nations we once relied on are collapsing in flames. Latin American leaders sound steadily more anti-Yankee. Terror groups capture territory and commit horrific atrocities. We fight Ebola with one hand while fending off Central American children with the other.
In fact, this world of threats is an illusion. The United States has no potent enemies. We are not only safe, but safer than any big power has been in all of modern history.
............
Feeling threatened strengthens group solidarity. Some thinkers have gone so far as to suggest that since societies become more united and resolute in the face of enemies, those that have none should find some.
It is always possible to bind together a considerable number of people in love, Freud wrote, so long as there are other people left over to receive the manifestations of their aggressiveness. Nietzsche believed the nation-states profound appreciation of the value of having enemies produced a spiritualization of hostility. A young country especially, he said, needs enemies more than friends: in opposition alone does it feel itself necessary.
When Americans see threats everywhere, we fall into this trap. Believing we are besieged is strangely comforting. To recognize how safe we are would require a change of national mindset that we seem reluctant to make.
MORE TRUTH:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2015/04/11/have-seen-enemies-and-they-weak/Cho9J5Bf9jxIkHKIZvnVTJ/story.html?event=event25
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)How does a trillion dollar a year military, security and surveillance budget in a nation with only two bordering friendly neighbors stay so.....idiotically and firmly panicked??
On the other hand, have you watched any half hour of CNN or Fox lately? Who wouldn't be panicked after 30 minutes of that brain rinsing?
"We are all going to die!" is not just the banner logo of the NRA or Doomsday prophets anymore.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)dmr
(28,347 posts)... and comes into the airspace of the United States of America, where do they go?"
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)if her house were on Little Diomede Island
malaise
(268,998 posts)and war and weapons are very profitable so you have to create enemies - Islamist replaced Communist and both were and are bullshit. Invade, loot, plunder, slaughter - rinse and repeat.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Military and Surveillance Industry Scamming Your Tax Dollars.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's a good time to be in the media!
Kinzer is spot-on.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Thanks for posting.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)"Quiet down, the moderators are coming."
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And that has a lot to do with why our Congress is such a bunch of war lovers, they think they are safe.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)under control. Who has more power, the President or Gen Clapper?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)But there is someone at a higher pay grade than him, but we don't know his name.
Let's just call him the Puppet Master.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)They are all too powerful to have just one.
treestar
(82,383 posts)and they went on and on about how we were attacked and how the hijackers defeated us.
It wasn't a military incursion. In the long run, they took no territory. As an entire nation, they barely scratched the surface. It is nice we focus on the victims and their families and so see it very personally. But as a nation we were not harmed much.
Watching that coverage from this vantage point in time, it was almost as if the media were working with Bushco to get up going for a war.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)People are too frightened by the very real prospect of instant ruin so many of us are subject to. The so-called wealthiest nation on earth has more than 200 million people within one missed paycheck of homelessness, joblessness, and a system that treats anyone unfortunate enough to be homeless or jobless as the enemy to all that is decent and proper.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)catapult the fear 24/7. Otherwise they would not be doing the bidding of their owners, the MIC.
Kinzer's books are well worth reading, too.
brush
(53,778 posts)is eye-popping in reporting our continual and uninterrupted involvement since the 1890s in either wars, coups, assassinations or occupations in other countries.
Like you said, it's well worth reading.
We are the warmongers, but I'm a little encouraged that Obama has shown pretty persistent resistance to boots on the ground in the Middle East i.e. the Iran non-nuke agreement that he and Kerry are trying to get done.
I's also a little surprised that he's still physically healthy because of that resistance.
Logical
(22,457 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)are easier to control
Logical
(22,457 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)our real problems - climate change, MIC, poverty, etc.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Oh...Hang.
We Need More War - BFEE Business Plan is now the modern American Economic Worldview.
Economist Tyler Cowen of George Mason University has seen the future and it looks bleak for most of us. Thankfully, the United States of America may be in for good times, especially for those perched atop the socio-economic pyramid scheme, should war break out.
The Pitfalls of Peace
The Lack of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth
Tyler Cowen
The New York Times, JUNE 13, 2014
The continuing slowness of economic growth in high-income economies has prompted soul-searching among economists. They have looked to weak demand, rising inequality, Chinese competition, over-regulation, inadequate infrastructure and an exhaustion of new technological ideas as possible culprits.
An additional explanation of slow growth is now receiving attention, however. It is the persistence and expectation of peace.
The world just hasnt had that much warfare lately, at least not by historical standards. Some of the recent headlines about Iraq or South Sudan make our world sound like a very bloody place, but todays casualties pale in light of the tens of millions of people killed in the two world wars in the first half of the 20th century. Even the Vietnam War had many more deaths than any recent war involving an affluent country.
Counterintuitive though it may sound, the greater peacefulness of the world may make the attainment of higher rates of economic growth less urgent and thus less likely. This view does not claim that fighting wars improves economies, as of course the actual conflict brings death and destruction. The claim is also distinct from the Keynesian argument that preparing for war lifts government spending and puts people to work. Rather, the very possibility of war focuses the attention of governments on getting some basic decisions right whether investing in science or simply liberalizing the economy. Such focus ends up improving a nations longer-run prospects.
It may seem repugnant to find a positive side to war in this regard, but a look at American history suggests we cannot dismiss the idea so easily. Fundamental innovations such as nuclear power, the computer and the modern aircraft were all pushed along by an American government eager to defeat the Axis powers or, later, to win the Cold War. The Internet was initially designed to help this country withstand a nuclear exchange, and Silicon Valley had its origins with military contracting, not todays entrepreneurial social media start-ups. The Soviet launch of the Sputnik satellite spurred American interest in science and technology, to the benefit of later economic growth.
War brings an urgency that governments otherwise fail to summon. For instance, the Manhattan Project took six years to produce a working atomic bomb, starting from virtually nothing, and at its peak consumed 0.4 percent of American economic output. It is hard to imagine a comparably speedy and decisive achievement these days.
SNIP...
Living in a largely peaceful world with 2 percent G.D.P. growth has some big advantages that you dont get with 4 percent growth and many more war deaths. Economic stasis may not feel very impressive, but its something our ancestors never quite managed to pull off. The real questions are whether we can do any better, and whether the recent prevalence of peace is a mere temporary bubble just waiting to be burst.
Tyler Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University.
SOURCE: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/14/upshot/the-lack-of-major-wars-may-be-hurting-economic-growth.html?_r=0
[font color="purple"]Dr. Cowen, from what I've read, is a fine person and not one to promulgate war. He's just sayin'.
He has commented on other Big Ticket economic themes impacting us today: "Inequality," for another instance. [/font color]
Tired Of Inequality? One Economist Says It'll Only Get Worse
by NPR STAFF
September 12, 2013 3:05 AM
Economist Tyler Cowen has some advice for what to do about America's income inequality: Get used to it. In his latest book, Average Is Over, Cowen lays out his prediction for where the U.S. economy is heading, like it or not:
"I think we'll see a thinning out of the middle class," he tells NPR's Steve Inskeep. "We'll see a lot of individuals rising up to much greater wealth. And we'll also see more individuals clustering in a kind of lower-middle class existence."
It's a radical change from the America of 40 or 50 years ago. Cowen believes the wealthy will become more numerous, and even more powerful. The elderly will hold on to their benefits ... the young, not so much. Millions of people who might have expected a middle class existence may have to aspire to something else.
SNIP...
Some people, he predicts, may just have to find a new definition of happiness that costs less money. Cowen says this widening is the result of a shifting economy. Computers will play a larger role and people who can work with computers can make a lot. He also predicts that everyone will be ruthlessly graded every slice of their lives, monitored, tracked and recorded.
CONTINUED with link to the audio...
http://www.npr.org/2013/09/12/221425582/tired-of-inequality-one-economist-says-itll-only-get-worse
For some reason, the interview with Steve Inskeep didn't bring up the subject of the GOVERNMENT DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT LIKE IN THE NEW DEAL so I thought I'd bring it up. Older DUers may recall the Democratic Party once actually did do stuff for the average American, from school and work to housing and justice. But, we can't afford that now, obviously, thanks to austerity or the sequester or the divided government.
What's important is that the 1-percent may swell to a 15-percent "upper middle class." Unfortunately, that may see the rest of the middle class go the other way. Why does that ring a bell? Oh yeah.
"Commercial interests are very powerful interests," said George W Bush on Feb. 14, 2007 White House press conference in which he added, "Let me put it this way, ah, sometimes, ah, money trumps peace." And then he giggled and not a single member of the callow, cowed and corrupt press corpse saw fit to ask a follow-up.
Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan tried to bring it to our nation's attention back in 2007. I don't recall even one reporter from the national corporate owned news seeing it fit to comment. Certainly not many have commented on how three generations of Bush men -- Senator Prescott Sheldon Bush, President George Herbert Walker Bush and pretzeldent George Walker Bush all had their eyes on Iraq's oil.
I wish the Press had done its job. Those in authority would have to do their job. Millions might still be alive, the People might use the money spent on wars in better ways, and the Republic might see a return to Justice. Then, again...
"You know, General Sherman had it all wrong. It's not war that's hell, it's peace that's hell." -- former Sec. of Defense (and former CIA director) James Schlesinger, honored at the Military Order of the Carabao luncheon, 2002.
http://www.thebaffler.com/salvos/in-the-good-old-wallow-time
also great reading:
http://www.villagevoice.com/2003-01-28/news/the-empire-strikes-back/
Sorry to over-vent. The nation needs some serious re-thinking.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)Interesting read.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,632 posts)Thanks for posting.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)possibility that some number of influential people may have endorsed the following reasoning :
" ... Some thinkers have gone so far as to suggest that since societies become more united and resolute in the face of enemies, those that have none should find some. ... "
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)And the sooner the better.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)It's own borders...
We need to clean up our own house and sweep out the garbage if we ever hope to defeat the real enemies..
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Thank you, AuntPatsy.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague." ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Reminds me of Blue Dog Democrats.
KG
(28,751 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)[center]
K&R
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And thought it was the way to go.
But it has been refined a bit...the two minute hate is all day on the TV and no need for mass meetings...and it is well mixed with fear.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)The following is precisely the truth.
The United States has no potent enemies. We are not only safe, but safer than any big power has been in all of modern history.
dsc
(52,162 posts)the UK in the 1800 and 1900's was in all probability much safer than we are now. Invading the UK was pretty much impossible back then and terrorist attacks were of at most limited danger. In theory we could have thousands die in a terrorist attack if it were the correct kind of terrorist attack, that was literally impossible back then.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)and many other maladies.
I think the article is dead on. Where are the great navies to oppose us? The great armies? Those that we consider our enemies have nothing. Iran? We could defeat Iran in less than a week.
It is only through a great exercise of the imagination do we see the USA as threatened.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)You don't have to be a "conspiracy theorist" to have reasonable suspicions about
the powers-that-be.
http://thesuspicionist.blogspot.com/
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)Wall Street crime makes them feel safe.
Sending jobs by the millions to India makes them feel safe.
Torture makes them feel safe.
Having massive poverty makes them feel safe.
Police violence and shootings make them feel safe.
Oil drilling and fracking makes them feel safe.
There is no outcry. No demand for justice.
Where is the Democratic Party?
All snuggled up with someone safe, like Hillary.
We are so fucked.
And so are our children.
And their children.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Too many to list, but they include Al Q'aeeda, Al Q'aeeda Iraq and ISIL. Oh, and how about installing the Shah of Iran after we instigated ousting of Iran's democratically elected leader? Egypt's Morsi, too.
See, among many other things, Oliver Stone's History of the United States, which aired on the Showtime network
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)"Can't make money without a bogey man."
(George Herbert Walker Bush)
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)Defense contractor payoffs to Congress prove it. Eisenhower warned us. He just didn't know that cable TV propaganda would be as influential as Orwell predicted.
Martin Eden
(12,867 posts)It has been used to manipulate the American people into supporting violent costly policies counterproductive to national security, and this is another divisive factor that prevents us from coming together to work on our common interests.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)of threats outside the US.
But there are threats to our nation, now more than ever. Still, those threats are from within:
-- radical RW religiosity that seeks to impose itself everywhere in every way on everyone;
-- the NRA and its limitless GUNS, including automatic weapons, with impunity for all gun owners, but especially for white males;
-- an overly intrusive NSA/CIA security state (already mentioned by another poster);
-- the thinly-veiled racist attitudes that have become more overt;
-- the dismantling of our once great public education system;
-- continuing attempts to dismantle Social Security and Medicare;
-- the amassing of wealth into the hands of a selective few who then control all facets of the media and who buy politicians at a scale unprecedented in our history;
-- paying working people wages that are comparable only to a medieval feudal system;
-- a Supreme Court that is stacked with corporate tools and a lower court federal system that is not much better;
-- Etc., etc., etc.
But so long as we focus on ISIS and other "others," we can't see what is right in front of our faces. Every day.
Overseas
(12,121 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)are the ones that people from within our borders are creating i.e. outsourcing, tax havens, and cheap labor.