General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWant to see some GOP heads explode? Barbara Lee for VP
Think about it.
East/West
Wall Street/Oakland
Elite/Populist
Puts a black woman next in line for Presidential succession.
I've never heard anyone field Barbara Lee's name before, but she has a lot of cred for voting the People's way around here. Perhaps she just lacks exposure to larger Stateswoman-making opportunities.
She could balance the ticket without making it look like Hillary needs a man.
Thoughts?
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)I could cheat and look it up but I think so.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)Can't look it up either where I am (DRs office).
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Though she likely voted against that abominable Act too.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)Lee is notable as the only member of either house of Congress to vote against the authorization of use of force following the September 11, 2001 attacks.
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.
NAYS 1 --- Lee
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll342.xml
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)against the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001;
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1927
csziggy
(34,136 posts)66 Democrats voted against the Patriot Bill, Lee among them.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll398.xml
Barbara Lee is noted for being the lone vote against the authorization of force bill and your first post in this sub-thread was about a lone vote against the Patriot Act.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)daredtowork
(3,732 posts)I could be reconciled to Hillary as the Democrat nominee if Barbara Lee was the VP pick AND she was assured of domestic policy-shaping influence/power and a mandate to undo the damage that the previous Clinton era wrought. A HUGE PUBLIC MANDATE to signal the poor will no longer be the easy scapegoats of politics, but rather the foundation stone in rebuilding American communities.
A two woman ticket can't succeed? How sexist is that? Why not? Hillary and Barbara Lee could prove that society has matured beyond that point - that we just skipped over the step where we could only tolerate one token woman at the top. Society has never rejected a ticket with 2 men on it.
Besides, these days a woman making it to the top is...meh. Two women would be something different: something epic: something worth fighting for.
Barbara Lee provides the social voice and, frankly, color, Hillary is missing. That's a perfectly balanced ticket. But if that was the ticket: two women, a Clinton, an authentic black progresive woman from California vs. Texas Oil Money, Lobbyists of the Super Rich, Ayn Rand Fanboys, TV Megachurch Ministers, and Tea Party Wingnuttery -- the next election could be as close as we ever get to WWIII without using nukes.
Kind of awesome if you think about it. Quick someone design the video game. :p
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)We need her in the (now) House and (futureI'm hoping she takes DiFi's place, assuming that Dino ever retires) Senate.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)but this is also sounding like a "keep the woman in her place" line. We need more woman in the pipeline whi can ALSO be alternatives to Feinstein.
Have we ever kept a man back by saying "we need him in the House/Senate" like we did with Warren and now Lee? We needed tge luttle woman in the kitchen, too.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)daredtowork
(3,732 posts)But Barbara Lee has a wider range of experience, and just as holding up Hillary as the first (token) female President won't win the election, throwing in a Latin male won't win the "diversity" vote. In fact if he doesn't bring the right political stuff to the ticket, he will seem like yet another pathetic effort at "triangulation" engineered by pollsters and focus groups, ultimately withlut a soul.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Raiding the Senate to fill cabinet positions, or whatever. Frankly, we lost the Senate (and governors) because Obama raided it/them for cabinet positions. Most of those men and some women should have stayed in the house or senate or as governors.
I, personally, have no problem with a two-woman ticket, but I do not represent national demographics. This is called politics, where you play the odds and percentages; what will win and what will not. Like it or not, I (and it would seem) you, are marginal votes. In other words, they don't give a shit about us. They have to go with (as much as possible, and still satisfy the fringe) mainstream choices. Two women on the ticket is sensory overload for the mainstream.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)I still wonder if the opposition to such an unexpexted, ostensibly unviable, yet undeniably powerful pairing might energize the campaign to fight for it. That's what took Hillary by surprise in 2008 -people fought for Obama.
People weren't going to fight for Third Way Hillary then, and they aren't now. Hillary's campaign is fueled by money. I'm willing to bet even Skinner's sudden appearance and endorsement has something to do with funding for DU. The amount of fake enthusiasm drummed up over the last 24 hours feels like the attack of the Pod People/Stepford Dems.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)To run for president. The 1st person I actually campaigned for was Shirley Chisholm. Shirley paved the way for strong women who take tough votes. I would love to see Lee on the ticket. She is one of the people I admire on congress and there ain't that many of them
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 15, 2015, 01:15 AM - Edit history (1)
Get Barbara Lee in the game.