General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmericans are spending $153 billion a year to subsidize McDonald’s and Wal-Mart’s low wage workers
Protesters lobby for higher wages for fast food workers. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/04/15/we-are-spending-153-billion-a-year-to-subsidize-mcdonalds-and-walmarts-low-wage-workers/
By Ken Jacobs April 15 at 6:24 AM
Ken Jacobs is the Chair of the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education and co-author, with Jenifer MacGillvary and Ian Perry, of "The High Public Cost of Low Wages."
The low wages paid by businesses, including some of the largest and most profitable companies in the U.S. like McDonalds and Wal-Mart are costing taxpayers nearly $153 billion a year.
After decades of wage cuts and health benefit rollbacks, more than half of all state and federal spending on public assistance programs goes to working families who need food stamps, Medicaid, or other support to meet basic needs. Let that sink in American taxpayers are subsidizing people who work most of them full-time (in some case more than full-time) because businesses do not pay a living wage.
Workers like Terrence Wise, a 35-year-old father who works part-time at McDonalds and Burger King in Kansas City, Mo., and his fiancée Myosha Johnson, a home care worker, are among millions of families in the U.S. who work an average of 38 hours per week but still rely on public assistance. Wise is paid $8.50 an hour at his McDonalds job and $9 an hour at Burger King. Johnson is paid just above $10 an hour, even after a decade in her field. Wise and Johnson together rely on $240 a month in food stamps to feed their three kids, a cost borne by taxpayers.
The problem of low wages and the accompanying public cost extends far beyond the fast-food industry. Forty-eight percent of home care workers rely on public assistance. In child care, its 46 percent. Among part-time college facultysome of the most highly educated workers in the countryits 25 percent.
FULL story at link.
marym625
(17,997 posts)jen63
(813 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)It's the new American business model.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)starting to look over their shoulders when the Washington Papers print something that is not pro Business. Got a feeling they see the same change Agent as many of us see,and her name is Hillary Clinton. She is not a Bill Clinton Clone. Been watching her transformation to a more progressive profile. And we can thank Sanders and Warren for this change. Our country is hungry for a FDR revival and Wall Street can see it coming and they are pissed because all the money in the world is not going to stop it. Case in point,just look at the Headlines on your so called liberal web pages,Hillary gets visit from GOP Congressional Committee Investigators. Bottom line,just more of the 1 %ers outrage,it is not going anywhere except Faux News.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Somehow I doubt these companies could afford to spend $76b more per year on employee costs.