Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChris Christie says his Social Security plan hurts the rich, but it really hurts the poor
http://www.vox.com/2015/4/16/8422945/chris-christie-social-securityIn a speech delivered April 14 in New Hampshire, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie proposed a large across-the-board cut in Social Security benefits that would primarily target poor Americans. In a remarkable bit of political salesmanship, he also managed to get this covered in the press as primarily a proposal to reduce benefits for wealthy retirees.
The proposal is part of an effort by Christie, whose 2016 chances have dimmed considerably in recent years, to position himself as the Republican brave enough to take on the politically difficult fights the rest of his party won't. In recent years, congressional Republicans have decided to back off any cuts to Social Security Rep. Paul Ryan's budget, for instance, simply punts on the issue altogether. But Christie is proposing real cuts here, even if he's obscuring whom they'll hurt most....
Although the retirement age section of Christie's proposal is both more quantitatively significant and targeted to especially inflict pain on the poor, Christie spent more time talking about the case for his smaller cuts on the rich. And he succeeded in framing much of the media conversation around this idea....
Again, it is true that Christie's plan has this feature. But the specific choice that generates the bulk of the savings is a broad cut in benefits that cuts proportionately more from the poor.
The proposal is part of an effort by Christie, whose 2016 chances have dimmed considerably in recent years, to position himself as the Republican brave enough to take on the politically difficult fights the rest of his party won't. In recent years, congressional Republicans have decided to back off any cuts to Social Security Rep. Paul Ryan's budget, for instance, simply punts on the issue altogether. But Christie is proposing real cuts here, even if he's obscuring whom they'll hurt most....
Although the retirement age section of Christie's proposal is both more quantitatively significant and targeted to especially inflict pain on the poor, Christie spent more time talking about the case for his smaller cuts on the rich. And he succeeded in framing much of the media conversation around this idea....
Again, it is true that Christie's plan has this feature. But the specific choice that generates the bulk of the savings is a broad cut in benefits that cuts proportionately more from the poor.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 440 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chris Christie says his Social Security plan hurts the rich, but it really hurts the poor (Original Post)
KamaAina
Apr 2015
OP
Turbineguy
(37,329 posts)1. The Art of being a republican.
Make the middle class think you are motivating the shiftless poor into getting a job, while you take from the middle class and give to the rich.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)2. Our friend is an early retiree who was a plumber.
He spent his working life carrying heavy fixtures and being on his knees fixing plumbing. His shoulder and knees are shot. He retired at 62. Mercifully, he had a union and has generous benefits. but this is not the case with other plumbers.
The well manicured rich couldn't care less...and CC is their errand boy...