Someone who doesnt care about you or someone who HATES you, who do you want in WH?

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

I am reminded of George Carlin and his comment, in regard to ALL politicians:

"these people dont care about you"

It is true, for the most part.

Now, you DO have a choice, actually.

A politician who doesnt much care about you and one who kind of hates you.

Which do you choose, the one who wont overtly go out of their way to harm you or the one that will?

[TDale313]

1. Tired of those being the two choices.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

3. But those are the choices

[AtomicKitten]

4. South Park described that choice as

a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwich.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

9. OK, one will work day and night to destroy all progress of the last 100 yrs

one wont

still no difference in your world?

REALLY?

[AtomicKitten]

14. Don't like my opinion? Get a better candidate.

[AtomicKitten]

22. Bless your heart.

[bigwillq]

2. Neither (nt)

[cali]

5. so you believe that Bernie doesn't care about the people he fights for so passionately?

interesting.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

7. I dont know why I would bother to even respond to you, but as I said elsewhere

he may be the only one who does.

But, I wonder what he would do if wall street came to him and said we can guarantee you the WH if you only bend a little here and there

who knows

and what if he doesnt, he wont go out of his way to cause harm

big difference

nor will Hillary

[cali]

8. He's not the only one and I know he'd tell Wall Street to fuck off

He's my Senator. I know him. I've interacted with him both at his office in DC and at town meetings and pot lucks.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

10. Still havent answered the question, I see

Let's try again

One side will do everything in their power to reverse ALL progress of the last 100 yrs, including social security, medicare, MW laws and many many other things, like regulations of companies polluting our environment

The other wont

Which do you go out of your way to support?

[cali]

21. I'm reluctant to engage with a question this silly and with such a transparent agenda

I don't think there's anything sane about the question. I don't buy into it's premise. I've already said I'll vote for the dem nominee.

I think your op is really, really bizarre and creepy as all hell.

I trust I've made myself clear.

[geek tragedy]

6. loaded question. nt

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

11. Simple question but I can see why some wont answer it

These type of questions are designed to point out the LUNACY of saying you wont vote for the Democratic party if x, y or z are the candidate.

[geek tragedy]

13. no, it's a classic loaded question.

A loaded question or complex question fallacy is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt).[1]

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

15. So you think Hillary wants to destroy Soc Sec, medicare and MW laws and regulations?

Yes or no, or admit you dont know what you are talking about, please.

[geek tragedy]

18. no, I'm saying Clinton is not obviously some sociopath who doesn't care about human beings

she's got some beliefs that I take issue with (especially on foreign policy) and she's definitely a little too comfortable with the rich and powerful.

But, her record and life story is not that of someone who is indifferent to the suffering of others.

[winter is coming]

12. Lowering expectations before primary season even begins. Classy. n/t

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

17. Neither.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

19. So the one who WONT destroy Soc Sec and medicare etc, doesnt deserve your time

noted...hope it is noted by others as well

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

24. The candidate I'll probably vote for won't destroy any of those.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

26. Why not write in Mickey Mouse or something, same result.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

30. Why don't you? Same results.

Unless you believe that your single vote will decide the election or the fate of the programs you mentioned.

[Tommy2Tone]

20. I will support the Dem

If for no other reason than we can't take another Scalia, Roberts or Thomas on the SCOTUS.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

23. The SC is one of the main tools the cons will use to destroy ALL progress of the past 100 yrs

so you are paying attention, good

thanks

spread the word to those who dont seem to care about progress

[Tommy2Tone]

31. There is sufficient evidence to back up a Democrat and the SC

Obama appoints > Sonya Sotomayor and Elena Kagan

Dubya Bush > John Roberts and Samuel Alito

Bill Clinton > Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Dubya Daddy > Clarence Thomas

Regan > Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy

This is what happens when Dems vote for a Green Party candidate or refuse to vote because a particular Dem does not past some test. We get this. Ask Florida Dems if they would like a do-over on voting for Nader?

[herding cats]

25. It's clear you're not being serious.

Framing our choices as bad or worse? Yeah, that's gonna fly with political wonks.

FWIW I regret giving your "Why all of a sudden is it so important Hillary have competition within the party?" thread a serious answer now. You're just playing and I was too stupid to realize it at first.

[NoJusticeNoPeace]

27. Really? So the right isnt dedicated to destroying ALL progress of the past 100yrs?

If the answer is yes, and it clearly is, then my framing couldnt be more important or accurate.

You see we can lose the WH to the right, it could happen.

[cali]

29. I've made similar mistakes before

[samsingh]

28. a Democratic candidate is better than anyone the repugs will put up

I want Hillary, but I would vote for any of the other Democratic candidates.