Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNeil deGrasse Tyson: Politicians Denying Science Is ‘Beginning Of The End Of An Informed Democracy’
What will you be doing on Monday, 4/20, at 11 p.m.?Perhaps watching the premiere of acclaimed astrophysicist and author Neil deGrasse Tysons new show StarTalk. Tyson, who may be best known for hosting the reboot of Carl Sagans Cosmos series in 2014, will now be appearing weekly on the National Geographic Channel in what may be the first late-night science talk show.
ThinkProgress was lucky enough to snag a few minutes of Tysons time to ask him about his new show, his feelings on how the media covers science, what we can do about climate change, and more:
Going forward, can you predict where the conversation around climate change will be in a decade or two? And maybe where well be in meeting the challenges it poses?
Neil deGrasse Tyson: I cant predict where it will be, but I can suggest where it should go. The conversation that needs to happen here it is: you have conservatives and liberals in a room, people with power, lets say they are representatives or senators. They shake hands and say, ok humans are changing the climate of this planet, this is the consensus of scientific experiments being conducted, what policy and legislation should we debate in the face of the information?
The Republican is thinking different suggestions from the Democrat, and that is the healthy political conversation that should unfold. Should there be carbon credits or not? Should there be trade regulations or not? Should we invest in solar panels rather than clean coal?
That would be a fruitful debate that could be held in the political arena. But the moment the politicians start saying they are in denial of what the scientists are telling them, of what the consensus of scientific experiments demonstrates, that is the beginning of the end of an informed democracy.
You cant just cherry-pick data and choose what is true about the world and what isnt.
Going forward, can you predict where the conversation around climate change will be in a decade or two? And maybe where well be in meeting the challenges it poses?
Neil deGrasse Tyson: I cant predict where it will be, but I can suggest where it should go. The conversation that needs to happen here it is: you have conservatives and liberals in a room, people with power, lets say they are representatives or senators. They shake hands and say, ok humans are changing the climate of this planet, this is the consensus of scientific experiments being conducted, what policy and legislation should we debate in the face of the information?
The Republican is thinking different suggestions from the Democrat, and that is the healthy political conversation that should unfold. Should there be carbon credits or not? Should there be trade regulations or not? Should we invest in solar panels rather than clean coal?
That would be a fruitful debate that could be held in the political arena. But the moment the politicians start saying they are in denial of what the scientists are telling them, of what the consensus of scientific experiments demonstrates, that is the beginning of the end of an informed democracy.
Lots more:
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/04/18/3647978/neil-degrasse-tysons-new-show-will-blow-your-mind-on-4-20/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 737 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neil deGrasse Tyson: Politicians Denying Science Is ‘Beginning Of The End Of An Informed Democracy’ (Original Post)
kpete
Apr 2015
OP
I love his quote "the great thing about science is that it's true, whether or not you believe in it"
okaawhatever
Apr 2015
#3
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)1. It starts with the Texas Textbooks
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)2. And the religulous idiots
who think that The Flintstones was a documentary. And it all goes to hell in a handbasket from there.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)3. I love his quote "the great thing about science is that it's true, whether or not you believe in it"
MisterP
(23,730 posts)4. or end of the beginning, more likely--when were we an informed democracy?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)5. Don't forget anti-vaccination liberals like Robert Kennedy.
Conservatives aren't the only science deniers.