Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 08:02 AM Apr 2015

Bloomberg: Shell's income drops, lays off workers, triples CEO pay to $32 million



The only people not hit by the drop in oil price are the CEOs running the companies

Bloomberg – Oil’s plunge has forced the world’s biggest energy producers to lay off workers and stall projects. Their chief executive officers have so far proved immune. Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Europe’s biggest oil company, paid CEO Ben Van Beurden a total of $32.2 million last year, almost three times the amount his predecessor Peter Voser earned in 2013, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence. At BP Plc, where shareholders will vote on compensation at the annual general meeting on Thursday, CEO Bob Dudley’s total pay rose 4.9 percent to $15.4 million.

“The only people not hit by the drop in oil price are the CEOs running the companies,” said Gregory Elders, a London-based analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. “BP may face irate shareholders again over climbing executive pay during its annual meeting this week.” Shell’s net income has dropped in nine of the past 12 quarters and BP’s has fallen in six. Oil’s 50 percent decline in the past year has forced industrywide cutbacks and thousands of job losses, including at Shell and BP. The global industry may lose 50,000 to 100,000 jobs in the next six months, oil-services company Weatherford International Plc said Tuesday.

“The workers are paying a heavy price for the greed of those at the top,” said Tommy Campbell, a regional officer with the U.K.’s Unite trade union, which represents 8,000 North Sea workers. “It’s morally reprehensible.” Pensions & Investment Research Consultants, which advises institutional shareholders and issues proxy vote recommendations, advised shareholders to reject Dudley’s pay at the April 16 meeting in London. His increase exceeds the company’s performance over the past five years, Pirc’s press officer Andrew Whiley said.

BP’s shares have declined in four of the past five years after an explosion at the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010 resulted in the biggest oil spill in U.S. history, forcing the company to pay billions of dollars in fines. Shell’s have dropped in two of the past three years and are down 5 percent in 2015 in London trading. “CEO renumeration is far outstripping shareholder returns,” Whiley said by phone. “There’s a growing concern about renumeration and that’s something that boards can’t ignore.”




http://www.pa-journal.com/people-hit-drop-oil-price-ceos-running-companies/











“Actually, capitalism works pretty well–until it doesn’t. Capitalism in this country is going to fail if there’s not a significant, substantial number of people who believe that capitalism works for them and people are beginning to doubt around the world and in this country whether capitalism works for them.”

-Howard Dean



http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=thread&address=10026524237



















10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bloomberg: Shell's income drops, lays off workers, triples CEO pay to $32 million (Original Post) Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 OP
lather rinse repeat... mnmoderatedem Apr 2015 #1
Whenever I read about these insanely bloated salaries... malthaussen Apr 2015 #2
Mansions, Yachts, Fine Art, Politicians... n2doc Apr 2015 #4
Limbaugh makes 50 million sorefeet Apr 2015 #6
seriously. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2015 #8
How long until the myth of shareholder power is finally destroyed? n2doc Apr 2015 #3
Huge pay raises anticipated douggg Apr 2015 #5
Typical abelenkpe Apr 2015 #7
Repetitive, morally reprehensible behavior sulphurdunn Apr 2015 #9
Direct correlation between the huge CEO pay and people losing everything. Grand Theft! n/t freshwest Apr 2015 #10

malthaussen

(17,193 posts)
2. Whenever I read about these insanely bloated salaries...
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 09:31 AM
Apr 2015

... one question keeps coming to mind again and again: what the hell do they spend it on? I couldn't burn through a million a year if I tried, nevermind 32 million.

-- Mal

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
4. Mansions, Yachts, Fine Art, Politicians...
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 09:43 AM
Apr 2015

Lots of things to spend that kind of money on. And of course, hoarding it so that your progeny never have to work a day in their lives. Usually running some sort of Foundation or 'charity' scam.

sorefeet

(1,241 posts)
6. Limbaugh makes 50 million
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 09:50 AM
Apr 2015

a year. To spread propaganda to the stupid that these salaries ore justified through hard work. These people actually think they earn and deserve this kind of money. I would feel guilty making that kind of money, no one deserves that kind of dough. Especially knowing what your corporation had done to actually get that kind of profits in the first place.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
3. How long until the myth of shareholder power is finally destroyed?
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 09:38 AM
Apr 2015

Unless one holds or controls a significant stake in the company (more than 5-10%) your voice is not heard. There are cases out there where even a majority vote by shareholders has been ignored by the company's Board and CEO. Essentially there is no control on the CEO's actions anymore if they have enough buddies on the board.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
7. Typical
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:18 AM
Apr 2015

How many times does this story need to be repeated before anyone cares?
People don't care until it happens to them and then they find no sympathy from anyone not effected by similar layoffs and job loss.
But hey, the economy is improving.. Z

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
9. Repetitive, morally reprehensible behavior
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 10:47 AM
Apr 2015

is a strong indication that those engaged in such behavior are morally reprehensible. When it becomes obvious that the reprehensible behavior will not change, those affected must make a decision about what, if anything to do about it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bloomberg: Shell's income...