Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 06:23 PM Apr 2015

Facing threat in Congress, Pentagon races to resettle Guantanamo inmates

Facing a potential showdown with Congress, the Pentagon is racing to move dozens of detainees out of Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in coming months before lawmakers can block future transfers and derail President Obama’s plan to shutter the U.S. military prison.

As a first step, officials plan to send up to 10 prisoners overseas, possibly in June. In all, the Pentagon hopes that 57 inmates who are approved for transfer will be resettled by the end of 2015. That would require “large muscle movements” by at least two countries, which officials hope will each agree to take in 10 to 20 Yemeni detainees, who cannot be repatriated because of security conditions in their war-torn homeland.

“I am aware of the clock ticking,” a defense official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal planning. “It’s going to take high-level leadership, and it’s going to take some big asks to some countries.”

The issue of what to do with those remaining detainees on trial in military commissions or who are deemed too dangerous to release also looms over a White House that is facing the end of Obama’s second term in 2017.

In the event that Congress does pass legislation that would freeze Guantanamo Bay’s population, currently at 122, White House officials are exploring options for the unilateral closure of the prison and moving detainees into the United States, an action that Congress has opposed from the president’s first months in office.

more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/facing-threat-in-congress-pentagon-races-to-resettle-guantanamo-inmates/2015/04/22/e001e328-e82a-11e4-9a6a-c1ab95a0600b_story.html?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Facing threat in Congress, Pentagon races to resettle Guantanamo inmates (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2015 OP
What will happen to Gitmo if the prison is ever closed? KamaAina Apr 2015 #1
We'll Keep It HassleCat Apr 2015 #3
Who said anything about vacating it? KamaAina Apr 2015 #5
We already own a Starbucks and KFC/Taco Bell there Mnpaul Apr 2015 #6
Those are MWR* (non-appropriated funds) instrumentalities. MADem Apr 2015 #7
I'm thinking about the construction gigs Mnpaul Apr 2015 #9
We closed Roosevelt Roads in Puerto Rico years ago--we have no Navy installations there. MADem Apr 2015 #8
I'm Curious HassleCat Apr 2015 #2
Good question. Before they passed a law saying no military money (& maybe members) could okaawhatever Apr 2015 #4
Move faster, Pentagon. You know you can do it. Hekate Apr 2015 #10
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. What will happen to Gitmo if the prison is ever closed?
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 06:25 PM
Apr 2015

We don't really need a naval base there, since Puerto Rico is in the Caribbean.

A free port, perhaps? A Cuban equivalent of Hong Kong before the handover?

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
3. We'll Keep It
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 06:35 PM
Apr 2015

Gitmo has been an "in yer face" ever since Castro took power. About the only way we're going to vacate is if we establish completely normal relations with Cuba. Which could happen.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
5. Who said anything about vacating it?
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 11:42 PM
Apr 2015

We could, as I mentioned, turn it into a Caribbean Hong Kong or Singapore.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
6. We already own a Starbucks and KFC/Taco Bell there
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 01:52 AM
Apr 2015

and 7.3 million dollars worth of football and baseball fields, a quarter million dollar volleyball court, an Irish Pub and a $300,000 go kart track.
http://www.eater.com/2010/6/9/6730541/the-military-spent-1-45-million-opening-a-starbucks-and-a-kfc-taco

I think some Republicans may be profiting off GITMO and that is a partial reason they don't want to close it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
7. Those are MWR* (non-appropriated funds) instrumentalities.
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 02:49 PM
Apr 2015

The profits made at those places are poured back into military recreational opportunities, with an emphasis on single-servicemember activities.

*Morale, Welfare and Recreation

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. We closed Roosevelt Roads in Puerto Rico years ago--we have no Navy installations there.
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 02:54 PM
Apr 2015

We even closed the bombing range at Vieques. The only military installation of any note in Puerto Rico is the Army installation, Fort Buchanan, and that thing isn't very big. It has a fair sized commissary and exchange and a class 6 store, and it gets busy at the weekends for drills, but there's no place to park your seagoing vessel---the Naval place to go OUTUS in the Caribbean is GITMO.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
2. I'm Curious
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 06:33 PM
Apr 2015

How does the fanatical right wing of Congress propose to keep them there? Isn't that a (gasp!) unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers principle? The constitution specifies Congress shall pass no bill of attainder, which this clearly is. A "bill of attainder," by the way, is a law aimed at a specific person or group of persons.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
4. Good question. Before they passed a law saying no military money (& maybe members) could
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 07:02 PM
Apr 2015

be used for moving prisoners. They've passed legislation to block closing it, but so far it's always been money or military being blocked. They haven't actually dealt with the prisoners themselves. It will be interesting to see what they will come up with next.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Facing threat in Congress...