General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFacing threat in Congress, Pentagon races to resettle Guantanamo inmates
Facing a potential showdown with Congress, the Pentagon is racing to move dozens of detainees out of Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in coming months before lawmakers can block future transfers and derail President Obamas plan to shutter the U.S. military prison.
As a first step, officials plan to send up to 10 prisoners overseas, possibly in June. In all, the Pentagon hopes that 57 inmates who are approved for transfer will be resettled by the end of 2015. That would require large muscle movements by at least two countries, which officials hope will each agree to take in 10 to 20 Yemeni detainees, who cannot be repatriated because of security conditions in their war-torn homeland.
I am aware of the clock ticking, a defense official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal planning. Its going to take high-level leadership, and its going to take some big asks to some countries.
The issue of what to do with those remaining detainees on trial in military commissions or who are deemed too dangerous to release also looms over a White House that is facing the end of Obamas second term in 2017.
In the event that Congress does pass legislation that would freeze Guantanamo Bays population, currently at 122, White House officials are exploring options for the unilateral closure of the prison and moving detainees into the United States, an action that Congress has opposed from the presidents first months in office.
more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/facing-threat-in-congress-pentagon-races-to-resettle-guantanamo-inmates/2015/04/22/e001e328-e82a-11e4-9a6a-c1ab95a0600b_story.html?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)We don't really need a naval base there, since Puerto Rico is in the Caribbean.
A free port, perhaps? A Cuban equivalent of Hong Kong before the handover?
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Gitmo has been an "in yer face" ever since Castro took power. About the only way we're going to vacate is if we establish completely normal relations with Cuba. Which could happen.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)We could, as I mentioned, turn it into a Caribbean Hong Kong or Singapore.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)and 7.3 million dollars worth of football and baseball fields, a quarter million dollar volleyball court, an Irish Pub and a $300,000 go kart track.
http://www.eater.com/2010/6/9/6730541/the-military-spent-1-45-million-opening-a-starbucks-and-a-kfc-taco
I think some Republicans may be profiting off GITMO and that is a partial reason they don't want to close it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The profits made at those places are poured back into military recreational opportunities, with an emphasis on single-servicemember activities.
*Morale, Welfare and Recreation
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)They seem to funneling a lot of money there.
65 million for a high school Dec. 29, 2014
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/article5133627.html
$195 million in renovations and construction in April 2013
http://www.allgov.com/news/where-is-the-money-going/obama-plans-195-million-dollars-in-renovation-and-new-construction-at-guantanamo-130408?news=849672
MADem
(135,425 posts)We even closed the bombing range at Vieques. The only military installation of any note in Puerto Rico is the Army installation, Fort Buchanan, and that thing isn't very big. It has a fair sized commissary and exchange and a class 6 store, and it gets busy at the weekends for drills, but there's no place to park your seagoing vessel---the Naval place to go OUTUS in the Caribbean is GITMO.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)How does the fanatical right wing of Congress propose to keep them there? Isn't that a (gasp!) unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers principle? The constitution specifies Congress shall pass no bill of attainder, which this clearly is. A "bill of attainder," by the way, is a law aimed at a specific person or group of persons.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)be used for moving prisoners. They've passed legislation to block closing it, but so far it's always been money or military being blocked. They haven't actually dealt with the prisoners themselves. It will be interesting to see what they will come up with next.
Hekate
(90,681 posts)Thank you, President Obama.