General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton: "Some day people are going to read about them & wonder, who were these people?"
Last edited Thu Apr 23, 2015, 09:19 AM - Edit history (1)
Clinton reiterated her support for President Obamas executive actions on carbon emissions, and suggested she might be open to more.
I give Obama and the EPA enormous credit for going as far as he can go as a president using executive and regulatory action, she said, according to pool reporter Annie Karni of Politico. We have to actually convince more Americans that this is in their interest. You know, whatever it takes. I happen to think its a real threat. I think the science is pretty clear. The deniers, Lord knows, some day people are going to read about them and wonder, who were these people? And how did they say this?
On campaign finance, Clinton said even total disclosure of campaign money is not enough on its own.
What good does it do to disclose if somebodys about to spend $100 million to promote their own interest and to defeat candidates who would stand up against them? What good does that do? Clinton said.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-woos-democrats-climate-change-and-campaign-finance
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)I guess we'll see.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)having a base that is questioning Hillary is actually a good thing. No real primaries ?? means we have to do it. Still Nov 2016 we'll have to see. She can't be in the position of obvious winner cause nobody will show up
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)CatWoman
(79,302 posts)I am so fucking sick of the endless, non stop, constant Hillary bashing on this forum.
calimary
(81,459 posts)It's about time we had a politician at the highest levels saying these things. And articulating these attitudes. And reinforcing these themes. In public and out loud and on the record. It's long past time.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)What I notice about the supporters of Hillary Clinton is that when I raise an argument based on solid facts that explain why I do not want her to be my president, the answers I get are not based on facts. They are just emotional outcries.
Hillary Clinton is strong on women's issues in my view. But she showed in her vote for the Iraq War Resolution that she does not carefully do her homework when faced with a decision and in the light of the video in which she spoke to the Code Pink women who had gone to Iraq and personally informed Hillary about what they saw in Iraq and why Hillary should not support the war against Saddam Hussein, she was sternly rude. She had made up her mind, and no amount of evidence could shake her resolve.
Watch this for yourself:
Obama would never have treated any citizens with so much disrespect.
Then there are the problems with the bills that Clinton signed:
Nafta, which led to the outsourcing and exporting of many American jobs and ultimately with low wages and bad working conditions here.
The repeal of Glass-Steagall which was a major step toward the crash of 2008 -- major.
The so-called Welfare Reform Act which came back to bite in 2008 and the recession and which pushes poor women into the labor market while their children are still small. I happen to know the cost of day care. It's cheaper to pay a mother welfare and let her care for her child than to put her in a low-wage job and force her to work for food. Why shouldn't we care for families with children? Why shouldn't we admit that women with small children work hard and deserve pay just for doing that job? Rich women can afford to stay home with their small children if they wish, and everyone thinks they are so great for doing that. Why can't the poor? What is wrong with a poor woman getting a modest paycheck for caring for her own children?
Then there is the Telecommunications Act - - another bill that Bill should have sent back to Congress. It has resulted in corporate control and consolidation in all aspects of our communication sector. It's horrible.
So I have good reasons for supporting Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. I am very unhappy with the thought of Hillary Clinton in the White House. My unhappiness is not based on some personal hatred of Hillary. Far from it. My unhappiness is based on the policies of the Clinton administration and flaws that I perceive, weaknesses, in Hillary Clinton's handling of decision-making and dealing with people.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)"retired justice John Paul Stevens told her the only way he thought real(campaign finance) reform could happen would be through a constitutional amendment". It seems like the SC overturning Citizens United would be a good start and more likely than a constitutional amendment coming anytime soon.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)yellowcanine
(35,701 posts)And shame on us if we let people forget it.
calimary
(81,459 posts)yellowcanine
(35,701 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Good article!
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)spanone
(135,873 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I was afraid this was going to be about TPP before I clicked on the link. Phew
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Can't wait to see her actual policy papers.
rurallib
(62,448 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Seriously, the problems of
Climate Change and Campaign Cash
run straight through her donor base
Wall Street, Hillary, Wall Street!
The same people who "Stacked The Deck".
Does she think we are stupid?
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Just thought I would let the Hillary Haters know.
Oh yeah, he left office with
a budget surplus after 22 million
jobs were created.
I will take a Clinton Re-Run any day of the week.
I would personally prefer Bernie, but he is
a "Socialist" and the would disqualify him in
the minds of 75% of voters, because of
Castro, and Stalin, and Mao and stuff.
How about a Clinton/Sanders ticket?
Would probably take all 50 states.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Name calling?
It seems you are being rude,
disruptive and intentionally hurtful?
-post #20 by Yallow
As you responded to my post,
is that comment directed at me?
If so, you may want to reconsider your post.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Is Bill running again????
No.
You do realize Hillary and Bill are two different people....right?
Maybe not. This is only one problem with Hillary, and dynasties running for president.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)and then he cut them http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2665533
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)My version of an ideal situation based on the current political climate.
H. Clinton as President
B. Sanders as VP
E Warren as Majority Leader in the Senate
C. Rangel as Majority leader in the House.
Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center as Attorney General.
Dream postings
E. Snowden as Director of the NSA
J Boehner to third bar stool from the door at Frankie's Duck On Inn; West Chester Ohio.
Scott Walker In Witness Protection Program; Whereabouts unknown
Any help?
ismnotwasm
(42,008 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Attacking Obama for lack of purity on a poorly understood international trade agreement is so short sighted as to be blind....unions have always been against trade agreements....Obama is again correct.
The truth is an equal opportunity illuminator and the light hurts no matter that it shines on the right or the left.
Republicans will drive a wedge into any discord and put TNT in the crack - using billions of their newly spendable dollars and purchased media - to widen any division in the Democratic Party, we all know it and need to think about it some more.
Debate the nominee with respect and please put away the Purity Police whistle.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Either that or let some Republican goofball muck up the country more than it already is.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)calimary
(81,459 posts)"Debate, not vilify."
kpete
(72,014 posts)should be our mantra
here at DU
peace,
kp
DownriverDem
(6,231 posts)All you negative folks regarding Hillary: Please keep your eyes on the prize. Yes, it's about the White House, but even more it's about the House, Senate and Supreme Court. Repubs know this to be true and look at the Supremes we are stuck with. I will proudly cast my vote for Hillary. Check her out. Go back to the Watergate Hearings when she was a young lawyer and move forward from there. Yes there needs to be more Dems running (Warren isn't running) . It would make Hillary a better candidate for the general election if she has primary opponents.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)and how we'll begin to change the course of the behemoth that is the Democratic Party toward the Left and Social Justice as it relates to our Nation.
jalan48
(13,883 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)The same ones destroying our democracy & civil liberties. Once in, they provide blanket immunity in their name for the actions undertaken for them.
In for a penny, in for a pound.
3catwoman3
(24,041 posts)...wondering that already. Someday is now.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...but goddamn if that's not an otherwise great message.
I am very much afraid that Stevens is right, and that the corruption of the highest court means an amendment is our only way out.
treestar
(82,383 posts)with the TPP which will of course force us to raise the allowable emissions?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I would expect NO LESS from ANY Democrat,
but it seems disingenuous when observed with the list of Hillary's Top Donors:
Its EASY to just say the words.