Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Atman

(31,464 posts) Mon May 7, 2012, 05:35 PM May 2012

2

This was apparently no ordinary underwear bomb!

It was much more sophisticated. It was crotchless, allowing for the full force of the intended explosion to burst forth, unimpeded by lace and an absorbent cotton panel. And it apparently had a thin reinforced waistband for extra confidence.

It's amazing the bullshit you'll hear when you watch cable news.

.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This was apparently no ordinary underwear bomb! (Original Post) Atman May 2012 OP

But did it have a sewn in label or a printed label for comfort? Liberal Veteran May 2012 #1

Wow, I can't wait until Doocy, Kilmeade and Carlson give us an in-depth analysis tomorrow morning. tanyev May 2012 #2

Victoria's Secret has crossed the line this time...n/t monmouth May 2012 #3

New meaning to hot underwear. mmonk May 2012 #4

LOL! ... spin May 2012 #5

Can't wait for the TSA underwear inspections longship May 2012 #6

Liberal Veteran

(22,239 posts)

1. But did it have a sewn in label or a printed label for comfort?

Reply to Atman (Original post)

Mon May 7, 2012, 05:37 PM

May 2012

Out with it! These are very important questions!

tanyev

(42,552 posts)

2. Wow, I can't wait until Doocy, Kilmeade and Carlson give us an in-depth analysis tomorrow morning.

Reply to Atman (Original post)

Mon May 7, 2012, 05:37 PM

May 2012

monmouth

(21,078 posts)

3. Victoria's Secret has crossed the line this time...n/t

Reply to Atman (Original post)

Mon May 7, 2012, 05:39 PM

May 2012

mmonk

(52,589 posts)

4. New meaning to hot underwear.

Reply to monmouth (Reply #3)

Mon May 7, 2012, 05:54 PM

May 2012

They're a blast.

spin

(17,493 posts)

5. LOL! ...

Reply to mmonk (Reply #4)

Mon May 7, 2012, 06:06 PM

May 2012

I needed a laugh today.

longship

(40,416 posts)

6. Can't wait for the TSA underwear inspections

Reply to Atman (Original post)

Mon May 7, 2012, 06:52 PM

May 2012

Women are really going to go for that!

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This was apparently no or...