General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSherrod Brown has 88 amendments for this week's fast-track bill
The same number of counties in his state of Ohio: 88
He's doing this because as it stands now, TPA fast-track which sets the standard for future trade deals including the TPP & TTIP, sucks.
4/20/15
...At stake this week is a new bill to grant trade promotion authority, or TPP, to President Barack Obama and his successor, regardless of political party. TPP is better known as fast-track authority, because it gives a president the authority to implement trade agreements with other nations without interference from Congress. The last fast-track bill expired in 2007.
The latest bill lays out a series of objectives and protections that Congress wants to see in any new trade deal, particularly the big one that Obama wants to wrap up soon, the Trans-Pacific Partnership. If Congress decided that this or future deals did not address its objectives, it could block or change the new trade treaty as long as 60 senators agreed.
But a number of senators, and especially Brown, want to make sure the objectives are clear and enforceable.
Some of Brown's amendments would:
* Close an existing loophole that allows countries that use forced or child labor to export their products to the United States.
* Increase training and financial aid to workers who lost their jobs due to foreign trade. Brown wants $575 million a year, a level in force temporarily during the height of the recession.
* Make the president notify Congress when a trade agreement is about to go into force and allow Congress to review it. There can be a lag between the signing of a trade deal and its implementation, and Brown says he wants Congress to be able to see if anything has changed.
* Make the administration provide detailed annual reports, with data for each state, showing the effect of imports.
Although import data is now available from the Commerce Department, it is not always easily digestible, and critics say that like any data, it is open to statistical manipulation.
A recent example of this was seen when Democratic lawmakers including U.S. Reps. Marcy Kaptur of Toledo and Tim Ryan of Niles accused U. S. Trade Representative Michael Froman's office of playing games with the data. Froman's office said its statistics were accurate and that Congress members were trying to "cook the books."
Brown also has amendments addressing worker safety standards, environmental standards and currency manipulation. Countries with weak safety standards can produce goods more cheaply because they don't spend money protecting their workers from harm or they operate sweatshops of the kind the United States outlawed long ago. The same goes for countries that don't make their factories adhere to environmental standards.....
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/04/with_corporate_and_labor_interests_watching_sherrod_brown_has_88_amendments_for_this_weeks_foreign-trade_deal.html
So yes, plenty of people have read the TPA, including Senator Brown, and it is seriously lacking.
Since this has now passed the house, we need to hope at least some of Sen Brown's amendments will pass before the rethug majority senate passes this TPA fast track bill.
cali
(114,904 posts)jen63
(813 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)jen63
(813 posts)Portman is Ohio's other Senator. He's running against Ted Strickland and we have to make sure we beat that SOB!!
Strat54
(58 posts)YES WE DO need to get rid of Portman here in Ohio!!!
I've had 2 upclose encounters with Rob Portman. One non-confrontational. One as an adversary (protestor). I can honestly say that Rob Portman has an amazing ability to absolutely not give a F@#$ unless you agree with him 100% or you are handing him a campaign contribution. He's a career grifter. Politics is a means to an end. When it's over for him, he will slither back into the lobbying world and make 10s of $Millions.
jen63
(813 posts)I especially loved him walking back his opinion on homosexuality, once his son came out.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 25, 2015, 09:32 AM - Edit history (1)
How does that protect us from a Republican Congress?
If true, the protection is in name only.
We would very rarely, if ever, get 60 Senators to stop a trade agreement even if it's horrible (and unfortunately even if the Democrats had control of Congress; unless it was a HUGE Democratic majority - HUGE).
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)We're being screwed so that corporations & their execs, who happen to pay for campaigns, can send more of our jobs to even more low-wage/slave-wage countries to increase their profits.
Representative Democracy is in name only. If nothing else, this proves it.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Fighting against corporate money and the GodOffalParty will be very difficult.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Over & over.
He along with the other progressives in congress. I'm so glad they do though! But as an outsider looking in, its getting extraordinarily difficult just to witness this. So devastatingly discouraging. I can't imagine the frustration level on the front line in DC.
paleotn
(17,912 posts)....at least some in the Democratic party haven't sold their souls.
Overseas
(12,121 posts)I am glad that he is challenging parts of the agreement that we have learned about.
riqster
(13,986 posts)The party needs more Sherrod Browns, and fewer Chris Redferns.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)addressing TPP thru TPA. If so can we assume these amendments are about factual issues in the TPP that otherwise he would be banned from revealing?
If this is a legal way to reveal toxic ingredients of TPP thru amendments, why aren't there thousands of amendments from other Populist Senators concerning the devilish details?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)http://thehill.com/policy/finance/trade/239899-dems-rival-trade-plan-quashed
Can't believe its Democrats ag the Rethugs & our Democratic President. Again.
An exact repeat of NAFTA passing with a rethug congress and a "centrist" "Democrat" Clinton.
Can anyone really question now that republican economic policies & positions have infiltrated our Democratic Party now, via the false label of "centrism"?
And now we're ushering in not only another "centrist" but another Clinton.
It boggles the mind!!!
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)But no, both parties hold on with dear life to Trickle Down because they get rich off of it.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)The GOP can't win with out Ohio, and Brown would make a fine President
himself.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)To avoid clowning behavior like this that would derail the process
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)agree. The only thing he might accomplish with this is getting re-elected. If that is the case it might be worth it.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)not get my vote come election time. Something tells me Cantwell will vote for it.