Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 08:42 AM Apr 2015

Sherrod Brown has 88 amendments for this week's fast-track bill

The same number of counties in his state of Ohio: 88

He's doing this because as it stands now, TPA fast-track which sets the standard for future trade deals including the TPP & TTIP, sucks.

With corporate and labor interests watching, Sherrod Brown has 88 amendments for this week's foreign-trade deal
4/20/15



...At stake this week is a new bill to grant trade promotion authority, or TPP, to President Barack Obama and his successor, regardless of political party. TPP is better known as fast-track authority, because it gives a president the authority to implement trade agreements with other nations without interference from Congress. The last fast-track bill expired in 2007.

The latest bill lays out a series of objectives and protections that Congress wants to see in any new trade deal, particularly the big one that Obama wants to wrap up soon, the Trans-Pacific Partnership. If Congress decided that this or future deals did not address its objectives, it could block or change the new trade treaty as long as 60 senators agreed.

But a number of senators, and especially Brown, want to make sure the objectives are clear and enforceable.

Some of Brown's amendments would:

* Close an existing loophole that allows countries that use forced or child labor to export their products to the United States.

* Increase training and financial aid to workers who lost their jobs due to foreign trade. Brown wants $575 million a year, a level in force temporarily during the height of the recession.

* Make the president notify Congress when a trade agreement is about to go into force and allow Congress to review it. There can be a lag between the signing of a trade deal and its implementation, and Brown says he wants Congress to be able to see if anything has changed.

* Make the administration provide detailed annual reports, with data for each state, showing the effect of imports.

Although import data is now available from the Commerce Department, it is not always easily digestible, and critics say that like any data, it is open to statistical manipulation.

A recent example of this was seen when Democratic lawmakers including U.S. Reps. Marcy Kaptur of Toledo and Tim Ryan of Niles accused U. S. Trade Representative Michael Froman's office of playing games with the data. Froman's office said its statistics were accurate and that Congress members were trying to "cook the books."

Brown also has amendments addressing worker safety standards, environmental standards and currency manipulation. Countries with weak safety standards can produce goods more cheaply because they don't spend money protecting their workers from harm or they operate sweatshops of the kind the United States outlawed long ago. The same goes for countries that don't make their factories adhere to environmental standards.....

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/04/with_corporate_and_labor_interests_watching_sherrod_brown_has_88_amendments_for_this_weeks_foreign-trade_deal.html


So yes, plenty of people have read the TPA, including Senator Brown, and it is seriously lacking.

Since this has now passed the house, we need to hope at least some of Sen Brown's amendments will pass before the rethug majority senate passes this TPA fast track bill.




24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sherrod Brown has 88 amendments for this week's fast-track bill (Original Post) RiverLover Apr 2015 OP
Bravo, Senator Brown cali Apr 2015 #1
Love my Senator! n/t jen63 Apr 2015 #4
I like your Senator too, and I like both of mine: Sanders and Leahy cali Apr 2015 #9
I wish I liked both of mine! jen63 Apr 2015 #17
YES WE DO need to get rid of Portman here in Ohio!!! Strat54 Apr 2015 #18
You've got that right! jen63 Apr 2015 #20
K&R 99Forever Apr 2015 #2
It would take 60 Senators to block or change the treaty? Not 41 to filibuster? stillwaiting Apr 2015 #3
Everything is "in name only" lately. RiverLover Apr 2015 #6
Representative Democracy is in name only. Truth. PowerToThePeople Apr 2015 #14
Thanks, Sherrod Brown Thespian2 Apr 2015 #5
I don't know how he can stomach dealing w/ the outright corruption. Big$$$ trumping US citizens. RiverLover Apr 2015 #8
Thank, Senator Brown..... paleotn Apr 2015 #7
K&R. Yes please! Overseas Apr 2015 #10
Proof that some Ohio Dems rock. riqster Apr 2015 #11
Are his amendments aspirant Apr 2015 #12
Sandy Levin(D-MI) tried, & failed, in the House to make changes to GOP-backed TPA RiverLover Apr 2015 #16
You would think thirty years of bad results would disprove Trickle Down Economics by now. liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #24
The fast track is a ride to the bottom...nt Jesus Malverde Apr 2015 #13
Sherrod Brown is my pick for Hillary's VP: He could give us Ohio! lewebley3 Apr 2015 #15
He doesn't have the votes. CK_John Apr 2015 #19
Ironically this points out exactly why fast track is preferred for multi party agreements Egnever Apr 2015 #21
Exactly, it's political grandstanding. His amedments mean nothing unless the other 12 countries okaawhatever Apr 2015 #23
what a horrible, horrible, bill. I want to know exactly who is voting for the TPP because they will liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #22

jen63

(813 posts)
17. I wish I liked both of mine!
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 10:57 AM
Apr 2015

Portman is Ohio's other Senator. He's running against Ted Strickland and we have to make sure we beat that SOB!!

 

Strat54

(58 posts)
18. YES WE DO need to get rid of Portman here in Ohio!!!
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 11:27 AM
Apr 2015

YES WE DO need to get rid of Portman here in Ohio!!!

I've had 2 upclose encounters with Rob Portman. One non-confrontational. One as an adversary (protestor). I can honestly say that Rob Portman has an amazing ability to absolutely not give a F@#$ unless you agree with him 100% or you are handing him a campaign contribution. He's a career grifter. Politics is a means to an end. When it's over for him, he will slither back into the lobbying world and make 10s of $Millions.

jen63

(813 posts)
20. You've got that right!
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 11:33 AM
Apr 2015

I especially loved him walking back his opinion on homosexuality, once his son came out.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
3. It would take 60 Senators to block or change the treaty? Not 41 to filibuster?
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 08:55 AM
Apr 2015

Last edited Sat Apr 25, 2015, 09:32 AM - Edit history (1)

How does that protect us from a Republican Congress?

If true, the protection is in name only.

We would very rarely, if ever, get 60 Senators to stop a trade agreement even if it's horrible (and unfortunately even if the Democrats had control of Congress; unless it was a HUGE Democratic majority - HUGE).

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
6. Everything is "in name only" lately.
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 10:06 AM
Apr 2015

We're being screwed so that corporations & their execs, who happen to pay for campaigns, can send more of our jobs to even more low-wage/slave-wage countries to increase their profits.

Representative Democracy is in name only. If nothing else, this proves it.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
8. I don't know how he can stomach dealing w/ the outright corruption. Big$$$ trumping US citizens.
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 10:12 AM
Apr 2015

Over & over.

He along with the other progressives in congress. I'm so glad they do though! But as an outsider looking in, its getting extraordinarily difficult just to witness this. So devastatingly discouraging. I can't imagine the frustration level on the front line in DC.

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
12. Are his amendments
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 10:33 AM
Apr 2015

addressing TPP thru TPA. If so can we assume these amendments are about factual issues in the TPP that otherwise he would be banned from revealing?

If this is a legal way to reveal toxic ingredients of TPP thru amendments, why aren't there thousands of amendments from other Populist Senators concerning the devilish details?

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
16. Sandy Levin(D-MI) tried, & failed, in the House to make changes to GOP-backed TPA
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 10:53 AM
Apr 2015
Dem’s rival trade plan quashed
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/trade/239899-dems-rival-trade-plan-quashed

Can't believe its Democrats ag the Rethugs & our Democratic President. Again.

An exact repeat of NAFTA passing with a rethug congress and a "centrist" "Democrat" Clinton.

Can anyone really question now that republican economic policies & positions have infiltrated our Democratic Party now, via the false label of "centrism"?

And now we're ushering in not only another "centrist" but another Clinton.

It boggles the mind!!!

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
24. You would think thirty years of bad results would disprove Trickle Down Economics by now.
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 12:06 PM
Apr 2015

But no, both parties hold on with dear life to Trickle Down because they get rich off of it.

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
15. Sherrod Brown is my pick for Hillary's VP: He could give us Ohio!
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 10:44 AM
Apr 2015


The GOP can't win with out Ohio, and Brown would make a fine President
himself.
 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
21. Ironically this points out exactly why fast track is preferred for multi party agreements
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 11:43 AM
Apr 2015

To avoid clowning behavior like this that would derail the process

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
23. Exactly, it's political grandstanding. His amedments mean nothing unless the other 12 countries
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 12:05 PM
Apr 2015

agree. The only thing he might accomplish with this is getting re-elected. If that is the case it might be worth it.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
22. what a horrible, horrible, bill. I want to know exactly who is voting for the TPP because they will
Sat Apr 25, 2015, 12:05 PM
Apr 2015

not get my vote come election time. Something tells me Cantwell will vote for it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sherrod Brown has 88 amen...