General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCapitalism is a Sickness
What do call someone that will destroy their own environment, the very ground they stand on, pollute the water they drink, genetically alter their own food supply with unknown consequences, flood society with deadly weaponry, work to eliminate health care for millions, and then finance a massive campaign to deny any of it is actually happening because admitting so would impact the incomes of the richest 1%? Maybe it should simply be called genocide by social construct? In this country we just call it Capitalism.
former9thward
(32,003 posts)and East Europe. Capitalism is not perfect but is the best way of creating wealth for the most amount of people.
Joe Nation
(962 posts)Capitalism as practiced after WWII was great for creating a large prosperous middle class but since Reaganomics, capitalism is pretty much just a system to enrich the wealthy.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Denmark, Finland, Netherlands countries which probably have the best living standards in the world..
China and Russia have turned into Capitalistic States on Steroids.. In other words Oligarchies ..
Need to catch up on current state of affairs in the world..
http://blog.peerform.com/top-ten-most-socialist-countries-in-the-world/
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Denmark, Finland, Netherlands countries which probably have the best living standards in the world..
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)by High Taxes... Certainly most Capitalistic Countries want little to do with Higher Taxes.. Its an every man for himself mentality..
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)My point is that most successful economies are market based.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)are the driving force behind sound market based economies..
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The goal is to use the profits generated by markets to improve the lives of everybody.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)to our economy.. Corporate Taxes are so low that businesses are now just reaping higher incomes for their own self interests. They now have little motivation to create, just to pile up their earnings.
And thats a fact! Also a fact that our economy presently stinks..
jwirr
(39,215 posts)former9thward
(32,003 posts)All are market based capitalist countries. They have more social welfare programs than the U.S. does. They have been able to afford that largely thanks to the U.S. which defends them. They do not have a huge military budget like we do.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)while we let the Rs call it socialism and try to destroy it.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)drive the sound market based economies...
Take a look at our Market based economy,,, Its on steroids and our economy stinks to high hell.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I mean, I guess Austria is still explicitly socialist (the SPÖ is a member of the SI, for instance). But for the most part they're much more corporate-friendly and market-oriented than a lot of Americans seem to think.
Cayenne
(480 posts)We can't get too caught up in the isms.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)claim if we are talking about the inner cities. The are still waiting for the New Deal to work for them.
Joe Nation
(962 posts)The common features of a psychopath and sociopath lie in their shared diagnosis antisocial personality disorder. The DSM-5 defines antisocial personality as someone have 3 or more of the following traits:
Regularly breaks or flaunts the law
Constantly lies and deceives others
Is impulsive and doesnt plan ahead
Can be prone to fighting and aggressiveness
Has little regard for the safety of others
Irresponsible, cant meet financial obligations
Doesnt feel remorse or guilt
Symptoms start before age 15, so by the time a person is an adult, they are well on their way to becoming a psychopath or sociopath.
Joe Nation
(962 posts)The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry: the incidence of psychopathy among CEOs is about 4 percent, four times what it is in the population at large. I spoke with him recently about what that means and its implications for the business world and wider society.
Are we really to understand that theres some connection between what makes people psychopaths and what makes them CEO material?
At first I was really skeptical because it seemed like an easy thing to say, almost like a conspiracy theorists type of thing to say. I remember years and years ago a conspiracy theorist telling me the world was ruled by blood-drinking, baby-sacrificing lizards. These psychologists were essentially saying the same thing. Basically, when you get them talking, these people [ie. psychopaths] are different than human beings. They lack the things that make you human: empathy, remorse, loving kindness.
So at first I thought this might just be psychologists feeling full of themselves with their big ideological notions. But then I met Al Dunlap. [That would be Chainsaw Al Dunlap, former CEO of Sunbeam and notorious downsizer.] He effortlessly turns the psychopath checklist into Who Moved My Cheese? Many items on the checklist he redefines into a manual of how to do well in capitalism.
There was his reputation that he was a man who seemed to enjoy firing people, not to mention the stories from his first marriage telling his first wife he wanted to know what human flesh tastes like, not going to his parents funerals. Then you realize that because of this dysfunctional capitalistic society we live in those things were positives. He was hailed and given high-powered jobs, and the more ruthlessly his administration behaved, the more his share price shot up.
So you can just go down the list of Fortune 500 CEOs and say, psychopath, psychopath, psychopath
Well, no. Dunlap was an exceptional figure, wasnt he? An extreme figure.
I think my book offers really good evidence that the way that capitalism is structured really is a physical manifestation of the brain anomaly known as psychopathy. However, I woudnt say every Fortune 500 chief is a psychopath. That would turn me into an ideologue and I abhor ideologues.
Is it an either/or thing? It seems to me, thinking about it, that a lot of the traits on the checklist would be be useful in a corporate ladder-climbing situation. So maybe there are a lot of CEOs who simply have some psychopathic tendencies.
It is a spectrum, but theres a cutoff point. If youre going by the Hare checklist [the standard inventory used in law enforcement, devised by leading researcher Robert Hare], where the top score is 40, the average anxiety-ridden business failure like me although the fact that my book just made the Times best sellers list makes it difficult to call myself that would score a 4 or 5. Somebody you have to be wary of would be in early 20s and a really hard core damaged person, a really dangerous psychopath, would score around a 30. In law the cutoff is 29.
There are absolutes in psychopathy and the main absolute is a literal absence of empathy. Its just not there. In higher-scoring psychopaths, what grows in the vacant field where that empathy should be is a joy in manipulating people, a lack of remorse, a lack of guilt. If youve got a little bit of empathy, youre kind of not a psychopath.
So maybe theres a sweet spot? A point on the spectrum somewhere short of full-blown psychopathy thats most conducive to success in business.
Thats possible. Obviously there are items on the checklist you dont want to have if youre a boss. You dont want poor behavioral controls. Itd be better if you dont have promiscuous behavior. Itd be better if you dont have serious behavioral problems in childhood, because that will eventually come out. But you do want lack of empathy, lack of remorse, glibness, superficial charm, manipulativeness. I think the other positive traits for psychopaths in business is need for stimulation, proneness to boredom. You want somebody who cant sit still, whos constantly thinking about how to better things.
A really interesting question is whether psychopathy can be a positive thing. Some psychologists would say yes, that there are certain attributes like coolness under pressure, which is sort of a fundamental positive. But Robert Hare would always say no, that in the absence of empathy, which is the definition in psychology of a psychopath, you will always get malevolence.
Basically, high-scoring psychopaths can be brilliant bosses but only ever for short term. Just like Al Dunlap, they always want to make a killing and move on.
And then youve got this question of what came first? Is society getting more and more psychopathic in its kind of desire for short-term killings? Is that because we kind of admire psychopaths in all their glib, superficial charm and ruthlessness?
Theres a certain sour grapes aspect to accusing CEOs of being psychopaths. Its very tempting to look at anyone more successful than you are and say, It must be because hes a monster.
Theres a terribly seductive power in becoming a psychopath stalker. It can really dehumanize you. I can look at, say, Dominique Strauss Kahn, who, if one assumes that what one is hearing about him is true, certainly he hits a huge amount of items on the checklist the $30,000 suits, the poor behavioral controls, the impulsivity, the promiscuous sexual behavior. But of course when you say this youre in terrible danger of being seduced by the checklist, which I really like to add as a caveat. It kind of turns you into a bit of a psychopath yourself in that that you start to shove people into that box. It robs you of empathy and your connection to human beings.
Which is why people like Robert Hare are kind of useful. Im against the way that people like me can be seduced into misusing the checklist, but Im not against the checklist.
marmar
(77,080 posts)"US capitalism is fundamentally flawed, and has a strong tendency toward stagnation. Left to its own devises, without exogenous factors, the private economy cannot generate sufficient jobs and incomes for full employment. That means low growth rates, rising poverty and growing inequality. Due to popular pressure, government politics can arrest these tendencies, with public works programs, progressive taxation, support for unions and the like. Capitalists generally oppose these measures as an impingement on their prerogatives and their control over the economy. Even in Scandinavia, where working-class victories created a much-admired social democracy (unless you are a FOX News fan), capitalists lie in wait always keen to reverse the victories and turn back the clock. In the United States, military spending became the one form of government stimulus spending that faced no serious opposition from capitalists coming out of World War II, and instead it created an army of corporate supporters: Eisenhower's military-industrial complex. Militarism is now so hard-wired into really existing capitalism in the United States that the call to reduce it to a level approaching sanity becomes a demand to rethink the entire structure of the economy."
Joe Nation
(962 posts)Try and close a military base in some congressman's district and they can't stop whining. We are becoming the bullies of the world with empire desires that would have made any 20th century dictator envious. Now, if corporations can successfully dumb down the population to nothing more than a herd of ignorant soldiers that will willingly fight wars of choice at great profit, how are we any different than those 20th century dictators?
Rolando
(88 posts)The federal government virtually supports the State of Arizona, largely through military connections--bases and contractors. Much of the military is outmoded, and contracts are out for things we don't need. The money and the space could be put to better use. What if we shut down the Goldwater Bombing Range (east of the Colorado River) and turned it into a windmill and solar panel farm? We could use the government contractors to build energy collectors and hire local people to manufacture them. We would not be blowing money up.
Joe Nation
(962 posts)Orioles' COO John Angelos, the son of owner Peter Angelos, then took to his own Twitter to deliver a powerful statement about the situation in Baltimore, USA Today reports.
"The innocent working families of all backgrounds whose lives and dreams have been cut short by excessive violence, surveillance and other abuses of the Bill of Rights by government pay the true price, and ultimate price, one that far exceeds the importance of any kids' game played tonight, or ever, at Camden Yards," Angelos wrote. "We need to keep in mind people are suffering and dying around the U.S., and while we are thankful no one was injured at Camden Yards, there is a far bigger picture for poor Americans in Baltimore and everywhere who don't have jobs and are losing economic, civil and legal rights, and this makes inconvenience at a ballgame irrelevant in light of the needless suffering government is inflicting upon ordinary Americans."
adding...
"My greater source of personal concern, outrage and sympathy beyond this particular case is focused neither upon one nights property damage nor upon the acts," Angelos wrote, "but is focused rather upon the past four-decade period during which an American political elite have shipped middle-class and working-class jobs away from Baltimore and cities and towns around the U.S. to third-world dictatorships like China and others, plunged tens of millions of good, hard-working Americans into economic devastation, and then followed that action around the nation by diminishing every American's civil rights protections in order to control an unfairly impoverished population living under an ever-declining standard of living and suffering at the butt end of an ever-more militarized and aggressive surveillance state."
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/sports/news/orioles-exec-delivers-powerful-statement-on-baltimore-riots-20150428#ixzz3YiWfij2M
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Joe Nation
(962 posts)Like I already said, it is not a choice simply between Capitalism and Socialism. That assumption is just black and white thinking. How about something like a social democracy with aspects of both Capitalism and Socialism?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'd say even that is a problematic definition. It's how I'd describe the US, Norway, and India (though India is still much more of a command economy than either the US or Norway).
Joe Nation
(962 posts)Many people think Capitalism and Socialism are the only 2 choices even though blended hybrids that encompass aspects of both economic systems abound. I have nothing against Capitalism or even Socialism but either taken to the extreme are equally dangerous to freedom and the growth of the middle class.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Including its entire sovereign wealth fund.
Granted, they tax a petro powered vehicle highly and subsidize electrics with that same money, but they find all of this with massive offshore drilling sending that oil all over to be burned.
They pretend to be noble and green while ignoring they fund all of it with oil...
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Are Market Based...driven by high taxes, which leads to higher living standards, which means a vibrant middle class which is walking around with more money in their pockets.. Good for business!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Honestly for all the problems with a VAT I can't argue with how Europe has handled it.
Joe Nation
(962 posts)I think we are seeing the extremes Capitalism can reach. The louder they scream about Socialism the tighter the Oligarchy wraps their hands around our throats. Socialism is their boogieman and by all economic indicators you simply can't conclude that Socialism is even a factor in this country. I would hate to live under a total Socialist model but Socialism emphasizes the role of the worker in society and we are sorely lacking consideration of that sector of society at this point.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Joe Nation
(962 posts)Greed is part and parcel of the same illness that Capitalism breeds. What is it that makes people that already have enough money want to destroy people, the planet, and anything else that they see as an impediment to gaining more money? It is a sickness that affects people than can never reach an endpoint to their own greed. It goes long past the point of having enough to survive. It is a sickness that continues to feed on itself when there is no rational reason to continue. Some praise the greed the see in others while others recognize it as the human abnormality it represents. If we even try to convince ourselves that we are in fact a Christian nation, we literally have to ignore everything Jesus taught. Wealth, and especially extreme wealth couldn't be more contrary to what Jesus taught. Not only were we never a Christian nation, we have even less reasons to pretend that we are today given the vast economic disparity that we see all across the country.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)pollute the water they drink, genetically alter their own food supply with unknown consequences"
I know: YEAST!
What did I win?
Joe Nation
(962 posts)of removing the "S" and the "g" from your name.
ananda
(28,859 posts)This includes capitalist oppressors.