Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 05:34 PM Apr 2015

The most racist places in America, according to Google

&w=1484

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/04/28/the-most-racist-places-in-america-according-to-google/?postshare=7781430242128505?link=mktw

Where do America's most racist people live? "The rural Northeast and South," suggests a new study just published in PLOS ONE.

The paper introduces a novel but makes-tons-of-sense-when-you-think-about-it method for measuring the incidence of racist attitudes: Google search data. The methodology comes from data scientist Seth Stephens-Davidowitz. He's used it before to measure the effect of racist attitudes on Barack Obama's electoral prospects.

[Data suggest Republicans have a race problem]

"Google data, evidence suggests, are unlikely to suffer from major social censoring," Stephens-Davidowitz wrote in a previous paper. "Google searchers are online and likely alone, both of which make it easier to express socially taboo thoughts. Individuals, indeed, note that they are unusually forthcoming with Google." He also notes that the Google measure correlates strongly with other standard measures social science researchers have used to study racist attitudes.

This is important, because racism is a notoriously tricky thing to measure. Traditional survey methods don't really work -- if you flat-out ask someone if they're racist, they will simply tell you no. That's partly because most racism in society today operates at the subconscious level, or gets vented anonymously online.

For the PLOS ONE paper, researchers looked at searches containing the N-word. People search frequently for it, roughly as often as searches for "migraine(s)," "economist," "sweater," "Daily Show," and "Lakers." (The authors attempted to control for variants of the N-word not necessarily intended as pejoratives, excluding the "a" version of the word that analysis revealed was often used "in different contexts compared to searches of the term ending in '-er'.&quot

...................................clip
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The most racist places in America, according to Google (Original Post) ErikJ Apr 2015 OP
By odd coincidence... Xipe Totec Apr 2015 #1
can you explain what you think you're seeing? Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #5
I think that what I see is that racism is more prevalent in areas where there is a mixed population Xipe Totec Apr 2015 #7
I agree with that in some ways, with important exceptions. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #11
True. It does not coincide, it parallels. Xipe Totec Apr 2015 #12
Much of the dark blue is "out of sight, out of mind" 1939 Apr 2015 #14
my place, more than average. no surprise. nt seabeyond Apr 2015 #2
Link not working we can do it Apr 2015 #3
Fixed ErikJ Apr 2015 #4
Thank you, want to pass it on. we can do it Apr 2015 #18
Why would anyone be searching on the n-word? Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2015 #6
Maybe they don't know how to spell "Stormfront" or "Klan." hifiguy Apr 2015 #8
"Why are n*****s so damn lazy?" Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #9
I'm always reminded of a Gandi quote that states the following Hutzpa Apr 2015 #10
Highly skeptical. JaneyVee Apr 2015 #13
Cue the North Easterners B2G Apr 2015 #15
Seems to be a large northeast component... n/t cherokeeprogressive Apr 2015 #16
the guy who wanted to make an all white town in ND treestar Apr 2015 #17

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
7. I think that what I see is that racism is more prevalent in areas where there is a mixed population
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 05:58 PM
Apr 2015

It skews the numbers when areas that are predominantly white claim not to be racist, when in reality they've never had any experience in a mixed race population. Their attitudes are hypothetical, not actual.

ETA:

For example, according to the map, Texas is not racist.

I find that hard to believe based on personal experience.


 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
11. I agree with that in some ways, with important exceptions.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 06:15 PM
Apr 2015

The western edge of Louisiana, spilling over into east Texas, is nasty for the racism thing, and the minority concentration is highish. But, the highest densities of minority population in the South (running along the Mississippi River and the heart of Appalachia) are orange in their racism rating, not red. The very worst strip of red (racism) runs through Ohio, Pennsylvania, NY, and southern New Jersey does not coincide with the highest density of minorities.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
12. True. It does not coincide, it parallels.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 07:42 PM
Apr 2015

If the mixed race population is high enough, racism drops.

Perhaps.

There is hope in that.

1939

(1,683 posts)
14. Much of the dark blue is "out of sight, out of mind"
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:14 PM
Apr 2015

A lot of the dark red is not in areas where black percentages of the population are high.

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
10. I'm always reminded of a Gandi quote that states the following
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 06:06 PM
Apr 2015

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, and then you win"

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
15. Cue the North Easterners
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:20 PM
Apr 2015

Explaining why this is wrong because the south is so fucked up.

Lol.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The most racist places in...