Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
1. If that's the most important issue, I'll never convince you, so I won't try...
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:24 AM
Apr 2015

...Suffice to say that was 14 years ago, she's acknowledged her mistake, people had an opportunity to consider this in 2008, and it dind't have an impact in the campaign.

Additionally, Bernie Sander's better policies are irrelevant if a Republican gets elected instead.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
2. Why do you think she embraced this position? Did she trust Bush? Believe Cheney?
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:35 AM
Apr 2015

Was there some other reason that she didn't see the truth that millions of everyday Americans saw and understood?

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
7. I believe she, like most Democrats, believed there was a risk based on the information provided...
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:44 AM
Apr 2015

...and that she, like most Democrats, though Bush would be far more responsible in applying the authority he was granted.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
9. By "most Democrats" you must mean those in Congress.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:46 AM
Apr 2015

Most of us back home saw through the lies and knew not to trust the man who stole the Presidency.

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
11. No, most of you didn't...
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:53 AM
Apr 2015

A significant majority of the population at the time believe military action was the right thing to do:


http://www.pewresearch.org/2008/03/19/public-attitudes-toward-the-war-in-iraq-20032008/

I sure the Democratic percentage was lower, but the fact that you and people you know were opposed is not reflective of national opinion.

And in any event, it's irrelevant to the immediate question: do voters TODAY see the policy difference between Sanders and Clinton as relevant. I still contend that the answer is no, just as it wasn't in 2008.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
12. The UN wasn't fooled by the lies. That's what we have leaders for. To make the right
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:55 AM
Apr 2015

Decisions when faced with sending our men & women into war.

Both Kerry & Clinton failed the American people. Thousands died and tens of thousands were severely injured. Over a trillion dollars was spent fighting a preemptive war based on totally fabricated bullshit.

That's no small policy blunder. It was a catastrophic fail that was epic in proportion.

Leaders are suppose to lead. Not follow...

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
13. If you believe that this is a resonant issue today, please feel free to press it...
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 09:57 AM
Apr 2015

...and think the 2008 Primary, where Clinton and Obama got virtually the same number of votes (and for that matter, the 2004 Primary, where Kerry got nominated), addresses how Democrats feel.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
14. Obama opposed the war. Hillary didn't. Obama won. And many were still believing the lies
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 10:08 AM
Apr 2015

at that time. Sometimes it takes time for the truth to resonate and sink in. Years of war propaganda shaped the views of the American public. Now many can see how badly they were lied to.

In 2003 70% of Americans believed Saddam Husain was directly involved with 9/11. How did Americas leaders & free press fail them so badly? Seriously.

So yes, the Iraq war is still very relevant as it should be..

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
15. Obama won and Clinton lost because of tactical choices on states to contest...
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 10:26 AM
Apr 2015

...but their vote counts were almost the same.

"many were still believing the lies" is a convenient excuse, but not supported by the data:



nor by the fact that the 2006 Election was a significant rejection of Bush Administration policies.

Again, feel free to press this issue (I don't think Sanders will): I think you'll end up being disappointed in the results.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
16. The economy is always the top issue. Bernie won't focus on the war vote
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 10:36 AM
Apr 2015

But it will come up. It's a significant part of the whole picture.....

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
10. That, and
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:50 AM
Apr 2015

the fact it was important to have the appearance of a country being united behind the President, re: using force against the Hussein regime.

Don't get me wrong, I admire Bernie for the courage he showed in voicing opposition and sticking to his beliefs.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
3. Does that mean we throw out everything she did while Senator?
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:37 AM
Apr 2015

Because it seems very convenient of you to pick and choose.

brooklynite

(94,517 posts)
6. Not at all...you're entitled to oppose any policy you like.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 08:43 AM
Apr 2015

Just be sure it was an actual policy she had.

Most people seem to have forgotten that she voted against the Bush tax cuts, for example.

I'm just commenting on whether IWR is an issue the average voter will care about today.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic Party candidat...