Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
Sun May 3, 2015, 12:03 AM May 2015

What's this? 30 Years and Bernies' not rich?

He's been in government for 30 years, and unlike others in similar positions, he's not a millionaire? Heck, we have senators who have been in office less time than him who are 10 times richer than when they went in.

What has he been doing all this time if he's not getting rich like the rest of them?

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's this? 30 Years and Bernies' not rich? (Original Post) RobertEarl May 2015 OP
Working for us..... daleanime May 2015 #1
Is that what a socialist does? RobertEarl May 2015 #2
It is obvious, isn't it? RobertEarl May 2015 #4
He is not a socialist. He is a Democratic Socialist who has run as an Indie for many years. merrily May 2015 #17
He is known as a socialist RobertEarl May 2015 #23
No, Senator Sanders is a Democratic Socialist... There is a big difference. TheProgressive May 2015 #25
The media is attempting to smear Bernie by omitting "Democratic". L0oniX May 2015 #27
+1 darkangel218 May 2015 #31
Smear? RobertEarl May 2015 #43
+1 L0oniX May 2015 #44
According to someone here on DU he is the rich guy running for president cui bono May 2015 #3
That must be what is colloquially known as a logic pretzel nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #5
And he only supports white males BrotherIvan May 2015 #21
Someone said he was even a USSR Putin luv'r too. L0oniX May 2015 #30
Oh great BrotherIvan May 2015 #39
Q: "What has he been doing all this time if he's not getting rich like the rest of them?" Jack Rabbit May 2015 #6
+10000! RufusTFirefly May 2015 #7
What a novel concept! arcane1 May 2015 #35
Rejected by Wall Street, MannyGoldstein May 2015 #8
Rejected by Wall Street? Jack Rabbit May 2015 #10
Actually, America might be ready for this.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #20
This is awesome! n/t ms liberty May 2015 #37
LMAO L0oniX May 2015 #32
- Bigredhunk May 2015 #9
No dsc May 2015 #38
Good point! Catherine Vincent May 2015 #11
He's actually working for the people of Vermont onecaliberal May 2015 #12
According to them, putting his name of failed legislation.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #13
Hillary claimed she turned $1000 into $100,000 in cattle futures former9thward May 2015 #14
Yeah, that's it, the WSJ. That's the ticket! merrily May 2015 #16
I think the most money he made, other than his public servant salaries, were from the sales of his merrily May 2015 #15
Rush would call him an "unsuccessful American." n/t Beartracks May 2015 #18
Well, he's clearly doing it wrong. More kowtowing to Wall Street! That's the ticket. AtomicKitten May 2015 #19
More kowtow!! RufusTFirefly May 2015 #24
Ask Cantor, McConnell, DiFi and American Samoa BrotherIvan May 2015 #22
The rich reward their friends. The people mostly ignore theirs. True Blue Door May 2015 #26
Neither is Joe Biden Warpy May 2015 #28
Yes, Joe is another good leader. jwirr May 2015 #41
Bernie... You're not doing it right. n/t cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #29
Apparently he has not learned how to be a capitalistic predator like many other congress critters. L0oniX May 2015 #34
Zactly. n/t cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #36
Must be a clothes horse nt fadedrose May 2015 #33
Being our representative. jwirr May 2015 #40
Hillary pulled herself out of poverty don't you know ?? Nt Logical May 2015 #42
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
2. Is that what a socialist does?
Sun May 3, 2015, 12:17 AM
May 2015

Does a socialist go into government with the idea that he's there, not to get rich, but to do good for the people?

So that's what it means to have a socialist in government. I like it.
Better than the capitalists we have making decisions that make them rich. Eh?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. It is obvious, isn't it?
Sun May 3, 2015, 12:25 AM
May 2015

That what we have now in congress is a bunch of "Anti-socialists".

Yep, that's what they are. They are anti-socialist and they are using government, not for the people's good, duh, but using their office for them and their friends to get rich. Now, I am not saying they also take bribes - but they do.

It's pretty obvious Bernie ain't been taking no bribes!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
17. He is not a socialist. He is a Democratic Socialist who has run as an Indie for many years.
Sun May 3, 2015, 02:46 AM
May 2015

A socialist believes in government or other collective ownership. A Democratic Socialist works within capitalism. Huge difference.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
23. He is known as a socialist
Sun May 3, 2015, 12:58 PM
May 2015

That's why he is such a good employee of the people. He's not in it for the money, he's in it for helping people. Social reasons versus capital reasons.

As for collective ownership.... the best things in the US are collectively owned by the people, the government manages those things for the people. That's why it is important we have socialists like Bernie in government.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
43. Smear?
Mon May 4, 2015, 12:46 AM
May 2015

Why do we let them get away with smearing socialism?

Time we friggin stand up for what we know is right, and socialism is the correct thing to have in government. What we have now is corporates in control and look at the mess we are in.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
3. According to someone here on DU he is the rich guy running for president
Sun May 3, 2015, 12:24 AM
May 2015

and his buddies that he works with are GOP toadies or something. I don't know, it really didn't make any sense, but s/he said that Sanders was the rich candidate, not Hillary so stop lying about Hillary. Waiting for an explanation on that!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
39. Oh great
Sun May 3, 2015, 10:27 PM
May 2015

A Red Scare on DU. Just what we need. At least we're safe from the evil clutches of Scandinavia!

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
8. Rejected by Wall Street,
Sun May 3, 2015, 01:06 AM
May 2015

he's a bitter little man with inferior hair care-habits, who can only dream of big-bucks speeches.

Dream on, Green Mountain Boy! America wants a Wall Street Winner, not a Crabby Commie.

Regards,

TWM

Bigredhunk

(1,349 posts)
9. -
Sun May 3, 2015, 01:09 AM
May 2015

He's not a whore (one of the senators in my state gets big farm subsidy $$ he doesn't need). But don't members of congress make $170,000/year or something? You'd think he'd be a multi-millionaire from that alone (provided I'm not wrong about the figure).

dsc

(52,161 posts)
38. No
Sun May 3, 2015, 10:21 PM
May 2015

He has been in Congress for about 20 years and made an average of about 150k a year. that would be 3 million but he had to live in two places during all that time. On paper he might be if he bought instead of rented in DC but in terms of liquid assets it would be quite unlikely.

onecaliberal

(32,854 posts)
12. He's actually working for the people of Vermont
Sun May 3, 2015, 01:37 AM
May 2015

Actually all of us. Not selling out to corporations or putting his votes up for sale.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
13. According to them, putting his name of failed legislation....
Sun May 3, 2015, 02:00 AM
May 2015

Their idea of being a success is to rubber stamp the stuff Wall Street hands them.

It also pays better.

former9thward

(32,003 posts)
14. Hillary claimed she turned $1000 into $100,000 in cattle futures
Sun May 3, 2015, 02:10 AM
May 2015

by reading the Wall Street Journal. Maybe Sanders should subscribe....

merrily

(45,251 posts)
15. I think the most money he made, other than his public servant salaries, were from the sales of his
Sun May 3, 2015, 02:41 AM
May 2015

filibuster in book form.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
28. Neither is Joe Biden
Sun May 3, 2015, 09:29 PM
May 2015

Congresscritters who serve multiple terms without trying to strike it rich are rare, but we've seen them before.

Harry Truman was a shining example, leaving office no richer (some say poorer) than he was when he entered it.

Congress is where you get all the inside information on investment strategy, a quid pro quo involving friendly voting traded for insider stock tips.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's this? 30 Years and...