They have been actively cutting food stamps and welfare which they seem to regard as mostly black people depending on. So they are arming their bunkers, expecting black people to rise in rebellion now that their dole has been taken away.
Whereas the real story is large segments of this country have been deprived by various forms of economic injustice: especially lack of access to good jobs, but also inequities in education, the justice system, environmental justice, housing policy, etc. But the ECONOMIC injustice is not primarily black: i.e., when you take away welfare, you are hurting white people, asians, hispanics, and native americans - who outnumber the black recipients. However, since all the prejudice and malice about the poverty programs is focused on black recipients and since urban policy has tended to herd them together into ghettos, there is a black identity to the reaction and the resistance.
In short, I think certain elements of American politics half knew what they were doing in setting this situation up. They falsely painted black people as the typical welfare dependent, so poor whites experiences scarcity would want to take that "dole" away. And then once those black people were both "othered" and deprived of their "dole", of course violent retaliation was to be expected. This expectation of violence is also what makes the police tend to start riots by over-reacting to minor protests. The notion that "black people will resent their food stamps being taken away" has been spread on thick.
Meanwhile, don't forget that Obama is actually supposed to lead a black coup via the Jade Helm exercises in Texas or a false flag nuking of Charleston. And we already has Muslim NoGo Zones established all over the country. Why do wingnuts embrace this crap? Part of it is because tax hikes were pushed toward the lower end of the social scale, which made poor white people believe any social program was an incursion of totalitarianism that was out to take from their pocket and give to "lazy black people". Another part of it was seeing images of urban violence on TV where black people had been kettled into large zones of poverty and then harassed by quota-driven police. Whenever someone called for social programs to alleviate the situation, it sounded like more dole coming out of their pockets to pacify an unspoken threat of riots. The current riots are what they've been expecting all along. Because *that's the situation that was set up*.
In my view, at the base of all this is the routine association of welfare with black people. Both Republicans and Democrats do it when it suits their political purposes. This is what sets up the idea of black people as an "othered" group on the dole from "white" taxpayers. And this is what creates the expectation that the "other" is potentially hostile, vengeful, and will retaliate if their dole is taken away. Only educating Americans about how welfare really works and who it really goes to will change this long fostered dynamic.
= new reply since forum marked as read
