General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen President Sanders negotiates a trade deal, should he be given the authority Pres. Obama is
currently asking for?
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Iggo
(47,552 posts)moondust
(19,979 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)It has a six year life span
fredamae
(4,458 posts)okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Should president walker have it?
cali
(114,904 posts)When president walker negotiates a trade agreement should l d he be given it? He will be because the tpa has a 6 year life span.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)I don't think so.
I don't like the idea of decision making in the hands of only one person, no matter how much he/she might be trusted.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Just as Bush was denied the authority
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)process is for.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)That's like pushing for a line-item veto.
A very bad idea to give the president that much power...considering who could be wielding the pen at any time.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I find it amusing how everyone is making Obama the boogieman on this matter. If you don't like it, stop griping at him and start griping at Congress.
He doesn't have the POWER to make this happen--the CONGRESS does.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)same as he is.
MADem
(135,425 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Oh and start working on the state legislatures...they are generally the ones who draw the lines to ensure which party elects representatives to Congress.
While everyone argues about who gets to be President...
MADem
(135,425 posts)They donate to the party, they support it and its candidates, and they are the backbone of the organization.
They VOTE.
You might not like that, but that's life.
Calling people names isn't the way that you win any converts to your cause.
Trying to divide Democrats into "good" ones and "bad" ones is what Chaos Kiddies from Rove-ville do.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)""Fing retarded," Mr. Emanuel scolded the group, according to several participants. He warned them not to alienate lawmakers whose votes would be needed on health care and other top legislative items."
Just fine when it's one of the third-way "Democrats" that's hurling the insults I guess...
MADem
(135,425 posts)He's a STATE governor. He has nothing to do with national politics, and hasn't for some time.
Try to stay on point, anyway. Conflation is tiresome and exposes the weakness in your argument.
Pretty poor attempt at distraction, that.
Yelling at Democrats (and I see you had to drag out your Quickly-Becoming-Meaningless "Third Way" Whine yet AGAIN) isn't the way to bring them to your point of view, you know. Scolding isn't an effective strategy to exhort people to join your team. You just sound nasty and angry and entitled.
Huffing, puffing, name-calling, stomping feet...it just makes people want to get as far away as they can manage.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Sen. Michael Bennet (Colo.) Voted for the TPA bill in the Senate Finance Committee
Sen. Maria Cantwell (Wash.) Voted for the TPA bill in the Senate Finance Committee
Sen. Ben Cardin (Md.) Voted for the TPA bill in the Senate Finance Committee
Sen. Tom Carper (Del.) Voted for the TPA bill in the Senate Finance Committee
Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.) "Murray supports the package of bills that came out of the Finance Committee. She will be working with colleagues on ideas for improving the legislation and managing its path through the floor," said a Murray representative.
Sen. Bill Nelson (Fla.) Voted for the TPA bill in the Senate Finance Committee
Sen. Mark Warner (Va.) Voted for the TPA bill in the Senate Finance Committee
Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.) Wyden, ranking member of the Finance Committee, helped negotiate the fast-track trade deal.
MADem
(135,425 posts)lobby those guys.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)On Sun May 10, 2015, 06:19 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
would help if we didn't have to fight third-way Democrats
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6652313
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Accusation that MADem is a 3rd way is OTT, and out of line. By logic you can assume MADem voted for Warren so I highly doubt he is the problem. This post is pure trolling.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 10, 2015, 06:33 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Strawman
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alerter reads the post entirely different then how I read it.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It doesn't seem over the top, and I don't think MADem should see it as a personal accusation .
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Where does this say that MADem is a third-way Dem.?
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Get grip. Cripes.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This isn't "trolling" - posting something just to get a response. An the poster doesn't accuse MADem of being 3rd way, although I'm not sure that is technically a slur anyway, the poster states that "working on congress" would be easier if not for having to fight 3rd way democrats.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
MADem
(135,425 posts)We know them by their attitudes.
The DNC is a big tent. People who don't like it, well, too bad. They don't get to be "the deciders."
It has been ever thus.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)And if we were talking about the trades of Cobblers, Clothiers, and Machines... it would be one thing...
But THIS deal is trying to pervert the ideas of Patents, Copyrights, and Sovereignty... to name a few.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT TRADE.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)if he had to deal with one.
I think a Boehner/McConnell congress would totally rewrite or just reject any trade agreement that a President Sanders sent to them since it would probably have high labor and environmental standards - things that republicans are not generally too fond of.
That is what congress did to FDR and Truman when the latter submitted the ITO to congress, with its linkage of trade rules and labor standards.