How Republicans have made a science out of white working-class resentment
But let’s not kid ourselves about what the term most commonly means in our current political discourse. When a conservative derides “identity politics” he’s saying that white people are getting the short end of the stick. It’s not an academic critique or even more anodyne call for melting-pot solidarity. It’s racist coding, plain and simple. Even if “identity politics” is open for interpretation, there is no mistaking the meaning of Dog-whistle politics:
Dog-whistle politics is political messaging employing coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has an additional, different or more specific resonance for a targeted subgroup. The phrase is used only as a pejorative, because of the inherently deceptive nature of the practice and because the dog-whistle messages are frequently themselves distasteful, for example by empathising with racist or revolutionary attitudes. The analogy is to a dog whistle, whose high-frequency whistle is heard by dogs but inaudible to humans.
That conservatives use “identity politics” as a dogwhistle is not well understood by the mainstream media. Or, if they do understand it, they ignore it. Here is a perfect example from a story this past Friday in the New York Times about Marco Rubio:
“The identity politics people in the party want a champion who looks like him to mitigate accusations of racism,” said Ben Domenech, a conservative writer. “And the classical conservatives look at him and say, ‘This is somebody who can sell our ideas to the public.’ ”
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/11/how_republicans_have_made_a_science_out_of_white_working_class_resentment/
= new reply since forum marked as read
Again, could you more explicitly articulate what you are trying to say? 
Both Democrats and Republicans relentlessly send this message that there is a class of people "living on welfare" to justify what they are going to "get tough on". And when white people discover that's not the case when they need it...of course there must be "special welfare for black people". So many advocates for the poor work so hard to fight this myth - because the lies result in harm to the weakest and most vulnerable members of society. Not only are the remaining forms of assistance continually cut (food stamps), but recipients are treated with indignity and once they are rendered homeless they are subject to all sorts of physical ills, indignities, and the general hostility of society. Yet the truth can't break through the perpetual barrage of lies told by politicians. It's just in their interest to tell them, or at least hint at them, and they can get away with it.
There is no "special welfare for black people".
Blacks are not even the majority recipients of welfare programs. 
As if racism, sexism, misogyny, homophobia, and contempt for the poor were not structural and systemic in American society, but were rather, some individual moral failing that lower-status whites are more susceptible to (because of "lack of education". 
)
Notice that, in all this attention on people (skin color none-withstanding) with less wealth, power, and status, those whites with more of all of those things are utterly let off the hook in this discussion.
Why aren't we talking about how educated, affluent middle-class whites participate in (and perpetuate) the hierarchies of power and domination in American society?
...
So, in these lefties minds, it’s an equal opportunity duping. Still one cannot help but notice that most of the people on both sides who complain about their fellow citizens being duped by politicians pandering to their narrow concerns have rarely walked in the shoes of those to whom the pols are allegedly pandering. It undoubtedly looks a little different from that perspective.
And,
When the phrase shows up in liberal spaces, it is saying ... "I feel I am getting the short end of the stick."
immigrants.
In Europe the right has been quite successful playing the "us vs them" card. It not only is effective politically but it serves the further right-wing purpose of diverting attention from the 99% against the 1% to "us" workers against "them" workers.
As the world becomes more interconnected, diversity will increase. While liberals are comfortable with diversity and multiculturalism, conservatives prefer to maintain the dominance of one cultural/racial group ("us"
against minorities/immigrants ("them" .
Along with the non-white working and middle classes. The problem is that the whites are blaming all the wrong people for the situation in which they find themselves. And they have been endlessly propagandized to be willfully blind to the people who are actually inflicting their suffering upon them. They have also been given a vast number of scapegoats.
Well said, hifiguy.
