General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBin Laden report 'full of lies,' says former SEAL
Bin Laden report 'full of lies,' says former SEAL
By Ben Kamisar - 05/11/15 04:53 PM EDT
The former Navy SEAL who says he killed Osama bin Laden is slamming a new report that challenges the White Houses account of the mission, calling it garbage.
The story that I read, the part from {Seymour} Hersh, was full of lies, Rob ONeill said on Fox News' "Shepard Smith Reporting."
It took me a long time to read it because I had to put it down I couldnt read the nonsense.
snip//
ONeill specifically criticized Hershs assertion that Pakistani officials were part of the mission to kill the al Qaeda leader and that there was no resistance.
"Well Im sure that my friends who got shot at and almost took a few bullets to the face through the doors would disagree with them there and be insulted," O'Neill said.
I saw Osama bin Laden standing on two feet, there was no ISI up there. I shot him in the head twice and then I shot him again in the face while he was on the ground.
more...
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/241661-bin-laden-report-full-of-lies-says-former-navy-seal
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)It reminds me of Pierre Salinger's last years.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)said something like "I wish him well". I think Hersh may be getting a little tin foilish.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)For some reason he seems proud of this.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)And it's not like Osama bin Ladin was an innocent bystander.
Bryant
samsingh
(17,595 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Yikes!
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)samsingh
(17,595 posts)Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)Osama bin Laden was no choir boy.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Why not gut him with a deer knife and play jump rope with his intestines?
Better yet, find his children and shoot them because, you know, Bin Laden.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)and attack him to eat his brains.
Or what passes for brains.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)davekriss
(4,616 posts)"You gotta destroy the brains!"
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)davekriss
(4,616 posts)Picky, picky!
Just prior to that a newscaster announces:
The survival command center
at the Pentagon
has disclosed
that a ghoul can be killed
by a shot in the head
or a heavy blow to the skull.
Officials are quoted as explaining
that since the brain of a ghoul has
been activated by the radiation,
the plan is, kill the brain
and you kill the ghoul.
http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=night-of-the-living-dead
In any case, we're being too ghoulish over this! I'll stop now...
babylonsister
(171,059 posts)He was a really bad man who had been hunted for years. I'm glad he's out of here.
samsingh
(17,595 posts)who were brutully murdered by bin laden - the horrible monster.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)SMH
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Official details but I like to give the story to prove its self true or false. It sounded a far fetched tail and I know the SEALs are not supposed to give the details.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)I have my doubts about the Hersh account too, but these objections sound more than a bit self serving, coming as they do from somebody who doesn't seem to have a lot of credibility on the matter himself.
Not near as macho to go in there with a shitload of Pakistani troops and shoot somebody who isn't armed. That wouldn't make much of a movie script.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)with absolutely no access to intelligence, policy decisions, or the thoughts of the people who made the decision to authorize the operation.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)A boots-on-the-ground grunt would know absolutely nothing about who knew what at the highest levels.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)I knew that I couldn't trust ANYTHING that I was hearing from official US sources.
Of course official US sources have been the ONLY sources for a long time, and it's been a total propaganda coup.
Anyhow, the world has moved on. Now I'm reading about how the US is calling for a "diplomatic" end to the Syrian war, while funding arming training "moderate terrorists" or whatever they're called, whose aim is to fight ISIS *and* to implement regime change (coup) in Syria. While the US's coalition partners are warring in Yemen, which coincidentally now has a huge al qaeda / IS controlled territory, which is protected.
Uh huh.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)but this Navy SEAL with a book to sell is telling the truth?
Not a compelling argument.
EX500rider
(10,842 posts) Contradictory claims. Hersh disregards the fact that two of the Navy Seals involved in the attack on Bin Laden's compound have come out with details of the raid that directly contradict his account. Bergen, who visited the compound after the operation, writes that there was clear evidence of a protracted fire fight, as the location was "littered almost everywhere with broken glass and several areas of it were sprayed with bullet holes".
Unrealistic conclusions. Why would the Saudis support a man who wanted to overthrow the Saudi monarchy? Why, if US support for Pakistan was part of the bargain, did US-Pakistani relations deteriorate in the years after the raid? If the US and Pakistan were co-operating, was a staged raid really the simplest possible way to ensure that Bin Laden was killed?
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32698016
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)that neither Hersh nor his dubious source have.
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Rex
(65,616 posts)had to 'cowboy' it up out of fear of...what exactly? Don't think so. Not buying it.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Jones bragged about Sy Hersh emailing him not too long ago.
You done fucked up Sy
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)I have no reason to believe the SEAL with a book to sell.
But we can't have official accounts questioned so I'm sure we'll see lots of posts about the "sad downfall" of Sy Hersh.
Same shit, different day.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)away and whose sources weren't there at the scene either?
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Except that he's selling something.
I also know that governments usually lie about this stuff (*gasp*). Especially a big media event with high propaganda value like the killing of Bin Laden.
Hersh, on the other hand, is known to be meticulous in his work, because he knows he's going to rattle the cage of powerful people and be challenged on everything. That's the way investigative journalism is supposed to work. As opposed to simply retyping White House press releases, which is what some people here seem to think it should be limited to.
(edited for typo)
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Devastating takedown.
You should probably do a mic drop.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Sy Hersh isn't what he used to be. There's a reason he was removed from The New Yorker.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Last edited Tue May 12, 2015, 07:32 AM - Edit history (1)
The 2 hour firefight and the no way to capture UBL after he used one of his wives as a shield version.
As for whether Usama was a fugitive or a prisoner in Abattobad, that is still very much unanswered.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)The house was 100 yards from the gate of the Kakul Military Academy, an army run institution where top officers train. A Pakistan intelligence official said the property where bin Laden was staying was 3,000 square feet.
An American administration official said the compound was built in 2005 at the end of a narrow dirt road with "extraordinary" security measures. He said it had 12 to 18-feet walls topped with barbed wire with two security gates and no telephone or Internet service connected to it.
Critics have long accused elements of Pakistan's security establishment of protecting bin Laden, though Islamabad has always denied this. Ties between the United States and Pakistan have hit a low point in recent months over the future of Afghanistan, and any hint of possible Pakistani collusion with bin Laden could hit them hard even amid the jubilation of getting American's No. 1 enemy.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/national_world/2011/05/02/bin-ladens-hideout-located-near-pakistans-military-academy.html
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But no! He would never lie for it, God forbid.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)And the White House would never lie to us.
Failing to acknowledge this means one has "lost it" and entered a "sad decline", like poor Sy Hersh.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Cha
(297,187 posts)"a liar" will have many start salivating and believe it.
US raid that killed bin Laden was 'an act of war', says Pakistani report
:The commission's report - leaked by Al Jazeera on Monday - denounced the US action as the "greatest humiliation" suffered by Pakistan since 1971, when East Pakistan seceded to form Bangladesh.
US officials have justified the decision to keep Pakistan in the dark by suggesting there was a risk that the target might be tipped off. In an October presidential debate, President Barack Obama put it bluntly: "If we had asked Pakistan (for) permission, we would not have gotten him."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/10169655/US-raid-that-killed-bin-Laden-was-an-act-of-war-says-Pakistani-report.html
Pakistani anger lingers a year after raid killed bin Laden
LAHORE, Pakistan A year after Osama bin Laden's death, there is still anger among Pakistanis over the secret raid carried out by Navy SEALs on a compound near here. And some don't believe he's dead.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012-05-01/osama-bin-laden-pakistan-raid/54662824/1