General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama’s Warren Attacks Backfire
Obamas Warren attacks backfire
By Mike Lillis and Jordan Fabian - 05/14/15 06:00 AM EDT
President Obamas sharp rebuke of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D) over his ambitious trade agenda is backfiring in the House, where the personal attacks are alienating the same Democrats the president is courting for votes.
Warren, a freshman liberal from Massachusetts, has emerged as among the fiercest and most visible opponents of Obamas trade wish list, which includes deals with countries in Asia and Europe the president is hoping to make a legacy of his White House tenure.
The tough tenor was designed to rally the backing of more Democrats, particularly in the House, where GOP leaders are struggling to find the 217 votes needed to pass the fast-track bill aimed at facilitating those pacts.
Instead, Obamas rhetoric he said his critics were just wrong in an interview with Yahoo published Saturday seems to have exacerbated tensions between Democrats and the White House, which could make it tougher to move one of the presidents top legislative priorities through Congress this year.
You and I can disagree about policy, but I cant call you a bad person or impugn your motives or anything else except at great risk, Rep. Jim McDermott (Wash.), a liberal Democrat whos undecided but leaning against the trade bill, said Wednesday.
Civility in this business is important, because tomorrow I have to work with you, tomorrow I may need you badly, he added. A lot of people are standing around saying, You know something, this is getting to be a personal thing, and thats not the way we want to go here. ... He went quite a ways with her and I think probably he wont go that far again.
Appearing Wednesday on C-SPANs Washington Journal program, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) offered a similar critique, saying he was disappointed that Obama adopted an insulting tone toward Warren, while acting like she has no legitimate point of view.
If I was trying to persuade a friend, I wouldnt start out by saying how deficient they were, said Ellison, a long-time opponent of trade deals who heads the Congressional Progressive Caucus. If you want your friends to go for something, meet their concerns as opposed to putting them down.
The tensions underlying the trade debate have highlighted a long-standing problem for the president: namely, his penchant for negotiating legislation in ways that leave even his closest allies on Capitol Hill feeling excluded from the process.
Were the children at the kids table during the negotiations, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), an opponent of the trade legislation, said Wednesday.
Weve had the presidents back over and over and over again and I can disagree with the president and still have his back [but] itd be nice if the approach was reciprocal, Pocan added. Elizabeth Warren agrees with Barack Obama on 98-99 percent of issues, and to decide to take her to task on the 1 percent is just a very ineffective way to gain friends.
MORE AT:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/242037-obamas-attacks-on-warren-backfire
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Response to HERVEPA (Reply #2)
TheNutcracker This message was self-deleted by its author.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...just that she somehow is.
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)My belief. So don't start the attacks. After all, it appears that Obama just cannot live without this trade deal.
THIS TOTALLY SUCKS!
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)This so Fast Track Legislation was created by the Social Elite who as a general rule,don't pay their fair share of taxes. These 1%ers know that if the shit hits the fan,well so be it,just increase taxes and fees on those little people. We know better and besides,we control the levers of power. And there for you little people just shut the f--- up,we do the deciding.