This is what some call journalism. He might have been one in the past. Not one today.

[NCTraveler]

"the fact of the matter is that she(Clinton) has been on the wrong side of every signal issue over the course of this century."

This is from the author of the Trojan Horse piece being discussed here today.

"This is not exactly a resume that inspires confidence, or even mild interest."

Enough interest for them to do a whole write up on her. Opps. Many write ups. The thought that her resume doesn't inspire "even mild interest" shouldn't make it past an editor it is so foolish.

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29623-short-tales-from-bizarro-world-treason-edition

See everything she is wrong about here:

http://www.ontheissues.org/hillary_clinton.htm

[Buzz Clik]

1. Somebody dusted off this article for discussion today?

Why?

[NCTraveler]

2. Because said "journalist" is being used to attack Obama.

I just want it to be clear they are not doing so from a progressive angle in any way. They have often let it slip.

If a journalist is going to be used here they should be fair game. Dusted off? You don't think an article about Hillary is relevant? I didn't post in LBN did I? We are talking March 13. Not sure where your issue is as far as the date is concerned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026687597

[Buzz Clik]

3. I thought this thread was initiated because of another DU thread discussing this.

If you point is to pound on Pitt, I have no problem with that.

[geek tragedy]

4. said person is not a journalist, but rather a clickbait invective spewer nt