General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsnapkinz
(17,199 posts)Gothmog
(145,231 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Jeezus, what a pair of criminally insane simpletons.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)05/14/2015
Ryan Grim
Jeb Bush and other Republicans have accused Obama of enabling the insurgency by withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq at the end of 2011. The administration says it could not have maintained the troops there without an agreement to protect them that Baghdad was not at the time willing to sign.
But Bush's preferred reading of history overlooks the fact that the risk of an Islamic State-level militant expansion was clear back in 2003, after George W. Bush had ordered a U.S. invasion of Iraq on the basis of sketchy evidence. Saddam Hussein had at that point effectively controlled Iraq for more than 30 years. First tasting great power as the country's intelligence and internal security chief, Hussein invested heavily in making Iraq a police state, with loyal, well-trained agents of his Baath Party government as numerous in the country as conspiracy theories about their activities. He also focused on making his army a formidable force, appointing Sunni Arabs -- members of his own sect of Islam and a minority in Iraq -- to leadership positions. Hussein's rule forced those soldiers and officials to become even closer to the despot, because they, like many other people in the centralized quasi-socialist state that was Iraq, were reliant on government salaries, subsidies and favor.
Then an American came to Baghdad and told all those well-trained, well-armed men that their services would no longer be required. Or allowed.
-snip-
Although Iraq's dominant Baath Party was secular, the two systems ultimately shared a conviction that control over the masses should lie in the hands of a small elite that should not be answerable to anyone -- because it ruled in the name of a grand plan, legitimized by either God or the glory of Arab history. The secret of IS' success lies in the combination of opposites, the fanatical beliefs of one group and the strategic calculations of the other.
read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/14/jeb-bush-isis_n_7284558.html