General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsViewers Are Quitting 'Game Of Thrones' After That Controversial Scene
"Game of Thrones" has chopped off heads, castrated characters and slaughtered them in wedding blood baths. But HBO tested the limits of many viewers with a recent scene involving sexual assault.
Sunday night's episode of "GoT" will undoubtedly be remembered as one of the most controversial episodes of the series. In the episode, Sansa Stark marries Ramsay Bolton, a character known as the most sadistic, evil and twisted in all of the Seven Kingdoms. During the wedding night, Ramsay forces Sansa to undress and proceeds to violently rape her as he forces his slave Reek (formerly known as Theon, Sansa's childhood companion) to watch the horrific act.
It was an incredibly disturbing and upsetting scene to watch, prompting a public response from author George R.R. Martin. But the episode has also turned some people away from the show for good.
Feminist site The Mary Sue declared on Monday that they would no longer be covering "Game of Thrones" following Sunday night's rape scene. Jill Pantozzi, editor-in-chief of The Mary Sure, wrote that the scene was "not necessary to Sansas character development," nor necessary to further prove Ramsay's evil nature. Pantozzi noted that Sansa is already a survivor and thus, "rape here, like in all instances, is not a necessary story-driving device."
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Rape, not ok.
Got it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)There's a huge adaptation issue: Taking a scene in the book where Jeyne Poole is the primary victim and Ramsay is the primary perpetrator and Theon is the victim/perpetrator/audience POV and adapting it to Sansa and Ramsay creates two serious problems. In the long term it fucks up Sansa's development arc and in the short term Theon's inclusion makes less sense. In TV we don't need Theon to be our eyes and ears, and Theon's role being downgraded from unwilling participant to witness leaves the viewer with the sense that Sansa's pain is terrible because it gives Theon the sads.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And Sansa suffered far far less than the character it diverged from. She has been having near misses in a way that is quite 'mary sue' itself. Arya has killed. Dany had an awful (from my pov) wedding night. Many small folk have been raped and tortured. This will help her snap out of the fog she has been in under LF. Now she knows just how much he actually cares about her (very littke)and just who she can trust(the few and loyal). Sansa is suffering no more than many and far less than most in that world. Imagine if she were a poor bastard girl. The raping would never end.
I think they did a good job cause it really is kinda fanfiction. There is not enough time to tell the entire story faithfully. Combining characters makes sense.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Stuff that happens to the small folk gets discounted.
dawg
(10,622 posts)Rape scenes in general make me uncomfortable. I understand that they are sometimes integral to the story, but I still prefer more of a "tell" don't "show" approach to the subject.
But I especially hate, hate, hate storylines where someone ends up falling in love with their rapist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Grossed me out. After riding a horse all day the last thing I'd want is Khal Drogo giving me bedroom eyes. I'd strangle him in his sleep if he did me like that.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)In the books, Daenerys is 13 when she's married to Khal Drogo.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I did not like their relationship at all and thought Jorah a bit gross for lusting after her like that. He was old enough to be her dad or grampa.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)And that's reflected in the books, and carefully within the show. Look at the Frey patriarch and his slew of wives.
The show naturally had to age up just about all the kids, with just some of the younger Starks still being young for the most part, but able to grow up during it. It happens with the Lannister kids as well since Joffrey should have been younger and Myrcella is now much older than she would be in the books.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I have to tell myself over and over that that's just how things were. I really hate the way they aged Tommen up, though. It makes no sense to age him up just to sleep with margaery, but have him act like a child and need a regent. I'm glad I'm a book person. I prefer the books to the show so I don't feel all upset like they ruined it for me. Just fanfiction as far as I'm concerned.
I'm going to keep watching it until the end, and just wait for Winds of Winter and Dream Of Spring to come out. I hope he finishes the books before he dies. I just cannot take it. I need to see the end.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)Especially since a lot of fans of these books were Jordan fans as well, though at least that mostly worked out.
I knew they had to age up the characters and it does make things more complicated with some of their actions, but there's no way having them run around as 13 year olds engaged in bloody wars would have gone over with viewers.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)samsingh
(17,594 posts)I just want justice for Sansa in a future episode - and the other Starks
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I need a Stark comeback or it will haunt me forever.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)or after the next book is out.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I hope so. He is taking hella long.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But, you know, no pressure, dude.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)In the books it's gradual, she isn't anywhere close to show Sansa in terms of development. The Lords Declarant were formidable unlike the show.
Her sudden cleverness raised expectations too far, it seems. I don't think it will hurt her character. The revenge will just be sweeter when she inevitability gets it.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)focusing on Theon, rather than watching Sansa be traumatized the whole time or focusing on creepy Ramsay Bolton as he goes "moo-mua-hahahahaha" like the evil demented Frodo Baggins they've deliberately made him resemble.
My hunch is that Theon - while clearly upset here - probably had more "sads" when Ramsay cut his dingus off, but oddly enough that particular scene didn't cause internet shit-losing like this one. I wonder why?
But your interpretation is the one which the bloggers who WILL NEVER WATCH THIS SHOW AGAIN are pushing, sort of how they would NEVER WATCH THIS SHOW AGAIN after the Cersei/Jamie Sept scene got all Wester-rapey.
To which I say, I guess, there's only so many times someone can swear off something, aren't there? I think what has some people really cheesed off is, they lodged their complaints after the last "problematic" scene, the media-savvy writers must have heard them, and here they are ... well, hell, it would appear they don't give a shit, they aren't going to let tumblr decide how they should write their show.
(I'll tell you what's "problematic" in the writing right now- stuff like the extremely weak and cheesy Bronn/Jamie/Sand Snakes "let's just walk into the water gardens and find myrcella doop-de-doop-de-doop, oh, hi, there you are, hi who are you". It played like bad community theater. That scene was glaringly NOT based off of anything GRRM ever wrote, I think)
And also, why assume that it "fucks up Sansa's development arc"? There's no law that says she can't emerge from this even more of an ass-kicker.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)ananda
(28,854 posts)Way too bloody and sociopathic.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)stray too far off the GRReservation (man, I'm having fun making up words in this thread. I wonder why?) ... I was thinking about it, and realized it was pretty much exactly like what they did with Asha or Osha or Tycho or whatever they renamed Theon's sister as, when she gathered up a bunch of ironborn to go rescue Theon, thus making for an exciting cliffhanger "departure" scene at the end of one episode, only to have them show up at Chez Bolton, conveniently run into Ramsay, engage in some clumsily choreographed fighting, and then be scared off by the dogs and Reek, as if there is any difference at this point amirite?
They don't do so well, when they create things for the characters to do out of whole cloth.
But a crapfest? Hardly. It's still the most interesting thing on tv. Even with the sort of lame Jaime/Sand Snakes deal, the bit about "The Dwarf lives until we find a cock merchant" made the entire episode worthwhile.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Ramsay was/is a monster. If the wedding night has gone any other way but this (except maybe worse) *that* would have been unrealistic, imo.
I think there was a reason the scene focused on Theon and not Sansa. I'm thinking maybe the two of them take revenge on Ramsay...
I thought what Theon endured was horrible, I had a hard time watching that. This series is not for the faint of heart, that's for sure. Neither was Spartacus, but I watched that too.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)if he ends up killing Ramsey. That scene may be the event that forces Theon over the edge.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)It can indeed, be rather difficult to realize different triggers affect different people. Even more difficult should one be rather slow.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)It could be a narrow-minded conceit that one's own viewpoint is the only one that matters combined with a massive victim identity driven by a persecution complex.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But the thought you might makes me back off.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Didn't they see the Red Wedding? Why didn't they quit when two main characters (and hundreds of others) were massacred? Daenerys was forced into sex on her wedding night early in the first season. Lollys Stokeworth was a mentally disabled young woman gang-raped by a mob of 50 men.
It will make her revenge, and Ramsey's comeuppance, all the sweeter. Like Joffrey's demise
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)And furthermore, everyone is allowed to decide when their personal level of violence is reached.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And my feeling is a lot of people who've never watched a single episode of GoT in their lives, are now happily informing the intertubes that they're DONE with it. THIS. TIME. FOR. REAL!
Hey, some people like it, some people liked Mad Men, some people liked Breaking Bad, and of course some people like hopelessly middlebrow network pablum, shoveled to folks with a bad laugh track and a lot of ham-fisted science references, to try and make them feel smarter than they actually are.
C'est La Vie!
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,318 posts)Laugh track
I couldn't watch 10 minutes.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)is supposed to be anything to write home about.
Intelligent people are socially inept nerds who can't get laid! HYUK HYUK HAR HAR HYUK .......and what is this, 1975?
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Somehow I don't think too many actually smart people like it.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)especially with a series known for blood, guts, gore, incest, sex, and violence on a Mortal Kombat-esque scale.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)And what I'm saying is that pretending it shouldn't matter because the character is fictional is bogus. If it matters to someone, it matters to them. People are entitled to decide when they've reached their limit of tolerance for violence, etc., regardless of what may have gone before. When you've had enough, you've had enough.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I found Dany's wedding night to be atrocious, both in the book and in the show. I find all of the rapes horrific, to be honest, but that is my own perspective and memories of my own rape that makes dealing with the rapes a sort of trigger.
I will still finish reading the books, because I do want to see several of my favorite characters get revenge at some point, hopefully.
George RR Martin had better live long enough to finish this series or they will have to hide his grave site from a lot of pissed off fans, at least from what I have heard some people say. People get testy over him taking so long to finish the books. I'll just make up my own ending in my head if I have to.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)Because the main theme of the book is that revenge never, ever goes well. We've seen it play out to different levels so far in the books, but I'm hard pressed to find an instance where it served the greater good in the end. And so many are hellbent on revenge for so many reasons.
I watched the first episode, and said "Nope. Not relevant to my interests. Or getting triggered every episode." I quit watching Downton Abbey when the advisory message for Joanna's rape episode appeared.
So nice to have a choice!
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)I do have the right to ask, if this concerned them so much, why they didn't bail after the first two episodes had 2 rape scenes. Very inconsitent opinons by the offended.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)I don't follow your use of the word "incontinent" in that particular sentence.
Anyway, in your world, if you sit through one rape scene you are somehow "incontinent" if you finally, FINALLY, bail after the 10th, or 34th, or 50th rape scene. Got it. Watch one, you must watch and embrace them all, no matter what. Nothing rigid about that. No sir.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)It unfortunately corrects to inappropriate words and registers nonsense words. My 5 year old HTC was better, my first iPhone in '07 was better. The word was inconsistent.
Anyway, you mustn't do anything. I am curious why these people continued watching this show for instance, after Joffrey nailed a prostitute to a wall with a crossbow (killing her). Sansa is mild compared to what happened for three entire seasons on this show. I'm looking for a good explanation for this inconsistent behavior.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)You seem determined that this must be an all or nothing proposition. People do have breaking points, you know, and sometimes enough is just enough. I'm really having trouble understanding why you don't get that - if you accept any violence, any at all, you must accept everything, no matter how awful, forever more? Is that really what you mean?
I commiserate on the autocorrect - it's awful.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)I think people got too wrapped up in Sansa. They were misled into believing that she would become the all-conquering heroine who shows everyone she's not stupid, as the other characters had all assumed. She was supposed to go from strength to strength.
It's common in popular fiction for fanboy and fangirl cults to develop, especially when those fans are sympathetic to that character. But this show pulls the rug out from under the feet of fandoms. The Red Wedding, for instance. This is just another example. It wasn't their final straw because there have been far too many for any person who can't stomach these sorts of scenes. They would have quit long ago if that were the case. Their offense is because it happened to Sansa, their fave. And they are too embarrassed to admit that they're just as wrapped up in her character as Twilight fans were wrapped up in which boyfriend Bella should choose. No one likes to admit they're a fanboy or fangirl.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)disappointed fanboy or fangirl? Really? Okay, there's no point in continuing with this nonsense. Have the last word.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)someone that was repulsed by sexual violence in fiction would have quit the show long ago. There's a situation in one of the first few episodes of the first season that is extremely similar to this one. And there have been rape scenes that have been both more gratuitous and violent in the past. It's a reasonable conclusion that there is more outrage and controversy this time, because it's a character that the audience cares about.
I suppose some of it could be new people coming in that haven't watched the show from the beginning - It has picked up viewers every season.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Or tortured him for 6 months and threw him in a cage with the dogs.
Behind the Aegis
(53,936 posts)Last edited Wed May 20, 2015, 06:15 AM - Edit history (1)
That wasn't a step too far?!Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Not in the source, nor i nthe script. The people behind the show apparently had no clue it was 'rapey" until the fans were like "what the fuck was that?!"
In the book (there's a phase that comes up a lot) it is clearly 100% consentual (weird, but consensual) and Cersei's protestations are because she's afraid they'll be seen, not because she dosn't want to - In fact if i recall, she's chewing on Jamie rather fervently the whole time, so, uh...
yeah. They're a pair of weirdoes.
FarPoint
(12,309 posts)Regarding Sansa...it was the mental picture, projected image of sexual violence... Seeing Reek/Theon cry in response to the cruelty. I actually see the Jamie Cersei screen equal to rape.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm like, wait, when was there insect fucking? I missed that episode.
Behind the Aegis
(53,936 posts)My computer only spell checks the "message text" not the "reply title" and I usually forget to run spell check. I speak 5 languages and don't spell well in any of them! LOL!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)it'd be, like, "el poppo del corno. El huevo de micro"
djean111
(14,255 posts)Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Adjective. "involving incest"
Response to Pooka Fey (Reply #32)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Thanks for the laugh!
And since we're on the Cersei and Jamie sub-thread, why do people think that the twisted sex act on the tomb of their son was a 'rape'? Cersei is the dominant partner in that sicko 'relationship-like' entity; I've never had the impression that Jamie is 'into' Cersei, he's just "trapped" by his evil family dynamic, IMO.
I swore I would quit watching the uber-perverted GOT at the end of Season 1, because the Zombie Walkers idea just pushed way beyond my 'suspension of disbelief' tolerance. Then I swore I would quit after watching the Theon torture scene - well, hearing it because I had to turn my head away from the TV screen.
Well, I'm still watching that grotesque show; I've become mesmerized by it. My reason is Tyrion Lannister. What an amazing character! I cheered when Tyrion shot his cruel arrogant bastard father sitting on the loo. I love the actor, Peter Dinklage. What a discovery! Yup, GOT fan right here.
Gonna watch this week's show on TV on Demand tonight!
Response to Pooka Fey (Reply #162)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)For the sweeping hoards, here is my obligatory preface that everyone needs to decide their own TV violence tolerance level, and stop there. That being said...
For me, the Sansa rape scene was a complete non-event when put into the overall violent context of the series. That people would "choose this hill to die on", (as one poster above so eloquently put it) I find a tad ridiculous. Sansa is becoming a very interesting character, she is adapting and growing.
I admit I find Jaime less loathsome than he was in season 1, his experience as Brienne's prisoner opened up his worldview: "Wow. The ruthless power-mad motivations of the Lannister family are NOT universal." Jaime is the only Lannister who treats Tyrion like a human being. I agree, Jaime is the least unsympathetic Lannister, but he allows himself to be completely dominated by his sister and beforehand, his father. As long as he is under their nefarious influence, he is nothing - a cynical person who does what he is told and thinks with his dick.
Disobeying family orders from time to time (from Dad "you must detest and ridicule your brother" (from Sister "you must only fuck me when I order you to fuck me" is Jaime's only outlet to assert an independent identity. He's nice to look at, and he has the right family name, and he's a good team player. I think he is sympathetic because, on some level, maybe people understand how universal he is - "there but for the grace of God go I"
Tyrian was always the outsider, rejected by his own family. Tyrian has the qualities of nobility, intelligence, and honor of a great noble family. Jamie doesn't have Tyrion's strength of character to break away, but he didn't need to develop it either.
I loved LOTR and the Hobbit - I've probably read each one 3 times - and I have every DVD. I've never been tempted to read GOT, but who knows...
IVoteDFL
(417 posts)Every horrible thing that happens to the characters drives home that point. I don't think it is logical that there will never be any depictions of rape, because historically that is a very real consequence of war.
Frankly, it was more disturbing to see Jamie and Cersei reunite in the Sept when he returned to KL. The problem with it there was that the writers and director took a consensual sex scene from the novels and turned it into a pretty rape-y one... and still tried to claim it was consensual..and loving.
The problem with Sansa's storyline is that we've been seeing her abused too much since the first season. Since the pilot episode they have been pushing the fact that Sansa is not her sister and isn't likely to be a warrior. This is her way of using what she learned from Cersei to get revenge on the Boltons for their part in the RW. If she successfully has a hand in it before Stannis shows up, then I feel like the scene isn't meaningless.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)& trust me I usually have no issue with any of those things. But I do have major problems with PTSD & nightmares. That show gave me some of the weirdest dreams I have had & they weren't violent at all. Other than a slurpee was thrown at me & I caught it. But it was definitely spawned by that damn show. I haven't allowed it to be on when we fall asleep since.
Response to giftedgirl77 (Reply #9)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)No more Game of Throne's at bedtime.
Response to giftedgirl77 (Reply #30)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)in my damn dream, just the dwarfs playing soccer & one threw a slurpee at me like a baseball & I caught it. No spill or anything. It was the craziest shit ever. No more GOT while going to sleep.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)and funnier and funnier.
Response to KittyWampus (Reply #153)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Peter Dinklage and Steve Buscemi in a scene TOGETHER. I have tears of joy running down my cheeks!
On edit: and Catherine Keener - the wonderful actress from "Being John Malkovich!!!
Response to Pooka Fey (Reply #164)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Last edited Wed May 20, 2015, 08:45 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121790/life-triggering-best-literature-should-be-tooThe pathway of such trigger warningsnot just for sexual assault but for violence, bigotry, and racismwill eventually lead to every work of literature being labeled as potentially offensive. There goes the Bible, there goes Dante, there goes Huck Finn (loaded with racism), there goes all the old literature written before we realized that minorities, women, and gays werent second-class people. And as for violence and hatred, well, theyre everywhere, for theyre just as much parts of literature as parts of life. Crime and Punishment? Trigger warning: brutal violence against an old woman. The Great Gatsby? Trigger warning: violence against women (remember when Tom Buchanan broke Mrs. Wilsons nose?). The Inferno? Trigger warning: graphic violence, sodomy, and torture. Dubliners? Trigger warning: pedophilia.
kcr
(15,315 posts)Aww, it must be so hard to read the words trigger warning. I'm not sure what the difference is being being verbally warned that something might be upsetting, the author's line in the sand, and the same warning written in words. Who cares? If things don't bother you, ignore it and move on.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)very rare that I find a movie or TV show better than the book(s) it is based on. The showrunners have deviated from the books too much and not in a good way and the Sansa assault scene cemented that.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)And the scene wasn't all that controversial.
I really don't see why people are making such a big deal out of it.
Response to PeteSelman (Reply #15)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But it was also a powerful, compelling episode (mostly due to the tension of whether or not she would tell Tony about it). And I don't think it made anyone stop watching the show.
Response to Lunabell (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)Response to woolldog (Reply #189)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
cali
(114,904 posts)story-driving device."
wait. "in all instances"? I disagree. strongly.
And I thought the scene was well done and served to drive the plot. There was nothing lascivious about that scene. It wasn't even shown but reflected on Theon/Reek's face.
Yes, it's different than the book. Many things in the show are, but Martin doesn't shy away from violence in almost every imaginable form.
Oh, and did you write the op? there's no link.
Eko
(7,272 posts)I would like to hear more. Not.
Oneironaut
(5,490 posts)They pull the O'Reilly, "I didn't need to see it. I heard it was bad" act. I was disturbed by the scene, but the show itself is disturbing. It wasn't out of character or any worse than other scenes on the show.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)I got the tone and message right quickly that there would be lots of gratuitous sex (and violence) and women (and men) being treated as nothing more than meat puppets. You can argue that there are strong female (and male) characters in the show but one shouldn't have to wade through scenes of a brothel (I'm not inherently against sexual gratification but I'm against non-plot related scenes that don't further a story) to see these women (or men) make an appearance.
For me the question is this: if this scene weren't here, would the story still be tellable and would you understand the rest of the show and from what I saw in those 2 episodes (I have revisited later episodes--same opinion) you didn't need some dude spying through a peephole at the women having sex in the brothel to further the story.
I also, being a big reader, tried to read the books but could not get into them. So, I think the show was doomed for me from the start.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)It's a brutal show.
Get over it.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Apparently, the person being qouted has the ability to read the scriptwriter's mind, or to see into the future. That, or she just feels comfy with substituting speculation for facts. Only direct knowledge of the character arc can tell us what was necessary for development, and there's only three ways to get that...having written it, having been told by the writer, or after having watched it unfold. None of these apply, and the quote is worth nothing.
2. Ramsay...proceeds to violently rape her as he forces his slave...to watch the horrific act.
I watched the scene, and I'm not convinced it was rape at all. We didn't see the act, just Reek's response. Reek could be crying from guilt over his role in the betrayal and death of Sansa's family. He could be in love with Sansa, and sad for himself. Hell, for all we know, the noises we hear in the background could be Sansa killing Ramsay, and Reek's tears could be shed in joy. Or, he could be witnessing a horrific and violent rape. Until some future episode answers that question, we can only guess.
We already know the script differs from the book. People die and live who should live or die, or the timeline of their death changes. George RR Martin, commenting on the controversy around the scene, doesn't speak to the act itself, but focuses only on the changes in the scene, and on their eventual butterfly effects. Let's all remember that whether we follow the book, or the TV series, we're discussing a work of fiction. None of this really happened.
cali
(114,904 posts)What on earth else could possibly be occurring as Ramsay rips off her gown and forces her down on the bed? We briefly see the stony resignation on Sansa's face and then here here groans and screams of pain.
The noise could be Sansa killing Ramsay...let's not pretend were talking about realism here. There are dragons, giants, and snow zombies involved.
In addition, and more realistically, Sansa could be consenting to the sex, despite the fact that it's ugly and sadistic, because she believes it will allow her to ultimately hold a position that will allow her to get her revenge. Why not? She agreed to the marriage for exactly the same reasons, didn't she?
It's fiction, not news. Speculation in the spirit of the form is acceptable...
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)If someone had jumped in and killed Ramsey, Theon's facial expression would have changed.
She was raped.
demwing
(16,916 posts)but right now we don't know what happened.
BTW - if Sansa killed Ramsay, I would expect Theon to be overwhelmed, even to the point of tears.
demwing
(16,916 posts)JTFrog
(14,274 posts)If you can't handle the fact that your comment was sickening, then so be it.
demwing
(16,916 posts)speculation is allowed. get over yourself
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)and replies are allowed.
If you are going to make ridiculous speculations that invite disgust, you should get over the fact that people will call you on it.
demwing
(16,916 posts)My response to you differs from my response to cali because cali approached the issue differently.
As long as you post silly indignations over a comment about a TV series based on a book that deals with dragons, giants, and snow zombies, I will continue to respond to you in kind.
If that makes you barf in disgust, grab a bucket and try to avoid getting any on your shoes.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)From the bottom of my heart, I thank you
brooklynite
(94,452 posts)...but I know the parameters of the books and the series, and I'm hard pressed to understand how anyone who's been watching it for years suddenly feels that it's somehow stepped over a line.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)Sometimes your mind can minimize it while reading it, even as it repulses you.
When done visually with actors, emotions that your mind isn't putting into it coming into play, it can be more intense.
I'm certainly not pro-rape or anything, and hate that I have to say that, but the show is presenting the brutalities of war and those within power and a real indictment of the kind of person Ramsay is; the son of a powerful man who feels free and entitled to do whatever he wants and does so.
We see a lot of that in the world. And providing that reflection here is important.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)I've been getting something of a kick out of all the people who are freaked out by the story line...who clearly haven't read the books. The reaction to the Red Wedding is a perfect example. If you read the books, you know what's coming. It's some seriously ugly stuff, but attacking the TV show for following the story line as laid out in the books the TV show is based on strikes me as a little strange.
Given the content, maybe they shouldn't have done the show in the first place. That's an argument I'd certainly entertain...but freaking out because the show follows the book the show is based on? Ramsay Bolton is a monster. Don't be shocked when he acts monstrous.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)in the book.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Trying to remember the details of all those books is difficult. I do, however, recall a pretty damned savage rape scene involving Ramsay and Reek in one of the later books. On reflection, it may have been the girl pretending to be Arya. Thanks for the correction; I'll have to take some time and look it up.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And it was way way way worse in the book.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)And this is really my point. If you're going to watch a show based - even loosely - on such savage depictions of violence, sanded down though they may occasionally be, bring a helmet. It's going to be a rough ride.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)I don't think the characters of Jeyne Poole and Sansa Stark are interchangeable and I feel that different emotions are evoked depending on who the character is.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)No matter the character.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)make a difference if the show runners decided to have Tywin murder Tyrion, rather than the other way around? Would it be appropriate to have a different reaction depending on which character was the one murdered?
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)Sansa is a prominent character who gets her own "point of view" chapters, Jeyne Poole was Sansa's handmaid who was a bit player in the books and I don't think was ever even on the show? People care more for Sansa because they see more of her - it's only natural.
Krytan11c
(271 posts)But *BOOK SPOILER* in the book Reek is forced to perform oral sex on Jeyne Pool (pretending to be Arya Stark) before she is raped by Ramsay. IMO the book was worse.
herding cats
(19,558 posts)From when she was given to Littlefinger to use in his brothel on, I cringed when she would reappear in the books. You knew it wouldn't go well for her. It never had and never would.
In the television series they've given Sansa the chore of being married to Ramsay. Lucky for her they took out some of the horrors of what that wedding night entailed for Jeyne in the books.
Krytan11c
(271 posts)In the books Jeyne is just as broken as Theon by the end? of her arc.
I believe Sansa is nowhere near broken and will get redemption/revenge.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)marriages are a mechanism for rape.
cali
(114,904 posts)It was disturbing- and it was meant to be. I also think it was very well done.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)This is one of the worst sadists in literature.
cali
(114,904 posts)Littlefinger laid out his plan to Sansa to have her marry Ramsay. And I can't believe that Littlefinger wasn't aware of Ramsay's reputation.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Perhaps even an obligation.
Imagine, and I think you agree with me, if despots and dictators were described as warm and fuzzy people because we don't want to upset anyone. I think that would be a huge mistake.
My understanding for instance is that Uday and Qusay, Saddam Hussein's sons, among many other sadistic aspects of them, both were serial rapists and used their positions as Saddam's sons to avoid prosecution for it.
I would expect any depiction of Saddam and his sons to make that clear, perhaps graphically so. I want them to seem like horrific people because they were. I don't want that watered down at all.
I am not familiar with Game of Thrones. But if the person being depicted is a sadistic rapist, I don't understand the complaints about depicting him that way.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The man is a sadist in the worst ways. He hunts and flays women and names his new puppies after his victims.
She got off way easier than the girl in the book. No beastiality at least.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and beloved character to this abuse, whereas in the books it was essentially a throw-away character who was introduced for the purpose of being abused and tortured.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Spoiler
.
.
Harry the Heir sounds like Robert mk 2. He already has at least one bastard daughter despite his youth. The show writers might be aware of Harry's nature and simply merged Harry and Ramsey. So a similarly miserable outcome might already be planned for her anyway
demwing
(16,916 posts)which probably is coloring my interpretation of the act
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)anyone?
Response to whatthehey (Reply #60)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Baitball Blogger
(46,697 posts)...the tremendous unhappiness that Sansa goes through because of Ramsay's cruelty is the reason that the people of Winterfell revolt. In other words, this event will develop the next event, that would probably not occur otherwise. (I only read wiki, so I'm guessing that this is the reason that Jon Snow might leave the wall to come to Winterfell, which is unlikely to happen otherwise.)
And, the scene was heavily edited, thank goodness. We only see Sansa's spine as he rips the bodice from the back, and then lays her face down on the bed. We only "witness" the horror through Theon's eyes, and, can surmise what is happening to Sansa from her wimpering, which escalates. But the scene shuts down within seconds, so we know what happened without needing to see more.
Bolton was just told in the last episode how he was borne of rape. His father described it to him in detail, so I'm wondering why people didn't object to that one?
djean111
(14,255 posts)So - those who were okay with hanging burnt children, torture and castration, killing all of Robert's illegitimate children quite graphically - this was their sticking point? Fair enough, but I hope they were not expecting some sort of groundswell of agreement and/or the ratings to go down.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)to watch shows with graphic and horrific rape scenes in them.
Who the hell wants to see filth like that?
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)Otherwise the majority of what I watch and read would be considered filth by quite a few others.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)She knew it would be an ugly wedding night. I felt sorrow for the character,but it was an expected part of the storyline.
It was hard seeing Theon watch, but it showed he has real feelings.
Can't imagine why people who have seen everything so far would turn off because of this scene.
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)She attributed the miller's daughter's comments to jealousy over Ramsay and her (Sansa's) position as lady of Winterfell. She had no other real proof of the depths of Ramsay's sadism.
I hope she calls on the people of Winterfell to help rid her of the pervert.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)What did she think happened to Theon?
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)I see people in remote places with spotty communication. What is real and what is rumor?
And what choice did she have regarding RB? The marriage was arranged by powerful men. Does saying "No" offer protection or invite even worse violence? She probably believed marriage provided protection for a woman.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Also, Ramsey's dad stabbed her brother in the heart
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)Who-did-what. I saw the red wedding, but I don't remember knowing the name of the character who killed Robb Stark. The size of the cast has me thrown, occasionally.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)and I'm not saying Ramsey isn't a horrible person.
But she had to know what type of person he was. She didn't just come there and get married an hour later. She knows what type of person his dad is. And she would have to be completely clueless to think marriage provided protection in this world.
Was it probably worse than she thought? Yeah. Was it as bad as it could have been? Well, the book was a lot worse.
And Little Finger said she could have said "No" and he would have taken her away.
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)This union to secure Winterfell as a property to offer on the political chessboard. I wonder what Baelisch would have done if she had refused Bolton.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Why are people particularly offended by rape, as opposed to other forms of violence? I don't watch the series, but it sounds like there have been scenes involving violence that should have turned off viewers long ago. I'm curious as to why rape is the final straw for some people.
Response to HassleCat (Reply #78)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)They didn't make Sophie Turner do a nude scene, and it's not like there haven't been rape scenes written into the show and the book. Doesn't mean that fans of the show condone rape.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)Martin is allowing them to ruin his story for the sake of TV ratings. The books are grafic enough without adding extra rape scenes.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)And the TV show has enough characters for most people that watch this genre of show to keep straight without adding the million more that are in the books but not the TV show. Martin makes the classic Russian authors look like they couldn't come up with minor characters to add to a novel.
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)so we don't know where they are going with so, so how do you know for sure it is gratuitous?
My guess is that this, and her subsequent treatment by Ramsey, will result in those still loyal to the Starks, Theon, and--perhaps most importantly--John Snow to take the North away/back from the Boltons. If that is the case, then it isn't gratuitous. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'm guessing this is going to be the driving force for a lot of things.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)bluedigger
(17,086 posts)They really push the limits over there at PBS.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)it was a terrible, horrible act by a terrible horrible character.... Honestly, worse has been done. It's not a feel good series.
Feron
(2,063 posts)the camel's back.
The showrunners have inserted gratuitous female nudity and rape from the beginning. I think Sansa's rape was just the breaking point.
Personally I quit watching last season. I got tired of the constant female nudity and rape just about in every episode. Plus Joffrey was the only character worth hanging around for even if I do like Sansa.
Anyhow just because it or a variation of it is in the books, doesn't mean that it should be translated on screen.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Anyone who knows the books expects violence including rape to be portrayed but the show seems to fill every gap in the violence with a sex scene or female nudity. That Ramsay Bolton would savagely rape a woman wasn't a surprise. The scene however felt like a clumsy device to show Theon's horror at the event.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Ilsa
(61,690 posts)Yes, there is a complicated political storm unfolding, but for me, it is moving extremely slowly with the disgustingly violent segments.
LostOne4Ever
(9,287 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]But it has always hit me as trying to be a fantasy that depicts midevil life in an ultra realistic way. Those were brutal times and horrible acts of violence were committed.
The rape scene was horrible...but I took that as the point. To show how horrific rape is and how women were treated back then.
If anything the show revels in how horrific things were back then. Children getting thrown down and spears driven through their throats, servants getting beheaded because of their masters, incest, pedophilia (Daenerys is only 13), raping of the villagers during war.
It makes it pretty clear that those were NOT fun times to live in.[/font]
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Seriously any scene with Ramsey....go ahead and leave the room. It's never going to be nice.
Prism
(5,815 posts)You have two story threads here: Theon's redemption/reclamation of identity, and Sansa's new found agency.
The original Ramsey bridal night was kept because it was the trigger in the books that led to Reek becoming Theon again. It was the horror too far. That sticks pretty close to the books, so that brings us to . . .
Sansa's arc. I feel like the people who are outraged missed the scene preceding the wedding. Miranda threatens Sansa with Ramsey's cruelty. Miranda tells Sansa what she is in for. What is Sansa's response? "This is Winterfell. This is my home. You cannot scare me." Sansa knows she's in for a rough time, but she goes ahead willingly. She and Littlefinger discuss this in previous episodes. This is going to be horrible. These are terrible people. But will you do what it takes to avenge your family? Sansa says she is.
That doesn't make what happened any less horrible. Sansa is suffering. But she subjected herself to this man and this situation in the pursuit of a larger goal. Therein (I hope) lays her strength. She's enduring him now in order to bring him and his father down later.
The only way the writers will ruin this, IMO, is if they make Sansa a damsel in distress, looking to an outside force to rescue her. If she, instead, rallies the North Remembers brigade, turns Theon, and engineers the downfall of the Boltons, this all works.
If this results in Brienne or anyone else having to swoop in and rescue her, then I will join everyone else in being utterly pissed off and disgusted, and I will question the point of the rape as others are doing now.
Blue_Adept
(6,397 posts)I wish there was a way to recommend individual posts in a thread.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Agreed.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)it's not exactly like Sansa can back out. She's surrounded by the Bolton family and a thousand or two of their allies at Winterfell. She has no allies, except for a possible old woman who says the North Remembers. If she says "no" to Ramsay, is he going to just say, "OK, Sansa, as you wish... we'll just pack up and leave Winterfell. Here are the keys."
If she says no, she's basically going to be (at best) thrown in a jail cell, or, (more likely) she'll be flayed inch by inch until she consents to marry Ramsay. There's a reason why the Flayed Man is the symbol of House Bolton.
My guess, though, is that while she is escaping with Theon (possibly with the help of Brienne and Pod), she'll take somebody out as she goes - maybe Myranda, maybe Ramsay, maybe Roose? Maybe she'll bake them a special pie before she leaves?
The 100% evil characters in the series so far - Viserys and Joffrey - have died particularly gruesomely and pathetically. So, I'm hopeful Ramsay will as well. (Walder Frey is another, I hope)
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)the stories would have been effected had the graphic violence been toned down.
That said, I don't really like or even "get" porn, especially violent/rape porn, so the whole thing escapes me.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)I'm surprised any Feminist site is still covering the show.
People who are offended and don't want to watch, shouldn't watch. I completely agree on that.
As far as determining what is a "necessary story-driving device" is, though, I'm not sure that being editor-in-chief of The Mary Sure necessarily qualifies one as an expert on that.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Township75
(3,535 posts)Most people won't know and won't care about some made up tv show.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Each person will have to decide how much violence is too much violence for them.
I do want to know why Dany's (and several other female characters) rape didn't seem to upset them as much. How was Sansa's rape any worse than Dany's (and several other female characters)? I thought what Dany went through was atrocious too.
lovuian
(19,362 posts)and rape and torture is not my kind of idea of entertainment
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)was so much less gross than the original story line. secondly, it was fiction. third, it clearly portrayed the rapist as a psychotic monster (so no ambiguity about victim blaming).
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I still wonder why all the other rapes did not bother them so much. Why this particular rape?
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)the change to the Daenerys/Drogo wedding night bothered me more - while it was an arranged marriage and Dany had no real say in the matter, book Drogo was surprisingly gentle that first night with her. Show Drogo was not.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)I was surprised there was no outrage then, to be honest. The Daenerys/Drogo story in the books was very different. They didn't need to make it a violent wedding night like they did in the show.
Yavin4
(35,427 posts)The men on the show have been headed, castrated, throats slashed, stabbed, poisoned, gutted, skinned alive, maimed, burned, and eaten by dragons.
Not one word of protest.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)When ratings come out for next weeks show, maybe then we can speculate
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)after reading all these comments, I never will.
840high
(17,196 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)Furthermore I was angry because of the absolute humiliating way that it took place. But I will say the scene had the exact effect it should, rape is horrible and I am sure every person who saw that episode gave thought to the disgustingness of the act. It also opened up a dialogue and got people to talk about rape. This was all done just by showing a fictional rape taking place on a fictional character in a fictional world.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)especially in shows where favorite characters are routinely killed/maimed etc.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)and picking up more viewers since the beginning.
sendero
(28,552 posts).. please, these people should crawl back into their cocoons. It is a drama. It is an edgy drama. If it is not to your taste by all means don't watch it but don't imagine for a second you are making a political statement. No one cares.
romanic
(2,841 posts)that these sensitive little snow-flakes have never read the books or forgot all of the other violent scenes and heaping amount of female nudity to conclude that GOT is an evil presence promoting rape culture. :I
Well all I got to say to those viewers leaving is this:
[IMG][/IMG]
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)... who quit watching after the red wedding.
And they'll quit again after the next over-the-top outrage.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)I don't see the mockery for this show, so I have to conclude that knowing about "Sansa Stark" is vastly more cultured than knowing who Kelly Clarkson is.
Am I right, or am I right?
#trenchantsarcasm
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)Hopefully, the rapist will be get his due
Pisces
(5,599 posts)Who comes here to stir up outrage? It is a medieval, fantasy show. This guy raped a man and tortured him to become a
a slave with no identity and nobody quit after that heinous display. This is how sick and depraved a human can become.
Orrex
(63,185 posts)Generic Brad
(14,274 posts)Perhaps viewers have become over saturated with this show. You can only see so many disgusting, unthinkable things before you finally hit the wall.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)What makes you think that "Viewers Are Quitting 'Game Of Thrones'?" I've never watched it, but not a day goes by without someone talking about it. I have never even heard of the scene that you mentioned.
Also, I'm curious (once again) how a thread about a television show that will never affect anyone's real life can turn into such an all-out brawl at times.
AnnieBW
(10,421 posts)If the ratings for tonight's episode are down significantly or not. Remember, it is a holiday weekend.
Response to Lunabell (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)It's fiction FFS.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)and I'm a big fan of fantasy, sword and sandal films, and most things by George R.R. Martin (loved his short stories The Monkey Treatment and The Sand Kings- so original). After watching GOT a few minutes I find my mind wandering and just not caring about the characters or their extremely complicated situations. But I don't think I would ever abandon a series I like over just one scene.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)you have to strain your eyes just to get a glimpse of what's going on!