Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:12 PM May 2015

Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations: ‘I acted inexcusably’

In the wake of a tabloid report alleging that he molested several underage girls while he was a teenager, reality-television star Josh Duggar said Thursday that he “acted inexcusably” and was “deeply sorry” for what he called “my wrongdoing.”

The 27-year-old Duggar, a member of the family that stars on TLC’s “19 Kids and Counting,” also resigned his post with the Family Research Council.

In a statement posted on Facebook, Duggar said:

Twelve years ago, as a young teenager, I acted inexcusably for which I am extremely sorry and deeply regret. I hurt others, including my family and close friends. I confessed this to my parents who took several steps to help me address the situation. We spoke with the authorities where I confessed my wrongdoing, and my parents arranged for me and those affected by my actions to receive counseling. I understood that if I continued down this wrong road that I would end up ruining my life.

On Thursday, In Touch Weekly published a partially redacted police report from the Springdale Police Department in Arkansas that, the tabloid said, contained details of the allegations against Duggar. The report redacted the name of the suspect and the alleged victims, all juveniles, but listed Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar as relatives.

Josh Duggar is the oldest child in the family that stars in the popular TLC show, “19 Kids and Counting.” Duggar, his wife Anna and their three children live in Washington, where Duggar worked as executive director of FRC Action, the non-profit lobbying arm of the Family Research Council.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/05/21/josh-duggar-apologizes-resigns-from-family-research-council-amid-molestation-allegations/

Other bombshells in the police report are: Josh Duggar was investigated for multiple sex offenses — including forcible fondling — against five minors. Some of the alleged offenses investigated were felonies. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar were interview by the Springdale Police department on Dec. 12, 2006. The report says that James told police he was alerted in March, 2002 by a female minor that Josh — who turned 14-years-old that month — had been touching her breasts and genitals while she slept. This allegedly happened on multiple occasions. In 2006, Jim Bob told police that in July, 2002 Josh admitted to fondling a minor’s breasts while she slept. “James said that they disciplined (redacted, Josh) after this incident.” The family did not alert authorities

http://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/bombshell-duggar-police-report-jim-bob-duggar-didn-t-report-son-josh-s-alleged-sex-offenses-for-more-than-a-year-58906

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Josh Duggar apologizes amid molestation allegations: ‘I acted inexcusably’ (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA May 2015 OP
UGH! Texasgal May 2015 #1
and just 10 years later he has 3 kids of his own? Liberal_in_LA May 2015 #3
I'm sure they all prayed about it. Texasgal May 2015 #5
if many of the victims are his sisters there is a whole lot of hurt in that family. I hope they got Liberal_in_LA May 2015 #10
4 of them are his sisters Beaverhausen May 2015 #39
They won't get treatment. They will just pray and it's a done deal SummerSnow May 2015 #44
I'm surprised IVoteDFL May 2015 #2
Resigned his post with the Family Research Council? I would think a promotion would come of this. NYC_SKP May 2015 #4
Fuck that guy. zappaman May 2015 #6
Why is he not in jail? Laffy Kat May 2015 #7
That, and is he on the sex offenders list? nt procon May 2015 #25
The parents knew and failed to report their son being a rapist Kalidurga May 2015 #8
An "apology" doesn't feed the bulldog, Slappy. hifiguy May 2015 #9
I know nothing about the Duggars except what I read here. cwydro May 2015 #11
patriarchal family - females are to be lead, males lead Liberal_in_LA May 2015 #13
I understand that they are lowlifes. cwydro May 2015 #16
the parents and the son are active politically Liberal_in_LA May 2015 #24
Don't forget that there was another victim outside the family. A cop who was friends with Jim Bob StevieM May 2015 #32
They're a public family, holding themselves up as the morally superior ones. historylovr May 2015 #42
Normally I would agree, polly7 May 2015 #14
And now his children will have to deal with it too. cwydro May 2015 #17
Yes, it is sad all around. :(. nt. polly7 May 2015 #20
And the sisters (who it seems were the victims) cwydro May 2015 #21
That's true. I just hope they realize that none of it is their fault and can get through this polly7 May 2015 #30
I agree. cwydro May 2015 #33
Did the SISTERS get any REAL help, I wonder? Board certified help? MADem May 2015 #34
I don't know. polly7 May 2015 #35
That entire franchise needs to feel the Finger of Shame pointed at them from all directions. MADem May 2015 #36
Completely agree! Those girls' welfare should have been the focus when it happened, polly7 May 2015 #38
He's still not getting the vehemence Cosby got on here so to me they're actually letting craigmatic May 2015 #15
True. cwydro May 2015 #19
I want to see somebody say they want him arrested but nobody seems willing to go that far so again craigmatic May 2015 #26
I think he should have been arrested when the situation first came to light. MADem May 2015 #37
I think it's only hypocritical if the same people are excusing one and not the other Marrah_G May 2015 #41
Very good point n/t Boudica the Lyoness May 2015 #49
I think that anyone who reads that apology intuits that he isn't truly remorseful KitSileya May 2015 #55
TLC and Family Research Council will be apologizing malaise May 2015 #12
And Jimbob & Transgender hatin Michele had the damn nerve all these years .. misterhighwasted May 2015 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author seabeyond May 2015 #22
That still doesn't speak to the actions of Jim Bob Duggar. He covered it up and got a friend StevieM May 2015 #31
ya. you know, i didnt read the paragraph in between the two links. i am going to delete my post seabeyond May 2015 #40
He got a child-porn-loving friend on the police force to cover it up. arcane1 May 2015 #53
Not at all an unreasonable conclusion on your part. A more honorable police officer would StevieM May 2015 #54
Ah yes, the good ol' Family Research Council. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #23
The hypocrisy is so thick you couldn't cut it hifiguy May 2015 #27
and the duggars are apparently transphobic, too. Warren DeMontague May 2015 #28
That whole family is a perfecta of awfulness hifiguy May 2015 #29
Barstool Palin Aerows May 2015 #43
Acting "inexcusably" is getting drunk and popping off at the mouth... Joe the Revelator May 2015 #45
Am I the only one having trouble understanding Jamastiene May 2015 #46
It means that the names were redacted in the police report but the news outlet StevieM May 2015 #47
I was wondering, because the way they had redacted with the comma Jamastiene May 2015 #50
I didn't even know about this story BrotherIvan May 2015 #48
That last line is news to me Renew Deal May 2015 #51
"Jim Bob knew Hutchens personally." arcane1 May 2015 #52
People are commenting that they think old Jim Bob might be the originator of this behavior BrotherIvan May 2015 #61
Arkansas needs a change in laws KitSileya May 2015 #57
Absolutely and I thought mandatory reporters HAD TO REPORT BrotherIvan May 2015 #60
Considering the cop who was told is currently serving 56 years for child pornography KitSileya May 2015 #62
The family lawyer gave him a crash course in damage control. lpbk2713 May 2015 #56
Duggars fail to alert the PROPER authorities because those with a penis are important. Sheepshank May 2015 #58
I don't see any apology to his victims, am I just missing it? Rex May 2015 #59
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
10. if many of the victims are his sisters there is a whole lot of hurt in that family. I hope they got
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:38 PM
May 2015

Treatment

IVoteDFL

(417 posts)
2. I'm surprised
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:15 PM
May 2015

Oh wait, no I'm not. Most sexual deviants that I've been exposed to are repressed religious types.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
4. Resigned his post with the Family Research Council? I would think a promotion would come of this.
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:21 PM
May 2015

I'll bet he will still hang tight with them.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
8. The parents knew and failed to report their son being a rapist
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:33 PM
May 2015

They should be charged and arrested for that.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
11. I know nothing about the Duggars except what I read here.
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:40 PM
May 2015

This is a very sad story.

I find it interesting that DUers who want to excuse much older teens vis a vis "the brain is not developed until 25", which I've heard said about Tsarnaev, Michael Brown, et. al. - but this kid was 14 years old and we're ready to lynch him.

DU hypocrisy is something that one can always count on.

This is sad on so many levels.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
16. I understand that they are lowlifes.
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:53 PM
May 2015

I just cannot understand shaming a person for what they did at 14.

Normally, most progressives would agree. But since this is a family DU hates, we get to shame the guy for what he did at an extremely young age. It makes us all feel so superior I suppose.

Sadly, this is not an unusual thing. I've had several close friends who experienced similar horror at the hands of their brothers. This does not happen only in conservative families...and if you think it does, you are very sadly mistaken.

This is not for the public to comment on.

DU is better than this nastiness.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
32. Don't forget that there was another victim outside the family. A cop who was friends with Jim Bob
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:40 PM
May 2015

covered it up until the statute of limitations had expired.

historylovr

(1,557 posts)
42. They're a public family, holding themselves up as the morally superior ones.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:00 PM
May 2015

And now it all comes out. The oldest son did horrible things to his younger sisters and another girl. He did it while they slept. Secretively. Like he knew it was wrong, even. The family covered it up until the statute of limitations had expired. He should be shamed. Everyone who participated in the cover up should be shamed. He was protected. The girls were not.

It is an awful situation, as you say. It can happen in any family. But most families don't put themselves in everyone's faces and hold themselves up as arbiters of right and wrong. Oh, how perfect they are. What a great example for everyone. And now, we shouldn't comment? Maybe you're right. Maybe we shouldn't, if it spares the girls embarrassment and flashbacks of their older brother molesting them. As for Josh Duggar? I don't give a damn about how he feels.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
14. Normally I would agree,
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:51 PM
May 2015

regarding someone so young being judged so harshly because they are not mature - but he should have gotten intensive help, and certainly not been allowed near his sisters for a long, long time.

He's been vocally anti-gay as executive director of Family Research Council Action, and his mother placed a robocall asking voters to oppose a bill that was meant to protect transgender residents of Fayetteville, Arkansas. That, as well as playing the good, moral family they appear on their reality show makes people angry at the hypocrisy.

My anger is mainly for what those little girls went through - although I read everyone involved had received counseling, I doubt they got the kind that taught them they were worth being protected from their own brother - probably just 'everyone makes mistakes, forgive your brother and leave it to God' or some such thing. I don't understand why they even allowed him to be around their daughters afterwards when the only 'treatment' he got was from a family friend - working to help build a house or something. Those girls are going to have problems trying to reconcile this with self-worth when they're freed from that home and will probably have very conflicted feelings towards him and their parents. It's going to be hard for them, imo.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
21. And the sisters (who it seems were the victims)
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:58 PM
May 2015

will now be victimized all over again.

God, this really makes me sick.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
30. That's true. I just hope they realize that none of it is their fault and can get through this
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:34 PM
May 2015

without blaming themselves, like most survivors of sexual assault usually end up doing without some good counseling. You're right, it's not fair to them at all.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
34. Did the SISTERS get any REAL help, I wonder? Board certified help?
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:18 PM
May 2015

Or did they get "STFU and FORGIVE, or ELSE" type help?

And do his kids have bedroom doors they can lock, to keep his pervy ass out?

The show should be cancelled. NOW.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
36. That entire franchise needs to feel the Finger of Shame pointed at them from all directions.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:24 PM
May 2015

And that includes the station that airs that shitty show.

The victims? They deserve treatment and justice. Doubt they'll get it, and that's just messed up.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
38. Completely agree! Those girls' welfare should have been the focus when it happened,
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:33 PM
May 2015

and for their own parents and the station to carry on as though what happened to them was no biggie is really sick.

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
15. He's still not getting the vehemence Cosby got on here so to me they're actually letting
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:52 PM
May 2015

him off light and these are kids he did this to.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
19. True.
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:57 PM
May 2015

But he was a kid at that time also.

As I said in an earlier post, I know more than a few women who experienced this same thing.

They would be horrified for it to go public so many years later. This is just so wrong for the girls (now women) that he victimized.

Let the tabloids have a field day if they want. But DU should be better than this.

 

craigmatic

(4,510 posts)
26. I want to see somebody say they want him arrested but nobody seems willing to go that far so again
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:10 PM
May 2015

I say they let him off light.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
37. I think he should have been arrested when the situation first came to light.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:27 PM
May 2015

He should have gone to Juvvie and done some serious time while getting mental health help.

And his victims should have gotten treatment too--and door locks for their rooms.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
41. I think it's only hypocritical if the same people are excusing one and not the other
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:57 PM
May 2015

I'm not sure that is the case.

I think the really big issue here is the parents reaction and actions taken after they knew. At least one more girl was touched after they knew.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
55. I think that anyone who reads that apology intuits that he isn't truly remorseful
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:25 PM
May 2015

They may not know why, but they feel that there is something hinky about it, and therefore they're so unlikely to be compassionate.

Know what sets off our spidey senses? He talks about how his life would have been ruined if he continued on the path he was on. Not a word about how he ruined the lives of his victims. He's 14 no longer, so he should definitely have learned his lesson. When you apologize for hurting others, you don't mention the consequences to yourself, you focus on your contrition and acknowledgement of how you've hurt your victims.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
18. And Jimbob & Transgender hatin Michele had the damn nerve all these years ..
Thu May 21, 2015, 08:54 PM
May 2015

..to preach loudly & push legislation against the "faults" of others.
Reality TV should show the many juveniles locked up for sexual experimentation, and forever labelled sex offenders.
Too bad they weren't 'KKKristians"
This makes me wanna barf.

The difference in this case is that John Dugger diddled his own sisters. And TV cameras continued to roll and nothing more was said nor done about young Josh.
This makes the entire Dugger show a lie.
Preaching the faults of others in the name of Jesus while hiding their own faults while bankrolling for Jesus, is blasphemy.

They need to start walking that walk like they preach to others to do.
Enjoy your fortune you sick bigoted hypocrites.


Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
31. That still doesn't speak to the actions of Jim Bob Duggar. He covered it up and got a friend
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:38 PM
May 2015

on the police force to sweep it under the rug until the statute of limitations had expired. And the sisters weren't the only victims, there was one more.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
40. ya. you know, i didnt read the paragraph in between the two links. i am going to delete my post
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:43 PM
May 2015

thanks for making me do a closer read

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
53. He got a child-porn-loving friend on the police force to cover it up.
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:29 PM
May 2015

I'm having a hard time believing that's a coincidence, that he just so happened to be a pedophile.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
54. Not at all an unreasonable conclusion on your part. A more honorable police officer would
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:31 PM
May 2015

have done their job and begun a thorough investigation.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
23. Ah yes, the good ol' Family Research Council.
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:06 PM
May 2015

Working to save the rest of us from gay marriage and pictures of consenting adults fucking on the internet.

http://www.frc.org/pornography

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
27. The hypocrisy is so thick you couldn't cut it
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:11 PM
May 2015

with a chainsaw. Business as usual for the reichwingers.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
28. and the duggars are apparently transphobic, too.
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:13 PM
May 2015

Another ideological position that is noxious as fuck no matter who it comes from.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
46. Am I the only one having trouble understanding
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:40 AM
May 2015

exactly what was "redacted" in this part?

“James said that they disciplined (redacted, Josh) after this incident.” The family did not alert authorities...

<snip>

Is redacted the name of another person involved, the victim or what?

My main problem is that they let it continue even after knowing. It was their responsibility to protect those girls from harm and they did not do it.

Some people can complain that he was "only" 14 years old, but the adults in this case, were adults, and should have done the right thing. They did not. Others were molested by him because of their inaction. They enabled him.

Yet, these are the same people who call gay people an abomination. I tend to think child molestation is an abomination. I guess we just have different religious beliefs, then. Damn shame that people like them can hide behind their religious beliefs and do any damn thing they damn well please.

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
47. It means that the names were redacted in the police report but the news outlet
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:47 AM
May 2015

confirmed that it was Josh Duggar being referred to.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
50. I was wondering, because the way they had redacted with the comma
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:00 PM
May 2015

then his name made me wonder who else got punished. It looked like someone else's name was redacted but not his.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
48. I didn't even know about this story
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:47 AM
May 2015

Full disclosure that I am disgusted by this celebration of irresponsible over-breeding and cultism.

But here is some info I found when I looked it up.

Jim Bob told police in 2006 that when Josh returned home in 2003, Jim Bob, accompanied by some of his church elders, took Josh to Arkansas State Trooper, Jim Hutchens. Jim Bob knew Hutchens personally. Hutchens did not take any official action and instead gave Josh a “very stern talk.”

According to inTouch, Hutchens is now currently serving 56 years in prison for child pornography and never charged Josh Duggar.


Seriously, WTF is going on here? When will people get a clue that these people are messed up and their ideas are harmful? Is there anyway that people will realize that they are all hypocrites and charlatans? Damn, America, you're stupid.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
61. People are commenting that they think old Jim Bob might be the originator of this behavior
Fri May 22, 2015, 03:00 PM
May 2015

I have not watched one minute of the show, so I can't be sure, but yes the fact that he took him to a child porn lover is HIGHLY suspect. There is lots of talk that he seems pervy or strange on the show. I really wonder if there is more to the story. They let Josh fall on his sword pretty damn fast. There is too much covering up and strange coincidence. I'll bet if they keep digging, they might find more abuse. And that fucker should be put in jail. Apparently his wife wrote an article that she never says no to sex and they only time they're not fucking like bunnies is 40 days after she gives birth to a boy and 80 days after birthing an unclean (slave) girl. So you can bet there's more there. And how did they get the girls to keep quiet? They surely blamed them for being lustful harlots who at age 6 tempted their brother to sin. The more I think about it, the more violent thoughts go through my head, so I better stop. A mother and father who don't protect their children from a rapist? OH HELL NO.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
57. Arkansas needs a change in laws
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:34 PM
May 2015

They need to change the statute of limitation on these crimes. If they are adamant on keeping the three-year limit, it should be three years after the victim reaches their age of majority, and if it turns out that the victim told a mandatory reporter (teacher, church elder) within the statute of limitations, but the mandatory reporter didn't do their duty, the statute of limitation should not count.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
60. Absolutely and I thought mandatory reporters HAD TO REPORT
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:53 PM
May 2015

As a teacher and as the child of a teacher, that was very well known. You MUST report even if there is a hint of suspicion. You are legally obligated to report and I'm not sure how it goes by state, but you will definitely lose your job. This town must be at the mercy of this cult and the "elders" who like the Catholic Church just want to sweep these horrific crimes under the rug to keep the money flowing and their false appearance of morality intact. I have NO IDEA how they sleep at night or, as people who supposedly believe in hell, don't melt through the floor in fear of what's waiting for them. They are monsters!

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
62. Considering the cop who was told is currently serving 56 years for child pornography
Fri May 22, 2015, 03:48 PM
May 2015

it's no wonder he swept it under the rug, but it is especially galling that victims lose the chance to have their perpetrator face justice because people don't do their duty.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
58. Duggars fail to alert the PROPER authorities because those with a penis are important.
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:36 PM
May 2015

Those with vagina's not so much. It's a pattern of mysoginy for almost all persons so fully immersed in religiousosity

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Josh Duggar apologizes am...