Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Fri May 22, 2015, 04:12 PM May 2015

37 year old Maggie Gyllenhaal ‘too old’ to play 55-year-old’s love interest

Oscar nominee Maggie Gyllenhaal was left speechless when a casting boss recently told her she was “too old” to play the onscreen love interest of a 55-year-old man.



The 37-year-old The Dark Knight star’s experience of ageism in Hollywood initially left her fuming, but she couldn’t help but laugh once she had time to digest the executive’s remark.

The actress refuses to name the man behind the comment or the project he ruled her out of, but she tells TheWrap.com, “There are things that are really disappointing about being an actress in Hollywood that surprise me all the time… It was astonishing to me. It made me feel bad, and then it made me feel angry, and then it made me laugh.”

Despite the negative incident, Gyllenhaal remains hopeful she will continue to receive opportunities to play strong women on film.
http://blog.sfgate.com/dailydish/2015/05/22/maggie-gyllenhaal-too-old-to-play-55-year-olds-love-interest/

164 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
37 year old Maggie Gyllenhaal ‘too old’ to play 55-year-old’s love interest (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA May 2015 OP
It's unbelievable what Hollywood does to women sharp_stick May 2015 #1
There was a funny video about that topic recently, I don't recall where I saw it arcane1 May 2015 #2
Julia Louis-Dreyfus' "no longer fuckable' video? randome May 2015 #63
Found it: arcane1 May 2015 #8
Love it. Women just gotta have fun Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #18
Love this. LWolf May 2015 #23
Too funny! And yes, I DID notice that about Sally Field and Tom Hanks Warpy May 2015 #101
It is sad the way actresses are judged... awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #105
Love that clip. Screw the media and screw Hollywood. liberal_at_heart May 2015 #108
Is Woody Allen producing/directing the movie? guillaumeb May 2015 #3
Woody does like those may / December romances doesn't he? Liberal_in_LA May 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author guillaumeb May 2015 #22
Hollywood is pretty much Logan's Run ZX86 May 2015 #4
Actually I think that as well as Falling Down: Initech May 2015 #30
Dafuq? KamaAina May 2015 #5
He played for the Steelers, didn't he? madinmaryland May 2015 #129
... KamaAina May 2015 #156
Producer Pig should be outted imo. Rex May 2015 #7
She looks 50 4139 May 2015 #9
Um, nope. winter is coming May 2015 #12
Maybe he looks 40 Reter May 2015 #148
That comment nugget is sexist and ageist! 50 y o women are beautiful and many are wise. Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #17
It is neither sexist nor ageist... 4139 May 2015 #20
Ridicule and degradation are so easily apparent Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #21
...and how do you tell by one photo? Let me take 20 photos of you and then pick out... BlueJazz May 2015 #138
Wha? I was responding to 4319's derogatory comment about Maggie looking 50. Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #139
I'm an Idiot. Note to self: Do not eat ice cream, watch TV and post to the wrong poster. BlueJazz May 2015 #141
... Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #143
You must be very young gollygee May 2015 #24
60 4139 May 2015 #25
Then you can tell she doesn't look 50 gollygee May 2015 #26
In the pic she that was used in the OP, she does look a lot older Reter May 2015 #149
She looks younger than any of the 40-somethings I know gollygee May 2015 #151
Then you need to get out more. Lizzie Poppet May 2015 #40
I'm afraid so DavidDvorkin May 2015 #39
? Skittles May 2015 #43
My "Afraid so" was in reference to her looking 50 DavidDvorkin May 2015 #48
Uh, there's a well-established pattern. SusanCalvin May 2015 #55
Huh? DavidDvorkin May 2015 #56
If you hear hoofbeats, SusanCalvin May 2015 #67
Try responding to what I said, instead of making a general observation. DavidDvorkin May 2015 #70
OK. SusanCalvin May 2015 #72
While that's true, I'll still reserve judgement in this case DavidDvorkin May 2015 #74
Probably true if so. SusanCalvin May 2015 #79
That's a different discussion, and we'd probably find ourselves in agreement DavidDvorkin May 2015 #81
Movies, for me, SusanCalvin May 2015 #82
There's no way in hell she looks 50. I don't even think she looks 37. She looks younger than liberal_at_heart May 2015 #116
If I didn't know anything about her, I'd guess she was in her late forties. DavidDvorkin May 2015 #137
No she doesn't gollygee May 2015 #152
To you she doesn't, to me she does DavidDvorkin May 2015 #155
What does 50 look like? DawgHouse May 2015 #41
Here: kcr May 2015 #51
She might look like Hollywood's version of 50. But she doesn't look like a typical 50 year old. pnwmom May 2015 #60
No, she doesn't. Cha May 2015 #62
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #65
Well, every casting decision should be based on what makes you pitch a tent, huh? PeaceNikki May 2015 #83
Still 5 years younger than him treestar May 2015 #112
Damn Solly Mack May 2015 #10
casting directors etc.....are below street pimps olddots May 2015 #11
I wonder if it was tje casting director's opinion TexasBushwhacker May 2015 #13
I know when I, as a middle-aged woman, am looking for movies to go see, tanyev May 2015 #14
Is Hollywood targeting woolldog May 2015 #78
Maggie Gyllenhaal is worth $15 Million. As with $300M J. Lopez, closeupready May 2015 #15
economic vs social justice. she has $ so fuck misogyny. doesnt matter, irrelevant. financially, seabeyond May 2015 #36
No. Misogyny matters, but Maggie's welfare is secure. closeupready May 2015 #45
In your world, THIS is your example of social justice? Bonobo May 2015 #58
Steve Buscemi Dorian Gray May 2015 #64
Yup. 99Forever May 2015 #66
so if a white director told Chris Rock he was too dark-skinned for an African American role, that'd be ok? zazen May 2015 #110
Actors get chosen based on their looks. It is part of the job. Bonobo May 2015 #142
I would never be picked to play Bill Walton AngryAmish May 2015 #154
Then that would be a social issue involving short-shaming or something I guess. nt Bonobo May 2015 #159
It is women being treated unfairly treestar May 2015 #132
You need to be really careful because falling from a high horse that high CBGLuthier May 2015 #52
Most casting directors do not deserve to saved if falling over a cliff. Dawson Leery May 2015 #16
Maybe he didn't want to tell her she wasn't pretty enough. Bonx May 2015 #19
Right and I'm sure the 55-year-old man looks perfect gollygee May 2015 #27
Meh, Its hollywood Travis_0004 May 2015 #32
You are also missing the point gollygee May 2015 #35
they are intentionally ignoring the point. again. economic justice vs social. SURELY if there is seabeyond May 2015 #37
Yeah and people wonder gollygee May 2015 #44
Is this performance art at this point? nt Bonobo May 2015 #59
Not true. Helen Mirren is still smokin hot Bonx May 2015 #49
Mirren is not smoking hot, and getting great work. kwassa May 2015 #53
That made no sense, but OK. Bonx May 2015 #54
This Reter May 2015 #150
Women are supposed to crawl off and die when they hit 35. Manifestor_of_Light May 2015 #28
What's the movie about? davidn3600 May 2015 #29
I agree. Maybe the movie is about some old guy chaising after 20 year olds. LisaL May 2015 #75
I was actually wondering if Gyllenhaal got her start in the business hughee99 May 2015 #160
In the 1959 movie "North by Northwest" Lydia Leftcoast May 2015 #31
Also 1985 film "Murphy's Romance". no_hypocrisy May 2015 #33
i liked the movie and i like both actors. i had a tough time watching the movie because of the age seabeyond May 2015 #38
Relationships do happen like that, but they should be the exception ... dawg May 2015 #47
Crispin Glover was younger than Michael J fox in back to the future Travis_0004 May 2015 #34
Anne Bancroft was only 6 years older than Dustin Hoffman, yet "Mrs. Robinson" Tanuki May 2015 #57
In the Manchurian Candidate (the 1962 version), Angela Lansbury was only 3 years older hughee99 May 2015 #161
Guy is 55? Wonder if he's James Spader/Rupert Everett/Hugh Laurie/Vincent D'Onofrio/Kevin Spacey/ valerief May 2015 #42
What a ridiculous statement by the movie executive. ladjf May 2015 #46
STUPID DonCoquixote May 2015 #50
Yeah, a lot of that type of thinking from the Suits of Hollywood and it is so boringly wrong. It's Cha May 2015 #61
I bet this is about the actors' enormous egos too. Oneironaut May 2015 #68
Hollywood is fantasyland oberliner May 2015 #69
Maggie G has frequently appeared in the theater in challenging roles, she is excellent on stage. Bluenorthwest May 2015 #71
But she says that she was surprised oberliner May 2015 #73
True. "Surprise" is the last thing I'd feel. nt SusanCalvin May 2015 #80
Women don't prefer men in their 50s and 60s gollygee May 2015 #90
George Clooney is 54 oberliner May 2015 #92
This is a result of sexism, not an explanation gollygee May 2015 #93
exactly. but a myth needed by so many. nt seabeyond May 2015 #95
age diference in marriage is like 2.3 years. and yearly, is going down. pretty much tells us seabeyond May 2015 #96
True. Real 55 year old men don't want a woman in their twenties treestar May 2015 #119
that is exactly it. use and be used. nt seabeyond May 2015 #121
How so? oberliner May 2015 #97
OK you obviously didn't read my post gollygee May 2015 #98
Huh? oberliner May 2015 #99
Because older and younger men are the only ones who spend money to watch movies? n/t seaglass May 2015 #100
No oberliner May 2015 #103
Do you see that as a problem for women? That executives/casting directors kowtow to male hangups to seaglass May 2015 #109
Absolutely oberliner May 2015 #124
I think when it happens to you, it is an oh wow moment. Don't know how old you are but seaglass May 2015 #134
Fair point oberliner May 2015 #136
Why do you think both older and younger men are attracted to younger women? gollygee May 2015 #102
Not sure oberliner May 2015 #104
You don't think there's sexism in Europe? gollygee May 2015 #107
I do think there is sexism in Europe oberliner May 2015 #120
you think us women dont want a hot 19 yr old? ya right buddy. then the reality. seabeyond May 2015 #111
I don't think that oberliner May 2015 #122
i think whats his name, you used? clooney stepped over the line of old the last couple of years. seabeyond May 2015 #126
Definitely disagree with you here oberliner May 2015 #128
old is old. we all have had a lifetime of being told men do not count in old. nt seabeyond May 2015 #130
He looks much older this year than last gollygee May 2015 #131
I think it may have more to do with biology davidn3600 May 2015 #144
because back in stone age, it was all about attractive. fuck.... seabeyond May 2015 #145
It was about creating offspring davidn3600 May 2015 #146
i want to know how "attractive" stone age women were. do tell. you are the one linking "attractive" seabeyond May 2015 #147
You are confusing attraction with appearance. They are not the same. davidn3600 May 2015 #153
Then there is the double standard. treestar May 2015 #117
Of course there is oberliner May 2015 #125
Well I guess we are saying there should not be treestar May 2015 #133
Agreed oberliner May 2015 #135
This ^^^^^^^^^ treestar May 2015 #115
You're in essence saying yes it's sexist but it's the way it is so just accept it treestar May 2015 #114
No I'm not oberliner May 2015 #118
Pedophile Fantasy HassleCat May 2015 #76
my thoughts exactly. liberal_at_heart May 2015 #127
This is so very very wrong Gothmog May 2015 #77
What an idiot. That movie will be missing out on outstanding actress. Probably even an actress that liberal_at_heart May 2015 #84
What if the plot calls for a much younger woman? AgingAmerican May 2015 #85
They all call for a younger woman and an older man. That's the problem. We're obsessed with seeing liberal_at_heart May 2015 #86
Some story plots are based on such things AgingAmerican May 2015 #87
Of course they don't have to be realistic, but sometimes it is nice to see Hollywood do something liberal_at_heart May 2015 #88
I'm not talking about formulas AgingAmerican May 2015 #89
You may not be, but I am. The reason some plot stories call for a younger woman and an older man liberal_at_heart May 2015 #91
"I'll See You in My Dreams" CrispyQ May 2015 #106
Maybe, but that plot has been overdone treestar May 2015 #123
What is an 'over done plot'? AgingAmerican May 2015 #157
Well I at least would not be interested treestar May 2015 #162
How do we know it was a romance movie? AgingAmerican May 2015 #163
she was deemed to old to play a love interest treestar May 2015 #164
Hell, I'm 53... MrScorpio May 2015 #94
No mention of what the movie is about? PersonNumber503602 May 2015 #113
My guess is that "too old" might have meant something else. TheManInTheMac May 2015 #140
Sadly, that mindset is almost as old as Hollywood itself... Blue_Tires May 2015 #158

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
1. It's unbelievable what Hollywood does to women
Fri May 22, 2015, 04:17 PM
May 2015

They're good to about 30 or 35 and then nothing until they can play doting mothers.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
2. There was a funny video about that topic recently, I don't recall where I saw it
Fri May 22, 2015, 04:24 PM
May 2015

It was a group of famous actresses in their 40's talking about this...

Dammit, it's going to bug me until I remember where I saw it

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
63. Julia Louis-Dreyfus' "no longer fuckable' video?
Sat May 23, 2015, 06:10 AM
May 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
101. Too funny! And yes, I DID notice that about Sally Field and Tom Hanks
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:37 PM
May 2015

and there's a wonderful song in "Postcards from the Edge" about how every actress goes through stages from ingenue to vamp to mother to camp.

Hollywood has a weird idea of women. I watch damned few of their movies because of it, preferring BBC and foreign flicks, subtitles or not. Hollywood with it's emphasis on very young women paired with very old men and no character development of either lost me decades ago.

Response to Liberal_in_LA (Reply #6)

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
12. Um, nope.
Fri May 22, 2015, 05:15 PM
May 2015

And even if she did, why would a 50-year-old woman be too old to be a love interest for a 55-year-old man?

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
138. ...and how do you tell by one photo? Let me take 20 photos of you and then pick out...
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:02 PM
May 2015

...the worst one. Get a clue please.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
139. Wha? I was responding to 4319's derogatory comment about Maggie looking 50.
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:08 PM
May 2015

Get a clue about what? Recognizing ridicule and derision of women and age when I see it?

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
141. I'm an Idiot. Note to self: Do not eat ice cream, watch TV and post to the wrong poster.
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:16 PM
May 2015

I'm sorry Don't call me Shirley Forgive me.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
24. You must be very young
Fri May 22, 2015, 06:24 PM
May 2015

to have so little an ability to judge age of people who aren't very young.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
26. Then you can tell she doesn't look 50
Fri May 22, 2015, 06:37 PM
May 2015

I'm in my late 40s and around women of this age constantly. She doesn't look at all 50.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
149. In the pic she that was used in the OP, she does look a lot older
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:42 PM
May 2015

But in other pictures, she looks much younger.

DavidDvorkin

(19,475 posts)
48. My "Afraid so" was in reference to her looking 50
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:50 PM
May 2015

Rather than 37.

From the article, we don't know the specifics. Perhaps the character she was auditioning for is supposed to look mid-30s. If so, she doesn't qualify.

The elephant in the room that I referred to is how much older she looks than her age. Were other actresses of the same age also rejected, or was it just her? We don't know. The outrage across the Internet at this story isn't justified, at least based on what little we know.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
67. If you hear hoofbeats,
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:29 AM
May 2015

your first thought is *not* a herd of zebras. (Unless, of course, you're in an area where they're more common than horses.)

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
72. OK.
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:58 AM
May 2015

There's a well-documented history of sex and age (at least with regard to women) discrimination in Hollywood. So I lean toward that explanation, although I'm always open to facts.

Which is essentially what I already said.

DavidDvorkin

(19,475 posts)
74. While that's true, I'll still reserve judgement in this case
Sat May 23, 2015, 10:26 AM
May 2015

I'd like to know what the storyline was. If the character is in her 20s or 30s, then Gyllenhaal would be a very bad choice for the role.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
79. Probably true if so.
Sat May 23, 2015, 11:48 AM
May 2015

Leading us to the next question: "Is it absolutely essential, story-wise, that the character be in her 20s or 30s?"

Once again, based on past history, my bet would be on "no."

DavidDvorkin

(19,475 posts)
81. That's a different discussion, and we'd probably find ourselves in agreement
Sat May 23, 2015, 01:05 PM
May 2015

I don't know when I first noticed how often the leading man was middleaged to old and the female love interest was young enough to be his daughter. Maybe about 20 years ago?

I detest that on the screen. May-December romances happen, in both directions, but they're rare. In any case, in movies that's rarely the story. Usually, the old man is playing a romantic hero. I'd much rather see a younger actor in that role, and I'd much rather see the two characters being around the same age.

One could object that restricting male leads to young actors would just exacarbate the problem of Hollywood ageism by subjecting men to the discrimination that actresses now face. Frankly, I don't care. Movies are for escape, and I want to see beautiful young people on the screen.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
82. Movies, for me,
Sat May 23, 2015, 01:29 PM
May 2015

Can be for many other things besides escape, and I rarely enjoy pure escapism. That's probably why I like very few contemporary movies.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
116. There's no way in hell she looks 50. I don't even think she looks 37. She looks younger than
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:46 PM
May 2015

37. What are women suppose to look like anyway? Are we all supposed to eternally look 15 years old? Because if that is the case, that is disgusting and unattainable.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
152. No she doesn't
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:48 PM
May 2015

I look in my late 40s, and I am in my late 40s, and I look about 10 years older than she looks.

DavidDvorkin

(19,475 posts)
155. To you she doesn't, to me she does
Sat May 23, 2015, 10:35 PM
May 2015

It's nonsense to say "No, she doesn't," as though it were something objective.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
60. She might look like Hollywood's version of 50. But she doesn't look like a typical 50 year old.
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:24 AM
May 2015

She really looks her natural age, IMO.

Response to 4139 (Reply #9)

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
11. casting directors etc.....are below street pimps
Fri May 22, 2015, 05:04 PM
May 2015

the nature of entertainment is unjust ,thats why facists want to control the bizz .

TexasBushwhacker

(20,185 posts)
13. I wonder if it was tje casting director's opinion
Fri May 22, 2015, 05:27 PM
May 2015

or the actor's. I remember many years ago, someone suggested Jodie Foster to be cast as Michael Douglas' love intterest and Michael said she was too old. He was born in 1944. She was born in 1962.

tanyev

(42,552 posts)
14. I know when I, as a middle-aged woman, am looking for movies to go see,
Fri May 22, 2015, 05:29 PM
May 2015

I'm always on the lookout for movies that have a love story between an OK looking 55 year old man and an unbelievably hot 25 year old woman.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
15. Maggie Gyllenhaal is worth $15 Million. As with $300M J. Lopez,
Fri May 22, 2015, 05:34 PM
May 2015

if she didn't work another day in her life, she'd still likely be in the top 0.001 in terms of net wealth. So no, I'm not feeling it.

I get the point that it's not fair that she wasn't even considered for the part on the basis of her talent (which is considerable). But that's just the way it goes. She is a part of that sexist machinery known as Hollywood. She can always turn her back on it.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
36. economic vs social justice. she has $ so fuck misogyny. doesnt matter, irrelevant. financially,
Fri May 22, 2015, 08:15 PM
May 2015

she is secure.

if people have little faith in economic justice trickling down to social, this is an example.

but it is ok. because she has $.

i really am surprised all over the place how often i am hearing this sentiment, while in the mist of this very argument.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
45. No. Misogyny matters, but Maggie's welfare is secure.
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:25 PM
May 2015

So I save my energy for the homeless minority woman trying to raise children. Like, for example, the women profiled on many of Al Jazeera's documentary programs, or even on Frontline occasionally.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
58. In your world, THIS is your example of social justice?
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:18 AM
May 2015

An actor should get any role they want and should not be judged on how they look?

An actor??? Not judged on how they look?

What kind of fucking world are you living in?

You think Steve Buscemi is going to be chosen as the next fucking James Bond?

Would THAT also be a "social justice" issue?

zazen

(2,978 posts)
110. so if a white director told Chris Rock he was too dark-skinned for an African American role, that'd be ok?
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:41 PM
May 2015

Because the "part" was written for a lighter skinned African American? Because the directors consider lighter skinned African American men more--I don't know--wealthy, or attractive, or some ridiculous stereotype about lighter vs darker skin for African American men?

If Chris Rock said he was turned down for a part because he was too "dark" people would be screaming from the rooftops. Would you be defending the white director who thought lighter skinned African American men "appealed to a broader demographic," and that darker skinned Black men should just get over it because they're already made money in Hollywood?

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
142. Actors get chosen based on their looks. It is part of the job.
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:17 PM
May 2015

They know it, you know it, we all know it.

That's all there is to it.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
154. I would never be picked to play Bill Walton
Sat May 23, 2015, 10:21 PM
May 2015

I am 1.5 feet shorter than him. And can't play basketball.

Triggered.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
132. It is women being treated unfairly
Sat May 23, 2015, 06:37 PM
May 2015

and Hollywood does a lot to keep that up.

Women go to movies too, so if they really cared about their pockets they would do less of this.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
16. Most casting directors do not deserve to saved if falling over a cliff.
Fri May 22, 2015, 05:38 PM
May 2015

At times, I find it laughable to call Hollywood "liberal". Behind the scenes the place is just as bad as Wall Street.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
27. Right and I'm sure the 55-year-old man looks perfect
Fri May 22, 2015, 06:40 PM
May 2015

Do you notice that women are expected to not age and look perfect but men are allowed to age and are not expected to look perfect? Well then, you should know that That's The Whole Point Of This.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
32. Meh, Its hollywood
Fri May 22, 2015, 07:26 PM
May 2015

There is always going to be somebody younger and more beautiful to take your job. She made 15 million and will have plenty of more roles, so Im sure she will be ok.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
35. You are also missing the point
Fri May 22, 2015, 08:02 PM
May 2015

It isn't whether she'll be OK or not. She is pointing out sexism in Hollywood. Men are allowed to age and be imperfect, women are not.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
37. they are intentionally ignoring the point. again. economic justice vs social. SURELY if there is
Fri May 22, 2015, 08:17 PM
May 2015

economic justice, social will follow.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
44. Yeah and people wonder
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:22 PM
May 2015

why we don't feel secure that the Dem. party, or any particular Democratic individual, will be on our side. Because we regularly communicate with a group of progressive Democrats, and we regularly see them dismiss sexism, racism, homophobia, and whatever else.

"Meh." Right.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
53. Mirren is not smoking hot, and getting great work.
Fri May 22, 2015, 11:25 PM
May 2015

and is the exception, rather than the norm.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
28. Women are supposed to crawl off and die when they hit 35.
Fri May 22, 2015, 06:41 PM
May 2015

According to the movie and fashion industries.
Unless you're a powerful woman like Jane Fonda, and can get movies made with Jane Fonda, age 77, starring in them.

I saw The Dark Knight and thought it was the biggest waste of film I'd ever seen. I don't remember Maggie Gyllenhaal being in it because the two women were introduced and killed off quickly. I don't remember their character names either. No character development to make me care enough about them to notice their names. There was no chance for any human relationships to develop in that one. Nothing but "Explosions and Shit" as I call it. Violence and the threat of violence. No thanks.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
29. What's the movie about?
Fri May 22, 2015, 06:54 PM
May 2015

Maybe the plot is written so the 55 year old falls for a 20 year old or something. I have no idea...Im just asking if anyone knows what the role in the script really is? We are sort of out of context here.

Like it or not, movies are based on looks. The parts sometimes call for a certain look or physique. And it does apply to men in ways too. You don't see any fat old men playing Superman.

I understand this all plays into the narrative that women seem less valued in society as they age while men seem to gain social value with age, but that's a problem that goes beyond Hollywood. But Hollywood actresses should be focusing more on stronger and complex roles than love interests anyway. When you play a love interest, you kind of have to have a certain look. And chances are the younger actresses are likely going to win out.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
160. I was actually wondering if Gyllenhaal got her start in the business
Sun May 24, 2015, 03:01 AM
May 2015

because 30+ year old actresses were being passed over for her when she was in her 20's. I'm not saying it's right, although I have no idea what can realistically be done about it. Can you really FORCE studios to start putting age appropriate actresses in roles?

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
31. In the 1959 movie "North by Northwest"
Fri May 22, 2015, 07:04 PM
May 2015

Cary Grant was 55 years old in real life. His love interest, Eva Marie Saint, was 35, which was getting up there by the standards of movies in those days.

But here's the real killer. The woman who played Grant's mother, Jessie Royce Landis, was 61 years old--only 6 years older than her supposed "son."

Four years earlier, Cary Grant, at age 51, was in To Catch a Thief. That time, his love interest was 26-year-old Grace Kelly. Jessie Royce Landis was in this film, too, only playing Grace Kelly's mother, but at least she was 31 years older than Grace, so it was plausible casting.

But at the age of 54, Cary Grant played opposite 25-year-old Sophia Loren in Houseboat. No sign of Jessie this time, though.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
38. i liked the movie and i like both actors. i had a tough time watching the movie because of the age
Fri May 22, 2015, 08:20 PM
May 2015

split.

same with harrison. now he is older, i have no interest in watching him matched up with someone two decades younger.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
47. Relationships do happen like that, but they should be the exception ...
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:48 PM
May 2015

not the norm.

My uncle is about 20 years older than his wife and they seem pretty happy.

I even got the impression that a much-younger woman was showing a little interest in me the other day. Of course, it's also possible that she was just being friendly and I was just being a delusional old man.

If she had been older, I would really have been put on the spot. I would have had no excuse for not asking for her number.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
34. Crispin Glover was younger than Michael J fox in back to the future
Fri May 22, 2015, 07:35 PM
May 2015

And we was cast as Martys Dad. I realize most of the fim he is in the 50's and therefore a teenager, but he also played the role of George Mcfly as and adult

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
57. Anne Bancroft was only 6 years older than Dustin Hoffman, yet "Mrs. Robinson"
Sat May 23, 2015, 02:53 AM
May 2015

was supposed to be old enough to be his mother in The Graduate!

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
161. In the Manchurian Candidate (the 1962 version), Angela Lansbury was only 3 years older
Sun May 24, 2015, 03:05 AM
May 2015

than Laurence Harvey, who played her on-screen son.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
42. Guy is 55? Wonder if he's James Spader/Rupert Everett/Hugh Laurie/Vincent D'Onofrio/Kevin Spacey/
Fri May 22, 2015, 08:52 PM
May 2015

Jason Alexander/Val Kilmer.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
50. STUPID
Fri May 22, 2015, 11:00 PM
May 2015

I say this as one who admittedly feel in love with Magiie back in one of her eailrer movies "secretary", which still reamins a very sexy film

Cha

(297,192 posts)
61. Yeah, a lot of that type of thinking from the Suits of Hollywood and it is so boringly wrong. It's
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:06 AM
May 2015

a stupid cliché. they need to get over themselves.

Oneironaut

(5,493 posts)
68. I bet this is about the actors' enormous egos too.
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:35 AM
May 2015

"A 37-year-old? I can get any young girl I want!" etc., etc. Not that there's anything wrong with a 37-year-old woman: You have to remember that they're still obnoxious little boys inside and can't have their fwagile little egos bruised by someone reminding them that they aren't masters of the universe.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
69. Hollywood is fantasyland
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:46 AM
May 2015

Male moviegoers of all ages for the most part want to see young attractive women on the screen so that's what Hollywood provides.

Female moviegoers will still refer to male actors in their 50s and 60s as heartthrobs. You don't see that as much the other way.

Dumb action movies especially always seem to include attractive 20something females as eye candy for the mostly young male demographic.

Movies geared towards females will generally have 20something male eye candy as well, for what that is worth. Those so-called chick flick romances usually manage to find an excuse for a good looking younger guy to take his shirt off.

In any event, movies are designed not to reflect reality but rather to create a fantasy that attracts people to spend money to watch.

A female actress going into the business no doubt is already very well aware of this reality so I'm not sure why they would be surprised.

If you want to play strong characters as you get older, maybe consider doing theatre. The pay is less, but the parts usually have a lot more depth and the ageism is not quite as pronounced.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
71. Maggie G has frequently appeared in the theater in challenging roles, she is excellent on stage.
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:58 AM
May 2015

She's also a liberal Democrat and activist. A person does not have to be surprised by bias to object to it.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
73. But she says that she was surprised
Sat May 23, 2015, 10:06 AM
May 2015

From the OP:

"There are things that are really disappointing about being an actress in Hollywood that surprise me all the time… It was astonishing to me."

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
90. Women don't prefer men in their 50s and 60s
Sat May 23, 2015, 02:21 PM
May 2015

It's really men's fantasy land. Not just fantasy land in general.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
92. George Clooney is 54
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:03 PM
May 2015

He is considered a heartthrob by many women.

I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a 54 year old woman who is considered a heartthrob by similar numbers of men.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
93. This is a result of sexism, not an explanation
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:04 PM
May 2015

And really it's just older women who find him to be a hearthrob. Older women like older men. Younger women like younger men. But older men and younger men like younger women. This is the exact problem she's talking about.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
96. age diference in marriage is like 2.3 years. and yearly, is going down. pretty much tells us
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:21 PM
May 2015

we stick to our own age, on average. 2 yr difference is nuthin'.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
119. True. Real 55 year old men don't want a woman in their twenties
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:48 PM
May 2015

And most couldn't get one anyway. In the rare cases where they could and did, they get what they deserve. To be used for their money.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
97. How so?
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:28 PM
May 2015

Not sure I understand how women being attracted to George Clooney is a result of sexism.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
98. OK you obviously didn't read my post
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:42 PM
May 2015

Young women are attracted to younger men, like the guy who was in Twilight. Older women are attracted to older men like George Clooney. Older and younger men are all attracted to younger men. And men run the entertainment industry.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
99. Huh?
Sat May 23, 2015, 04:10 PM
May 2015

I've read your post and your re-posting of the same thing. Again, what you've described does not really reflect sexism. Since, according to your thesis, no group is especially attracted to older women then it would make sense for films not to feature them in romantic leads. If both older and younger men are attracted to younger women (you wrote men here, but I think you meant women) then it would make economic sense to feature them in such roles since they appeal to both age demographics.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
103. No
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:08 PM
May 2015

Because older and younger women do not generally have the same sort of hangups about the age of the male leads in the film.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
109. Do you see that as a problem for women? That executives/casting directors kowtow to male hangups to
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:35 PM
May 2015

the detriment of women?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
124. Absolutely
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:52 PM
May 2015

However, I do not find it surprising under the circumstances. Thus, it seemed strange to me that the actress in the OP was astonished when faced with this unpleasant situation.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
134. I think when it happens to you, it is an oh wow moment. Don't know how old you are but
Sat May 23, 2015, 07:22 PM
May 2015

there is that surprising moment when you don't feel old but suddenly you are too old for something, or at least others think you are. 37 is young for that moment, except maybe for professional athletes.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
136. Fair point
Sat May 23, 2015, 07:27 PM
May 2015

But she has been in the business most of her life and her parents are Hollywood people too.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
102. Why do you think both older and younger men are attracted to younger women?
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:03 PM
May 2015

Because of our sexist culture. It's a result of sexism.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
104. Not sure
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:11 PM
May 2015

Men of All Ages Want Women in Their Mid-20s, Study Says

Whereas women tend to prefer men of the same age or slightly older

Straight men of all ages tend to have their romantic sights set on women in their mid-twenties, while women prefer men who are about the same age as they are, according to a new study.

The survey out Friday, financed by the government-backed research funding group Academy of Finland, gathered data on 12,000 Finns and found that women, on average, are looking for partners who are about their age or slightly older. But men across the age spectrum have a sexual preference for women in their mid-20s. This remains true for men of all ages—men in their early-20s or younger are attracted to women older than themselves and older men are attracted to younger women.

The findings are similar to data culled from the dating website OKCupid, which found that male users of the site of all ages, by far, are looking for women in their early-20s

http://time.com/3433014/men-women-dating-mid-20s/

This study is from Finland, for what that is worth.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
107. You don't think there's sexism in Europe?
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:19 PM
May 2015

You said the exact same thing I said. Men of all ages are attracted to young women, and women are attracted to men about their same age. That is a result of our sexist society (and western society includes Finland.)

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
120. I do think there is sexism in Europe
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:49 PM
May 2015

I am not sure that men of all ages being attracted to younger women and women being attracted to men about their same age is a result of our sexist society, however.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
111. you think us women dont want a hot 19 yr old? ya right buddy. then the reality.
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:41 PM
May 2015

maybe because our wants are not constantly fed to us all our lives as some illusion to the right to have that 19 yr old, we handle reality a little better then you men

you are still under the illusion that 20 yr old really really wants you at 50

us women know better

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
122. I don't think that
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:51 PM
May 2015

I certainly am not under any illusion that a 20 year old woman really wants a 50 year old man.

I am merely observing that some women do view men in their 50s and 60s as heartthrobs in a way that is much rarer when the genders are reversed, and I think that is reflected in casting choices to some extent.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
126. i think whats his name, you used? clooney stepped over the line of old the last couple of years.
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:55 PM
May 2015

it happens with all men. we say how mature women still have it and mature men still have it. many dont.

a lot of it is simply created by hollywood and pr.

clooney is done, with the hot factor. as much as any woman his age. growing up with the same actors, i have found this to be true with ALL of them. i have yet to find one actor that has not stepped over the line to aging.

life

what we are talking about, and what you are talking about, is the exact same thing. an illusion created for ALL of us to live to coddle and stroke male ego.

no more.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
128. Definitely disagree with you here
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:58 PM
May 2015

Specifically this comment:

"clooney is done, with the hot factor. as much as any woman his age"

I think if a survey was taken there would be a pretty high percentage who think he is hot.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
131. He looks much older this year than last
Sat May 23, 2015, 06:06 PM
May 2015

He's probably not particularly attractive to women younger than 50 anymore, though they use a lot of makeup in the movies so he'll look younger in a movie. But of course, so would Maggie (however-she-spells-her-last-name.)

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
144. I think it may have more to do with biology
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:35 PM
May 2015

The purpose of sexual activity, at the biological level, is reproduction. Not just in humans but throughout the entire animal kingdom...the male searches for a healthy female to mate with. In humans, a woman who is young and looks healthy would appear attractive because she would have the best chance to produce a healthy baby.

That's the Darwinian answer. Think about it... humans spent most of their existence in the stone age. A woman pregnant at somewhat older ages in that day and age could be deadly.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
146. It was about creating offspring
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:10 PM
May 2015

Just like the drive of every species of life on this planet...survive and reproduce. That's Darwinism. And it's the only reason humans even exist.

If you have a problem with how that works...take it up with Mother Nature.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
147. i want to know how "attractive" stone age women were. do tell. you are the one linking "attractive"
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:25 PM
May 2015

you know, being fuckable, to the reproduction of man kind. so tell me about this "attractiveness" you envision.

come on, tell me. your fuckin argument. how gorgeous were these women. lol

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
153. You are confusing attraction with appearance. They are not the same.
Sat May 23, 2015, 09:56 PM
May 2015

Attractiveness in biological terms isn't necessarily based on appearance. It's largely based on fitness, health, body language, instinct, etc.

I'm not going to sit here and argue with you over basic high school biology. If you can't even accept the obvious fact that a younger woman has a higher chance of a successful pregnancy than an older woman, then you need to pick up a book.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
125. Of course there is
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:54 PM
May 2015

I think that most actors and actresses are aware of this when they go into the business. That's why I am an admirer of theatre which seems a lot less hung up on these sorts of things than movies.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
133. Well I guess we are saying there should not be
Sat May 23, 2015, 06:39 PM
May 2015

That is our aspiration.

Frankly Hollywood is stupid not to keep older women in roles - there are plenty of older women now with the baby boom and plenty of men too who would be interested in older female characters. Hollywood is sticking to much to its traditions when the world is changing.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
114. You're in essence saying yes it's sexist but it's the way it is so just accept it
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:45 PM
May 2015

Nothing ever changes.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
76. Pedophile Fantasy
Sat May 23, 2015, 10:45 AM
May 2015

You have to wonder what's in this guy's mind. Apparently, he wants an actress young enough to be the granddaughter. It's illegal to have someone 12 years old, or he'd probably go that way. Gyllenhaal is fabulous, and I'm sure she'll continue to get great roles.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
84. What an idiot. That movie will be missing out on outstanding actress. Probably even an actress that
Sat May 23, 2015, 01:33 PM
May 2015

would have given that movie an Oscar winning performance. It truly is their loss. She is phenomenal and will no doubt get many other fantastic roles.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
86. They all call for a younger woman and an older man. That's the problem. We're obsessed with seeing
Sat May 23, 2015, 01:49 PM
May 2015

actresses like Emma Stone with actors like George Clooney. It's not a realistic representation of what happens in the real world. Are there couples like that in the real world? Yes. Are they they only kind of couple in the real world? No. Maybe in Hollywood and maybe that's why that is all we see in Hollywood scripts, but it is not a real representation of the world that you and me live in.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
87. Some story plots are based on such things
Sat May 23, 2015, 01:59 PM
May 2015

Should plots be regulated?

I agree it isn't realistic as a general rule. I don't think movie plots have to be real representations. They are stories.

Harold and Maude, for example. Not very realistic, but a very good movie.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
88. Of course they don't have to be realistic, but sometimes it is nice to see Hollywood do something
Sat May 23, 2015, 02:05 PM
May 2015

other than what they always do. They have a formula that brings in the big bucks, and that is the formula they use every time. It gets boring. You have to go to the indie movies to truly get something that does not come out of the Hollywood cookie cutter formula for making money.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
89. I'm not talking about formulas
Sat May 23, 2015, 02:20 PM
May 2015

I'm talking about story plots.

I am curious what film she is talking about, that would give us a little perspective.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
91. You may not be, but I am. The reason some plot stories call for a younger woman and an older man
Sat May 23, 2015, 02:25 PM
May 2015

is because Hollywood knows that is what will bring in the money. I rarely go to the movies anymore. They are too expensive and they are all the same. I can't even remember the last time I was so excited about a movie coming out I said I have to see that movie. Let them make their summer blockbusters that blow things up and show women's breasts. I won't be one of the people paying $12 for a ticket to see it.

CrispyQ

(36,461 posts)
106. "I'll See You in My Dreams"
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:18 PM
May 2015

I'm looking for a theater that has it. Blythe Danner & Sam Elliot. Nice!

http://www.bleeckerstreetmedia.com/#!ill-see-you-in-my-dreams/cvk9

I'm sick of every movie featuring a older man with a woman young enough to be his daughter. I find it creepy. When I was in my 20s I hardly looked at men in their 30s, much less 40s or 50s. And if they were looking at me, I found them creepy, too.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
123. Maybe, but that plot has been overdone
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:52 PM
May 2015

It would be more interesting to explore the cougar thing that goes on these days.

Women watch movies too.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
162. Well I at least would not be interested
Sun May 24, 2015, 04:03 PM
May 2015

in yet another saga of older man and younger woman fall in love.



treestar

(82,383 posts)
164. she was deemed to old to play a love interest
Sun May 24, 2015, 04:21 PM
May 2015

love interest usually means that. If the movie was not a romance as a whole, it was still going to include a relationship of some type of "love interest" involving a 55 year old man.

For a romance movie it would be even dumber. That would be meant to attract female viewers. Make the hero in his late 30s. That's when men are at their most attractive.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
94. Hell, I'm 53...
Sat May 23, 2015, 03:12 PM
May 2015

If I were single again, I wouldn't be kicking 37 year old women to the curb. Shoot, the same goes for 45+ year old women as well.

What the fuck was this casting director talking about?

Pure Hollywood bullshit. I'm glad that Maggie the G called him on it.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
113. No mention of what the movie is about?
Sat May 23, 2015, 05:44 PM
May 2015

I agree that the way women in media are treated is very disturbing much of time, but I'll hold off on an opinion about this specific instance until I know what the movie is about. If the movie is about a old guy going after a much younger woman, then well, that's just what the movie is about. Although I doubt that is the case, because I couldn't see Gyllenhaal or anyone else making an issue out of it if that was the case. Still, I'll hold off on my opinion. If the character is supposed to play someone in her 30's or 40's then we'll know that the exec is an asshat.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
158. Sadly, that mindset is almost as old as Hollywood itself...
Sun May 24, 2015, 01:57 AM
May 2015

I remember Meg Ryan having a similar high-profile issue in the late 90s, and there have been plenty of women before her..

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»37 year old Maggie Gyllen...