Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. The only way to know is to compare input to output.
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:40 PM
May 2015

And I'm not even sure that this is possible, I'm not familiar with the wellhead equipment or presence of flow metering gear at either end of the pipe.

At Deepwater Horizon, there were submersible bots with cameras, and they weren't on the scene for quite a while.

Great question!

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
2. They plugged that leak, but who knows about the rest of the line.
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:41 PM
May 2015

It seems inspections haven't been a regular occurrence because there aren't enough inspectors to cover all the oil pipelines that are in the state. Welcome to the new small government model the Republicans like so much.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
5. There are oil pipelines all over the state. How do you get two? I don't know how
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:46 PM
May 2015

many this particular company has in my state. There are many oil companies operating throughout the state. I hope our legislators get rid of all of them. Just shut them down.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
7. Oh, okay. Yeah they probably have very few. I don't know but I'll look it up.
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:49 PM
May 2015

Now they want to bring the oil bomb trains with Alberta tar sands through these counties.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. The cars still have to be charged with some kind of fuel charged electricity, all of
Fri May 22, 2015, 10:01 PM
May 2015

it nasty other than solar and wind.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
10. I don't see any reason to doubt it - the dozens to hundreds of county and state
Sat May 23, 2015, 12:12 AM
May 2015

employees as well as the volunteers milling about would certainly notice if oil was still flowing up out of the ground. This wasn't a wellhead, where capping it might be difficult, it was a distribution pipeline where 'shutting it off' just means no longer sending oil down the pipe. That should be pretty easy.

I doubt they've actually fixed the pipe yet--the rupture was underground and maybe isn't even excavated yet--but 'shutting it off' doesn't require repairing the leak...

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
11. So it could be leaking anywhere then even though it's shut off or does the whole line drain when
Sat May 23, 2015, 07:28 AM
May 2015

it's shut off?

petronius

(26,602 posts)
12. One of the articles I saw said they had been ordered to remove any remaining oil
Sat May 23, 2015, 11:20 AM
May 2015

in the pipeline "within ten day" - I'm not sure how many days are left. I would imaging that, once a pipeline is shut off, the oil that was already in transit below the shut-off point continues to drain toward the terminus of the line, probably more and more slowly and eventually pooling up as the push from behind is removed...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How do we know the pipeli...