General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFront-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive?
Which do you prefer in a vehicle? As I've stated elsewhere, I wouldn't own a front-wheel drive vehicle. Only the automotive corporate giants benefit from the manufacture of front-wheel drive vehicles.
17 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Time expired | |
Front-wheel drive. | |
6 (35%) |
|
Rear-wheel drive. | |
11 (65%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Front wheel drive is much better in the ice and snow. You do need to be careful going downhill on a slippery road as the rear end can swing around on you.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I'd rather have to deal with a slight amount of oversteer than understeer, it's easier to compensate for once you learn where the limit is.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)You won't really be able to tell a difference.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)In the rain, coming up on a turn that ended up having a much tighter radius than I expected, a one year old El Dorado I was driving across country for the owner pulled me out of a turn that, without power to those wheels, would have taken me off the onramp.
PS, this was an American car.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)guitar man
(15,996 posts)If you do any of your own mechanic work rear wheel drive is the way to go. Every front wheel drive car I've ever owned has been an utter nightmare to work on.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)RWD is generally better for performance driving and drag racing. But front-drivers work better in a lot of wet conditions people drive in day-to-day. All cars are compromises.
Edit: And the post above re: over / understeer makes a good point. The flip side is that typical drivers deal better with FWD's typical understeer when approaching cornering limits.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)I'd pick RWD in a performance car (though front drivers can still handle very well) or a tow vehicle. FWD's easier to deal with otherwise.
JVS
(61,935 posts)Why would anyone want two drivetrains to worry about?
RC
(25,592 posts)You can go when everyone else is in the ditch.
Last year when we had record snowfall and the city couldn't keep up with the plows, I was the only one not getting stuck. (I'm in Canada, so it was a lot of snow. Really.
KG
(28,751 posts)prolly gonna own pick-ups from here on out, but that's got nothing to do with the drive train.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)and not towing something would a rear wheel drive car be superior? I learned on a rear wheel drive car in the 1980s and switched to a front wheel drive car (my first). Being in the north I would never consider going back. As an engineer I really can't see the advantage of extending the driveline back to the rear wheels. GM has done a heck of a job on holding down the cost of the Cavalier. My first one in 1985 was only about $2K less than the one I purchased in 2002 (which has been nearly a perfect car for me - thank you GM). I guess I may have gotten somewhat better tire life with a rear wheel but other than that???
All five of my cars (Cavalier, Lumina, Escort, Cavalier, and HHR) have all been front wheel drive. I was never that happy with the Escort, I had mixed feelings about the Lumina, and the HHR is still too new to rate (got it in 2009). The two Cavaliers have been great cars.
The corporate giants always give you a choice. I am a little sad to see the Crown Vic/Grand Marquis go away. I did rent them several times for long trips (because of the six passenger capability). Can't say I rented them because of the rear wheel drive though.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,328 posts)What I really need is to just drive a plow.
RC
(25,592 posts)Rear wheel drive you have to beef up the suspension and add weight in the trunk to get the traction of front wheel drive.
4WD is best of all. However it can take you out of reach of rescue before you get stuck. Always carry a shovel or two.
Kaleva
(36,299 posts)Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)Kaleva
(36,299 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)fil62793skx
(21 posts)OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)How the hell do you power out of a corner in a four wheel drift with a front wheel drive? Front wheel drive is for folks who think a line through a corner is sprinkled with white powder.
Ter
(4,281 posts)Vroom!
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)But I get lost a lot.
Most people are probably best served by front-wheel drive. All wheel drive is good if you live in places that get snow.
Rear wheel drive is pretty much non-existant in non-sports/luxury cars, or trucks.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)or else you're not going far in the wintertime.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)dwilso40641
(198 posts)Any where it rains or snows front wheel drive offers superior traction and control.
RockyMtnGuy
(83 posts)FWD offers better traction on icy or slippery roads. Rear while drive is great, but in winter, it quickly turns into "rear wheel slide."
flvegan
(64,407 posts)"Only the automotive corporate giants benefit from the manufacture of front-wheel drive vehicles."
Do tell.
Full disclosure. I do drive a car made in Japan. It is front wheel drive. Matter of fact, it's the fastest front wheel drive car ever built. It follows a 928S4, a couple Corvettes and a Grand National in my stable. So, I might kind of have some knowledge here.
JohnnyRingo
(18,628 posts)Using a universal power pod instead of individual drive components eliminates the need for a reinforced unibody or frame. It also simplifies unit versatility when one pod plugs into various platforms. RWD requires at least a half frame at the rear axle.
I'm not dissing FWD, I especially enjoy my LeSabre on winter roads, but for pure sport I like my vintage Triumph TR6.
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)....what they save on not having to cut a hypoid ring and pinion....
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)Will never own a front wheel drive.They push in the corners too much.
JohnnyRingo
(18,628 posts)I voted FWD for all season basic transportation, but for sport I like RWD. Downshifting a front drive into a corner is risky. On heavy deceleration, RWD keeps the rear bumper behind you.
I've always wondered who votes "pass" or "no opinion" in polls. By definition it means one doesn't care one way or the other. Why bother to register a vote at all?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Sometimes it's because of push polling, but in this case it looks like it's because the OP left out options for AWD, 4WD, or variable preferences for different applications.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)At least living here in the land of standing water, soggy leaf piles and street flooding.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)meaculpa2011
(918 posts)Better handling, better balance. ABS and traction control make all the old "foul weather" arguments obsolete.
Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)from November-April.
LeftinOH
(5,354 posts)in the winter. If it's not FWD, I don't want it.
madokie
(51,076 posts)The all wheel drive also has all wheel anti-lock brakes. In the rare occasion of snow and ice it is a go anywhere do anything vehicle.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)I wouldn't be opposed to RWD, necessarily, but my preference and familiarity are with the FWD.