Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:29 PM May 2012

Why is it off limits to say that Romney is a Mormon??

What is so negative or suspicious about Mormonism that makes it "off limits"?

Is it sort of like someone that doesn't want to talk about their criminal record because they did time for pornography or child abuse? I don't think of Mormonism like that. I think of it as a religion just like Southern Baptist or Prebsbyterian or Catholic?

So why is it taboo to talk about? We did not refrain from saying that Jimmy Carter was a Southern Baptist. In fact, he was rather proud of the fact.

So why are we hiding from the Mormon religion??

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is it off limits to say that Romney is a Mormon?? (Original Post) kentuck May 2012 OP
You misspelled "Moron" BuckIA May 2012 #1
My nominee for best response of the day. n/t 99Forever May 2012 #6
I would nominate that for DUzy! kentuck May 2012 #7
LOL! Jazzgirl May 2012 #30
lolz JNelson6563 May 2012 #17
Because Fundie right wing nuts don't want to be confused as to whom they must hate aint_no_life_nowhere May 2012 #2
it might hurt him with his base JI7 May 2012 #3
Because it's off limits to say that Obama is a Muslim. silverweb May 2012 #4
because if is often thought of as a cult- as is Scientology or the Moonies notadmblnd May 2012 #5
So if it was a cult..? kentuck May 2012 #9
I think we should talk about it too. I think all their strange rites and rituals should be brought notadmblnd May 2012 #10
Or that his family practiced polygamy Capt. Obvious May 2012 #8
Not just a Mormon C_U_L8R May 2012 #11
Cult? demosincebirth May 2012 #13
In 2008 and even now they bring up that Rev. Wright BS, I say it's fair game. Initech May 2012 #12
It's subtle...we can discuss Romney's faith Spike89 May 2012 #14
Who says it's off limits. trof May 2012 #15
I missed that memo too. nt ctaylors6 May 2012 #16
I see no problem with talking about it... kentuck May 2012 #18
Excellent point and it seems to be becoming Cleita May 2012 #26
It isn't, lots of people here love talking about it, and very few are hiding from it. jp11 May 2012 #19
I only see two groups with that view. JNelson6563 May 2012 #20
Because it's a secretive religion SoCalDem May 2012 #21
it's not ibegurpard May 2012 #22
Why? kentuck May 2012 #23
they encourage group-think ibegurpard May 2012 #25
I looked p an interesting article for you to read notadmblnd May 2012 #37
I guess for the same reason we can't call him a muslim. Cleita May 2012 #24
maybe it's this? I owe a May 2012 #27
It's a good question chowder66 May 2012 #28
I thought it was MORON underpants May 2012 #29
History is of the Essence Mister Lane May 2012 #31
Only a few are "concerned" about calling this out. nt Zorra May 2012 #32
Off limits? I hear it a dozen times a day. Zax2me May 2012 #33
There's not a problem with linking Romney to the LDS Church. MineralMan May 2012 #34
The media doesn't want to dig into that topic beyond the label "Mormon" JoePhilly May 2012 #35
Not just a Mormon DonCoquixote May 2012 #36

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
4. Because it's off limits to say that Obama is a Muslim.
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:40 PM
May 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Oh, wait....

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
5. because if is often thought of as a cult- as is Scientology or the Moonies
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:41 PM
May 2012

Perhaps he knows his religion is a farce and is ashamed of it?

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
9. So if it was a cult..?
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:55 PM
May 2012

We couldn't talk about it?

But Mormonism is an established religion, right? So why can't it be talked about? We should protect him from his religious-right base in the South? Why should we protect him? He is our political opponent? Don't we have a responsibility to point out his religion, without making a judgement about it one way or the other? Otherwise, it seems we are sweeping something under the rug for political reasons only?

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
10. I think we should talk about it too. I think all their strange rites and rituals should be brought
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:06 PM
May 2012

to light. But Rmoney doesn't want to talk about it. That's why he repudiated publicly what his strategists wanted to do in regards to the Pres and Rev Wright. I think he is ashamed and embarassed of his silly religion and I do think it is sillier than other religions. What with magic underwear, inheiriting and populating planets, plural marriage in the sky.. praying till it burns in your breasts, baptising by proxy, secret plot to overthrow US Government- all of it.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
8. Or that his family practiced polygamy
Thu May 17, 2012, 05:53 PM
May 2012

And they fled to Mexico so they could continue practicing polygamy.

Romney would prefer not to talk about polygamy.

I can see why, as public knowledge of polygamy in his family could cost him votes.

Polygamy.

C_U_L8R

(45,002 posts)
11. Not just a Mormon
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:12 PM
May 2012

But a Mormon Bishop.

I'd bet there would be a lot of talk and suspicion if a Catholic Bishop or any other sort of Bishop was running for President. Do we really want to be governed by some wackadoo church official ??

Spike89

(1,569 posts)
14. It's subtle...we can discuss Romney's faith
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:46 PM
May 2012

I think there is a very blurry line where it is appropriate to examine a candidate's faith because after all it does (the candidate's themselves claim) inform how they make decisions. The blurry part is "a candidate's faith" which can be parsed in two different ways; his/her personal interpretation and implementation of the religion or the religion itself.
It is fair to look at the first and discuss, for example, "Romney's faith has lead him to take a stand on issue X, and therefore he's likely to..." It isn't fair to say "Mormonism is a cult and magic underwear is silly so Romney, as a Mormon, is unqualified to be President."
Simply put, it is one thing to attack a candidate for "being" a member of a religion (wrong) and another thing to attack that candidate for "acting" on the religion. Not every Catholic is anti-choice, not even every anti-choice Catholic would impose that view on their legislative agenda. Likewise, not every Mormon will govern as an officer of the church.
Obama obviously isn't muslim, but it doesn't matter to me. He once (still does?) belonged to Rev. Wright's congregation, but again, I don't care. What matters is how those associations inform and influence his behavior and policies that matter.
I'd rather have a member of some crazed cult who can legislate sanely than a member of the most "sane" established religion who legislates on ideology over practicality.

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
18. I see no problem with talking about it...
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:57 PM
May 2012

Nor do I see any problem talking about Obama going to Rev Wright's church?

If the two Parties decide that they don't want to talk about it, then they can compromise and negotiate a cease fire on talking about religion.

Sound fair?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
26. Excellent point and it seems to be becoming
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:19 PM
May 2012

just that here at DU, if serving on jury duty and reading some of the alerts are pointing to a trend here.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
20. I only see two groups with that view.
Thu May 17, 2012, 06:58 PM
May 2012

Mitt's campaign and those who like to parade how righteous they are....You want to mention Mittens is a Mormon? Bigot!1! *puke*

Julie

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
21. Because it's a secretive religion
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:02 PM
May 2012

and because Romney refuses to talk about it.

There is a double standard in operation.

Democrats are portrayed as defenders of "the secular", so no matter how religious they personally are, they are always tagged as "unbelievers" and must constantly prove their beliefs

Republicans are portrayed as Christians FIRST and foremost, and since Christianity is the default position of the US, they rarely have to prove anything.

Odd-duck republican candidate who is NOT a Christian, always wants to be seen as part of the flock, so they never want to be singled out for scrutiny.

The media obliges republicans whenever they can.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
25. they encourage group-think
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:13 PM
May 2012

and an authoritarian mindset. Granted not all Mormons are like that but it's difficult to fit in (and it's a very social-oriented religion...it encompasses almost all aspects of your life) if you have unorthodox ideas or points of view...more so than other mainstream religions. They believe that their prophet and church leaders speak directly for God... most religions rely on scriptures. They believe that their "prophet" still receives revelation from God to this very day.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
37. I looked p an interesting article for you to read
Fri May 18, 2012, 09:08 PM
May 2012

Some posters here have indirectly attempted to chastise me for one of my previous posts. And I thought maybe I should attempt to provide some information that has led me to the opionon I have of the Mormon religion.


This link asks the question: How will view his Presidency (if elected) and how will he be influenced by the LDS church.
http://exmormon.org/d6/drupal/Mitt-Romney-Mormon-Secrets

The link I am providing is a site by ex mormons and has a plethora of information if you begin at the home page.

http://exmormon.org/d6/drupal/

 

I owe a

(50 posts)
27. maybe it's this?
Thu May 17, 2012, 07:20 PM
May 2012


in 1826, four years before the publication of the Book of Mormon, Joseph was arrested, jailed, and examined in court in Bainbridge, New York on the charge of being "a disorderly person and an impostor" in connection with his use of a peep stone to search for buried treasure. While the evidence indicates he was found guilty of this charge, the young Joseph was apparently released on the condition that he leave the area

http://www.utlm.org/newsletters/no68.htm

chowder66

(9,068 posts)
28. It's a good question
Thu May 17, 2012, 08:25 PM
May 2012

He is a mormon. He says he is. No one is saying he is a Scientologist or a Catholic, or any other religion.

It's interesting that many require religious presidential candidates but we are not supposed to discuss it.

Democrats are more tolerant but is there such a thing as being too tolerant - to the point that it becomes un pc to discuss topics that might offend others no matter how considerate the discussion may be??

Confusing.

 

Mister Lane

(7 posts)
31. History is of the Essence
Thu May 17, 2012, 08:32 PM
May 2012

Have you not heard of the prejudices that Mormons had to overcome in this Country, bro? It's pretty known and if the mainstream media wants President Obama to be reelected, it'll be best to not make Romney look like a Kennedy.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
34. There's not a problem with linking Romney to the LDS Church.
Fri May 18, 2012, 10:12 AM
May 2012

It's a fact. Where the problem comes in is when that membership leads to ridicule of the religion. Then, it can create a backlash effect. For example, attacking Romney for wearing "magic underwear" does nothing to help keep him from being elected. The Mormon garment is part of that church's doctrine, and faithful Mormons wear the stuff, at least some of the time. That has nothing to do with anything relating to whether someone should be elected to high office.

Similarly, the whole "planet" think is equally silly to use as a campaign feature. It is no more bizarre than regular Christian churches' concept of some "Heaven" and "Hell." It's just different. Ridiculing that serves no purpose.

The fact that Romney's great-grandfather or grandfather lived in Mexico and practiced polygamy is also a non-starter and won't affect anyone's vote. Polygamy isn't part of LDS doctrine today, and hasn't been for a long time. There are splinter groups that still practice it, but Romney's not a member of any of those.

Calling the Mormon church a "cult" is also a non-starter. It's a well-established religion, with members all across the country. It's no more a cult than any other large religious group, and no less a cult, either. The word "cult" makes no sense in this case, and does no good in bringing votes to Obama. Let the Right Wing do this, not us.

Romney is a Mormon. That is a fact. Current Mormon doctrines are fodder for discussion, certainly, but ridiculing what seems odd just doesn't do much, except to make those doing the ridiculing look petty. Romney has stated positions that can be attacked on any grounds we like, but making fun of his underwear, or calling him a polygamist for something his great-grandfather did is just foolish and will affect nobody's vote.

The reality is that the fundamentalist right is attacking Romney's Mormonism plenty often. It may well cost him votes from the far right, and that's a good thing. Our participation in that isn't needed. Independents, who we do want to vote for Obama, aren't going to be influenced by ridicule of the man's religion. They simply aren't. We'll do much better to attack Romney's stated positions in getting Independent voters to vote for Obama.

The bottom line is that ridicule or other outlandish attacks based on Romney's religion aren't going to benefit our side at all. So, they're a waste of time.

That the LDS Church opposes marriage equality very strongly is something worth using. The LDS Church's past refusal to allow black members to become members of the church hierarchy is a valid argument, especially when tied to Romney's failure to include black members in high positions on his staff. Those are things we can use that may have a good effect.

Underwear and planets? Not so much. Leave that to the Religious Right to bring up. They're doing it already.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
35. The media doesn't want to dig into that topic beyond the label "Mormon"
Fri May 18, 2012, 10:23 AM
May 2012

because the GOP has been playing a game here for a long long time.

Here is how the game works.

The GOP wants to keep all "Christians" as a voting block. Now, much of the right wing Fundy base thinks that Mormonism and Catholicism are cults. But they don;t really want to discuss that openly because doing so might divide the "Christian" voting block. So the GOP, and the media, might mention that a candidate is a Mormon, or a Catholic, but they avoid digging into the "who is a real Christian" question.

Of course the GOP loves to try to paint Democrats as "not true Christians". Anti "family values". No morals. So on.

And so they call Obama a Muslim, say he's "the wrong kind of Christian. All in an attempt to get the Christian voting block to vote against Obama and the Dems.

With a Mormon as the GOP candidate, the GOP is going to struggle here ... they can't be attacking Obama's religion, because it opens the door to the question "Are Mormons true Christians".

So, the GOP and the media will try to walk a tight-rope here. Its ok to say Mitt is a Mormon, but don't bring up the "Are Mormons true Christians" question, because it might cost the GOP part of its base.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
36. Not just a Mormon
Fri May 18, 2012, 10:38 AM
May 2012

But a Bishop. Has a Bishop ever been elected President? A clergyman that can run a church?

Also, he spoke regularly with the late Gordon Hinckley, the "prophet" who runs the church, in other words, the Mormon "pope."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1707753,00.html

It's one thing for JFK to be a Catholic, enitrely different if the Pope had a hand in his rise.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is it off limits to s...