Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 09:26 AM Aug 2015

We're a year into the unofficial war against Isis with nothing to show for it

by Trevor Timm


This Saturday marks one full year since the US military began its still-undeclared war against Islamic State that the government officials openly acknowledge will last indefinitely. What do we have to show for it? So far, billions of dollars have been spent, thousands of bombs have been dropped, hundreds of civilians have been killed and Isis is no weaker than it was last August, when the airstrikes began.

But don’t take it from me – that’s the conclusion of the US intelligence community itself. As the Associated Press reported a few days ago, the consensus view of the US intelligence agencies is that Isis is just as powerful as it was a year ago, and they can replace fighters faster than they are getting killed.

Like it does for every stagnant and endless war, this inconvenient fact will likely will only lead others to call for more killing, rather than an introspection on why continuing to bomb the same region for decades does not actually work. Perhaps we’re not firing missiles at a high enough rate, they’ll say, perhaps we need a full-scale ground invasion, or perhaps we need to kill more civilians to really damage the enemy (yes, this is an actual argument war mongers have been making).

Speaking of civilian deaths, they’ve barely gotten mention in the media over the past twelve months, likely because the US military has, somewhat incredibly, only admitted to two civilians casualties in an entire year of airstrikes spanning multiple countries. A new report by journalists and researchers in the region argues that the real number is probably around 500 civilians. Good luck getting the US military to come close to acknowledging that, though. Despite credible reports about civilian casualties almost immediately after the war started, it took the US nearly six months to admit there were any at all. And it’s tougher than ever for members of the media to travel into these war zones, and even when they head over with military officials, they are tightly restricted.

For now, there are already plans to launch more drone strikes in Libya, increased air power in Syria and who knows what is in store for Iraq. What the next year will bring as US presidential candidates vie for who can be “tougher” against Isis is anyone’s guess.

more

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/08/unofficial-war-isis-nothing-to-show-for

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
1. I disagree. They haven't completely overrun all of Syria and Iraq. And they would almost certainly
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 09:34 AM
Aug 2015

have done so without our intervention.

With two countries and all the money they have, we would be looking at a regional fundamentalist superpower who are eager to engage in unprovoked wars of aggression to expand their territory and influence.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
5. He states it. ISIS is no less powerful than a year ago
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 09:42 AM
Aug 2015

Meanwhile, your necocon argument that they would have become a 'superpower " is ludicrous. I suppose they would have amassed nuclear weapons and an air force and navy had we not bombed a bunch of rubble outer there these past 12 months. They would not have taken over all of Iraq or Syria, as all they have done is take over areas of similar Sunni belief, not Kurd or Shiite. Your scare mongering is so oughts.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
6. That's not proof. Proof would require that what he asserts would not have been different absent
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 09:44 AM
Aug 2015

our intervention and concrete evidence that says so.

The change from ISIS gaining territory and being on the offensive to a situation where there is a stalemate is a definite change.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
4. There is some progress
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 09:38 AM
Aug 2015

such as the rise of power from Kurds in that area.

But of course we have Turkey mucking things up with that. :/

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
7. So what? Kind of a back-handed way to say we should be isolationist, isn't it?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 10:09 AM
Aug 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
8. ISIS is a Sunni militia backed by the Saudis, Kuwaitis and Qataris
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 10:41 AM
Aug 2015

ISIS is helping us overthrow Assad, in part by creating an excuse for us to bomb the shit out of Syria. They are stabalizing Iraq and providing a buffer with Iran.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-state-sponsors-of-isis-saudi-arabia-qatar-turkey-why-are-they-no-subjected-to-sanctions/5403310

The Guardian piece reads like watching a baseball game and wondering why they aren't scoring more touchdowns.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
11. Funny, those are our key regional allies.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 12:08 PM
Aug 2015

The right hand fights ISIS while the left hand supports ISIS.

And everybody wants to talk about Iran destabilizing the region.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
9. So what's Timm's solution then, since he has this all figured out?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 10:57 AM
Aug 2015

And for all his complaints about civilian deaths, the media has done even less reporting on civilians killed by Assad, IS, and everyone else (unless they were western civilians, of course)

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
12. Well, it depends on what your definition of ''nothing to show for it'' is.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 01:13 PM
Aug 2015


KA-CHING: The Company Getting Rich Off the ISIS War

For the Middle East, the growth of the self-proclaimed Islamic State has been a catastrophe.
For one American firm, it’s been a gold mine.


by Kate Brannen
08.02.15

The war against ISIS isn’t going so great, with the self-appointed terror group standing up to a year of U.S. airstrikes in Syria and Iraq.

But that hasn’t kept defense contractors from doing rather well amidst the fighting. Lockheed Martin has received orders for thousands of more Hellfire missiles. AM General is busy supplying Iraq with 160 American-built Humvee vehicles, while General Dynamics is selling the country millions of dollars worth of tank ammunition.

SOS International, a family-owned business whose corporate headquarters are in New York City, is one of the biggest players on the ground in Iraq, employing the most Americans in the country after the U.S. Embassy. On the company’s board of advisors: former Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz—considered to be one of the architects of the invasion of Iraq—and Paul Butler, a former special assistant to Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld.

The company, which goes by “SOSi,” says on its website that the contracts it’s been awarded for work in Iraq in 2015 have a total value of more than $400 million. They include a $40 million contract to provide everything from meals to perimeter security to emergency fire and medical services at Iraq’s Besmaya Compound, one of the sites where U.S. troops are training Iraqi soldiers. The Army awarded SOSi a separate $100 million contract in late June for similar services at Camp Taji. The Pentagon expects that contract to last through June 2018.

A year after U.S. airstrikes began targeting the so-called Islamic State in Iraq, there are 3,500 U.S. troops deployed there, training and advising Iraqi troops. But a number that is not discussed is the growing number of contractors required to support these operations. According to the U.S. military, there are 6,300 contractors working in Iraq today, supporting U.S. operations. Separately, the State Department is seeking janitorial services, drivers, linguists, and security contractors to work at its Iraqi facilities.

While these numbers pale in comparison to the more than 163,000 working in Iraq at the peak of the Iraq War, they are steadily growing. And with the fight against ISIS expected to take several years, it also represents a growing opportunity for defense, security, and logistics contractors, especially as work in Afghanistan begins to dry up.

“It allows us to maintain the façade of no boots on the ground while at the same time growing our footprint,” said Laura Dickinson, a law professor at George Washington University whose recent work has focused on regulating private military contractors.

CONTINUED...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/02/the-company-getting-rich-off-of-the-isis-war.html

Ol' OP: Funny how that works

Has Corporate Owned News broadcast this story: REGULATING Defense Contractors?

As one who's been interested in this guy's comblicking companions in and out of government, including the cough Pentagon and cough cough cough CIA Wall Street Swiss banks cough Wendy Gramm of a combover War Party cough cough cough AKA BFEE, I hope they do. The traitors and warmongers who lied America into war may yet be held to account and face Justice.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We're a year into the uno...