Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:32 AM Aug 2015

CNN POLL: Jeb Bush, Favorable 34% Unfavorable 56%

http://www.pollingreport.com/A-B.htm#Jeb Bush

So much for people here saying "Hillary would lose to Jeb on the basis of fav/unfav" blah blah blah. This guy's scandals haven't even brought to light yet. But that's a good sign: Hillary has the Clinton legacy, Jeb has the Bush legacy. I think we know who wins...

Especially after voters are reminded of his rather active role in "electing" his brother or keeping a brain dead woman alive to please Pat Robertson and Jerry Fallwell, etc.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN POLL: Jeb Bush, Favorable 34% Unfavorable 56% (Original Post) ericson00 Aug 2015 OP
Jeb has a lot of money Tommy2Tone Aug 2015 #1
Amazing how much more savvy and successful ericson00 Aug 2015 #3
And he's the "lovable, cuddly" Bush! nt MADem Aug 2015 #2
He's got that Scarlet Letter scandal CanonRay Aug 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author CanonRay Aug 2015 #4
NO CLINTON NO BUSH! No more fucking dynasties! snooper2 Aug 2015 #6
The Clintons are not a dynasty. Bill and Hill are not blood relatives ericson00 Aug 2015 #7
nice spin but no thanks.... snooper2 Aug 2015 #10
These are not good numbers for Jeb Gothmog Aug 2015 #8
One must be sanguine as in the case of HRC however whatthehey Aug 2015 #9
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
3. Amazing how much more savvy and successful
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:40 AM
Aug 2015

both Georges were than Jeb. They went to better schools, ran away with their primaries, won the most votes one time each, Jeb probably will go 0-3 vs. the Georges.

CanonRay

(14,103 posts)
4. He's got that Scarlet Letter scandal
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:45 AM
Aug 2015

the whole Terry Schiavo mess, stealing the 2000 election for his idiot brother. Jebbie's got more that a few skeletons in his closets. I probably don't even know about most of them.

Response to ericson00 (Original post)

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
6. NO CLINTON NO BUSH! No more fucking dynasties!
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:46 AM
Aug 2015

The Clinton's and the Bush's can go vacation together in Italy or something

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
7. The Clintons are not a dynasty. Bill and Hill are not blood relatives
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:51 AM
Aug 2015

and they're a one generational political family. The Kennedys and Bushes span multiple and their candidates ARE blood relatives. That's a dynasty. The Clintons were born poor and are enjoying the fruits of their success. Kennedy and Bush were born rich.


How about some honour for Democratic heroes.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
10. nice spin but no thanks....
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:08 PM
Aug 2015

This really wouldn't look like a representative democracy


BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
OBAMA
OBAMA
OBAMA
OBAMA
OBAMA
OBAMA
OBAMA
OBAMA
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
9. One must be sanguine as in the case of HRC however
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:07 PM
Aug 2015

No household name political partisan has much of a shot at exceeding 50% favorability by a wide margin, or getting to <40% unfavorable.

How many Republican names would anyone of us respond to favorably? From Cruz to Collins on the loony scale or Trump to Boehner on the insider scale, the numbers would be so close to zero it wouldn't make a whit of difference. And as we often bemoan, Republicans are far better at lockstep. Doesn't matter if it's Sanders or Bashear, any Republican who knows who they are would respond as unfavorable. The differences we see are in knowledge not opinion. A nominated Sanders would jump to around 50% unfavorable overnight just as the Dem nominee as would a nominated Kasich or Carson on the right. Bush, and Clinton, are already there because they are known quantities.

Now this IS bad news for Bush, but the bad news is in the weaker than expected favorables for an establishment party golden boy. Part of that is the big money men syphoning off support for the puppets like Walker, and part of it is the reality show politainment crap with Trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN POLL: Jeb Bush, Favor...