Oklahoma should not execute Richard Glossip
Turns out Susan Sarandon can write, too.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/susan-sarandon-oklahoma-should-not-execute-richard-glossip
Based on one mans dubious testimony, Richard Glossip is sentenced to die on Sept. 16 for his alleged role in the murder of hotel owner Barry Van Treese....
According to Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin, Glossip has had two trials, appeals and a full clemency-board hearing; surely, his conviction and sentencing are just.
But Fallins argument is specious. The Oklahoma Court of Appeals tossed the first conviction due to gross ineffective assistance of counsel; the trial was unlawful.
The second trial wasnt much better. A careful review of the transcript reveals that Glossips lawyers did not thoroughly cross-examine Sneed. Had they carefully scrutinized Sneeds various confessions, they could have shown the jury all the contradictions, exposing Sneeds utter non-credibility. Or, had Glossips legal counsel allowed the jury to view Sneeds videotaped confession, the jurors could have seen how the detectives manipulated Sneed a teenager without a high school education into implicating Glossip.