Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,476 posts)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 03:59 PM Sep 2015

So you live in California. Or New York, or Minnesota

Three stalwart blue states where you can afford to stay home on election day knowing that the Democratic candidate will carry the state.

Well, think again. Especially as it appears that Trump could be the Republican nominee.

All three states voted for Nixon in 1972. CA and NY voted for Reagan in 1980 and in 1984. MN did not because native son Mondale was on the ticket.

More, California elected and re-elected Reagan and Arnold. Trump can fit right there.

Once Trump get the nomination he can "pivot" and return to his roots: single payer like Canada, special tax on millionaires, perhaps even support of Planned Parenthood.

There are many Democrats as there are Republicans who are disillusioned with the current environment. Many will vote for Trump. Yes, even in California there are many legal immigrants who would welcome a crackdown on undocumented immigrants. If I were a legal immigrants from, say, Guatemala, I would be very unhappy about being viewed as a potential undocumented, a criminal and a murderer like that person in San Francisco.

Thus, if Trump is the nominee, and you stay home because you do not like the Democratic nominee, you can kiss any future progressive rules from the Supreme Court goodbye. Which will be really sad, especially after the excitement that so many of us felt that last week of June.

Look at the current justices and see what will happen if the next president is a Republican.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 82
Antonin Scalia is 79
Stephen Breyer is 77
Anthony Kennedy is 79
Clarence Thomas is 67
Samuel Alito is 65
Sonya Sotomayor is 61
John Roberts is 60
Elena Kagan is 55


Just saying..

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So you live in California. Or New York, or Minnesota (Original Post) question everything Sep 2015 OP
Anyone who stays home over the presidential race forfeits every local election arcane1 Sep 2015 #1
This is how Nixon won in 1968 question everything Sep 2015 #9
Minnesotans generally don't stay home, whether we can "afford to" or not. We're one of the leaders Brickbat Sep 2015 #2
As long as I have been voting, and that's 41 years, that is the truth. hifiguy Sep 2015 #14
nixon and reagan were former office holders in CA mike_c Sep 2015 #3
If you think CA having elected Nixon and Reagan locally mitigates their national votes for them I Bluenorthwest Sep 2015 #6
"voter apathy which is usually disguised as voter superiority" arcane1 Sep 2015 #10
California is overwhelmingly blue these days Liberal_in_LA Sep 2015 #4
Let's remember something, can we? brooklynite Sep 2015 #5
Bernie would struggle to win California taught_me_patience Sep 2015 #7
Why more so than in any other state? KamaAina Sep 2015 #20
California used to be highly competitive, until Prop 187 geek tragedy Sep 2015 #8
NY is blue only because of NYC - LiberalElite Sep 2015 #11
Minnesotans don't stay home. MineralMan Sep 2015 #12
Like Tim Pawlenty? Ventura? question everything Sep 2015 #15
We have had a number of perfectly sane and responsible hifiguy Sep 2015 #18
I know that. But the post to which I responded claimed that "we" - Minnesotans question everything Sep 2015 #21
I have a bigger chance of dematerializing and winding up in the next room hifiguy Sep 2015 #13
I have been in Minnesota districts sarisataka Sep 2015 #16
I agree with the message of this post MrBig Sep 2015 #17
I never take anything for granted here in CA anymore. Starry Messenger Sep 2015 #19
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
1. Anyone who stays home over the presidential race forfeits every local election
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:10 PM
Sep 2015

And that is a fucked-up thing to do.

question everything

(47,476 posts)
9. This is how Nixon won in 1968
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:48 PM
Sep 2015

Many anti war Democrats were disillusioned with Humphrey and, of course, the Chicago convention.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
2. Minnesotans generally don't stay home, whether we can "afford to" or not. We're one of the leaders
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:12 PM
Sep 2015

in turnout percentage.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
3. nixon and reagan were former office holders in CA
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:14 PM
Sep 2015

Nixon was a former Congressman and Senator for California and Reagan a former governor, as well as being politically active in Hollywood and southern California. Arnold had obvious California connections as well, and his first election was largely due to dissatisfaction with Davis.

Trump has no California connections that I know of. I cannot imagine him getting much traction here. Non-whites, or more precisely people of non-european descent are the majority in California-- Trump's bigotry won't resonate with them, and of course much of the white population won't vote for him either.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
6. If you think CA having elected Nixon and Reagan locally mitigates their national votes for them I
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:22 PM
Sep 2015

give you Pete Wilson and Prop 8. I'm from CA and there is nothing more harmful to that State than voter apathy which is usually disguised as voter superiority 'I can't bother with Prop 8. I know CA is too liberal to pass that, you should know that'. Then it passed. With generous support from Obama voting Democrats.

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
5. Let's remember something, can we?
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:17 PM
Sep 2015

The Trump phenomenon is two part: 1) a large lead over the "establishment" candidate and 2) the fact that he has any support at all. HOWEVER, don't ignore the fact that he is ONLY getting 1/3 of ONLY the Republicans, and that a substantial number of voters say that they would NEVER vote for him.

I think the 2016 election will be competitive and Trump won't be a part of it UNLESS he decides to run as an Independent, in which case a Democratic win is almost guaranteed.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
7. Bernie would struggle to win California
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:34 PM
Sep 2015

I think Kasich would beat Bernie in California. Trump would get smoked here, no matter who the Democratic candidate is.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. California used to be highly competitive, until Prop 187
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:45 PM
Sep 2015

From 1967 until 2011, California's governor was a Republican for 32/44 years, with Reagan, Deukmejian, Wilson, and Schwarzenegger all serving 8 years.

Clinton was the first Democrat in a generation to win California's electoral votes.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
18. We have had a number of perfectly sane and responsible
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 03:38 PM
Sep 2015

Republican governors, in the long-gone days when there were sane and responsible adults in the Repug party: Elmer L. Anderson, Harold LeVander and Arne Carlson among them within the span of my memory.

Both Anderson and Carlson endorsed John Kerry in '04 and IIRC Carlson endorsed Obama in '08 (Anderson passed away after the '04 election and before "08). The jebus-wheezers and Ayn Rand zombies drove sane people like them out of the party

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
13. I have a bigger chance of dematerializing and winding up in the next room
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:17 PM
Sep 2015

than my home state of Minnesota has of voting for tRUMP. Of that I am as certain as can be.

Scare tactics will not convince me to vote for a Third Way Servant of the Plutocracy. But I would never miss a chance to vote for Keith Ellison and any other real Democrat on the ticket. Staying home is NOT an option.

sarisataka

(18,633 posts)
16. I have been in Minnesota districts
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 12:18 AM
Sep 2015

where a Democrat may run unopposed. I still vote to show the support for the candidate.

While our state may have some local deviance (Bachmann ) we will keep our streak of supporting Democrats for President for a long time.

MrBig

(640 posts)
17. I agree with the message of this post
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 12:25 AM
Sep 2015

But let's be clear - Donald Trump has a 0% chance of getting the Republican nomination, let alone becoming President. I'd put all the money I have on that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So you live in California...