General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh yeah! Davis's attorney ...goes to the Hindu argument.
Davis' attorney Roger Gannam said that this is the first time in history that an American has been jailed for believing in their conscience.
3:41 p.m. Time.com on the Davis case:
"Suppose the Rowan County Clerk was a devout Hindu. It would not be permissible to force her to eat beef at an office function, for that would violate the Hindu taboo on harming cows. But that official would not be allowed to refuse to issue a marriage license to a couple with plans to serve beef at their wedding reception, nor could a Hindu official deny a construction permit just because the building is intended to be a steakhouse."
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Has he ever heard of Mohammed Ali?
underpants
(182,945 posts)Hell he invented civil disobedience.
mnhtnbb
(31,408 posts)were pending all the way to the Supreme Court.
But thousands of other CO's have been jailed in this country.
yuiyoshida
(41,867 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Or play an instrument.
Or carry a tune.
Totally unfair.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)represent their client no matter what.
And his argument here makes no sense, at all.
I cant find the connection to this case to his example.
I am simply unable to figure it out, and I think he cant figure it out either and has NO defense AT ALL so he came up with this nonsense.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...since that is an argument for the plaintiffs in this case, and not the defendants.
beac
(9,992 posts)Now we'll have to see if the reporter is a bad transcriber or the lawyer is a complete idiot.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)when it boils down to her oath of office
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]There are so many things wrong with that analogy[/font]
1) Eating beef is not an essential part of her job
2) If it was a part of her job not eating beef affects no one but her
3) Not eating beefs does not force her beliefs on others
4) Not eating beef does not deny others their fundamental rights
5) There has been no SCotUS ruling on eating beef...
[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]Religious nuts arguments just get dumber and dumber.[/font]
Iggo
(47,574 posts)rocktivity
(44,580 posts)because in America, you're not supposed to have someone else's religious views thrust upon you. However, by refusing to issue marriage certificates for religious reasons, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HIS CLIENT IS DOING.
It is none of the clerk's business what ANYONE plans to serve at their wedding. And if the steakhouse is in a vicinity where enough people believe that eating beef is objectionable, or that the steak it serves isn't worth eating, Mr. Davis can rest assured that they will be out of business soon enough.
Public servants are in the business of serving the public -- ALL the public, not the segments of it they find most appealing -- or profitable.
rocktivity
mnhtnbb
(31,408 posts)This guy is really an ignorant, bigoted, moron. Good grief.
The New York Peace Society, founded in 1815 by David Low Dodge, was the first official peace society in America, but the true story of pacifism should begin with certain Native Americans who wished to live in peace. Since then, hundreds of peace groups and thousands of individuals have worked to promote peace and work against war, violence and injustice, following the voice of their consciences -- sometimes to the point of persecution and imprisonment. This page is intended as only a brief introduction to the historical setting for the topic of conscientious objection to war. More information should be sought from the links offered on other pages, as well as secondary published sources available from many libraries.
http://www.swarthmore.edu/library/peace/conscientiousobjection/co%20website/pages/HistoryNew.htm
markpkessinger
(8,409 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 3, 2015, 06:24 PM - Edit history (1)
I am an Orthodox Jew. I can't eat milk and meat together as per my own personal beliefs. But if I were a county clerk, and someone wanted to open up a cheeseburger joint, I'd have absolutely zero right as a government official to deny that person his permit on the grounds of the rules of my religion.
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)underpants
(182,945 posts)That's exactly what I thought of.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)I can find something relevant in everyday life that calls to mind either South Park or Monty Python.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Paging his law school, revoke his diploma ASAP.
underpants
(182,945 posts)Via LinkedIn. Can't copy and paste for some reason.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)underpants
(182,945 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)Happens all the time ...