General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTennessee Mom Calls Book On Cervical Cancer Cells 'Pornographic'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mom-cells-book-pornographic_55ef1340e4b002d5c076c412"A mother from Knoxville, Tennessee, believes the New York Times bestseller The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks has too much graphic information for her 15-year-old son and should not have been assigned as summer reading.
"I consider the book pornographic," Jackie Sims told WBIR-Knoxville. "There's so many ways to say things without being graphic in nature, and that's the problem I have with the book."
The book, by science writer Rebecca Skloot, details the true story of a poor black tobacco farmer whose cervical cancer cells were taken without her knowledge in 1951. The cells, which scientists referred to as HeLa, went on to become a vital tool in medicine, helping to develop the polio vaccine, in vitro fertilization and other major scientific breakthroughs. The book was published in 2011 and has won numerous awards from medical and scientific organizations.
Despite the book's success, Sims thinks it should be told in a "different way."
..."
How do people still act out against great books like this? What in the world drives them to do so?
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Either that or she has really, really weird tastes in porn.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Warpy
(111,256 posts)She needs to stick to all the carnage in her bible. I'm sure she's a lot happier that way.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)irisblue
(32,974 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Or maybe it's "Ewww! Cervix!" Can't we just say it was rainbow sugar crystals instead of cancer cells? And instead of it being taken from that woman's ladyparts (which no good Tennessee boys ever think about until they're good and married), can't we say they grew on the underside of a tobacco leaf? Or work some Jesus into the story, somehow?
Nicely done, Jackie Sims; you're now a nationally-recognized vaporbrain.
catrose
(5,066 posts)I've read the book, and anything less pornographic than the short, horrible life of Henrietta Lacks is hard to imagine. But don't help me, please.
Solly Mack
(90,766 posts)a vital tool in medicine?
In another article Sims states she didn't like the part where Lacks discovered the tumor herself through self examination. Because, you know, a woman touching herself in a non-sexual way is just so dirty.
Good thing no one was masturbating.
Idiot.
I can fully understand why her son (per her claim) was so uncomfortable reading the book.
He probably thinks girls have a hoohoo and boys have a hohowilly.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Solly Mack
(90,766 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)Contrary1
(12,629 posts)How did she ever get her son potty-trained? I would hate to be this idiot's doctor.
Solly Mack
(90,766 posts)benld74
(9,904 posts)at school to match the hell he has at home,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)I think it is an excellent case to look at for all sorts of themes/issues to teach - social justice, race, class, along with the actual science and related ethics....
Highly recommend it. Pretty well written, very readable to the layperson (aka me, who is not a close friend of the hard sciences to say the least...).
Oh, and yeah, this mom is a freaking idiot. Pornographic? Holy shit. Poor kid.
Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)The story is very important for several reasons, as evidenced by the well-written post above mine.
Another self-loathing imbecile teaching her child that women's bodies are shameful. I feel sorry for her kid.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)brer cat
(24,565 posts)She needs to sit down with her son and study it. I'll bet they would learn a lot about being poor and black in America.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)brer cat
(24,565 posts)are about zero. She must have skimmed a few pages.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)I yi yi.
Initech
(100,073 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)I'm happy to pass the Excedrin, if you need some, too!
SwissTony
(2,560 posts)the internet? I have no personal experience, but I believe there's something called pornography available on it. I know that I, as a 15 year old boy, would have had no interest in such material.
On a more serious note, that book (of which I was only vaguely aware) sounds fascinating.
brer cat
(24,565 posts)I almost couldn't put it down. I highly recommend it.
greatlaurel
(2,004 posts)This poor deluded woman needs to sit down and read it instead of throwing a temper tantrum over science concepts she does not comprehend. She should be embarrassed.
Henrietta Lacks must be remembered and honored for her tremendous contribution to science. Thank you Henrietta Lacks for all the lives you helped save.
Rebecca Skloot is an outstanding writer.
For anyone who likes good science writing, Dirt:The Erosion of Civilizations by David Montgomery is another great read, by the way.
gopiscrap
(23,760 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)to cancer treatments and understandings about cells. It helped lead to the association between HPV and cervical cancer, and a vaccine, among other things.
"How do people still act out against great books like this?"
It is the anti-science mentality that has been given free unquestioning reign by the media outlets. From those who don't recognize climate change, to the earth is only 5000 years old, really is a sad statement on the state of education in this country.
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)The fact that media are reporting on such a stupid, closed-minded and deliberately ignorant (and proud of it!) statement by an obvious religious nut is just mind boggling.