Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 01:50 PM Sep 2015

Huckabee: Dred Scott Decision “Remains To This Day The Law Of The Land”

While defending Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis’ refusal to issue marriage licenses out of her religious opposition to same-sex marriage, Mike Huckabee said Wednesday that the Supreme Court’s 1857 ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford — which held that all blacks, free or enslaved, could not be American citizens — is still the law of the land even though no one follows it.

Radio host Michael Medved quickly pointed out to the former governor of Arkansas that the decision was overturned by the 13th Amendment. (Although the 13th Amendment ended slavery, the birthright citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment overturned the Dred Scott decision.)

“I’ve been just drilled by TV hosts over the past week, ‘How dare you say that, uh, it’s not the law of the land?’” Huckabee said. “Because that’s their phrase, ‘it’s the law of the land. Michael, the Dred Scott decision of 1857 still remains to this day the law of the land which says that black people aren’t fully human. Does anybody still follow the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?”
<snip>
http://www.buzzfeed.com/christophermassie/huckabee-dred-scott-decision-remains-to-this-day-the-law-of

Do Jeebus!

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Huckabee: Dred Scott Decision “Remains To This Day The Law Of The Land” (Original Post) Are_grits_groceries Sep 2015 OP
It would seem there are quite a few supreme court decisions and constitutional amendments Mass Sep 2015 #1
Was he homeschooled? Gad! n/t haikugal Sep 2015 #2
Worse than that - he was church schooled. I cannot jwirr Sep 2015 #12
*riiiing* *riiiinnnnggg* Hong Kong Cavalier Sep 2015 #3
Every history teacher in the country shenmue Sep 2015 #9
At the very least, Huck's did. louis-t Sep 2015 #14
Maybe, maybe not. Either way, the closet is a psychologically damaging thing. closeupready Sep 2015 #4
clarify for me please Huckabee=gay man? irisblue Sep 2015 #6
How does one miss that slavery is no longer the law of the land in the US? merrily Sep 2015 #5
Nobody can be this dumb and still have hifiguy Sep 2015 #7
I don't even have a well-functioning autonomic nervous system but I'm still way LiberalLoner Sep 2015 #13
I never cease to be amazed by these people. mmonk Sep 2015 #8
It's just not amazing anymore with them... freebrew Sep 2015 #25
When I was a child and had just learned that a classmate's parents were Republicans I said EWWWW - LiberalElite Sep 2015 #38
Certain aspects of it remain jberryhill Sep 2015 #10
Interesting. Calista241 Sep 2015 #43
Not According to Westlaw Stallion Sep 2015 #11
I thought that the racists were on Donald Trump’s side. Initech Sep 2015 #15
There's an embarrassment of riches klook Sep 2015 #22
Even though that is a horribly inaccurate statement, what does it have to do with Kim Davis? Rex Sep 2015 #16
I think the idea is that unjust laws ought not to be followed? oberliner Sep 2015 #37
Fuckabee is a really stupid man malaise Sep 2015 #17
Straight from Barton mercuryblues Sep 2015 #18
Translation: if elected, Huckster promises to send runaway darkies home to massah! struggle4progress Sep 2015 #19
No Suckabee, the 14th amendment trumps the Scott decision. roamer65 Sep 2015 #20
This is what the right calls an intellectual Major Nikon Sep 2015 #21
See what happens when you don't understand history or the goverment. sinkingfeeling Sep 2015 #23
makes total sense lykemike Sep 2015 #24
Join the group, as a woman I am not capable of making my own decisions, according to the GOP LynneSin Sep 2015 #32
Thank goodness that man has no chance of ever MineralMan Sep 2015 #26
Ironic. He probably has a greater chance here than almost anywhere else, and could jtuck004 Sep 2015 #40
Sure, the 14th Amendment supersedes it, but Republicans think the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional tclambert Sep 2015 #27
Stephen Colbert had a word for how conservatives choose to interpret the Constitution LastLiberal in PalmSprings Sep 2015 #30
Huckabee chose inappropriate caselaw. no_hypocrisy Sep 2015 #28
huckabee seems to be misinformed about everything. samsingh Sep 2015 #29
THIS, is why Mike Huckabee isn't even qualified to be President of his local homeowner association LynneSin Sep 2015 #31
once more Micky proves he has no mind Angry Dragon Sep 2015 #33
huckabee isn't worth the hate he riles up in me. spanone Sep 2015 #34
Ted Cruz allegedly graduated from some third-rate podunk law school. (Joking about third-rate, etc. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #35
The constitution just doesn't exist to these people IronLionZion Sep 2015 #36
Huckabee is not a segregationist as I claimed on a similar thread. gordianot Sep 2015 #39
I see, so people being property is just a question of selective enforcement.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #41
I am trying to remember PATRICK Sep 2015 #42
Oh so you support your activist judges, Mike. Judges are arbiters of law, not Lawmakers, that's Dont call me Shirley Sep 2015 #44
What.An.Ass. Lifelong Protester Sep 2015 #45

Mass

(27,315 posts)
1. It would seem there are quite a few supreme court decisions and constitutional amendments
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:00 PM
Sep 2015

going against this decision, I think.

Huckabee is an idiot.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
12. Worse than that - he was church schooled. I cannot
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:57 PM
Sep 2015

believe that idiot actually said that. The whole R panel of candidates are the lowest of low.

Wonder how Ben Carson is taking his new status?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
4. Maybe, maybe not. Either way, the closet is a psychologically damaging thing.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:11 PM
Sep 2015

And it doesn't make gay men straighter the deeper one goes into it.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
5. How does one miss that slavery is no longer the law of the land in the US?
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:11 PM
Sep 2015

And, no, that is not just a decision each individual makes not to follow the Dred Scott decision.

Unfuckingbelievable. I'm sorry, but someone needs to say it: You cannot make up this shit.

LiberalLoner

(9,761 posts)
13. I don't even have a well-functioning autonomic nervous system but I'm still way
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 03:10 PM
Sep 2015

Smarter than Hucklebuckle.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
25. It's just not amazing anymore with them...
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 10:56 AM
Sep 2015

it's expected.

Really unfortunate for our government and our future.
Are these the best and brightest the R's have to offer?

Now, that's scary!

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
38. When I was a child and had just learned that a classmate's parents were Republicans I said EWWWW -
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:13 PM
Sep 2015

but back then there were conservative, moderate and even (GASP!) liberal Republicans. Imagine: normal people in the GOP. Thinking back, we didn't know how good we had it. I'm afraid I won't live to see normal Republicans again.
It's just an unmitigated freak show now.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
10. Certain aspects of it remain
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:37 PM
Sep 2015

A Supreme Court decision is a bundle of things. Obviously, the part of the Dred Scott decision dealing with the direct question of the Fugitive Slave Act was rendered inoperative by the Reconstruction Amendments to the Constitution.

The birthright citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment overturned the Dred Scott decision insofar as a person born in the United States could be denied the privileges and immunities of any state, upon taking up residence in another state. However, the Dred Scott decision did establish that persons (otherwise recognized as citizens) are citizens of the their state of residence, and that no state can grant "state citizenship" to a person who is not otherwise a US citizen.

That "Dred Scott is still good law" is one of those inane "fun facts to impress your friends" which is pointed out to law students when the case comes up in con law class.

If, for example, you live in New York and you drive to Connecticut, the state of Connecticut can't take your car away from you, on the ground that your car is not registered to you in Connecticut. Your car is titled to you in New York, and Connecticut is bound by the Constitution to recognize your New York registration, provided you have not left New York permanently and taken up residence in Connecticut (most states provide a grace period for re-registration of your car when you move).

What the Reconstruction Amendments did to Dred Scott was to prevent its application to the ownership of PEOPLE, and ended the non-recognition of rights of citizenship, by any state, to people who were born into a condition of servitude in the US.

One of the other points at issue was whether a person who was not recognized as a citizen either by their former state or by the United States, could become a US citizen by moving to a state which would recognize that person as a citizen. The answer at that time was "no", and it remains "no". Of course, in the context of that case, the reason why the person was not recognized as a citizen by their state of origin or the US, was because he was born a slave in a slave state. Hence, not having been a citizen of the US, he did not become one by moving to another state. That, of course, no longer applies to persons born in the US. But the general principle, of course, still applies that only US law can determine whether someone is a citizen of the US or a citizen of the state in which they reside. For example, a state cannot recognize an undocumented immigrant as a citizen of that state, if the US does not recognize that person as a citizen.

That said, the statement by Huckabee is breathtakingly stupid in its context here. The general principle of Dred Scott - that US law determines citizenship and that state citizenship is determined by residence - is thoroughly mundane, and thoroughly irrelevant to anything going on in the Kentucky marriage license follies.

Stallion

(6,474 posts)
11. Not According to Westlaw
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:38 PM
Sep 2015

It has a Negative Treatment index a mile long-most cases say it has been superseded by statute including the U.S. Supreme Court. There is no way to delete a former opinion in the law books like you can a statute which may be amended or may be repealed-bad opinions are there forever although the legal precedent may reject all or part of it like the prior poster pointed out

Initech

(100,068 posts)
15. I thought that the racists were on Donald Trump’s side.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 03:20 PM
Sep 2015

They should be supporting Huckabee, he seems to more openly cater to their interests.

klook

(12,154 posts)
22. There's an embarrassment of riches
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 08:58 AM
Sep 2015

for Republican voters shopping around for the most regressive candidate. Phuckabee is making a strong challenge to tRump's position as Imperial Wizard of the RKK.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
16. Even though that is a horribly inaccurate statement, what does it have to do with Kim Davis?
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 03:26 PM
Sep 2015

I understand Suckabee was trying to make a point (a bad one which is false), but STILL...what does Dred Scott have to do with marriage equality? Here let me answer that - NOTHING!

Pathetic, history FAIL.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
37. I think the idea is that unjust laws ought not to be followed?
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:11 PM
Sep 2015

I think that is the angle he is going for.

mercuryblues

(14,531 posts)
18. Straight from Barton
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 03:42 PM
Sep 2015

HUCKABEE: I, I almost wish there could be a simultaneous telecast and all Americans would be forced,...FORCED at gun point no less,...to listen to EVERY David Barton message.

David Barton is where huckster gets his edumacation from. David Barton who had a book on Jefferson pulled from publication because it had so many lies in it. Ironically it was titled Jefferson Lies: Exposing the myths you always believed about Jefferson.

In the rightwing nuttery circuit Barton is considered a genius. Barton teaches only Christians are eligible to hold public office, according to the Constitution.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
20. No Suckabee, the 14th amendment trumps the Scott decision.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:39 PM
Sep 2015

Amendments that are ratified nullify any conflicting SCOTUS constitutional interpretations. The SCOTUS cannot disobey the Constitution, it can only interpret it.

That is why you will have to amend the Constition to protect your precious little fetuses, you jackass. But that will not happen..hahahah.

lykemike

(25 posts)
24. makes total sense
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 10:48 AM
Sep 2015

Don't all repubs believe I'm less than a man? Huckabee's remarks actually provide insight as to why that is. Not at all surprising in today's GOP.
DR. Carson will need 3x as many votes just to tie Donald Trump.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
32. Join the group, as a woman I am not capable of making my own decisions, according to the GOP
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:59 PM
Sep 2015

in a nutshell since neither of us (or about 99% of the USA in general) are not wealthy white men we really do not matter in their eyes.

Oh and welcome to DU

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
26. Thank goodness that man has no chance of ever
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:01 AM
Sep 2015

being on the ballot for the office of President. He is an abject moron, to say the least.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
40. Ironic. He probably has a greater chance here than almost anywhere else, and could
Sat Sep 12, 2015, 07:07 AM
Sep 2015

help bring the greatest damage.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
27. Sure, the 14th Amendment supersedes it, but Republicans think the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 12:23 PM
Sep 2015

See, Republicans, and especially Teabaggers, really, really revere the Constitution. They don't need to actually read it because they all know instinctively what's in the Constitution and what it really means. Anything in the Constitution they don't agree with they call unconstitutional. If you try to explain what the word "unconstitutional" means, then you're just some kind of grammar nazi, and they know what they mean and they know what they know and they do so love the constitution even if the only part of it they can quote from memory is about half of the Second Amendment.

30. Stephen Colbert had a word for how conservatives choose to interpret the Constitution
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:05 PM
Sep 2015


Truthiness - When you feel it in your gut, you know it must be right.

no_hypocrisy

(46,088 posts)
28. Huckabee chose inappropriate caselaw.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 01:08 PM
Sep 2015

Would have been better to cite:

A) U.S. v. Koramatsu - Federal government can legally detain and imprison citizens without habeus corpus based on their ethnicity. While the government doesn't do this anymore, the decision hasn't been overturned or overruled.

B) Bell v. Buck - State governments can legally sterilize any resident with due process if there is a statute allowing such procedure. I believe the trend peaked and dwindled by 1977. Again, while not done as policy anymore, the law is still viable.

My point: If a "rogue" government employee was ordered to facilitate sterilization or detaining a citizen on the basis of "national security", and that employee refused to execute that order on the basis of personal religion, the same situation exists: the employee has to resign if s/he can't implement the order. Until the law is changed, the employee has to either follow the law or resign under protest.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
31. THIS, is why Mike Huckabee isn't even qualified to be President of his local homeowner association
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 03:44 PM
Sep 2015

To be so horribly clueless and allowed access to a TV Camera and/or microphone is a dangerous thing. And what's worse is the idiots out there that would want him to be the President of their United States.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
35. Ted Cruz allegedly graduated from some third-rate podunk law school. (Joking about third-rate, etc.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 08:34 PM
Sep 2015

Surely Ted Cruz will set Huckabee straight on how the Constitution and the courts work.

Let's hope.

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
39. Huckabee is not a segregationist as I claimed on a similar thread.
Fri Sep 11, 2015, 11:27 PM
Sep 2015

Segregation is several levels ahead of what he suggests. Huckabee his delusions, fallacies, fantasies and misinterpretations are not to just get attention.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
41. I see, so people being property is just a question of selective enforcement....
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 04:43 AM
Sep 2015

I still say this is the kind of thing that comes from gin drinkers.

PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
42. I am trying to remember
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 02:34 PM
Sep 2015

the days when a stupid or offensive statement knocked you right out of the race, no apology awaited. The GOP low bar has been replaced simply by "the drinks are on the GOP house bar" with a wink at the supposedly non-acoholic beverages of the values wing. And when things get more serious with fewer contenders there are no recalls of past blunders, crimes, gaffes at all- and even less acknowledgment when they continue on the campaign trail because- hey- by now the anointed GOP candidate has almost reached apotheosis.

The Democrats on the other hand have almost hardened themselves in many cases into reviled sainthood, despised intelligence, either in public appearance or in actuality.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
44. Oh so you support your activist judges, Mike. Judges are arbiters of law, not Lawmakers, that's
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 07:45 PM
Sep 2015

the job of Congress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Huckabee: Dred Scott Deci...