General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOne Alabama city is now considering banning mini-skirts and short shorts
After first proposing an ordinance banning saggy pants, the Dadeville City Council is now considering banning short shorts and mini-skirts.
Dadeville City Councilwoman Stephanie Kelley said it shouldn't just be men who are singled out on their attire.
"My concern is it should be for everybody," Kelley said during Tuesday's council meeting, the Alex City Outlook reported. "I think for the girls, with these shorts up so high looking like under garments and dresses so short, I don't want us to be showing favoritism."
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2015/09/one_alabama_city_is_now_consid.html
This is a city?
Dadeville City Hall
Looks like a repurposed Dennys
.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)If this person is respected then perhaps this is what the citizens want. Who knows.
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)RKP5637
(67,107 posts)PatrickforO
(14,572 posts)offices, especially in off-year elections. The bottom line is that if we aren't careful, we'll all be living in these f'ed up places. These religious nuts are very dangerous, and only an enlightened populace who is aware of the issues can sweep them back under their rocks.
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)PatrickforO
(14,572 posts)To match the equally terminal cancer of neoliberal capitalism.
Unsustainable, all of it.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)of predatory capitalism and religulous superstition.
The only question is which will kill society first.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)of predatory capitalism and religulous superstition"- I should steal that for a sig line.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Just credit me.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)meow2u3
(24,761 posts)Instead, why shouldn't politicians control their own urges instead of other people's dress habits?
PoutrageFatigue
(416 posts)Sick of these prudes....
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)trust me, I've seen things that make that building look like St Paul's
Baitball Blogger
(46,703 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)architect: and remember - spaces are for people!
brutalist: and remember - those people have sinned and must be punished
PatrickforO
(14,572 posts)Theocracy anyone?
Because, hey, when you mix theocracy with oligarchy you get fascism!
DFW
(54,370 posts)It seems that Allah is still U akbar in Dadeville, Alabama.
Do women also now have to wear veils there, too, or are they saving that for next week's ordinance?
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)RKP5637
(67,107 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Must make for some interesting racial dynamics.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)What is next, religious zealots wanting us to cover up everything but our faces?
They are insane and should be realized as such.
spanone
(135,830 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)and I'm very proud of that. Now I don't even own a dress because I never wear them. They are too uncomfortable.
I hope they have a big jail because they are going to need it.
Dumb, dumb, dumb. Why is anyone wasting time on this? I really don't like seeing guys wearing pants with their underwear hanging out down below their butts but I don't think it should be banned.
niyad
(113,284 posts)enquired whether the school board was composed of idiots, or crazy people.
while I find the sagging thing unappealing (to say the least), I find myself deciding each time I spot such, whether to laugh, to enquire whether they realized they hadn't finished dressing, asking them how they could walk with the crotch around their knees, or simply ignoring them. generally it is the last one, since I believe that at least some do it for attention.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)They have to hold them up with one hand and if they let go to open a door or something they fall down and they are standing there in their underpants. Hilarious.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)High hemlines are good for the economy, I hear.
niyad
(113,284 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)It's not for everybody, but I've never seen a person's backside skin. Only brand new boxer underpants are shown. What's wrong with that? It may not be everyone's idea of fashion. but, nonetheless, it is fashion.
Leave people's clothing preferences alone. Jeez!
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Funny thing is, it would probably work!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)niyad
(113,284 posts)the hell do they walk dressed like that?"
lunatica
(53,410 posts)and they hold their pants up with one hand in the front.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Pretty gross when you're just walking down the street.
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)Just ban everything in one big swoop. People of Dadeville you are hereby notified that starting today everything is banned.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Everything that is not forbidden is mandatory.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)you'd think these folks would be more interested in "protecting their heritage"
struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)for every eleven acres. It sounds like they can't decide whether they want to be a quiet conservative retirement community or a supply hub for recreation at Lake Martin
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and a stylish restaurant called "Eats."
I don't think they even have one horse.
dembotoz
(16,802 posts)they are fucken strong as hell in big parts on this god forsaken county
Cleita
(75,480 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)Jesus wore this in public at his death and was not ashamed.
If Frank Goodman is worried about respect then maybe he should try respecting women enough to stop ogling them like nothing but sex objects and assuming every young woman who dares to show skin is a slut.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Have they solved all the other ills of that hick town?