General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Democratic Socialism is so bad, where are all the scandinavian immigrants? - img
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)I've wondered that myself. Strangely, you don't see Norwegians desperate to escape their socialist hellhole (with all that awful free college and health care) lining up at the U.S. Embassy in Oslo to apply for asylum.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)a conservative? Erner
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And vice versa.
Yes, this is research-based. I read it in a thick book. But wonderers can just take a quick look at political maps. Both the nations of the world and the U.S. states that are more "liberal" tend to cluster in cooler areas, and also tend to be more prosperous and stable. (There are other geographic factors, of course, like coastal locations, etc.)
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I'm thinking Alaska would have both the kind of life-challenging conditions that cause populations to be more conservative (i.e., protective) in order to survive -- we're not talking "cool" here! -- and jobs and economy very heavily dependent on Big Oil and Gas. At least these are my assumptions based on what I've read.
A lot of people also seem to say they moved there not only because of its beauty and wilderness but because of its differences from a variety of things they disliked about continental America, including widespread urbanization. I'm just guessing that doesn't weight the newcomers toward a preponderance of liberal personalities, though.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Most people there are actually pretty liberal. However, there is a SERIOUS distrust of "big government" and then there's the influence of the oil industry.
Democrats could take Alaska, if we'd just put forth the effort.
DFW
(54,370 posts)The Party of Democratic Socialism did exist. THESE were the "Democratic Socialists" where I now live.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_of_Democratic_Socialism_%28Germany%29
Some of them still claim it was their perfect right to shoot people down at the Berlin Wall. They are not nice people. Labels are just that: labels. "Democratic Socialist" has never meant murdering your own citizens in the USA, so it doesn't raise eyebrows back home. In Germany, where I live, it'll get you more than just shoes thrown at you.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Go to one of his rallies.
I lived in Austria, France, Germany and the UK.
Those countries are relatively socialist. We are talking about truly universal health care insurance, free post-secondary education and training, child care that is of high quality, really basic stuff that is taken for granted in European countries. Just what the movement behind it is called is unimportant. It's what America needs to be doing to make life less frightening and guilt-ridden that matters.
I don't know whether you are American or not but when you look at our family law courts and see the bickering over child support payments, it's pretty disgusting.
Some of the costs of caring for children should be shared for all of us. We should expect parents to be responsible in planning their families, but some (not all by any means) of the responsibility for making sure children have shoes on their feet and food in their tummies when they go to child care or school should be shared by all of us. It's just the moral thing to do.
DFW
(54,370 posts)In Germany, however, it far from being as rosy as you picture. German men neglect their child support as often as men of any other nationality, and there is no universal health care at all. It is not France. It is a patchwork system that asked me to pay 2500 euros a month for health insurance if I wanted German health insurance, even though I pay my taxes there. I keep my US insurance, crappy though it is, rather than lay out $34000 a year for health insurance. I mean gimme a break. You either don't speak German or weren't there very long. The child care is spotty. The word "kinderunfreundlich" is hard to pronounce to some non-Germans, but every Germany learns it early, and it applies well to the German approach to little ones. I've lived there for years, married to a German (SPD/Greens voter) and we speak German at home. I'm no stranger there.
I realize that Bernie isn't about to shoot anyone, no matter what his age. However, as one who has dealt with an existing version of "Democratic Socialism," the term makes me cringe. Not only because to all Europeans, it means the killers at the Wall, but because Bernie advocates a classic Social Democratic line as is practiced in most northern European countries, which is something else entirely. He's not running for Bundeskanzler of Germany, so it obviously doesn't matter in the States. Should he win, however, he had better have some reassuring talks with countries that have buried 19 year olds who died at the hands of "Democratic Socialists," as happened when their European version was in power.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Had babies there and went through kindergarten and elementary with then in Austria. Maybe things have changed since we lived there, and of course services have to be paid for but I loved the health care and the kindergarten system in Europe.
It is really much worse here.
French doctors and their healthcare system saved my life.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Most of the government are SAP Social Democrats. I went to Malmo in Sweden it is nice, people very friendly and nice coffee.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)brooklynite
(94,520 posts)will you be leaving anytime soon?
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Applications to immigrate are considerably higher. However, Scandinavian countries have considerably higher immigration standards then the US.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)But I do know a few Americans who have done so (they qualified by marriage or having a parent from there) and they are very happy there.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)For New Zealand. The United States is the easiest in the world to come to.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)While she was there, she heard that Norway was in desperate need of IT professionals. Since she had a good math background, she applied for the new computer science department at the University of Oslo and was accepted.
From then on, she was in. She currently works for the Norwegian equivalent of the IRS. Like all Norwegian residents (she never got around to becoming a citizen, although she was thinking about it), she gets four weeks of paid vacation by law, an additional week as a government employee, and another week for being over sixty.
She and her long-term gentleman friend live in Oslo and have a beautiful cabin in the mountains, but they don't own a car. They don't have to. Urban or intercity transit or bicycles do the job.
About twenty years ago, she was seriously injured when a car hit her bicycle, and she spent months in the hospital without ever seeing a bill.
I asked how her parents felt about her decision to stay in Norway, and she said that at first they were upset, but once they had visited a few times, they realized that she had a better quality of life than she would have had in the States.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)brooklynite
(94,520 posts)....maybe you could claim political asylum?
tabasco
(22,974 posts)I suggest a break from the Internet.
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)All I'm doing is addressing flippant comments about the political process.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)But it does seem you're trying to be dismissive.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)We could never leave you.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)we should have made a move when we were younger. he worked for IBM and could have lived anyplace he wanted.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo
(460 posts)It is very difficult if you are not married to a citizen of that country or have direct family to that county.
It is even difficult if you have a skill that an employer needs to bring you in as an American.
It is easier to immigrate if you are a refugee or are wealthy.
Regular person who wants a change of venue with only job skills to offer very, very difficult to do many times a temporary work permit and temporary visa is the best one can get usually one get a no.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)You typically have to be native-born or married to someone who is.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I am an immigrant in South Korea. I started working here almost 11 years ago, met my wife and got permanent residency five years ago. Even if you aren't married it's not difficult to work here. One of my co-workers who is not married has been here five years and received permanent residency on his own.
Response to brooklynite (Reply #4)
stillwaiting This message was self-deleted by its author.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I very well may be leaving.
former9thward
(31,997 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 13, 2015, 01:21 PM - Edit history (1)
All of them are capitalist based market economies. Their social welfare safety net is much deeper than the U.S. But that is the only difference. They can afford that safety net because their military expenses are negligible. Their military expenses are negligible because the U.S. taxpayer defends them.
eridani
(51,907 posts)former9thward
(31,997 posts)Why did the Scandinavian countries join?
1939
(1,683 posts)Only Norway and Denmark did. Sweden, like Switzerland, maintained strict neutrality and also maintained substantial armed forces. Finland maintained neutrality under the Soviet gun with their foreign policy severely constrained. Sweden was often confronted with Soviet naval provocations in the Baltic.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Democratic socialism isn't incompatible with capitalism and market based economics.
And when you're not involved in illegal wars (like the one Hillary voted for in Iraq) you don't need to spend trillions on your military.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The Nordic Model is one of social democracy, not democratic socialism. Democratic socialism is inherently incompatible with market economies by virtue of the simple fact that it seeks to replace the market system with a socialist model.
The Nordic Model has no such goal.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Democratic socialism isn't the combination of a free market economy with a welfare state. It's the replacement of a free market economy with a socialist economy.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)"Nordic capitalism or Nordic social democracy". From your own post no less.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The former is a reform of capitalism with a welfare state. The latter is the replacing of capitalism with socialism.
They're not the same thing.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Democratic Socialism has numerous variants, much akin to the difference between a European Liberal and an American Liberal... by which I mean to say, they are different. In the case of Democratic Socialism, I refer to the brand that developed in the states. I think you'll find its much closer to social democracy:
http://www.dsausa.org/what_is_democratic_socialism
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)For your edification: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism
former9thward
(31,997 posts)I don't take my definitions from the baby pablum of Wiki
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Might I suggest: http://www.dsausa.org/what_is_democratic_socialism ?
If not, please list your source so I can arbitrarily dismiss it, as you just did mine.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine the academic texts sourced in the wiki entry are merely pablum too... as they disagree with your premise.
former9thward
(31,997 posts)Not with you.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Yours is not the only position being expressed here.
PosterChild
(1,307 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I've lived in Germany, Austria, France and the UK all pretty much democratic socialist. There is a huge difference between communism and democratic socialism.
Democratic socialism just means that they have the very strong safety net that the people choose to have through democratic representation.
They do have lower military expenses because we pay their defense costs to a great but not a total extent. We are the fools.
But we need a complete and thorough audit of our defense costs and expenditures.
treestar
(82,383 posts)we have and of being world policemen.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)as Democratic Socialists. They are two very distinct ideologies.
DavidDvorkin
(19,475 posts)According to Dwight Eisenhower.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)the totally unaffordable college costs, the incredibly expensive child care, our wonderful no maternity leave policies, all the random shootings and murders by firearm, the $7.50 an hour jobs, and the no vacation policies of so many employers. To name a few of the many reasons why thousands of starving Scandinavians are desperately trying to enter the US illegally on a daily basis.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)kairos12
(12,858 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)Would the answer to that validate or invalidate our economic system?
PosterChild
(1,307 posts)1monster
(11,012 posts)checking out Norway, if only it were not so freakin' cold up there and it didn't get so much snow... I'm a warm climate type.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Secondly, immigrating to Scandinavian countries is EXTREMELY difficult to do for most Americans.
A small percentage of us would even be eligible to immigrate, and those that are eligible would be the ones that most likely have a great job in the U.S. that provides at least SOME level of benefits and financial security.
So many that would hugely benefit from living in a Scandinavian country (relative to their lifestyle in the U.S.) are not welcomed there.
Immigration policies exclude them.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)If they let just anyone in, their safety net stretches thinner!
We, on the other hand, don't have to worry about our safety nets stretching too thin, since we barely have one, anyway.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)I am simply perplexed that some around here spout off about why Americans aren't immigrating to Scandinavia if it's so great over there. I expect for ignorant right-wingers to say it. I would expect better from informed posters around here.
It would be very difficult for most Americans to immigrate to Scandinavia.
The "love it or leave it" argument is so ignorant and/or disingenuous.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Not sure I buy it, but the argument is by making it incredibly hard to emigrate unless you are very wealthy or a refugee they can afford the social welfare benefits by managing how many use them.
The wealthy they allow in will always be a cash positive to the system, so they are welcome.
The number of refugees they allow in is managed and controlled and accounts for the amount of job growth they want to see on the unskilled labor side.
Pretty much nobody else gets in- so no middle class jobs and only a managed number of "lower class" jobs are taken by anyone but the natives of those countries- resulting in far more job availability and far fewer people, including immigrants, using the generous social welfare benefits without working and contributing.
I'm not sure I buy it, but it makes an interesting argument. I do know that the highly restrictive nature of what those counties allow for immigration- allowing only refugees and only in numbers that they feel benefit their economy, not allowing anyone else a chance- is one aspect of their way of governing I don't think we need to emulate at all.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)I looked into it in 2000 after Bush was sElected, because I'm half Norwegian and speak some of the language.
No luck.
You have to meet one of a set of stringent qualifications:
1. Be a refugee or political asylum seeker (hating the Bush administration didn't count)
2. Be married to a Norwegian (wouldn't have minded but there were no likely candidates)
4. Be the child of a Norwegian citizen (Sigh, I'm the grandchild of two Norwegian citizens, but that's not close enough.)
5. Have a job offer from a Norwegian employer who has proved that no current resident of Norway is qualified
6. Be skilled in an occupation that is in short supply in Norway
I also tried Germany, but again, one generation too far down. You can be the grandchild of a German citizen, but unfortunately, my grandmother was born two weeks AFTER her parents came from Germany. If they had waited just one month...
Rex
(65,616 posts)kidding they will just insult you. They are one trick ponies.
IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)in Minnesota and here in Washington, DC where I live now. They were born and raised in Sweden but liked America so much they came over. It's not that hard to believe. People move all the time.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)nobody said there's a wave
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)OP was about how Scandinavians in general are not fleeing democratic socialism.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)Between 1840 and 1910 about one in three Swedes left the country, mostly to the U.S. (especially Minnesota, of course).
And what were they fleeing? Their feudal class system - in other words exactly the kind of conditions our friends in the GOP want to recreate here in the U.S.
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=b6UyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MukFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2599,1490863&dq=swedish-diaspora&hl=en
1939
(1,683 posts)Upper Peninsula of Michigan has a very large number of people of Finnish descent.
forest444
(5,902 posts)As hard as it may be to believe now, Scandinavia 100 years ago was a lot like Central America today - only whiter and colder.
1939
(1,683 posts)a whole lot less corruption in government.
My grandfather and half of his siblings came to the US after they grew up. Only one brother inherited the farm in Sweden.
PosterChild
(1,307 posts)Venezuela ? A country that actually claims to be democratic socialist ?
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Venezuela is federal republic style of government rather than a democratic socialist state.
http://venezuelanalysis.com/basicfacts
PosterChild
(1,307 posts)... tarred and feathered with Venezuelan oil.
From the same source. Be sure to read the whole thing! Its likely donald trump with a vocabulary!
http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/3367
Democratic socialism means healthcare, jobs, food, and security, in neighborhoods where in many cases nothing but absolute poverty existed ten years ago..... Bottom up democracy in Venezuela starts with the 25,000 community councils elected in every neighborhood in the country. We establish the priority needs of our area, reported community council spokesperson Carmon Aponte.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/democratic-socialism-moves-forward-in-venezuela/11292
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)They may be choosing to move to democratic socialism, but they're not currently there.
Also consider that Bernie doesn't point to Venezuela as being representative of his ideals.
PosterChild
(1,307 posts)The problem for bernie is simple - the westren European democraciees bernie does point to are social democracies and do not embrace or exemplify democratic socilism . The European People's Party is not socilistic. They are not, and never will be democratic socialist states.Venezuela however explicitly embraces and exemplifies the political ideology that bernie espouses . And, by the way, bernie knows it.
But more importantly bernie's electoral competition knows this and they are going to make good use of it. So you can be quite sure the voters will know all about it too.
What the voters will hear is one candidate saying Make America Great and another candidate saying Make America Venezuela .
Bernie, and the Democratic Party , will be smeared with Venezuelan crude.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)It's just not the issue it was during the red-scare. In fact, with as much as we've delved into a fascist/oligopoly state, people are desiring and even demanding something to counter the iron grip of corporations. Bernie represents that.
The GOP can trot out the toothless dog of "But he's a socialist" all they want, it'll make little difference. The media has already tried that tactic, and it's failed... people just aren't biting onto that shriveled old bait.
PosterChild
(1,307 posts)... concerning the electability of socialists. Even atheists do better .
http://www.gallup.com/poll/183713/socialist-presidential-candidates-least-appealing.aspx
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/17/could-a-socialist-actually-be-elected-president/
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)There are a number of issues I take with the polling methods used, and the opinion piece article... but even setting those concerns aside, that poll just isn't consistent with the enormous enthusiasm out there for Bernie. You think the federal republic of Venezuela will harm Bernie's campaign... I see this argument as facile. It's a distraction at most. Bernie sticks to the issues and points to Scandinavian counties as an example of what he's aiming for. His actions speak louder than the words of his detractors. Substance over smoke and mirrors.
PosterChild
(1,307 posts)PosterChild
(1,307 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)PosterChild
(1,307 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)They differ from progressives on immigration more than anything. On most things they are left of the DNC Wall Street dems.
Also...like every other non tinhorn country other than us they do not allow for profit health care.
Rec
Recursion
(56,582 posts)With a large concentration in Minnesota.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Response to Recursion (Reply #42)
stillwaiting This message was self-deleted by its author.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)A long time ago for the most part.
I don't believe that there have been many Scandinavian immigrants to the U.S. over the past few decades. Those that are here are not first generation immigrants for the most part. That is some very important missing information.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)They're still sort of monarchies.
Here's the King of Sweden:
And the King of Norway:
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Your application of historical context is dramatically lacking.
Little more than another post hoc ergo prompter hoc fallacy.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)seem to have arrived via Minnesota.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)the Winter. Lots have stayed, though. You can still attend church services here in the Twin Cities, conducted in Swedish and Norwegian, if you like. I went to the Norwegian Lutheran service once with my Mother-in-law.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Yah, you betcha.
Disclaimer: I am Norwegian by marriage, so I know these things.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)But I imagine you mean recent ones.
Having the benefit of the internet permits many to look into various locations prior to moving. It surprises me that anyone would immigrate here given the hostility of the right wing toward immigrants.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)And only those who have good, safe jobs, like upper management, visiting Professor-type white-collar jobs, or who try for the American dream in entertainment or other flashy jobs.
I currently live in Norway, but I have family in the US, and I have lived there before. However, these days I know that moving back isn't an option unless I win the lottery. Not only would it hurt me economically (I am a high school teacher,) but I would not last long in the American work environment. I have gotten too used to actually having rights as a worker. I wouldn't accept the expectations, not having a say in my job duties, no having the worker's safety net of not fearing being fired if I speak up.
Even if I got a job that isn't teaching, I would never accept so little vacation, no maternity leave, the hours and hours of unpaid overtime most white-collar workers do in the US. I spend every summer there, and I see how exploited my friends are, how little spare time they have, how uncertain their lives are. That's not for me.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)considered giving up the protections of her Danish citizenship, for herself and her children, for love of both heritages and because of all the differences you describe, and more, when she visits relatives in Denmark.
Fortunately, now for the first time she can get dual citizenship, which she is doing, but I've recommended she carefully do everything required to retain her citizenship rights under Danish law now that she is accepting U.S. citizenship and lives here. What the laws of nations can confer, they can also take away.
Because of the the destabilizing effects of climate change alone, in future many more mass population migrations will be occurring. Today's are just the beginning, and I believe protective reactions in many places are inevitable. I even imagine I am hearing the sound of doors slamming in the future... She doesn't believe it could happen, but unlikely as it is, some of those migrations could conceivably be from hard-hit regions of the U.S. in decades to come if heat, drought and fresh water scarity continued to increase and economic decline set in.
DFW
(54,370 posts)In Sweden, for example, they are "Socialdemokraterna (social democrats)," of Socialdemokratiska Partiet " (the Social Democratic Party). Die Sozialdemokraten in Germany (Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands, or SPD)
There WAS a Party of Democratic Socialism until recently. "Democratic Socialism" to us in Europe means these guys:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_of_Democratic_Socialism_%28Germany%29
These are the people who got their jollies putting people in mental institutions for being dissidents, forcing dissidents out of jobs and then jailing them for the crime of "parasitism (i.e unemployment)," and shooting them down at the Berlin Wall if they tried to escape. Not the same to those of us who have lived through both.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)DFW
(54,370 posts)No one gets anything they don't want to get. But I laud your optimism.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)...and US political parties here at DU before. I got a called a GOP troll and got a hide for saying that in many ways the Tory party in the UK was further left than the Democratic party in the US. I have given up trying to explain the differences. Folks that have never set foot outside the US, much less lived abroad are going to insist they are well informed....when they aren't.
DFW
(54,370 posts)I see people in the USA who live inside their "smart" phones. A lot of uninformed people on their smart phones.
I'm using the local (think American) version of the term. Much as there is considerable difference between a European Liberal and a US Liberal, there are differences between the Democratic Socialism of Germany and that of the US.
http://www.dsausa.org/what_is_democratic_socialism
DFW
(54,370 posts)I live in Germany, am married to a German and we speak German at home. You cal use whatever label floats your boat here. After all, there won't be many Germans voting in the Democratic primaries, why should you care?
However, in Germany, no one calling himself a "Democratic Socialist" will ever be associated with anything other than the Wall murderers without a LOT of "'splainin' to do." It just leaves a bad taste in our mouths. Not anyone's fault. It just does. You have to have lived here to know.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)In the US, there's a big push to malign Bernie Sanders with the term Democratic Socialist... though when Bernie refers to Democratic Socialism, he points to Scandinavian countries as prime examples of his ideology. That, to a very large degree, is where most of this contention lies. Its a battle of defining words... partly because there's a group of individuals who will use the concrete meaning of a word as a wedge, rather than recognizing and acknowledging the intent behind it.
Those who dislike Bernie, want to be able to use Democratic Socialist as a slur... and are apt to ignore the local variant of the word. His supporters, including myself, are not inclined to sit back and let it happen... and so the war of words continues.
Kaleva
(36,298 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I could see it working well in the north east and the north west.