Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(33,575 posts)
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 09:41 AM Sep 2015

Decline in Labor’s Share of Corporate Income Since 2000 Means $535 Billion Less for Workers

http://www.epi.org/publication/the-decline-in-labors-share-of-corporate-income-since-2000-means-535-billion-less-for-workers/

Between 2000 and the second quarter of 2015, the share of income generated by corporations that went to workers’ wages (instead of going to capital incomes like profits) declined from 82.3 percent to 75.5 percent, as the figure shows. This 6.8 percentage-point decline in labor’s share of corporate income might not seem like a lot, but if labor’s share had not fallen this much, employees in the corporate sector would have $535 billion more in their paychecks today. If this amount was spread over the entire labor force (not just corporate sector employees) this would translate into a $3,770 raise for each worker.


And the GOPs answer is more tax cuts for the Corporations and the Rich.
Unchallenged by the Media and believed by at least half the voters. Oh no, the problem is a few immigrants working menial jobs.

Why is this not the #1 issue in this election?
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Decline in Labor’s Share of Corporate Income Since 2000 Means $535 Billion Less for Workers (Original Post) edhopper Sep 2015 OP
Oh, but it is to One Candidate , but MSM has a problem with his name, his goals, and his allegiance orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #1
You mean the wacky, left wing socialist edhopper Sep 2015 #2
That's the Guy, not a Neo- Liberal, fascist, agent of the oligarchy, so he must be a socialist, or orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #4
I m kicking my own post here edhopper Sep 2015 #3
Isn't it pathetic how atrocities like that have become common place ? orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #5
I hate to think edhopper Sep 2015 #6
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Sep 2015 #7
 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
1. Oh, but it is to One Candidate , but MSM has a problem with his name, his goals, and his allegiance
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 09:49 AM
Sep 2015

to his contributors, the people .

edhopper

(33,575 posts)
2. You mean the wacky, left wing socialist
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 09:51 AM
Sep 2015

who can't possible be considered a serious candidate but the "Serious People", not like Trump or Carson.
That guy?

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
4. That's the Guy, not a Neo- Liberal, fascist, agent of the oligarchy, so he must be a socialist, or
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 08:42 PM
Sep 2015

Wacky Left wing socialist. Good thing MSM doesn't mention him unless it's with Marie Antoinette .

edhopper

(33,575 posts)
3. I m kicking my own post here
Sun Sep 13, 2015, 06:36 PM
Sep 2015

I thought this was an important story and shows how much the rich leaches are taking from the Middle Class.

I hate to think Trump has not left room on DU for things like this.

That, or it isn't of interest to people here as I thought it would.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Decline in Labor’s Share ...