Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDecline in Labor’s Share of Corporate Income Since 2000 Means $535 Billion Less for Workers
http://www.epi.org/publication/the-decline-in-labors-share-of-corporate-income-since-2000-means-535-billion-less-for-workers/Between 2000 and the second quarter of 2015, the share of income generated by corporations that went to workers wages (instead of going to capital incomes like profits) declined from 82.3 percent to 75.5 percent, as the figure shows. This 6.8 percentage-point decline in labors share of corporate income might not seem like a lot, but if labors share had not fallen this much, employees in the corporate sector would have $535 billion more in their paychecks today. If this amount was spread over the entire labor force (not just corporate sector employees) this would translate into a $3,770 raise for each worker.
And the GOPs answer is more tax cuts for the Corporations and the Rich.
Unchallenged by the Media and believed by at least half the voters. Oh no, the problem is a few immigrants working menial jobs.
Why is this not the #1 issue in this election?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 749 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Decline in Labor’s Share of Corporate Income Since 2000 Means $535 Billion Less for Workers (Original Post)
edhopper
Sep 2015
OP
Oh, but it is to One Candidate , but MSM has a problem with his name, his goals, and his allegiance
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#1
That's the Guy, not a Neo- Liberal, fascist, agent of the oligarchy, so he must be a socialist, or
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#4
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)1. Oh, but it is to One Candidate , but MSM has a problem with his name, his goals, and his allegiance
to his contributors, the people .
edhopper
(33,575 posts)2. You mean the wacky, left wing socialist
who can't possible be considered a serious candidate but the "Serious People", not like Trump or Carson.
That guy?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)4. That's the Guy, not a Neo- Liberal, fascist, agent of the oligarchy, so he must be a socialist, or
Wacky Left wing socialist. Good thing MSM doesn't mention him unless it's with Marie Antoinette .
edhopper
(33,575 posts)3. I m kicking my own post here
I thought this was an important story and shows how much the rich leaches are taking from the Middle Class.
I hate to think Trump has not left room on DU for things like this.
That, or it isn't of interest to people here as I thought it would.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)5. Isn't it pathetic how atrocities like that have become common place ?
edhopper
(33,575 posts)6. I hate to think
people are just resigned to the continuing growing income inequity.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)7. K&R for visibility. nt